logo
Singapore opposition leader convicted for lying, covering up false testimony

Singapore opposition leader convicted for lying, covering up false testimony

Khaleej Times17-02-2025

Singapore's opposition leader was convicted Monday of lying to parliament while helping a fellow party member to cover up a false witness account, in a case that could disqualify him from running in upcoming national elections.
Pritam Singh, 48, secretary-general of the Workers' Party, was found guilty on two counts of lying to a parliamentary committee which was probing a fellow MP.
The conviction is a blow to the Southeast Asian nation's struggling political opposition which is seeking to challenge the overwhelming dominance of the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) in elections expected within months.
The PAP has ruled the wealthy city-state since 1959.
District court judge Luke Tan said that contrary to what he told the committee, Singh had not done enough to get rookie MP Raeesah Khan to admit to her lie in parliament.
The judge also gave credence to Khan's testimony that Singh had told her during a meeting to "take the lie to the grave".
Singh's sentence, which will likely be handed down at a later date, could have a devastating effect as it will determine whether the MP could stand in general elections to be held before November.
Under the constitution, a person fined a minimum of Sg$10,000 ($7,400) or jailed for at least one year, is disqualified from running for election or holding a parliamentary seat for five years.
Singh faces a maximum sentence of three years' behind bars and a fine of up to Sg$7,000 ($5,226) on each charge.
The Attorney-General's Chambers had previously said that the prosecution will seek a fine for each charge.
Lies in parliament
Raeesah Khan who resigned from the legislature following the scandal, had admitted to making up a story she told in parliament about a female rape victim she accompanied to make a police report.
The former MP confessed that she lied when telling parliament in 2021 that a police officer supposedly made "insensitive comments" about the way the alleged victim was dressed and that she had drunk alcohol.
But Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam had said there was no record in the police files of such an incident and Khan eventually admitted to lying about the story.
Singh was then accused of lying to the parliamentary committee investigating Khan.
He allegedly told the committee that he was not aware that Khan had made up the story about the rape victim, in an apparent attempt to downplay his own responsibility as party leader, court documents said.
But the judge tore through Singh's credibility as a witness.
In the 2020 general elections, the PAP won 83 of the 93 seats at stake to retain its dominance.
But the main opposition Workers' Party stole the show when it captured 10 seats, four more than previously held, in its strongest performance yet since independence in 1965.
Its leaders have said they hope to further increase the party's numbers in parliament in the upcoming elections which will be new premier Lawrence Wong's first major political test.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Could David Cameron be prosecuted for threatening the ICC?
Could David Cameron be prosecuted for threatening the ICC?

Middle East Eye

time17 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Could David Cameron be prosecuted for threatening the ICC?

