
Kim Jong Un oversees warship weapons test-fire, eyes nukes for N. Korea navy
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and his daughter Kim Ju Ae attend what state media KCNA reported was a test-firing of the weapons system of the new "Choe Hyon-class" warship, in this picture released on April 30, 2025, by the Korean Central News Agency. KCNA via REUTERS
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has ordered the rapid nuclear armament of naval vessels, following the first test-firing of a new warship weapons system. The newly unveiled 5,000-ton destroyer-class vessel, Choe Hyon, is expected to be equipped with tactical nuclear missiles.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un ordered navy vessels to be speedily armed with nuclear weapons , state media reported Wednesday, as Pyongyang conducted its first test-firing of a new warship weapons system.This weekend, Pyongyang had unveiled its new warship, a 5,000-ton destroyer-class vessel named Choe Hyon, which some analysts said was likely to be equipped with short-range tactical nuclear missiles.Kim oversaw the first day of a two-day weapons test of the destroyer, the official Korean Central News Agency said.He then ordered officials to work on "accelerating the nuclear armament of the navy", it added.North Korea has previously said the vessel was equipped with the "most powerful weapons", and that it would "enter into operation early next year".Experts have said that given its size, the warship is believed to carry both ship-to-surface and ship-to-air missiles.KCNA said Tuesday's test was of "ship-to-ship tactical guided weapon, various kinds of ship-based automatic guns and smoke and electronic jamming guns," involving the newly unveiled vessel.The news agency said Pyongyang also tested its " supersonic cruise missile , strategic cruise missile, anti-aircraft missile and 127 mm ship-based automatic gun" on Monday.Kim said the country's ship-based firepower system was "effectively combined" with the "most powerful strike means including supersonic cruise missile, strategic cruise missile and tactical ballistic missile".Seoul's defence ministry said it was "closely tracking and monitoring the North Korean military 's shipbuilding and development trends," in cooperation with the United States.Pyongyang's announcement came days after it confirmed for the first time it had deployed troops to Russia to support Moscow in its war in Ukraine.Moscow also said Saturday that North Korean soldiers "provided significant assistance in defeating the group of Ukrainian armed forces".Some analysts say Pyongyang appears to have acquired certain weapons from Moscow to equip its warships, possibly in exchange for deploying troops."It seems that North Korea has recently imported several modern weapons from Russia," Ahn Chan-il, a defector-turned-researcher who runs the World Institute for North Korea Studies, told AFP.The North has also "assembled them, and used them effectively to strengthen internal unity and boost military morale," he added.- Kim at launch -State media had reported Saturday on the launching of the Choe Hyon, showing images of Kim attending a ceremony with his daughter Ju Ae, considered by many experts as his likely successor.In March, Kim inspected a project to build a nuclear-powered submarine, asserting that "radically" boosting the navy was a key part of Pyongyang's defensive strategy.At the time, Kim called for the modernisation of the country's surface and underwater naval forces, including the development of warships.Pyongyang has claimed in previous years to be developing underwater nuclear attack drones, which could unleash a "radioactive tsunami", but analysts have questioned whether it actually has such a weapon.Washington -- Seoul's key security ally -- has in recent years ramped up joint military exercises and increased the presence of strategic US assets, such as an aircraft carrier and a nuclear-powered submarine, in the region to deter the North.Pyongyang has repeatedly declared itself an "irreversible" nuclear weapons state and routinely denounces joint US-South Korea drills as rehearsals for invasion."North Korea's mention of its accelerated naval nuclear armament is presumed to refer to enhanced operational capabilities of tactical nuclear and strategic missiles by the fleet," said Yang Moo-jin, president of the University of North Korean Studies in Seoul.This week's test appears to highlight North Korea's assertion that its newly unveiled warship is capable of blue-water operations, he told AFP, referring to naval missions conducted far from a country's own coastal waters, often in open ocean areas.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Why Israel named strikes against Iran 'Operation Rising Lion'? A Bible connection
Israel on Friday launched a series of massive strikes against Iran, targeting its nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories, and military commanders. The Israeli strikes killed Iran's top military officials, including the chief of staff of its armed forces, Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, chief of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Hossein Salami, and Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the head of the Revolutionary Guard's missile programme in Iran. Follow Israel-Iran strike live updates Soon after the strikes on Tehran, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "Moments ago, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, a targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival. This operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat." Israel took the name 'rising lion' from a biblical verse, which promises the victory of the Israeli people. The context grows clearer as Netanyahu was on Thursday photographed putting a handwritten note into a crack of Jerusalem's Western Wall, one of the holiest prayer sites in Judaism. The Israeli PM's office released a photo of the note on Friday, which read: "the people shall rise up as a lion". The phrase comes from the Bible's Book of Numbers, verse 23:24. The verse says, "Behold, the people shall rise up as a great lion, and lift up himself as a young lion: he shall not lie down until he eat of the prey, and drink the blood of the slain." This is a part of non-Israeli prophet and diviner Balaam's first oracle, in which he predicts the strength and power of Israel and compares it to a lion that will not rest until it has satisfied its hunger. An Israeli official said that the military was ready to keep on going for days with the offensive, a move which would depend partly on Iran's response. Meanwhile, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called Israel's attack on Tehran as "satanic". He warned Jerusalem of "severe punishment". Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi described the attack as a "declaration of war". (with Reuters inputs)
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Why is Israel's attack on Iran being called biggest in region since it's war with Iraq? What happened then?
