GE2025: Over 900 fake Facebook accounts posted 5,000 comments in a day targeting news coverage of foreign interference
SINGAPORE: More than 900 inauthentic Facebook accounts posting over 5,000 comments were detected in a roughly one-day period after the government first alerted the public to foreign posts on religion and politics, recent checks by CNA have found.
CNA's latest analysis comes after it previously reported on Apr 24 that hundreds of fake Facebook accounts and bots were spreading anti-People's Action Party (PAP) and anti-Workers' Party (WP) sentiments.
CNA conducted another round of checks after it detected a hive of social media activity around news posts on race and politics, following the government's announcement at 10pm on Apr 25 that foreigners had posted online election advertisements urging Singaporeans to vote along religious lines.
The government had directed Meta to block Singapore users' access to several posts made by two Malaysian politicians, as well as a former Internal Security Act (ISA) detainee.
For the latest analysis, CNA looked at 35 Facebook posts uploaded between late Apr 25 and early Apr 27 related to the content about these news developments.
These include three from Islamic religious teacher Noor Deros, one from "Zai Nal" - belonging to the former ISA detainee - and one from the WP. The remainder are posts by news outlets CNA (12), Mothership (10) and The Straits Times (eight).
These posts involve responses or reactions to the government's move, as well as the news outlets' reporting of comments by Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and WP chief Pritam Singh on the foreign interference.
CNA then scanned 8,991 comments made by 2,915 unique Facebook accounts on these posts.
Of the 8,991 comments made, 5,201 - or 58 per cent - were deemed to be from inauthentic accounts, meaning they were fake or suspected to be fake.
A total of 911 out of the 2,915 accounts that posted the comments, or 31 per cent, were identified as inauthentic.
Another 1,427 accounts - or 49 per cent - were flagged as real accounts, while the authenticity of the remaining 577 accounts could not be determined.
The overall data suggest the fake accounts are part of a coordinated inauthentic campaign, with synchronised comment bursts, copy-pasted messages across accounts, and a tightly interconnected network of fake personas.
Fifteen of the 911 inauthentic accounts detected posted between 30 to more than 70 comments each, while around 290 of them posted only a single comment.
This suggests a mix of roles: A core group of active operators and many auxiliary accounts likely created to lend additional voices in one or two comment threads.
Slightly over one-quarter (26.9 per cent) of the 5,201 inauthentic comments were classified as anti-opposition attacks, followed by religious and political controversy (23.9 per cent), and anti-establishment and conspiracy (19.1 per cent).
An inauthentic comment only means that the comment was made by a fake account. It does not immediately mean that the content of these comments are false, though further analysis of the content shows half-truths and misinformation being used in some cases.
CNA is unable to determine where these fake accounts originate from, as users can easily lie during account registration or spoof their locations through various methods.
Categories of fake comments
Anti-opposition attacks
Many bots directly attacked WP figures or supporters with derogatory language.
These comments often used insults to demean and discredit.
Religious and political controversy
Comments in this category linked religion to politics and typically also took on a partisan nature, either by attacking WP for mixing religion with politics, or accusing the PAP of using this issue to smear the opposition.
For example, one coordinated message spread by multiple accounts said WP was being desperate to win votes by promoting religious disharmony.
On the other hand, others said the PAP was trying to bring religious issues into the election.
Anti-establishment and conspiracy
The criticisms against the PAP generally accuse the ruling party of hypocrisy, with some saying it is the one playing the race card.
Also in the mix are conspiracy themes, with bot accounts suggesting that China or Malaysia may be behind the attempts to influence the election.
Racial and minority issues
Posts in this category appear to be aimed at sowing suspicion or eroding trust between races.
For example, some fake accounts would try to create resentment among Malay voters by suggesting they were being used by either party.
Calls for religious neutrality
In this category, bots try to push or repeat messages about the dangers of mixing religion with politics.
While the comments may be seen as trying to urge caution, the fact that these were posted by fake accounts suggests the bots may be attempting to reinforce establishment messages.
For example, one comment said: 'like what the article say 'We must not mix religion and politics. Singapore is a secular state. Our institutions serve Singaporeans equally. Bringing religion into politics will undermine social cohesion and harmony, as we have seen in other countries with race- or religion-based politics.''
BOTS TARGETED CNA THE MOST
Telltale signs of inauthentic accounts include being recently created, having few connections, and posting mainly on a single type of content, such as those that attack a political party and its candidates.
They also tend to be locked and lack any original posts, such as photos of someone's day.
