logo
Ukraine criticizes Russia's 'sham' delegation to Istanbul – DW – 05/17/2025

Ukraine criticizes Russia's 'sham' delegation to Istanbul – DW – 05/17/2025

DW17-05-2025

Ukraine and Russia failed to reach a ceasefire deal in Istanbul during talks this week. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says real progress won't happen until he sits down with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin.
Ukrainian and Russian delegations met officially for the first time in three years in Istanbul on Friday. They failed to reach a ceasefire deal but did agree to exchange prisoners of war.
The talks were initiated by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who sent the deputy heads of several ministries, as well as his adviser Vladimir Medinsky.
One day ahead of the talks, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy criticized Putin for sending representatives who aren't empowered to make decisions and described the delegation as a "sham."
Zelenskyy had met with his Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, on Thursday and agreed to a personal meeting with the Russian president. This would have offered the opportunity to "resolve all the important issues," Zelenskyy said at the European Political Community summit in Albania, to which he had traveled from Turkey. "But he [Putin] didn't agree to anything."
Erdogan and Zelenskyy met in Ankara on Thursday ahead of the Russia-Ukraine talks Image: DHA
A prisoner swap
Zelenskyy said he sent the Ukrainian delegation to Istanbul primarily out of respect for US President Donald Trump and Erdogan. He added that he did not expect any significant results.
After the negotiations, the head of the Ukrainian delegation, Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, said the government's top priority was people and announced that each country had agreed to exchange 1,000 prisoners.
Both sides have shared their views on the modalities of a ceasefire, with the details still to be worked out, Umerov said. Though Ukraine is in a position to continue the fight, the war must be brought to an end, he said. "Our president was expecting high level discussions. …The next step would be that the leaders-level meeting should be organized."
Appeasing the US
Russian negotiators made statements that were unacceptable for Ukraine, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi said, without providing examples.
The co-chair of the opposition European Solidarity group in the Ukrainian parliament, Iryna Herashchenko, wrote on Facebook that Russia had demanded that Ukraine withdraw its troops from its own territory as a "gesture of goodwill" so that a ceasefire could be announced.
"This is an ultimatum and a call for capitulation that directly contradict the principles of international law," she wrote. "The behavior of the Russian delegation in Istanbul is evidence of blackmail instead of negotiations, and instead of compromises there is a list of ultimatums, including the demand to cede Ukrainian territory to Russia."
Ivan Us, a foreign policy expert from the Ukrainian National Institute for Strategic Studies, accused the Russian delegation of propaganda, but added that officials hadn't said anything unexpected. "There were negotiations because the US wanted to see them," he told DW.
Ukraine agreed to take part because its European partners had asked for it, and because they are not prepared to support Ukraine without US assistance. Moscow, on the other hand, came to Istanbul primarily to spread its usual narrative. "While Russia wants to continue fighting, it is aware that it will not succeed as long as the US provides Ukraine with assistance," he said.
Russian presidential adviser Vladimir Medinsky and Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan in Istanbul Image: ZUMA Press/IMAGO
What comes next?
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said the Ukrainian and Russian representatives agreed in principle to meet again in Istanbul. But military expert and former Ukrainian security service member Ivan Stupak told DW: "The Russians are currently not ready for talks because they have the advantage on the front."
As long as there is no stalemate on the line of contact, no one will sit down at the negotiating table, Stupak said. This will probably not happen until October at the earliest — following Putin's planned summer offensive, he predicted. "There must be no appeasement in the form of lifting sanctions, recognition of Crimea as Russian territory or a promise to jointly develop the Arctic," Stupak said, adding that this approach hasn't worked anyway. "That's why the fighting will continue."
Foreign policy expert Ivan Us also believes that a rapprochement is more likely in the fall. Studies of official Russian economic indicators suggest that there could be a sharp slump around October, Us said. Only then would Putin be prepared to discuss a ceasefire, make concessions and end the war, he added.
This article was originally written in German.
No breakthrough in direct talks between Russia, Ukraine
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK Charts Own Course on Human Rights and Sanctions Amid EU Reform Push
UK Charts Own Course on Human Rights and Sanctions Amid EU Reform Push

