UK humanitarian aid to Gaza scrutinized after document allegedly warns of links to Hamas-controlled ministry
A newly surfaced U.K. government document has raised fresh concerns over British-funded humanitarian aid to Gaza, suggesting officials were aware of the risk funds might indirectly support Hamas. the terrorist group that governs the Gaza Strip.
While U.K. officials strongly deny the claim, critics say key questions remain unanswered.
The document, dated November 2022 and obtained by NGO Monitor, outlines the U.K.'s humanitarian strategy in the occupied Palestinian territories. One section references a UNICEF-administered cash assistance program in Gaza coordinated with the Ministry of Social Development (MoSD).
The NGO Monitor report claims, "The MoSD in Gaza is affiliated with the de facto authorities and thus U.K. Aid can be linked directly or indirectly with supporting the de facto authority in Gaza (Hamas), which is part of a proscribed group."
The group's report also claimed the British consulate-general in Jerusalem, which reportedly authored the document, assessed this as a "reputational" risk, raising concerns not of legality, but of public perception if the arrangement were to be revealed.
Anne Herzberg, legal advisor at NGO Monitor, told Fox News Digital the phrasing is significant.
"This is what was most shocking to us," she told Fox News Digital. "The government clearly acknowledged the risk that U.K. taxpayer funds could reach Hamas, but they were more concerned about how it might look than the real danger of supporting terrorism."
Herzberg explained NGO Monitor uncovered the Foreign Office document, originally published in November 2022, during an extensive investigation into humanitarian aid flows in Gaza.
In a statement to Fox News Digital, the U.K.'s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) categorically denied any funding reached Hamas-controlled bodies.
"We categorically reject these allegations. The U.K. does not fund Hamas-run agencies in Gaza," an FCDO spokesperson stated. "The UNICEF program is coordinated with the Ministry of Social Development in Ramallah, which is run by the Palestinian Authority. U.K. funding was provided through UNICEF directly to vulnerable households in Gaza."
The FCDO stressed that Hamas is a proscribed terrorist organization under U.K. law, "and funding or supporting it is a crime." It further noted that the U.K. conducted a due-diligence assessment of UNICEF and tracks the path of funding to its final civilian recipients.
But Herzberg said the November 2022 document — alongside UNICEF's own March 2024 update celebrating its "strengthened partnership with the Ministry of Social Development" in Gaza — points to deeper inconsistencies.
Yona Schiffmiller, the director of research at NGO Monitor, told Fox News digital, "The U.K. document clearly refers to the Gaza-based MoSD. If the program was only coordinated with Ramallah, it's unclear why Gaza-specific risks were flagged."
UNICEF's March 2024 report states that over 540,000 Gazans received support after the Oct. 7 attacks, adding the partnership with the MoSD "helped ensure access to the social registry and resulted in targeting the most vulnerable families." NGO Monitor points out that the MoSD in Gaza is led by Ghazi Hamad, a Hamas politburo member sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury in 2024.
Herzberg said the report claims "this aid diversion was central in Hamas' preparations for the October 7th massacre, including the construction of tunnels and other military installations, and stockpiling supplies and resources. After thousands of terrorists invaded Israel and committed mass atrocities, Hamas continued to commandeer aid, creating and taking advantage of a black market."
"Even after Oct. 7 and all we've been seeing ... they still refuse to deal with this question of diversion," Herzberg claimed. "There's no transparency, no oversight, and the U.N. is actively trying to thwart Israeli, U.S. and other allied efforts in trying to improve the humanitarian aid situation."
She was referring to the recent U.S.-backed initiative to establish a new aid distribution system in Gaza that started operating Monday.
The NGO Monitor report further details how the MoSD is run by senior Hamas officials, including Ghazi Hamad, who publicly praised the Oct. 7 massacre and was sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury in November 2024. Another top MoSD figure, Mohammed Al-Araeer, has repeatedly glorified terrorist attacks on social media and praised Hamas commanders.
A recent investigation by Israel's website, "Shomrim," and Israel's Channel 12 revealed that Hamas has built an extensive fundraising network inside the U.K. Senior Hamas operatives with British citizenship have established charitable foundations that raise millions of pounds annually, some of which ends up in the hands of the group's military wing.
