
How Iran's American-style drones compare to US models
Last month Iran showed off pictures of the Shahed 149 drone on exercises. Referred to as the 'Gaza' drone, the system is almost identical to the US Reaper drone, and has impressive capabilities such as a camera with 100 times magnification and the ability to fly 1,000km or more on 35-hour missions. It joins a long list of Iranian drones that appear to be copied from US models, from the Yasir, a copy of the US ScanEagle, to the Saeqeh, a near copy of the US RQ-170. How then, might the systems compare? Much about drones like the Reaper and the Shahed 149 remains classified, but aerospace experts interviewed by The National were able to provide a glimpse of the capabilities of the Iranian systems. Evolving from the Predator drone – originally an unarmed reconnaissance drone first deployed during Nato's 1995 intervention in Bosnia – the Reaper became synonymous with the US's so-called Global War on Terror. Conducting thousands of air strikes in Afghanistan, Iraq and Yemen, among other fronts - often from controllers in the US using satellite links to control the drone - it was sought-after for its persistence surveilling small groups of militants, able to fly for 30 hours or more. Reapers would eventually be kitted out with a Wide Area Motion Imaging (Wami) sensor, a system of cameras and image processors with a data link that could film city-size areas in "super resolution." 'Super resolution – I'm simplifying a lot here – is taking a lot of imagery from multiple cameras, and then you basically bring the imagery all together,' says Robi Sen, an independent consultant on drone technology. During Reaper deployments in Afghanistan, that could result in two-gigapixel imagery, 20 times the resolution of an iPhone 15 photograph, and based on similar civilian technology, CMOS image sensors. In 2009, the US said its drones had captured 24 years' worth of video feed if played continuously. Today, Wami sensors can often film areas over 100km2 at once in the right conditions and the latest available for Reapers are 8.1 gigapixels. They can simultaneously collect infrared imagery – light invisible to the human eye, usually for night vision, but in daytime simultaneous IR collection helps detect objects in shadows. To detect infrared light, the sensor needs a cryocooler, which cools down the detector to around -150°C. 'When you stitch all that imagery together, you can get one really good image, maybe 10 times better than any of the cameras can do by themselves. So this is pretty interesting for things like intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, or protecting an area, anything where you may need a lot more resolution," Mr Sen says. "You could be filming a boat. Let's say there's a figure on the boat, and with your normal resolution you can just see the figure. And when you take the super resolution, you can then zoom in on the individual and see things like facial features.' Reapers can also be equipped with the Lynx multi mode radar. This has two powerful capabilities, Synthetic Aperture Radar (Sar) which creates images from radar waves, meaning it can peer through clouds (the example in the X post below shows Sar from space). Secondly, Ground-Moving Target Indicator (GMTI) which can pick out people moving at barely walking speed amid the wide image captures. The Lynx also features automatic man-made object recognition. Combined, these capabilities (which are added according to the mission) give the Reaper the ability to collect large streams of data, in some cases for over 40 hours, in the case of the SkyGuardian Reaper. The 'endurance' of 40 hours is helped by a Honeywell T76 engine, a military version of a propeller plane turboprop engine which propels the drone to speeds of over 480km/h. Endurance is enhanced by lightweight, strong materials such as carbon fibre and titanium in the airframe, which are expensive. The Reaper therefore doesn't come cheap, at roughly $30 million per aircraft. Experts The National spoke to said Iran's drone is not as capable as the Reaper for several critical reasons, particularly sanctions, which limit Iran's access to 'leading edge' microchips. Sanctions also stop critical components, from camera equipment to cryocoolers for infrared detection and metals such as titanium. But Iran has a long history of reverse engineering aircraft parts and smuggling, to the point where most components in some of its drones are of US origin. Despite lacking anything close to the US defence budget (approximately $850bn vs $16bn for 2024) Iran's drones could therefore be 'good enough' imitations. That could be dangerous if they can be made in large enough numbers, but Iran struggles with mass production of drones like the Shahed 149, and for some drones has even resorted to stealing foreign engines. The Shahed 149 contrasts with the cheaper Shahed 136s sent to Russia for the Ukraine war and sent to the Houthis, so-called kamikaze drones. 'We have seen cryocooling equipment used for optics in the Mohaher-6,' says Taimur Khan, a researcher with Conflict Armament Research, which forensically studies Iranian drones used in Yemen by the Houthis and the Russians in Ukraine. 