Bots, on the other hand, are multiple fake accounts managed by individuals, which also suggest a more coordinated attempt to spread a certain messaging on the platform.
They are also known to make repeated comments or replies, similar to techniques used by spammers. Sometimes, multiple fake accounts end up posting similar comments, albeit with slight variations to avoid detection.
Both types of behaviour run afoul of Facebook's community standards.
According to Facebook's website, the platform also requires users to provide real names on profiles to ensure they always know who they are connecting with. 'This helps keep our community safe,' its name and birthday policy states.
The latest analysis indicated that CNA's posts were the most targeted by the bot army, with 2,578 inauthentic comments on the 12 CNA Facebook posts. This accounted for nearly half the 5,201 inauthentic comments.
This is indicative of how bot campaigns typically work: Bots are not interested in preaching to the choir.
HIGHLY SYNCHRONISED POSTING OF COMMENTS
Posting of the comments was found to be highly synchronised, particularly between 10am to 3pm on Apr 26, when the bot accounts as a whole were found to have posted comments most frequently.
It was common to see many different fake accounts commenting within minutes of each other on the same post right after it went up.
For example, a 10-minute window of around 2.35pm to 2.45pm on Apr 26 saw 90 distinct fake accounts post comments.
There was also a burst of 157 inauthentic comments from 10pm to 11pm on Apr 25, night when news of the government's statement broke.
The bot tactics here reflect attempts to align with local audience attention, and to influence public opinion overnight through setting narratives by morning, and then reinforcing them during the day.
Analysis of the timings of the comments revealed orchestrated burst patterns. The bot network could mobilise at least 10 or more distinct accounts within a 10-minute window repeatedly.
TOP BOT AND SUPERSPREADERS
The top bot detected in this campaign is Facebook user 'Angeline Tan', who posted 71 times in a four-and-a-half hour span between 8.19pm on Apr 26 and 12.54am on Apr 27.
The user's 71 comments were posted on just two CNA posts uploaded on Apr 26 - a video post of Mr Wong's comments during a press conference on the foreign interference, and another earlier video post of Mr Singh's comments to the media on the same matter.
A handful of inauthentic accounts were also identified as superspreaders because they appeared to comment on each of these posts, and whose Facebook connections show that they are affiliated to a large number of suspicious accounts that also posted similar messages, also known as 'co-commenting'.
This could mean that they may be the main operators of these bot networks, or that automated bots take the cue from them.
The top five accounts based on the number of unique accounts they co-commented with are 'Low SiewFai', 'Maetiara Ismail', 'PS FU', 'Vincent Tang' and 'Dunkie Rookie', all of which are connected to at least 700 other inauthentic accounts.
These accounts each engaged in between 10 and 16 targeted comment threads, ensuring that the narratives permeated multiple audiences.
Low SiewFai, for instance, connected to 776 other suspect accounts and was active in at least 16 different posts, with 26 comments. The user's comments were nearly identical.
CNA's checks also found at least 179 distinct comments that were repeated word for word by multiple accounts. Many appear to be pre-written scripts or talking points injected into discussions.
One example, posted 43 times, is: 'Details of the earlier conversation between WP and the former religious teacher - available here for those interested:'.
Another example, posted 38 times, is: 'Full video of the conversation between Mr. Noor Deros and #WP available here for those interested:'.
Both examples were appended with spam links.
The Ministry of Digital Development and Information has earlier said it was looking into the fake accounts, in response to CNA's report on Apr 24.