Int'l Business Times

time4 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

UK Charts Own Course on Human Rights and Sanctions Amid EU Reform Push

The UK this week failed to join nine European countries that called for reforms to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), despite Attorney-General Lord Hermer recently urging Britain to take the lead in updating international legal frameworks that affect immigration. In a joint open letter , Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland urged the 46 member states of the ECHR to support reforms that would 'restore the right balance' between protecting human rights and allowing countries to manage immigration and national security more effectively. But Britain was not among the signatories, even as migrant arrivals across the Channel hit a new record. On Saturday alone, 1,195 people arrived in small boats, marking the highest single-day total so far in 2025, according to the Home Office . The UK government said it had not been invited to join the initiative, which may have emerged from discussions in an EU forum, despite the ECHR being governed by the Council of Europe, not the European Union. The government's position contrasts with comments made just a week earlier by Attorney-General Lord Hermer, who said the UK 'must be ready to reform' international agreements such as the ECHR to preserve the rules-based order. Shadow Lord Chancellor Robert Jenrick criticised Hermer's remarks, calling them 'a cynical ploy to give the impression Labour want to be part of the solution, when really they're helping to defend a broken system that stops us controlling our borders.' Human rights lawyer David Haye echoed the calls for tougher action, urging Britain to either 'reform or leave' the ECHR, arguing that the country 'cannot regain control of its borders' under the current system. Divergence The ECHR dispute reflects broader differences between the UK and EU legal systems, particularly in areas such as human rights and sanctions. Since Brexit, the UK has introduced its own independent sanctions regime, though it often mirrors the EU's initial listings. 'Our preference is to act with others where we can, but where there is a case for the UK to act alone via the use of our autonomous sanctions, we will do so,' the UK government stated in its policy paper , 'Cross-government review of sanctions implementation and enforcement,' published on 15 May. This divergence creates increasing compliance challenges for businesses. Even if an individual is removed from the EU sanctions list, businesses may still face penalties if that person remains sanctioned in the UK, causing confusion, driving up legal costs and complicating cross-border operations. The same issue affects individuals. Some have been delisted by the EU after legal reviews found sanctions were no longer justified, yet they remain on the UK list due to the absence of a formal review mechanism. For example, former Russian official Dmitrii Ovsiannikov was removed from the EU list in 2023 but is still sanctioned by the UK. In April 2025, he was sentenced to 40 months in prison for attempting to leave the UK on a private jet in breach of sanctions. Another notable example is the case of Gulbakhor Ismailova and Saodat Narzieva , sisters of sanctioned businessman Alisher Usmanov. Both successfully challenged their EU sanctions after legal reviews concluded the measures were based on false media reports . Although the EU delisted them in 2022 and 2025 respectively, and both were initially designated in the UK under the so-called 'emergency procedure,' which mirrored the EU's reasoning, they remain on the UK sanctions list, which lacks a formal process for regular review. A similar pattern can be seen in the case of Mikhail Degtyarev , a longtime loyalist of Russian President Vladimir Putin. As the country's sports minister and head of the Olympic Committee, Degtyarev is the highest-ranking Russian official to have been removed from the EU sanctions list. Despite this, he remains sanctioned in the UK. Commitment To Revision While each sanctions case is handled on an individual basis and countries follow their own legal procedures, the lack of alignment in how human rights are considered or how companies need to comply with the sanctions regime create friction in coordinated responses. In particular, indefinite UK sanctions imposed without clear procedures for review or appeal raise questions about proportionality and the absence of effective judicial mechanisms. But given that the current sanctions mechanism is relatively new, it would be reasonable to expect it to evolve in response to changing realities, especially as the UK has acknowledged its commitment to revision when necessary. 'Sanctions are often developed in response to real-time events, and in concert with allies, or the wider international community. We keep our sanctions powers, regimes, designations and measures under review to respond to new developments and changing circumstances,' the UK government's 15 May policy paper said. Originally published on IBTimes UK

Ukraine: 'Decisive' pressure needed after Russia pounds Kyiv – DW – 06/06/2025
Ukraine: 'Decisive' pressure needed after Russia pounds Kyiv – DW – 06/06/2025