Udi Levi, formerly head of the Counter-Terror Financing Division in the Mossad, told Israel's Channel 12, "Britain is becoming the central country transferring funds to Hamas, including after Oct. 7."
The watchdog also raised broader concerns about the role of other U.N. agencies in Gaza, noting at least 12 are active in the Strip. Herzberg said it remains unclear whether similar diversion risks exist across those agencies.
"We all know how UNRWA has been taken over by Hamas, but what about the others? Is the same thing happening there? These are the types of questions no one is willing to answer," she said.
The controversy unfolds against the backdrop of heightened diplomatic tensions. Last month, the U.K. suspended trade negotiations with Israel, citing humanitarian concerns. Foreign Secretary David Lammy criticized the Israeli government's actions in Gaza and called for restored aid and electricity.
NGO Monitor says the debate highlights the urgent need for a new international mechanism to oversee aid delivery in Gaza, one that bypasses Hamas-controlled institutions and ensures civilian aid is protected from exploitation.
"The issue isn't just legal compliance — it's moral responsibility," Herzberg said. "Western donors should be taking every precaution possible. So far, that hasn't been the case."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
38 minutes ago
- Atlantic
This Gaza Relief Effort Was Doomed to Fail
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is presiding over an unmitigated disaster, and everything about the U.S.- and Israel-backed group's failure was entirely predictable. After lifting a blockade on relief supplies to the Gaza Strip, Israeli authorities tapped GHF, which is barely months old, as the principal aid-delivery system for starving Palestinian residents. Since its operations began last week, dozens of civilians have been killed by gunfire while seeking to access the food-distribution centers. At least twice this week, GHF suspended its relief efforts in an attempt to improve security. Whatever you think of Israel's conduct during its war against Hamas in Gaza, you should understand that its delivery system for aid was doomed to fail. Israeli authorities and GHF had no realistic plan for what the logistics industry calls 'the last mile'—the process of getting goods from a distribution center to the customer, so to speak. GHF was founded in February and is already on its second leader, a Trump-supporting evangelical Christian public-relations executive. Among the firms that Israel engaged to provide security for distribution sites in southern Gaza is Safe Reach Solutions, a firm led by a former CIA official and staffed by former U.S. military and security contractors that was formed only in January. GHF and SRS are both mysterious, controversial entities whose financial backing is unclear. The organization has defended its work, claiming in a statement yesterday that 'almost 8.5 million meals have been delivered so far—without incident.' GHF also said it is still scaling up. 'Our top priority remains protecting the safety and dignity of those receiving aid,' the statement continued, 'especially as we continue to serve as the only reliable provider of humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza.' It's true that established aid agencies that have previously worked in Gaza's difficult conditions are not involved in the current effort. Israel cut ties with the UN Relief and Works Agency amid allegations that some of its staff had been involved with the October 7, 2023, terror attack by Hamas; the UN's World Food Program continues to work there but depleted all of its resources in late April. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has clashed with the International Committee of the Red Cross, which lost two of its personnel in an Israeli bombing in May. (The group's leader has called conditions in Gaza 'worse than hell.') World Central Kitchen, which lost seven people in an Israeli strike in Gaza in 2024, closed its soup kitchen in April because it could not deliver food there. With relief agencies either sidelined or unable to deliver resources because of Israel's blockade, Netanyahu then chose, with American backing, the new GHF. But its first leader resigned after a few weeks, citing a lack of 'humanitarian principles' in the Gaza relief effort. Julie Beck: It should not be controversial to plead for Gaza's children Perhaps to help solve logistical questions—and perhaps to add reputational gloss to its efforts—GHF hired the Boston Consulting Group. But after violence broke out, that company withdrew from the contract. Later that same day, GHF appointed its new executive chairman, Johnnie Moore, who insisted that his agency was 'demonstrating that it is possible to move vast quantities of food to people who need it most.' In all cases, an organization delivering goods must optimize distribution routes that align with the community it's delivering to. Israel's lack of trust for experienced relief groups doesn't justify ignoring what those operations learned about moving supplies. Many distribution systems rely on what are known as micro-fulfillment centers—local warehouses, delivery hubs, temporary facilities—to provide goods closer to where the community is. This is why, a few years ago, the