'We will continue to monitor the online space for foreign interference and will act on content that is in breach of our laws. We urge the public to be discerning consumers of information,' it said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Malaysian political cartoonist's travel ban stirs anger, but police call it a mistake
– The Malaysian government faced accusations of stifling dissent after a June 7 Facebook post by popular local political cartoonist Fahmi Reza Mohd Zarin, saying he had been banned from leaving the country. Backbench MPs, analysts and the public said the ban was unwarranted. But on June 8, the police claimed it was a mistake, caused by 'procedural confusion' in placing him on an observation list. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim ordered the police to provide an explanation, stating that the government 'respects personal freedom, provided it does not compromise national security or violate any existing laws'. In his Facebook post, Mr Fahmi said he was stopped at immigration at Kuala Lumpur International Airport while on his way to Singapore to see his favourite punk rock band. He claimed an immigration officer told him that Bukit Aman – the Malaysian police headquarters – had prohibited him from travelling abroad. 'I asked, 'Why?'' Mr Fahmi wrote on Facebook. 'The immigration officer replied, 'You need to ask Bukit Aman'. 'What's my offence? 'Only the Bukit Aman police and the Malaysian government can answer'.' His post garnered more than 19,000 reactions, 6,400 comments and 3,300 shares on June 8. Malaysia's police chief Razarudin Husain said Mr Fahmi was not subject to a travel ban, but he is under surveillance as part of an ongoing investigation. No details on the investigation were given. 'There was a confusion during the checkpoint verification process on June 7, which led to the erroneous issuance of a travel ban. The situation is currently under review and appropriate measures will be taken to update the relevant procedures,' Tan Sri Razarudin said in a statement . Mr Fahmi was dissatisfied with the police statement and said he will initiate legal action against the government. 'I did not see any officials dare to be responsible for their error to block my personal freedom of movement... Now it's time for the people to drag the authority into the court,' the activist said. In 2016, Mr Fahmi rose to prominence after caricaturing then Prime Minister Najib Razak as a 'sinister clown' in connection with the multi-billion-dollar 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal. He was charged with the improper use of network facilities with the intent to offend and annoy others. In July 2019, he was fined RM10,000 (S$3,030). In December 2024, Mr Fahmi was arrested and probed for ridiculing incoming Sabah governor Musa Aman as ' No 1 Corrupter' in a n artwork that depicted him with a RM100 note in place of his tongue. Tun Musa was accused of being involved in a US$63 million (S$81 million) timber kickback scheme during his tenure as Sabah chief minister from 2003 to 2018. But the charges against him were withdrawn in June 2020, causing widespread criticism. On May 29, 2025, the Sabah state government, which has the immigration autonomy , denied Mr Fahmi entry into the state – without giving an explanation. On Mr Fahmi's Facebook post about being denied freedom of travel, Asian Studies professor James Chin of Tasmania University described the Malaysian government's move as authoritarian. 'Silencing dissent and cracking down on political satire is not a national security matter – it's an excuse. Blocking someone from travelling over criticism is authoritarian, plain and simple. 'People are starting to see no real difference between Madani and Barisan Nasional (BN), and it's becoming clearer by the day,' Dr Chin penned in a Facebook post on June 7. Madani refers to Datuk Seri Anwar's slogan for civilised society under his administration. Before coming to federal power in May 2018, the Anwar-led Pakatan Harapan criticised the then-BN government for imposing travel bans on dissidents – most notably political cartoonist Zulkifli Anwar Ulhaque, who goes by the pen name Zunar; then-MP Tony Pua and Miss Maria Chin Abdullah, then chairwoman of the Bersih electoral reform group. Democratic Action Party (DAP) MP Syahredzan Johan stated that a travel ban cannot be imposed without strong justification. Mr Syahredzan, a lawyer who represented Mr Fahmi in the Najib caricature case, noted that the cartoonist had been allowed to travel abroad during the legal proceedings and had always cooperated with the authorities when required. 'If the travel ban is due to an ongoing investigation, such action is unnecessary, as Mr Fahmi is not a flight risk,' the DAP national vice-chairman said in a statement on June 8. Lu Wei Hoong is Malaysia correspondent at The Straits Times, specialising in transport and politics. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Top banker vows loyalty to DEI at Tokyo Pride parade as Trump's pushback rages
Some Japanese firms have sought to bolster the pool of available workers by becoming more inclusive of different gender and sexual minorities. PHOTO: EPA-EFE TOKYO – The head of one of Japan's largest investment banks used the Tokyo Pride parade to strike a rare public stance on pushing ahead with diversity initiatives, as US President Donald Trump seeks to abolish such policies. Few Japanese corporate executives have taken a clear position on US efforts to roll back the diversity, equity and inclusion policies that had become common at global corporations, though many firms appear to have quietly maintained their initiatives. 