DW

time5 hours ago

  • DW

Ukraine: 'Decisive' pressure needed after Russia pounds Kyiv – DW – 06/06/2025

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called those not pressuring Russia to end its war "complicit and responsible" for lives lost after Russian bombs hit Kyiv. The call came after Russia launched hundreds of overnight strikes. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Friday called for allies to increase pressure on Russia to end its war of aggression after Moscow launched more than 400 drones and 40 missiles at targets in Ukraine overnight, killing at least four people and wounding 20 more. Three of those killed in the attack were emergency responders helping victims in the city, with the Interior Ministry saying, "they were working under fire to help people." "If someone does not put pressure and gives the war more time to take lives, they are complicit and responsible," Zelenskyy wrote in a social media post, adding, "we need to act decisively." Separately, the Ukrainian president said Russia's leaders are, "obsessed with war, consumed by hatred and the desire to destroy the lives of other nations." Zelenskyy said such people could only be defeated with force, "the force of diplomacy, sanctions, weapons and technology." On Friday, Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko confirmed the attack on the capital and said at least six other regions had been targeted in what was one of Russia's largest coordinated attacks in the three-year war. Klitschko cited Ukrainian air force intelligence that counted 407 drones and 4 missiles launched at the country overnight. An air force spokesman said roughly 30 of the missiles and more than 200 of the drones had been shot down. Russia's Defense Ministry said the attacks was in response to what it called Ukrainian "terrorist acts" against Russia. Ukrainian drones damage more than Russian aircraft To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump shifts from 'I'll end it on day one' to 'let 'em fight for a while' The United Nations estimates that more than 12,000 civilians have been killed since Russia launched its war of aggression against neighboring Ukraine on February 24, 2022. Dmytro Lubinets, Ukraine's commissioner for human rights, said "Russia is acting like a terrorist, systematically targeting civilian infrastructure." He, too, called for a tough international response. Ukraine has offered a 30-day unconditional ceasefire as an attempt to end the war but Russia has continuously rejected such overtures. On Thursday, US President Donald Trump — who has repeatedly boasted that he could easily end the war but has utterly failed to do so — changed course from his calls to immediately end the conflict, instead suggesting it, "might be better to let them fight for a while" before Zelenskyy sits down with Russian President Vladimir Putin to negotiate a peace agreement. Trump said that with children, "sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart," adding that he relayed the analogy to Putin in a call this week. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Trump had the right to his own opinion, but that the conflict for Russia was an "existential matter." "For us it is an existential issue, an issue on our national interest, safety, on our future and the future of our children, of our country," Peskov told reporters when asked about Trump's comments. Edited by: Louis Oelofse

Ukraine: 'Decisive' pressure needed after Russian attack – DW – 06/06/2025
Ukraine: 'Decisive' pressure needed after Russian attack – DW – 06/06/2025

DW

time6 hours ago

  • DW

Ukraine: 'Decisive' pressure needed after Russian attack – DW – 06/06/2025

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called those not pressuring Russia to end its war "complicit and responsible" for lives lost after Russian bombs hit Kyiv. The call came after Russia launched hundreds of overnight strikes. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Friday called for allies to increase pressure on Russia to end its war of aggression after Moscow launched more than 400 drones and 40 missiles at targets in Ukraine overnight, killing at least four people and wounding 20 more. Three of those killed in the attack were emergency responders helping victims in the city, with the Interior Ministry saying, "they were working under fire to help people." "If someone does not put pressure and gives the war more time to take lives, they are complicit and responsible," Zelenskyy wrote in a social media post, adding, "we need to act decisively." Separately, the Ukrainian president said Russia's leaders are, "obsessed with war, consumed by hatred and the desire to destroy the lives of other nations." Zelenskyy said such people could only be defeated with force, "the force of diplomacy, sanctions, weapons and technology." On Friday, Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko confirmed the attack on the capital and said at least six other regions had been targeted in what was one of Russia's largest coordinated attacks in the three-year war. Klitschko cited Ukrainian air force intelligence that counted 407 drones and 4 missiles launched at the country overnight. An air force spokesman said roughly 30 of the missiles and more than 200 of the drones had been shot down. Russia's Defense Ministry said the attacks was in response to what it called Ukrainian "terrorist acts" against Russia. Ukrainian drones damage more than Russian aircraft To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump shifts from 'I'll end it on day one' to 'let 'em fight for a while' The United Nations estimates that more than 12,000 civilians have been killed since Russia launched its war of aggression against neighboring Ukraine on February 24, 2022. Dmytro Lubinets, Ukraine's commissioner for human rights, said "Russia is acting like a terrorist, systematically targeting civilian infrastructure." He, too, called for a tough international response. Ukraine has offered a 30-day unconditional ceasefire as an attempt to end the war but Russia has continuously rejected such overtures. On Thursday, US President Donald Trump — who has repeatedly boasted that he could easily end the war but has utterly failed to do so — changed course from his calls to immediately end the conflict, instead suggesting it, "might be better to let them fight for a while" before Zelenskyy sits down with Russian President Vladimir Putin to negotiate a peace agreement. Trump said that with children, "sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart," adding that he relayed the analogy to Putin in a call this week. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Trump had the right to his own opinion, but that the conflict for Russia was an "existential matter." "For us it is an existential issue, an issue on our national interest, safety, on our future and the future of our children, of our country," Peskov told reporters when asked about Trump's comments. Edited by: Louis Oelofse

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store