T-level qualifications still less popular and more expensive than BTecs, watchdog finds
Popular sixth-form vocational qualifications such as BTecs should be retained until the success of T-level qualifications can be fully evaluated, the National Audit Office (NAO) has suggested.
In its investigation into the introduction of the new qualification launched in 2020, the NAO noted that T-levels had been less popular and more expensive than alternatives, with only 25,000 students enrolled this year, hampered by 'uncertain' economic benefits.
The NAO recommended that the Department for Education (DfE) monitor 'the potential impact on T-level demand, benefits, costs and approach before making wider strategic changes and decisions around the development of the technical qualifications landscape'.
The DfE had initially forecast that 100,000 students would be enrolled in the two-year qualification by 2027, when it planned to stopped funding 'applied general qualifications' (AGQs) including many BTecs. But that forecast has since been revised down as fewer than expected students have enrolled, to a central estimate of fewer than 50,000 by 2027.
In contrast, more than 270,000 students are enrolled in at least one AGQ in England.
Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of parliament's public accounts committee, said the NAO report 'shows that a lack of widespread awareness, declining pass rates and challenges securing industry placements risk the DfE's ability to scale up T-levels'.
Bill Watkin, chief executive of the Sixth Form Colleges Association, said: 'The report from the NAO reinforces the need to retain a middle pathway of applied general qualifications for students for whom neither A-levels nor T-levels present the best way forward.
'T-levels represent a vital opportunity to acquire the skills and experience that are essential for the workplace but they are not right for everyone, and we need to be confident that every young person can access a valuable and valued suite of qualifications in the future.'
Each T-level, in subjects such as marketing, accounting or health, is equivalent to three A-levels and as academically challenging, which critics say accounts for the lack of enthusiasm among potential students looking for vocational qualifications.
The courses also requires colleges to secure lengthy industry placements for students, which the NAO identified as likely to hamper expansion.
A DfE spokesperson said: 'The £28m investment recently announced by the prime minister shows the government's clear commitment to T-levels as a high-quality technical qualification which offers young people a great route into further study and a rewarding career.
'T-levels continue to grow, with nearly 60% more young people taking them last year than in the previous year.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
10 hours ago
- NBC News
New Zealand halts millions of funds to Cook Islands over its China ties
WELLINGTON, New Zealand — New Zealand has halted millions of dollars in funding to the Cook Islands over the 'breadth and content' of agreements the smaller Pacific nation made with China, officials from the New Zealand Foreign Minister's office said Thursday. New Zealand, which is the smaller Pacific nation's biggest funder, won't consider any new money for the Cook Islands until the relationship improves, a spokesperson for Foreign Minister Winston Peters told The Associated Press. Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown told lawmakers in Parliament on Thursday that the funding was 'not halted, it's paused,' and downplayed the significance of the amount frozen. Relations between other Pacific islands and their larger regional backers Australia and New Zealand have stumbled over ties with China in recent years as Beijing has vied to increase its Pacific sway. But the latest move by New Zealand's government was striking because it reflected growing friction between two countries with strong constitutional ties — Cook Islands is self-governing but shares a military and passports with New Zealand — over their diverging approaches to managing relations with Beijing. News of the 18.2 million New Zealand dollar ($11 million) funding halt Thursday only emerged when a Cook Islands news outlet saw its brief mention in a government budget document. It is likely to prove difficult for New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, who is in China for his first official visit and due to meet President Xi Jinping this week. Beijing has defended its Cook Islands strategic partnership before, saying in February that the deals were not intended to antagonize New Zealand. In a report tabled in the Cook Islands Parliament this week, the Public Accounts Committee registered 'concern' about a reduction of 10 million New Zealand dollars ($6 million) in the government's purse, the first known mention of the finance freeze. The money was earmarked for 'core sector support,' which funds the Cook Islands' health, education and tourism sectors, with audits by Wellington on how it is spent. The money is part of NZ$200 million directed to the Cook Islands by New Zealand over the past three years as part of an almost 60-year-old free association compact. The links demand consultation by Cook Islands leaders with Wellington on agreements with other countries that might affect New Zealand. The pacts with China were the first serious test of those rules. The Cook Islands, population 15,000, has a large and lucrative exclusive economic zone, with Brown's government exploring prospects for deep sea mining activity. Cook Islanders can freely live and work in New Zealand, which prompted alarm about national security in Wellington when officials learned of the raft of agreements Brown signed in February. The agreements did not promise security cooperation between Beijing and the Cook Islands, but they did pledge more funding from China for infrastructure projects and educational scholarships. Not all of the documents Brown signed were released publicly. The spokesperson for New Zealand Foreign Minister Peters said Thursday that the agreements illustrated 'a gap in understanding' between the governments 'about what our special relationship of free association requires,' which included consultation to ensure the preservation of shared interests. The 'breadth and content' of the deals and lack of consultation with Wellington about them prompted a review of funding to the Cook Islands, Peters' office said. 