'Even if the US has adopted an anti-DEI policy, Japan should press ahead and make up for lost time rather than following suit,' said Mr Akihiko Ogino, president and chief executive officer of Daiwa Securities Group Inc, before the start of the Tokyo Pride parade near the bustling Shibuya area. He was speaking on June 8 at his first visit to the Tokyo iteration of the global event that organisers describe as 'advocating LGBTQ+ rights and dignity'. Faced with a rapidly ageing and shrinking population, some Japanese firms have sought to bolster the pool of available workers by becoming more inclusive of different gender and sexual minorities, as well as women. Major financial firms including Nomura Holdings, Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank are also among the sponsors of the event, according to its website. Companies around the world that do business in the US have faced a dilemma in dealing with the abrupt about-face on the issue. Mr Trump has vowed to stamp out diversity policies across the board, saying they are illegal and have disastrous consequences. In response, Citigroup withdrew its ambitious DEI goals and other US financial firms have made adjustments. Mr Ogino said he doesn't necessarily oppose the anti-DEI movement in the US, but that he thinks it's 'important to recognise that there are people with different viewpoints and work together within an organisation'. 'I believe we should acknowledge such diversity, recognise the differences between ourselves and others, and work together while respecting each other,' he said. Daiwa earned less than 7 per cent of its ordinary profit last fiscal year through businesses in the Americas as a whole. Japanese carmakers Nissan and Toyota rolled back some initiatives in the US in 2024 after pressure from conservative activists like Robby Starbuck. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group erased references to DEI from its American websites, but the Japanese company left its international websites untouched, describing the US changes as part of a global digital restructure 'after many months of planning'. A survey by the Mainichi newspaper published in March found 83 per cent of Japanese companies who responded agreed that DEI initiatives are necessary to secure talent. Bloomberg Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Chinese students reconsidering the US as Republicans threaten their visas
AUSTIN, Texas – Over lunch at the University of Texas at Austin, a professor from China and two Chinese students spoke dispiritedly this past week of the directive issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio to 'aggressively revoke' visas of Chinese nationals studying in 'critical fields'. They also talked about a Republican bill in Congress that would ban Chinese student visas to the United States. Even if such matters never come to pass, said Xiaobo Lu, a professor of government at the university in Austin, 'the damage is already being done'. 'Chinese students are practical,' he said. 'They now have to consider whether, if they come to America, their studies will be disrupted. There's no removing that uncertainty. That ship has sailed.' The two students accompanying Prof Lu to lunch, who asked not to be named for fear that their visa status might be at risk, described several recent conversations with Chinese friends. One had decided to turn down offers at two prestigious American journalism schools and had opted instead for the programme at the University of Hong Kong. Another said no to a coveted slot at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in favour of a modest local government job. A third Chinese friend, currently studying at Johns Hopkins University, is mulling whether to pack his bags and finish his degree back home. Their accounts align with sentiments shared by a senior academic official at the University of Texas, who said that several excellent graduate school candidates from China had withdrawn their applications. The official added that a number of Chinese students on the Austin campus were afraid to criticise the measures. He spoke on the condition of anonymity because he shared those fears. There are about 1,400 Chinese students on the Austin campus. A spokesperson for the university said that its administrators would have no comment. The chilling effect that has overtaken some Chinese nationals in the United States on student visas comes as the Trump administration and its allies have suggested that their presence constitutes a national security threat. Such assertions, combined with the continuing trade war with China, represent an increasingly strident anti-China sentiment among conservative officials, even as their states wrestle with the benefits and drawbacks of having Chinese students in their colleges and universities. The bill in Congress, called the Stop CCP Visas Act, was introduced in March by Representative Riley Moore, a freshman Republican from West Virginia who said in an interview that 'we're going to push hard for it'. Its prospects in the House are uncertain, and it has little chance of passing in the Senate, where it would need Democratic support to achieve a filibuster-proof supermajority. The timing of the legislation is also curious, given that Chinese student enrollment in the United States has fallen by more than 25 per cent, from about 370,000 in 2019 to roughly 277,000 in the 2023-24 academic year, according to data from the Institute of International Education. Critics say that even if the bill goes nowhere, its message and Mr Rubio's directive will alienate foreign students who are considering the United States. 'Why take the chance to come here when you know that some new policy might disrupt your studies?' said Eddie West, the assistant vice-president for international affairs for California State University, Fresno. 'And you could understand if a family in India is looking at this and saying, 'Are we going to be targeted next?'' Of the Chinese citizens whose visas would be revoked by his bill, Mr Moore was dismissive of the idea that they were here simply studying. 