COVID-vaccine-distribution efforts that drew so heavily on local doctors and pharmacies were prioritized over larger-scale efforts. Employing many small distribution sites promotes flexibility; the system can adapt to changes in demand. The GHF has provided only four distribution centers, presumably for security reasons, in all of Gaza, down from the 400 that the UN once managed; many Palestinians must now walk hours to have any hope of picking up a food package. No rational system of distribution, under any circumstances, would work this way. GHF increased the security risk by having fewer, not more, distribution sites. The organization also seemed unprepared when tens of thousands of people converged on those sites. Forgive the comparison, but American retail stores planning for Black Friday sales have come to understand—in some cases because of past tragedies at a ' crush point '—the need for information systems that collect data on where the demand is coming from and that help organizations meet that demand quickly. Surely Israel could have anticipated the sheer desperation of Gaza's Palestinians after it cut off relief efforts for months. Especially in hard circumstances, how the last mile will work must be clearly explained to those on the receiving end. In large-scale logistics efforts, the mechanics of how delivery will occur—who needs the information, when they need it, and through which communications channels it will be delivered—are all integral parts of the process. Whole systems of real-time tracking, delivery windows, and notifications are there for Israel to use, even against what it perceives as a hostile population. But information about food availability has been scarce by all accounts. Al Jazeera reported that some announcements last Sunday came from speakers mounted on military drones. The shortage of information led to a rush to the limited number of distribution sites. Business analogies only go so far. An aid site is not a Costco. Palestinian civilians are not retail customers. But perhaps if the Israeli government and its newly chosen relief entity had thought through any of the logistical matters that preoccupy established companies and experienced aid agencies alike, many more Palestinians would be receiving the food aid they badly need, faster and more safely.
Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
Rogue And Illegal Ebikes Spark Challenges In UK Cities
Rush-hour cyclists, traffic and pedestrian commuters on Bishopsgate in the City of London, the ... More capital's financial district, on 28th February 2025, in London, England. (Photo by Richard Baker / In Pictures via Getty Images) Ebikes are a perfect solution for getting around cities — but rogue designs that aren't legal on UK roads need to be addressed, as do other sources of friction. Because of that, one local councillor has called to bring 'licensing laws out of the 19th century', saying at the Living Streets Walk Summit in Bristol that the demands of the delivery market and a failure to sufficiently crack down on illegal ebikes are leading to dangerous driving. And it's no surprise there are concerns. At the end of February, a pedestrian was hit in West London by an ebike rider in West London — not a rental or sharing scheme, to be clear — and died after a month in hospital. Though the ebikes hurtling around making deliveries, illegally modified bikes causing road chaos, and the rise of ebike sharing schemes are causing friction, this shouldn't be construed as cyclists as a whole being a problem on city roads, where cars wreak much more havoc – and take up more space, too. In the UK, ebikes are legal so long as they don't provide assistance above 15.5mph and are pedal assist, and the motor must only kick in when the rider is pedalling, rather than controlled via a throttle. Of course, if you've been on British city streets, you'll have seen plenty of fat-tire bikes go much faster, when the rider isn't pedalling; those should technically be rated as electric motorbikes and only be ridden on the road with appropriate registration, license and tax, and meet safety rules. Some of those bikes are illegally imported, and others are modified to break the law. A member of the City of London Police Cycle Team takes part in a police operation to confiscate ... More illegally modified ebikes near Bishopsgate Police Station in London. Police seizures of illegally modified electric bikes (e-bikes) soared in the past year amid concerns their speed and weight present a lethal threat to pedestrians, according to Freedom of Information (FoI) figures obtained by the PA news agency. Forces across the UK confiscated 937 e-bikes in the year to August 11. Picture date: Thursday September 12, 2024. (Photo by Jonathan Brady/PA Images via Getty Images) Police forces have started to crack down on illegal bikes. Last year, the City of London police confiscated 937 dodgy ebikes, up from 511 the year before, including one that was modified to reach 70mph. That had been used by a food delivery worker, according to reports, and it's not clear that he ever actually hit that top speed; the bike was taken by police, and the rider faced no action, according to reports. Delivery companies need to address the use of illegal bikes by riders on their platforms, but such rogue bikes are also used for crime, with police