'What we have seen are a mix of DSLR cameras, video cameras made for small commercial UAVs and other readily available commercial optics,' he says. For sophisticated systems like inertial navigation – devices which navigate by calculating changes in speed and altitude, rather than relying on GPS – 'we don't think they make them from scratch, they still require a lot of smuggled non-domestic technology from the US, Japan and China,' Mr Khan says. 'Inertial navigation devices are not the only critical component but a very important one. Iran does still try to domesticate some component production,' Mr Khan adds. 'They have produced their own copies of electromechanical systems such as servo motors to try to be a bit more independent from external supply chains but they will always be dependent on those supply chains when it comes to more sophisticated technology and semiconductors. Even though those components are made by Western manufacturers, they are still in a position to acquire them relatively easily from Chinese distributors.' For Iran, rapid advances in microchip technology could enable the Shahed 149's S-813 Sar radar. Iran's advertised capability for the system is much lower-fidelity than the Lynx radar's claimed ability. Mr Sen says that advances in civilian cameras and image processing also mean basic Wami sensors could be within reach. 'Synthetic Aperture Radar is relatively old technology. I'm not surprised the Iranians can do it because a good radar engineer can build one of these things. For drones, it's perfect, because you're flying along and the act of flying creates this artificially large antenna. You need a good processor to do it. But that's not impossible with the chips you can buy now,' says Thomas Withington, an expert on electronic warfare and radar, and an associate fellow at London's Rusi think tank. Daniel Salisbury has studied Iran's efforts to circumvent sanctions. He says that it is extremely difficult for the West to curtail defence supplies to Iran when it comes to drones. 'The sheer amount of trade moving around the globe makes uncovering, tracking and interdicting even large shipments difficult. There are a number of ways that large shipments are undertaken to avoid scrutiny. If using containerised or commercial shipping, goods are frequently mislabelled on the manifest (something benign like 'machinery') and associated paperwork,' he says. 'Shipments might also be broken up into smaller parts to avoid scrutiny. The states involved in these networks also often use state-controlled assets to move goods rather than commercial logistics. This allows them to remain more in control of the shipments, and reduces the chance of interdiction. 'The dual-use nature of many of these goods make countering the trade even more challenging, making it difficult to uncover shipments destined for military programmes, and also making it difficult to ask countries like China to act and shut down procurement channels," Mr Salisbury says. 'The number of states that both seriously care about these transfers and have the means to do something about them is quite low.' Mr Salisbury says microchip smuggling – and supplies from allies like China – is Iran's great hope for scaling up drone capability. 'Chips are much smaller and easier to transfer," he says. "We have seen cases where procurement agents are personally trafficking them in suitcases on commercial flights, for example, or in diplomatic pouches. Supply chains for semiconductors are long and complex. They seem to – at least for the lower-end, off-the-shelf chips – involve many intermediaries and distributors. These firms often stock thousands of variants of the chips and have less understanding of what the goods can be used for.' Despite these opportunities for Iran, Mr Withington cautions that copying only gets you so far, as the US fields next-generation technology. The drone-mounted T-Soar pod, for example, records an enemy radar wave, instantly copies it and broadcasts it back, meaning a Reaper could be almost invisible on radar. 'The problem for the Iranians is that they're in danger of not just falling a generation behind, but actually being two generations behind in radar technology,' Mr Withington says.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
05-06-2025
- The National
Quest for a digital cutting edge for modern warfare