'Maybe some are,' he said. He added that a law passed in 2017 by the Chinese government, the National Intelligence Law, stipulates that citizens living abroad must support their home country's intelligence-gathering efforts. Of the estimated 15 per cent of Chinese nationals who receive government scholarships to study abroad, he said, 'they have to regularly report back to the diplomatic mission. They are active spies'. Mr Moore did not provide evidence to support his claims. The two University of Texas students, and eight other Chinese students and faculty members interviewed for this article, said they had never once interacted with their government back home, other than during the visa procurement process. Mr Moore did cite three instances over the past three years when Chinese students had been charged with attempting to gain access to US military information. He said his views on Chinese students were validated by an investigative report published last month by The Stanford Review, a conservative newspaper published by Stanford University students. The article, 'Uncovering Chinese Academic Espionage at Stanford,' relied on anonymous sources and concluded, 'In short, there are Chinese spies at Stanford.' But the only person named as a spy was a former Stanford researcher, Chen Song, who was charged with visa fraud in 2020 for what the Justice Department said was lying about her affiliation with the Chinese military. The Stanford Review story did not mention that the Justice Department withdrew the fraud charge and four other charges against Song a year later. A prominent Stanford faculty member quoted in the article, political sociologist Larry Diamond, reaffirmed to The New York Times his concern about 'the dangers of China penetrating our systems and ripping off our technology'. But, Mr Diamond said: 'I am completely opposed to Moore's legislation and think it would be incredibly destructive to our interests. 'This takes a blind sledgehammer to a problem that needs highly targeted tools.' Jessica Chen Weiss, a professor of China studies at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies, said that a vast majority of Chinese students in the United States are not here to spy or obtain information for their government. 'Chinese students who come to the United States want to stay and contribute,' she said, adding that three-quarters of Chinese graduate students in the fields of science, technology, engineering and math stay in the United States. The number is even higher for doctoral students in artificial intelligence, she noted. Democratic Representative Grace Meng of New York, chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, said in a statement that the legislation was 'xenophobic and wrongheaded'. She pointed to a survey earlier this year by The Asian American Foundation that found more than 1 in 4 Americans viewed Chinese Americans as a threat to American society. She added that Mr Moore's initiative, if passed, 'would send a dangerous message that people of Chinese descent – and Asian Americans more broadly – do not belong in this country'. Mr Moore said that he had not discussed the extent of any threat posed by Chinese students with his state's flagship college, West Virginia University, where around 130 Chinese students are enrolled. University officials declined to comment for this article. One of the bill's seven Republican co-sponsors, Representative Brandon Gill of Texas, said in a statement that 'it's time we start taking seriously the threat of the Chinese Communist Party and the hundreds of thousands of students they send to American universities each year, many of whom have been traced back to its espionage operations'. The statement provided no evidence for that assertion. Along with Mr Gill, five other co-sponsors – Representatives Troy Nehls of Texas, Andy Ogles of Tennessee, Burgess Owens of Utah, Addison McDowell of North Carolina and Scott Perry of Pennsylvania – represent districts in states that President Donald Trump won in November. Republican Senator Ashley Moody of Florida, where Mr Trump was also victorious in November, introduced a similar bill in the Senate. Each of these states has universities with large Chinese student populations, including the president's alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania, with more than 2,000 Chinese students, according to the most recent public data. 'We're literally skimming off the best and brightest China has to offer,' said Peter Lorge, a professor specialising in Chinese military history at Vanderbilt University, which has more than 700 Chinese students. 'They're fighting to come here, and their own country is struggling to get them to come back. The idea that we'd turn them away is baffling to me.' Mr David Firestein, the president of the George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations, said in an interview that the thousands of current and former Chinese students living in Texas contribute roughly US$500 million (S$644 million) annually to the state's economy. 'Banning them would be devastating to both our universities and to the state of Texas as a whole,' he said. His comments were echoed by Di Wang, a professor of history at Texas A&M from 1998 to 2015, who said in an interview that A&M's 'large number of professors and students from China have made substantial contributions to the education, research and exchanges between the people of the US and China'. Prof Wang described the current approach by Mr Rubio and Mr Moore as 'shortsighted, extreme and detrimental to the US. It would alienate many young Chinese who have a favourable view of the US and wish to learn from it'. Mr Moore scoffed at the idea that Chinese students experiencing life in an open society would have a salutary effect. 'They've been getting exposed to democratic values since Richard Nixon,' he said. 'That whole paradigm of, 'Let's introduce the free market into China and eventually democracy will flourish' – that's never happened.' Prof Weiss said that Mr Moore's bill could have unintended consequences for US security. During the Red Scare era of the 1950s, she said, a leading rocket scientist, Qian Xuesen, 'was prevented from continuing his scientific career in the United States,' even though he helped found the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology. Instead, Qian returned to China, where he helped develop China's ballistic missile system. Mr Lu, the University of Texas government professor, also referred to the saga of Qian as an example of how the significant contributions by Chinese scholars can be imperiled by fixating on unsubstantiated suspicions. 'It would be like a doctor treating a small skin rash on a shoulder,' he said, 'by amputating the whole arm.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