David Cameron, the former British foreign secretary, may be liable for prosecution under international law and within the UK for his attempts to obstruct the work of the International Criminal Court (ICC), experts have said. Middle East Eye revealed on Monday that Cameron privately threatened Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor at the ICC, in April 2024 to defund and withdraw from the ICC if it issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. "A threat against the ICC, direct or indirect, is an obstruction of justice," Francesca Albanese, the UN's special rapporteur on Palestine, told MEE's live show on Tuesday. "It's incredibly serious that someone in a position of power might have had the audacity to do that." And Professor Sergey Vasiliev of the Open University of the Netherlands reacted: "If the reports are confirmed, David Cameron did cross the legal line when he threatened the Prosector with all kinds of consequences for applying for the warrants. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "This is a serious matter that shows Cameron's utter lack of respect for the ICC's judicial and prosecutorial independence." What did David Cameron do? Cameron, then foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, made the threat on 23 April 2024 during a heated phone call with Khan. Cameron told Khan that the UK would "defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute" if the ICC issued warrants for Israeli leaders. At the time, Khan and his team of lawyers were preparing arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-defence minister, Yoav Gallant, as well as for Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh and Mohammed Deif. Khan's office applied for warrants on 20 May, less than a month after the phone call. 'Per the reported dialogue, David Cameron clearly seeks to pressure the ICC Prosecutor's decision regarding whether to pursue warrants for Israeli officials' - Professor Tom Dannenbaum Six months later, on 21 November, the warrants were approved by a panel of judges, officially charging Netanyahu and Gallant with war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Gaza since October 2023. MEE revealed details of the call based on information from several sources, including former staff in Khan's office familiar with the conversation and who have seen the minutes of the meeting. Cameron, a former British prime minister who was appointed foreign secretary by Sunak in November 2023, told Khan that applying for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant would be "like dropping a hydrogen bomb". He said Khan was "on the brink of making a huge mistake" and that "the world is not ready for this". The report has drawn condemnation from British MPs who called for an investigation into Cameron's actions. Cameron has not responded to multiple requests for comment. Approached by MEE for a response to the exchange with Cameron, Khan said on Monday: "I have no comment to make at this time." What's the background to David Cameron's demands? The Conservative government was accused last year of being behind the delay in the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants against Israeli and Hamas officials, after filing a request with the pre-trial chamber to challenge the court's jurisdiction on Israeli nationals. The request prompted dozens of submissions from other states, but was later dropped by the Labour government, which came to power in July 2024. The revelations about Cameron came after the administration of US President Donald Trump said last week that it would sanction four ICC judges for investigations into the US and its ally Israel. In February, Khan was the first ICC official to be the target of US sanctions, carried out under an executive order issued shortly after Trump took office. The revelations also follow Khan's decision to take a leave of absence pending a UN-led investigation into alleged sexual misconduct, an accusation denied by his lawyers. What are the legal risks for Cameron? The ICC, established by the Rome Statute in 2002, is the only permanent international court that prosecutes individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. It has 125 signatories, including the UK and all EU countries, though Hungary has officially begun the withdrawal process. Leading international law experts have told Middle East Eye that Cameron's behaviour is an attack on judicial independence, and is prohibited under the Rome Statute and British law as an obstruction of justice. Professor Tom Dannenbaum of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy said that, in general, the UK is entitled to withdraw from the ICC, and, upon exit, would then cease its financial contribution. Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » Additionally, as a state party to the Rome Statute, the UK can advocate budget cuts within the Assembly of States Parties, the court's governing body, without having to pull out. But, he said, the issue here arises before any such withdrawal or defunding. "The problem here is David Cameron's reported threat to condition possible UK action or inaction in those respects on the decisions of the ICC Prosecutor regarding whom to investigate and prosecute," said Dannenbaum. "That threat is deeply concerning. The rule of law depends on prosecutors' insulation from political pressure in their identification of individuals for investigation and prosecution,. That is true at the ICC just as it is in domestic systems of criminal justice." Under what law could Cameron be charged? The four experts MEE spoke to said the ICC could charge Cameron, given the nature of the phone call with Khan, based on Article 70 of the Rome Statute, which prohibits offences against the administration of justice. These include "impeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties; and retaliating against an official of the Court on account of duties performed by that or another official." Dannenbaum argued that Cameron's threat to withdraw the UK from the ICC and defund the court may amount to "corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of … persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties". Although this particular provision has never been litigated before the ICC, Dannenbaum said, the relevant offence of "corruptly influencing a witness" has. "That case law indicates that 'corruptly influencing' includes 'pressuring' the protected person in a way 'capable of influencing the nature' of their contribution and thereby 'compromising' it, with the term 'corruptly' signifying the aim of 'contaminating' the person's contribution," Dannenbaum explained. "Per the reported dialogue, David Cameron clearly seeks to pressure the ICC Prosecutor's decision regarding whether to pursue warrants for Israeli officials. It is possible that this pressure would be understood to have been designed to 'contaminate' the Prosecutor's decision, although that concept may be less clear here than it is in the context of witness testimony. "Considerations regarding state withdrawal and budget cuts are plausibly 'capable' of influencing such decisions, albeit that the Prosecutor appears to have resisted the pressure in the case at hand." Given the above points, Dannenbaum concluded that Cameron's conduct may be consistent with the prohibited offences against the administration of justice listed under Article 70. The court has jurisdiction over Article 70 offences, irrespective of the nationality or location of the accused. What penalty could Cameron face? If successfully charged, Cameron is likely to face an arrest warrant by the court and, if convicted, could be sentenced to up to five years of imprisonment in The Hague or a fine. However, given the vulnerability of the ICC, with Trump's sanctions and Khan's leave of absence, Vasiliev suggested that Cameron's prosecution in The Hague would be "rather unlikely. "The ICC could in principle open the investigation into these allegations under Article 70 or request the UK to do so (or the UK could do so on its own). Whether this will in fact be done, is a big question." Could Cameron be prosecuted in the UK? Toby Cadman, a British barrister and international law expert, said that if the allegations are substantiated by clear evidence, then Cameron could be investigated at an international and domestic level "provided there's political will". Francesca Albanese: David Cameron could be criminally liable for threatening ICC Read More » In the UK, an investigation could be opened for the common law offence of obstruction or perverting the course of justice or the common law offence of misconduct in public offence, he said. An investigation in the UK can be carried out in accordance with Section 54 of the ICC Act 2001, which is based on Article 70 of the Rome Statute. The attorney general's consent would be required for any prosecution to go ahead. "It is quite clear that the allegation is serious and if the UK is committed to maintaining a system based on the rule of law with full respect for the state's international treaty obligations it should open an investigation and if the evidence supports it, bring charges," Cadman told MEE. Could Cameron be prosecuted outside the UK? But Vasiliev suggested that Cameron's prosecution before the courts of other states would be precluded by his functional immunity - the protection granted to senior officials if an alleged offence was committed during their official duties. "Cameron has a functional immunity for that act as he uttered those threats in the exercise of his official functions, and there is no exception to such immunity applicable in foreign courts for offences against the integrity of judicial system," Vasiliev argued. "The prosecution authorities of other states parties therefore will not eagerly pursue such a case."