'New Zealand has therefore paused these payments and will also not consider significant new funding until the Cook Islands Government takes concrete steps to repair the relationship and restore trust,' the spokesperson's statement said. Brown said in February that the deals did not 'replace our longstanding relationships with New Zealand, Australia and others, but rather complements them, ensuring that we have a diversified portfolio of partnerships.' News of the agreements prompted protests in Avarua led by opposition lawmakers. On Thursday, Brown made a pointed reference in Parliament to Luxon's China visit, highlighting the New Zealand leader's announcements of increased trade with Beijing and looser visa requirements for Chinese travelers. The Cook Islands leader said he trusted any agreements Luxon made in Beijing would 'pose no security threat to the people of the Cook Islands' despite Avarua not knowing their content. New Zealand's latest action was an 'entirely avoidable consequence of Cook Islands' strategic flirtations with China,' said Mihai Sora, an analyst with the Australia-based think tank Lowy Institute. 'It's a bit cute to sign up to a comprehensive strategic partnership with China in 2025 and pretend there is no strategic angle for Beijing, given all the mounting evidence of China's malign strategic intent in the Pacific,' he said.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
HS2: a complete failure by the British state and its politicians
When was it obvious that HS2 was an economic turkey at risk of becoming 'an appalling mess', as transport secretary Heidi Alexander described today's position? A fair case can be made for 2013, a year of two neon-lit warnings of trouble ahead. One was a scathing report on HS2 from the National Audit Office (NAO), the first of many, when the project was still at the planning stage. The NAO concluded it was impossible to say whether the programme was likely to deliver value for money; the cost and benefit estimates were 'uncertain'; there had been 'past errors in the underlying model'; the Department for Transport had 'poorly articulated' the strategic need for a transformation in rail capacity and how HS2 was supposed to rebalance economic growth. In short, there was 'a weak foundation for securing and demonstrating success in the future'. Then there was Peter Mandelson's remarkable insider confession in the pages of the FT of how Gordon Brown and his cabinet came to approve HS2 in the first place in 2010. It was a tale of collective short-termism; in the grim post-banking crash era, the Labour government didn't want to be outdone by the Tories in their enthusiasm for a shiny new big project. The cost estimates were 'almost entirely speculative', wrote Mandelson, but 'the vision was exciting' and 'we were focusing on the coming electoral battle'. Laughably, ministers had imagined HS2 would attract private sector backers. By 2013, Mandelson had changed his mind on HS2 and feared 'an expensive mistake'. If only others had rethought. It would have been a painless option for David Cameron's coalition government to ditch the whole adventure. There was an excuse to do so because an earlier report in 2006 by former British Airways chief Sir Rod Eddington, which was being reread with fresh eyes at the time, had rejected the idea of new high-speed rail links. For a country the size of the UK, the best value will usually lie in improving existing rail and road networks, it argued. Instead, the HS2 show rolled on, fuelled by more political puff and short-termism. Some of the passages in the review by ex-KPMG infrastructure adviser James Stewart, published by Alexander on Wednesday, are excruciating. Key decisions, such as the passing of the first parliamentary bill in 2017 and the letting of works contracts, prioritised the schedule over costs. 'I have heard a range of reasons for this but pressure from politicians to maintain momentum, fear of HS2 being cancelled, and the belief that costs will increase as a result of delay have featured strongly,' says Stewart. Meanwhile, 'the top-down vision of building a railway that would be the best and fastest has been a major factor in undermining attempts to introduce a culture of cost control'. This is tear-your-hair-out stuff because it breaks the golden rule about getting plans hammered down in detail before you start building large-scale infrastructure projects. Even now half of Euston sits as a wasteland before a plan has been agreed for a design for a HS2 terminus. The main source of cost overruns, as Stewart and Mark Wild (the ex-Crossrail chief executive now charged with salvaging the shambles) agree, were the works contracts. The contracting model, combined with unrealistic targets, turned the contracts into 'cost-plus' arrangements whereby contractors had little to no incentive to hit cost targets. Companies rang rings around the department and its arm's-length body, HS2 Ltd. The Institution of Civil Engineers concluded roughly the same in its report last year: huge contracts created 'an imbalance of power', especially in the context of a political demand to hurry up. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Later Tory leaders, especially Boris Johnson, deserve their own mention in the catalogue of infamy. It was Johnson who pushed the formal 'notice to proceed' button in 2020, in full knowledge that the review he commissioned from Douglas Oakervee said HS2 only made sense if built in full. Within 18 months, and with costs hurtling out of control, ministers amputated most of HS2's eastern arm to Leeds in 2021; the section to Manchester followed. In shrunken circumstances, it makes sense, as Alexander and Wild say, to slow down and complete the rump Birmingham-London link to a slower timetable in the interests of minimising yet more cost overruns. It will involve running the high-speed trains at slower speeds initially, a suitably farcical postscript to a project that has wasted tens of billions of pounds and consumed the lion's share of spending on rail for years. The tragedy is this ending has been predictable for about a decade.
Times
2 days ago
- Times
No value for money from the office created by Rachel Reeves
T hink of three projects most in need of a value-for-money test and this trio are hard to beat: that blank cheque on wheels known as HS2; the Sizewell C nuke, nicely located on a Suffolk flood plain; and the Royal Navy's Dreadnought-class submarines, the biggest defence project presently under way. So how's this for a turn-up from the Office for Value for Money (OVfM)? It won't be reviewing any of them. No, as its chairman David Goldstone has just told the National Audit Office (NAO) chief, Gareth Davies, over five pages of total blather: 'In line with our principle not to duplicate the work of others we did not review HS2, Sizewell C and Dreadnought, as they are already subject to extensive [scrutiny]'. How convenient is that? Among her budget triumphs, the OVfM was invented by Rachel Reeves to 'root out waste and inefficiency' and 'help us realise the benefits from every pound of public spending'.