Digital targeting and frontline munitions factories are part of a wave of the battlefield future as upstart tech innovators start to win major defence contracts. A new target of a tenfold increase in firepower has been set for the UK military, largely driven by data-driven digital systems that promise to improve the speed and accuracy of weapons in combat. Trying to predict what AI, drones, quantum or any emerging tech will look like in three years, let alone five to 10, is impossible David Sully, founder 'We will invest in technology to give our troops the edge in the battlefields of the future; transforming our armed forces and boosting our war-fighting readiness," said John Healey, the Defence Secretary. 'This will increase our lethality, provide a powerful deterrent to our adversaries, and put the UK at the leading edge of innovation in Nato." The incentive in Britain has increased substantially following the government's strategic defence review (SDR) that called for innovation and much closer collaboration with small but advanced companies that bring in cutting-edge technology. This already appears to be happening in France where a 3D drone factory packed into a shipping container that can be hauled to the front line and can manufacture 10 drones an hour has been commissioned by the French army. But, analysts have said, there are still significant barriers for companies that are not defence giants to work more closely with the UK Ministry of Defence, with red tape proving a major obstacle. Creative independence Many start-ups operate in Britain and tap into its world-leading university system, alongside generous grants, 'setting the UK apart from other countries' in "early stage creativity", a leading innovation firm executive told The National. Chris Daniels, chief commercial officer for Flare Bright, also warned that in a fragmenting world every nation needs to have independence to deliver 'whatever other countries may do to prevent this'. This also means that, 'when at war it will be critical' to have an independent supply chain to ensure the supply of vital components. Flare Bright, which specialises in AI and drone navigation, is like many other small companies that rapidly adapt 'which is critical in the cat-and-mouse game of technological innovation and counter-measures we see in defence'. He added that UK defence should consider not just buying a product but a company's ability to 'adapt and rapidly produce innovative technology'. Frontline factories That innovative approach is already being pursued by the French, despite their reputation for burdensome bureaucracy, with Paris understanding the need to change and adapt in a more dangerous world. Which is why the proposal from Per Se Systems for a mobile micro-factory that can make drones on the front line is being trialled by 12 French regiments. Using a shipping container filled with 3D printers, it can produce ten FPV (first person view) drones per hour allowing a relentless supply of weapons without relying on a long logistics chain. The small factory operates in total autonomy, powered by a generator that gives it 19 hours of supply and solar panels for lighting, all of which can be towed by a light lorry. 'This approach addresses a growing need in modern conflicts: fast, autonomous and decentralised production of tactical drones, particularly FPV models considered single-use or expendable on the battlefield,' said the military outlet, Army Recognition. Bureaucracy wars But questions are being asked about whether Britain can really match the intent shown in its well-received SDR. David Sully, founder of the defence AI start-up Advai, posed what he called a 'controversial thought' that the review was limited when it came to emerging technology. 'Trying to predict what AI, drones, quantum or any emerging tech will look like in three years, let alone five to 10 is impossible. Two and a half years ago GenAI had only just arrived and drone warfare looked nothing like it does today,' he wrote on LinkedIn. The review's success hinged on the MOD's ability to 'adapt and adopt at pace and scale as technology evolves', and it had to be built into their requirements that there will be 'advances we can't predict right now'. His call for procurement projects to be run over weeks rather than quarters was going to require a radical change in government thinking, said military analyst Francis Tusa. He gave the example of a British firm that had rapidly made thousands of drones for Ukraine as part of an urgent operational requirement that included testing them on MOD sites, only to face major bureaucracy when asked to provide them for the UK military. 'Suddenly they received a 400-page request for a quotation document and an 800-page request for information,' he said. 'It was both ridiculous and massively time-consuming.' Capital inadequacy There was also a problem over 'capital adequacy' in which a small British company involved in AI had the product the MOD wanted but as they only had a turnover of £5 million it was felt they could not be trusted with a £100 million contract. 'This comes back to the trust on both sides as the MOD capital adequacy rules are not suited to dealing with a faster-paced technology environment,' Mr Tusa said. With warfare quickly evolving it was necessary for there to be three partners in procurement with the MOD, major companies like BAE Systems and the 'novel industry' of start-ups. 'If all three sides are working on an open playbook none of this ought to be a deal breaker,' he added. Ultimately, wrote Mr Sully, it required the same risk-taking that the armed forces took in 'split-second, life-and-death operational decisions' to be matched with the procurement process.