'Shameful': Humza Yousaf slams David Cameron for threatening ICC over Israel probe
'Shameful': Humza Yousaf slams David Cameron for threatening ICC over Israel probe

Middle East Eye

time2 days ago

  • Middle East Eye

'Shameful': Humza Yousaf slams David Cameron for threatening ICC over Israel probe

Former Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf has heavily criticised David Cameron after Middle East Eye revealed on Monday that the former UK foreign secretary privately threatened to defund and withdraw from the International Criminal Court if it issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. Cameron, then foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, made the threat in April 2024 in a heated phone call with Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor of the court. "It is shameful that Lord Cameron allegedly threatened the ICC for having the audacity to do their job," Yousaf, who was the Scottish first minister when Cameron made the threat, told MEE on Tuesday in a significant intervention. "He should immediately come clean and apologise if this was indeed the case." Cameron, a former British prime minister, was appointed foreign secretary by then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in November 2023. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Yousaf, a member of the Scottish National Party, served as Scotland's first minister from March 2023 to May 2024. He strongly opposed the Conservative government's support for Israel's bombardment of Gaza and called for an arms embargo on Israel in February 2024. 'Hypocrisy' Members of his wife's family were in Gaza when the war began in October 2023. Yousaf told MEE on Tuesday: "These revelations show that the UK Government, under both the Conservatives and Labour, are complicit in the atrocities we are witnessing in Gaza." 'It is shameful that Lord Cameron allegedly threatened the ICC for having the audacity to do their job' - Humza Yousaf, former Scottish first minister MEE reported on Monday that Cameron told the ICC prosecutor over the phone on 23 April 2024 that the UK would 'defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute' if the ICC issued warrants for Israeli leaders. Khan replied that 'if this were to occur then we would have to accept that the rules-based system would be dead'. MEE revealed details of the call based on information from a number of sources – including former staff in Khan's office familiar with the conversation and who have seen the minutes of the meeting. Yousaf said: "Successive UK governments, including when Lord Cameron was prime minister, would often publicly lecture other governments on the importance of international law, while it seems privately content to undermine the equal application of the law. "That is hypocrisy of the highest order." Cameron told Khan applying for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant would be 'like dropping a hydrogen bomb'. Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » He said Khan was 'on the brink of making a huge mistake" and that "the world is not ready for this". According to MEE's sources, the foreign secretary spoke aggressively and repeatedly shouted over Khan, who had to ask to be able to complete his points. "The ICC should operate free from political pressure and influence," Yousaf told MEE. "Given the scenes of starvation, death and destruction we are witnessing in Gaza, we should be applauding the ICC for not bowing to pressure from those who publicly purport to support international human rights law, but work behind the scenes to undermine it." Yousaf's criticism of Cameron, who currently sits as a Conservative peer in the House of Lords, comes as several British MPs criticised the former prime minister. Approached by MEE for a response to the exchange with Cameron, Karim Khan said: 'I have no comment to make at this time.' The British Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office declined to comment and Cameron did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

British MPs react to 'shocking' MEE report of Cameron threatening ICC over Israel probe
British MPs react to 'shocking' MEE report of Cameron threatening ICC over Israel probe

Middle East Eye

time2 days ago

  • Middle East Eye

British MPs react to 'shocking' MEE report of Cameron threatening ICC over Israel probe