Israel's latest strike on Iran — targeting nuclear and military infrastructure — has been dubbed the largest assault on the country since the brutal Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s. As the conflict escalates with retaliatory drone strikes, experts are drawing parallels to a time when Iran faced an existential threat in an eight-year war that shaped the region today read more People attend an anti-Israeli protest following the Israeli strikes on Iran, in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. WANA via Reuters On Friday, Israel launched what is being described as its in recent history — targeting nuclear and military installations deep within the Islamic Republic. Explosions rocked Tehran as Israel stated it was aiming at facilities tied to Iran's controversial nuclear programme. Among the fatalities reported by Iranian state media were senior members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the head of Iran's missile programme and two top nuclear scientists. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This major offensive has quickly escalated the longstanding shadow conflict between the two regional powers into a more direct and dangerous confrontation. In response, Iran reportedly deployed over 100 drones towards Israeli territory, most of which were intercepted. Military operations in Iran were still reported to be underway as of Friday afternoon. Israeli officials have framed the attack as a preventive measure against Iran's growing nuclear capabilities. 'The attack was aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear bomb,' an Israeli leader stated, as Iran's uranium enrichment approaches levels considered dangerously close to weapons-grade. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is intended solely for peaceful purposes — a position also echoed in past assessments by US intelligence, which have found no definitive evidence of Iran building a weapon. Talks involving US and Iranian officials, intended to resume shortly, may now be jeopardised. The Israeli strikes are described by observers as the most substantial assault on Iranian soil since the devastating Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s. What was the Iran-Iraq War? The reference to the Iran-Iraq war reflects the magnitude of Israel's latest operation. That war, lasting from September 1980 to August 1988, was one of the most protracted and destructive interstate conflicts of the late 20th century. It began when Iraq, led by Saddam Hussein, invaded western Iran, citing border disputes and fears of revolutionary influence spreading from Iran's new theocratic leadership. Underlying the conflict were deep-rooted tensions over territorial control, particularly over the Shaṭṭ al-ʿArab waterway — a crucial maritime route for oil exports — and fears of Iran exporting its revolutionary ideology into Iraq's Shiite majority population. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These factors, compounded by the recent upheaval of Iran's Islamic Revolution, created a volatile regional atmosphere that Saddam Hussein exploited to assert dominance and reclaim previously conceded territories. The war's early stages saw Iraq capturing key Iranian cities such as Khorramshahr, though their offensive stalled due to unexpectedly strong Iranian resistance. In 1981, Iran's Revolutionary Guard emerged as a decisive military force, reversing some of Iraq's gains. By 1982, Iran had reclaimed lost territory and began its own incursions into Iraqi land, pushing the war into a prolonged stalemate. How did the Iran-Iraq war end? Despite Iraq's initial advances, the conflict soon devolved into years of trench warfare, failed offensives and human wave attacks. Iran, under the leadership of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, refused ceasefire offers and continued its military campaigns in Iraq, aiming to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Both sides engaged in sustained air and missile strikes on urban centers and oil infrastructure. The 'Tanker War' phase that began in 1984 had global repercussions, with both nations attacking oil tankers in the Persian Gulf. These actions eventually prompted intervention by Western naval forces to safeguard energy routes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD By the mid-1980s, Iraq had rebuilt a large and technologically advanced military, heavily funded by Gulf Arab states and supported logistically and diplomatically by powers including the United States, the Soviet Union and France. Iraq also developed chemical weapons, which it employed against both Iranian troops and Kurdish civilians. The turning point came in 1988. Iraq's chemical weapons campaign, most notably the Halabjah attack which killed thousands of civilians, and military advances into Iranian territory prompted Iran to reconsider its position. A group of prisoners arrive in Mundharieh on the border between Iran and Iraq, June 29, 2000. The prisoners arrived home from Iran nearly 13 years after the end of the 1980-88 war between the Iraq the Gulf neighbours. File Image/Reuters Weary from years of war, casualties, and economic strain, Iran accepted United Nations Security Council Resolution 598, bringing the war to a formal ceasefire in August 1988. What was the toll of the Iran-Iraq war? The toll of the war was staggering. Estimates of casualties range from one million to two million, with at least half a million believed to have died. Iran is thought to have suffered the highest number of losses. The conflict left both countries economically battered, with combined financial damages surpassing one trillion US dollars. Despite the prolonged fighting, the war concluded without significant territorial changes or reparations. Diplomatic relations between Iran and Iraq were not fully restored until 1990, with the final exchange of prisoners of war occurring as late as 2003. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The recent Israeli strike on Iran is being measured against the scale and impact of the Iran-Iraq war due to its significance. As Israel asserts that the operation was aimed at preventing Iran from achieving nuclear weapon capability, and Iran retaliates through drone warfare, the current scenario brings back the spectre of broader confrontation. Just as the 1980s war reshaped alliances in the region, this modern-day escalation could similarly alter the strategic calculus in West Asia. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
At least 78 killed, 329 injured in Israeli strikes, say Iranian media
Israeli strikes in Iran have killed at least 78 people and injured 329, according to Iranian media read more Follow us on Google News Smoke rises from Tabriz airport in Iran, June 13, 2025 in this screengrab obtained from a social media video. Reuters Israeli strikes under 'Operation Rising Lion' killed at least 78 people and injured 329 people, according to Iranian media. This is a developing story. It will be updated as details emerge.