also reporting the use of illegal ebikes and scooters for drug distribution. Dodgy ebikes aren't just a problem in London and the UK, but New York has tried to crack down on the issue too. Ed Plowden, a Green councillor for Bristol, speaking at the Living Streets Walking Summit in Bristol this week, said it's time for action before the issue with ebike delivery drivers gets out of hand. "I do think that we're seeing a new danger, which is for want of a better phrase, 'Uberoo' – and it's a really unlicensed market where people have been pushed to deliver things really, really fast, and we are seeing some really quite risky behavior, which is making all of us less safe," he said. "And I'd like to see a bit more licensing and a bit more regulation of that market, because the people are putting themselves at risk by the way that they're moving around the city, often on personally changed vehicles," he said. "So I think that's something that we really need to drag some of our licensing laws out of the 19th century." He added it goes beyond dodgy ebikes, with issues raised by ebike sharing platforms, including messy pavement parking. 'Some of the tech companeis are making our cities more dangerous for all of us by putting people onto really quite dangerous vehicles that they've adapted themslves and asking them to whizz around really, really fast,' he said. While the introduction of a 20mph speed limit on Bristol roads has improved road safety, he says that casualties from road safety issues have gone back up. 'Some of the electric scooters and soem of the ways that people are forced to move very quickly through our city, delivering things is making our cities less safe for all of us, and we need some better regulation there of the tech bros,' he added. Indeed, beyond delivery ebikes, sharing platforms also continue to spark concerns. One alarming story comes via London Centric, which earlier this year reported on an alarming trend of legs broken when Lime bikes fall on riders after problems braking. Another ongoing challenge is how such "sharing" bikes are left littered on sidewalks, potentially blocking access — it's even tripped up celebrities like Timothee Chalamet. Speakers at the conference noted that pedestrians are supposed to be prioritized on pavements, but admitted that doesn't always happen. Rental bikes are pictured scattered across a pavement on 26th February 2024 in London, United ... More Kingdom. E-bikes left unsafely on pavements present hazards for pedestrians, in particular for disabled and elderly people. (photo by Mark Kerrison/In Pictures via Getty Images) Plowden added that giving over space encourages better behaviour — suggesting making room for bikes of any sort to be parked would help ease the challenge. But he noted that councils may find it difficult to remove car parking spots to make space for cycle parking because the former is a source of revenue, and the latter is not. It's worth noting that the health benefits of active transport — cycling and walking, essentially — are so high that they may outweigh the safety risks. Professor Scarlett McNally, also speaking at the conference, said "the benefits outweigh the risks by 10 to one." What do the bike companies say? A spokesperson for Forest (formerly known as Human Forest) said that it takes rider and pedestrian safety "extremely seriously" and that it doesn't publish raw incident figures, but that "serious injuries are rare". The company admitted that e-bikes are naturally heavier due to battery and motor, but that the weight is distributed to enhance balance and minimise the risk of tipping. LONDON, ENGLAND - JUNE 4: A Lime rental e-bike on the pavement in Leadenhall Street on June 4, 2024 ... More in London, United Kingdom. (Photo by) A Lime spokesperson echoed that, noting that share bikes need to be more sturdy and that ebikes are generally heavier than standard bicycles, saying that Lime bikes are about the same weight as other share bikes on London roads. "At Lime, safety is our highest priority," a spokesperson for Lime said in a statement sent to Forbes. It guides how we design and maintain our vehicles, how we develop technology and educational materials to encourage safe riding, and how we work with cities to provide safe riding environments. As part of our London Action Plan, we are increasing our investment in safer riding education to improve the safety of all London cyclists." "In London, 99.9% of trips end without a reported incident, which speaks to the strength of our safety record across millions of journeys," the spokesperson added. "The majority of Lime users are responsible, and incidents of dangerous cycling are rare. When they do occur, we take them seriously and work closely with the police and local authorities to support investigations."
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
A British TV art expert who sold works to a suspected Hezbollah financier is sentenced to prison
LONDON — An art expert who appeared on the BBC's Bargain Hunt show was sentenced Friday to two and a half years in prison for failing to report his sale of pricey works to a suspected financier of Lebanon's militant Hezbollah group . Oghenochuko Ojiri, 53, pleaded guilty to eight offenses under the Terrorism Act 2000. The art sales took place between October 2020 and December 2021.