Several British parliamentarians have responded to Middle East Eye's revelation on Monday that the former UK foreign secretary privately threatened to defund and withdraw from the International Criminal Court if it issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. David Cameron, then foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, made the threat in April 2024 in a heated phone call with Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor of the court. Asked about Cameron's threat, Emily Thornberry, a senior Labour MP and the chair of parliament's foreign affairs select committee, told MEE: "I've always believed that when making difficult decisions, international law must always be our guide." Labour MP Naz Shah called the news "shocking" and said she would be "raising this matter directly" with the Foreign Office. "No rules-based system can function with legitimacy if it does not apply the rules equally," she told MEE. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Cameron told Khan over the phone on 23 April 2024 that the UK would 'defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute' if the ICC issued warrants for Israeli leaders. Khan replied that 'if this were to occur then we would have to accept that the rules-based system would be dead'. Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » This week MEE revealed details of the call based on information from a number of sources – including former staff in Khan's office familiar with the conversation and who have seen the minutes of the meeting. Cameron, a former British prime minister who was appointed foreign secretary by Sunak in November 2023, told Khan that applying for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant would be 'like dropping a hydrogen bomb'. He said Khan was 'on the brink of making a huge mistake" and that "the world is not ready for this". According to MEE's sources, the foreign secretary spoke aggressively and repeatedly shouted over Khan, who had to ask to be able to complete his points. Approached by MEE for a response to the exchange with Cameron, Karim Khan said: 'I have no comment to make at this time.' The British Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office declined to comment. Cameron, who currently sits as a Conservative peer in the House of Lords, did not respond to multiple requests for comment. 'Cameron must be investigated' Labour MP Kim Johnson told MEE: "This revelation is a damning indictment of the previous Conservative government's disregard for international law." She added: "This Labour government must urgently and unequivocally distance itself from this position. "It must reaffirm its commitment to the ICC and uphold its rulings, including the arrest warrants that the previous foreign secretary sought to undermine." Labour MP Zarah Sultana said on social media platform X that "David Cameron — and every UK minister complicit in arming and enabling Israel's genocide in Gaza - must be investigated for war crimes." David Cameron — and every UK minister complicit in arming and enabling Israel's genocide in Gaza — must be investigated for war crimes. — Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) June 9, 2025 Less than a month after the call with Cameron, Khan announced that he was seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-defence minister, Yoav Gallant, as well as for Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh and Mohammed Deif. Independent MP Ayoub Khan called for a parliamentary investigation into MEE's report. He said that "political influence must never be allowed to shape judicial outcomes. The parliamentary Code of Conduct is unequivocal on this point, and rightly so." He added: "If these allegations are accurate, they represent not just a breach of that code but a breach of public trust and the moral authority of Britain's commitment to international law. "I urge the relevant parliamentary standards committees to investigate this matter with the seriousness it deserves." Former Labour leader and independent MP Jeremy Corbyn told MEE that "not one of the former ministers involved in the last Conservative government has so far supported our call for an inquiry into the UK's complicity in the Gaza genocide. "This shocking revelation could explain why." Zack Polanski, the deputy leader of the Green Party who is standing to be the next leader, added: "It's been clear for all to see that both the former and current government have stood with the oppressors, not the marginalised. "That's why I support Jeremy Corbyn's call for an independent inquiry." Concerning new allegations, which suggest the last foreign secretary tried to shield Israeli leaders from facing justice for war crimes. We need an independent inquiry into the UK's role in the Gaza — Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP (@BellRibeiroAddy) June 9, 2025 Independent MP Iqbal Mohamed said: "If Lord Cameron did in fact issue such a threat, it would represent a grave lapse in judgement and a betrayal of our commitment to justice and international law. "These allegations deserve urgent and transparent scrutiny in Parliament." Independent MP Shockat Adam added that "it is outrageous for ministers to interfere in the workings of the international justice system - particularly as the UK is one of its main architects." On 10 June 2024 the Conservative government filed an objection to Khan's application to the ICC, arguing that the court did not have jurisdiction over Israeli nationals – a position the Israeli government has held for years. The next month, Keir Starmer's newly elected Labour government announced it would drop the objection. The ICC issued the warrants that November. Sanctioned by the US Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy said on social media platform X that the report about Cameron's threat was "concerning" and backed calls for an "independent inquiry into the UK's role in the Gaza genocide". Scottish National Party MP Chris Law said on X: "Shocking that the UK Tory govt tried to undermine the International Criminal Court for investigating those responsible for war crimes in Gaza. "However not seeing much better under Labour." Shocking that the UK Tory govt tried to undermine the International Criminal Court for investigating those responsible for war crimes in Gaza. However not seeing much better under Labour #GazaGenocide‌ — Chris Law MP (@ChrisLawSNP) June 9, 2025 As of February, Khan has been sanctioned by US President Donald Trump because of the arrest warrants issued for Netanyahu and Gallant. The prosecutor has had his US visa revoked and his wife and children have been banned from travelling to the US. His bank accounts have been frozen in the UK. The warrants for Israeli leaders are currently in the hands of two deputy prosecutors. Last Thursday, the US imposed further sanctions on four ICC judges whom it accused of being involved in 'illegitimate actions targeting the United States and Israel'. Neither the US nor Israel are parties to the Rome Statute and have long rejected the authority of the court. In a statement, the ICC said it deplored the sanctions against Khan and the four judges. It said it stood fully behind its personnel and would continue its work undeterred. The court recently ordered that any further warrants issued in relation to its Palestine investigation cannot be publicised.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store