Arabian Post
26-05-2025
- Arabian Post
Astrolight Secures €2.8M to Propel Laser Communication Breakthroughs
Lithuania's Astrolight has secured €2.8 million in seed funding to advance its laser-based communication systems, aiming to establish a high-speed, secure optical data highway between satellites and Earth. This investment underscores the growing confidence in optical communication technologies as a superior alternative to traditional radio frequency systems. Astrolight's flagship product, the ATLAS terminal, is engineered to facilitate data transmission from low Earth orbit satellites to ground stations at speeds up to ten times faster than conventional methods. This technology not only enhances data throughput but also offers increased resistance to jamming and interception, addressing critical concerns in both commercial and defence sectors. The company's collaboration with NATO's Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic has positioned it among the top ten innovators selected from 44 participants. This partnership provides Astrolight with access to up to €300,000 in additional funding, specialised training, and a network of investors, facilitating the adaptation of its technologies for defence applications. ADVERTISEMENT Astrolight's POLARIS system, designed for ship-to-ship communication, exemplifies its dual-use approach. Developed in collaboration with the Lithuanian Navy and the Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, POLARIS aims to replace traditional signal lamps with laser-based communication, enhancing operational stealth and resilience in contested environments. In a significant stride towards international collaboration, Astrolight has been selected to supply its ATLAS-1 optical terminal for the PeakSat mission, a CubeSat project led by Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Scheduled for launch in the fourth quarter of 2025, PeakSat will demonstrate laser communication capabilities from LEO to ground stations in Greece, marking a pivotal step in validating next-generation optical communication technologies. Astrolight's recent operational test of a mobile optical ground station achieved gigabit-per-second data rates over a 10-kilometre distance, demonstrating the viability of cost-effective, scalable ground stations built from commercial off-the-shelf components. This development is crucial in addressing the limitations of radio frequency spectrum and meeting the increasing demand for high-speed data transmission from LEO satellites. The global satellite laser communications market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 40% between 2024 and 2032, reaching an estimated $15 billion. Astrolight's advancements in laser communication technologies position it as a key player in this burgeoning market, offering solutions that cater to both commercial and defence needs. Founded in 2019 by Laurynas Mačiulis, a former CTO of Kongsberg NanoAvionics, Astrolight has rapidly evolved from a research initiative into a company at the forefront of optical communication innovation. Its strategic partnerships and technological breakthroughs reflect a commitment to enhancing global communication infrastructure through laser technology.


The National
06-05-2025
- The National
Dubai company builds 3D-printed rocket engines as big as Elon Musk's
An AI engineering company in Dubai is scaling up its 3D-printed rocket engines to match the size of Elon Musk's SpaceX Starship Raptors, which could redefine how next-generation space hardware is built. Leap 71, which uses AI algorithms to design complex propulsion systems, is moving from small test engines to models powerful enough for full-scale orbital launches. With major advances in metal 3D printing, the company says it can now produce engines nearly two metres across, sizes that were previously too large for 3D printers to handle. 'Our customers want to fly to space with our engines, so now we are scaling them massively,' Lin Kayser, co-founder of the company, told The National. Unlike traditional aerospace companies that rely on teams of engineers to manually design rocket components, Leap 71 uses a computer system powered by AI to generate engine designs. The AI model, called Noyron, involves an algorithm that can generate rocket engines, including software codes that command the engine how much thrust and propellant it needs to have. Once the AI generates a design, it can be fed directly into a 3D printer to create the hardware. 'After an initial test last year, we test-fired eight more rocket engines, all of them different and designed by our computational system,' said Mr Kayser. Until now, Leap 71's engines have been relatively small, at about 30cm in diameter, making them useful for spacecraft like lunar landing vehicles. But to move into orbital launches, Mr Kayser said the engines needed to be much bigger. The company is now developing engines that require industrial 3D printers with build volumes close to two metres. Such printers, which use metal powder to build parts layer by layer, have become available only in the past 18 months, driven mostly by rapid progress in China. 'There's a number of 3D-printer manufacturers that can now support these extremely large-build volumes, which is really difficult because it's tonnes of metal powder that go in into these things,' said Mr Kayser. The company's newer designs include meganewton-class engines, those capable of producing thrust in the range of 1,000 to 2,000 kilonewtons, putting them in the same category as some of the world's most powerful rocket engines. But those engines would still have to be test-fired to ensure they work as expected. A key hurdle for Leap 71 is a lack of test stands, specialised sites where rocket engines are fired, in the country. These are essential but difficult to build due to safety, noise and regulatory requirements. Leap 71 hopes to set up its first rocket engine factory in the UAE, where it can take advantage of the country's growing ambitions in space. Sahith Reddy Madara, an aerospace engineer and founder of advisory firm Bumi & Space, told The National that Leap 71's work could be a game-changer. 'What Leap 71 is doing represents a promising step towards redefining how we approach rocket engine development,' he said. 'This method could democratise access to advanced propulsion technologies, lowering barriers for smaller players by reducing the need for large in-house engineering teams and long development cycles. That said, widespread adoption will depend on how these designs perform under real-world conditions and whether they can meet the rigorous reliability standards of spaceflight.' Leap 71's current business model is built around supplying what it calls 'reference engines', which are functional, baseline models that space companies can adapt to their own needs. It hopes to eventually carve out a niche supplying engines that can power everything from small orbital rockets to larger reusable systems. The company's AI-led method can dramatically shorten development times and lower costs, which could be especially appealing to smaller or newer players in the space sector. It already has a partnership with The Exploration Company, a European firm which is developing and manufacturing a reusable space capsule called Nyx. The collaboration would integrate Leap 71's AI-designed engines into future missions.