
Explained: How Gender Divide Is Affecting Voting Behaviour In GenZ
Berlin:
South Korea's young women are expected to lead a broad political backlash against the main conservative party at presidential elections on June 3, punishing it for months of chaos.
Multitudes of young men, though, are unlikely to join them.
In democracies worldwide, a political gender divide is intensifying among Gen Z voters, with young men voting for right-wing parties and young women leaning left, a break from pre-pandemic years when both tended to vote for progressives.
Recent elections spanning North America, Europe and Asia show this trend is either consolidating or accelerating, with angry, frustrated men in their 20s breaking to the right.
First-time South Korean voter Lee Jeong-min is one of them.
He says he will vote for the right-wing Reform Party's candidate, Lee Jun-seok, on June 3. Lee, the candidate, vows to shut down the ministry of gender equality, speaking to an issue that resonates with men like Lee, the voter, who particularly resents that only men have to do military service.
"As a young man, I find this to be one of the most unfair realities of living in Korea. At the prime of their youth - at 21 or 22 years old - young men, unlike their female peers, are unable to fully engage in various activities in society because they have to serve 18 months in the military."
In South Korea, almost 30% of men aged 18-29 plan to back the Reform Party compared with just 3% of young women, according to a Gallup Korea poll this month.
Overall, more than half of the men back right-wing parties while almost half the women want the left-wing Democratic Party candidate to win. The divergence shrinks for older age groups.
Political economist Soohyun Lee, of King's College London, said many young South Korean men felt unable to meet society's expectations: find a good job, get married, buy a home and start a family.
And they blame feminism, many believing that women are preferred for jobs. With negligible immigration in South Korea, Lee said, "women become the convenient scapegoat".
Angry Young Men
In South Korea and other democracies, Gen Z men are seeing an erosion of their relative advantage, especially since the pandemic -- to the point where in a few countries the gender pay gap among 20-somethings favours young women.
EU data shows one of them is France, where men aged 18-34 voted in larger numbers for Marine le Pen's far-right party than women in last year's legislative elections.
In the UK, where more young men than women vote conservative, males aged 16-24 are more likely to be neither employed, nor in education than female counterparts, official data shows.
In the West, young men blame immigration as well as diversity programmes for competition for jobs.
In Germany's general election in February, the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) won a record 20.8% of the vote, tugged along by an undercurrent of support from young men -- though the leader of the party is a woman.
Men aged 18-24 voted 27% for the AfD while young women ran to the other end of the political spectrum, voting 35% for the far-left Linke party, according to official voting data.
"A lot of young men are falling for right-wing propaganda because they're upset, they have the feeling they're losing power," said Molly Lynch, 18, a Berliner who voted for Linke, drawn by its stand on climate change and economic inequality.
"But it's actually losing power over women that wasn't actually equal in the first place."
The gender divide is not restricted to Gen Z, voters born since the mid-to-late 1990s. Millennials, aged in their 30s and early 40s, have felt the winds of change for longer.
In Canada last month, men aged 35-54 voted 50% for opposition conservatives in an election turned upside down by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on his northern neighbour. The Liberals, which had been braced for defeat, rode an anti-Trump wave back to power, thanks in large part to female voters.
"It tends to be men who have a bit more life experience and are now in that situation where they're saying, 'This isn't working out for me and I want change'," said Darrell Bricker, global chief executive of public affairs at polling firm Ipsos.
Nik Nanos, founder of Canadian polling outfit Nanos Research, agreed, saying social media was accelerating democracy's "angry young men symptom", especially in areas where blue collar jobs have dried up.
A Forever War
Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, which promised a manufacturing renaissance and attacked diversity programmes, also resonated with young white and Hispanic men, but turned off young women, fuelling the country's big political gender gap.
Roughly half of men aged 18-29 voted for Trump, while 61% of young women went for his opponent, Kamala Harris. Young Black voters of both genders still overwhelmingly backed Harris.
In Australia, which went to the polls this month, the Gen Z war did not play out at the ballot box. There was no clear divergence, with compulsory voting perhaps helping to explain why radicalised gender politics have not taken root.
"It tends to iron out extreme ideas, ideologies," said political scientist Intifar Chowdury of Australian National University.
So how does the Gen Z war end?
Pollsters said it could drag on unless governments addressed core issues such as home affordability and precarious employment. One cited young men's health as another policy challenge, especially high suicide rates.
Lee, of King's College, said the divide could make consensus on over-arching tax and welfare reforms harder to achieve.
"If the future generation is ever so divided along the lines of gender and then refuses to engage with each other to build social consensus, I do not think we can successfully tackle these huge issues," she said.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
South Korea elects its next President: What to know
South Koreans vote Tuesday to elect their next president and end months of leadership tumult that have followed the country's short-lived imposition of martial law late last year. The winner of the snap election will determine how Seoul will approach trade talks with Washington, tensions with Beijing and a bellicose Pyongyang. In recent months, South Korea has cycled through three different acting presidents. The partisan divide in South Korea is so rancorous that the front-runner, the leftist Lee Jae-myung, has delivered speeches in a bulletproof vest behind bulletproof glass, an unusual move for a politician in the country. Why a snap election? Former President Yoon Suk Yeol, a conservative, shocked South Korea by invoking emergency powers on Dec. 3, arguing that the country was vulnerable to 'communist forces." The move backfired, resulting in Yoon's impeachment, indictment for insurrection and removal from office on April 4. That kick-started a 60-day snap election campaign. Yoon, who took office in 2022 and left about two years before the end of his term, oversaw a flourishing of ties with the U.S., a revival of cooperation with Japan and heightened confrontation with North Korea—hallmarks of South Korean conservatism. South Korean presidents serve a single, five-year term. The candidate with the most votes wins. Who is running? The 61-year-old Lee enjoys a double-digit lead over his rivals, with his support at around 49%, according to Gallup Korea polling. He is a former provincial governor, parliamentarian and head of the Democratic Party. He is South Korea's most popular—and divisive—politician. He narrowly lost the 2022 presidential election to Yoon. In his second try, Lee has backed some elements of Yoon's foreign-policy approach, such as expanding the U.S. alliance and working with Japan. But he does say South Korea shouldn't exclude or antagonize China or Russia, suggesting more balance with the U.S. Kim Moon-soo, the nominee from the main conservative People Power Party, served as Yoon's labor minister. He was the only member of Yoon's cabinet who initially refused to apologize for the martial-law declaration. Kim, 73, has since expressed regret. His support sits at around 36%, Gallup Korea says. What are the key issues? The race has largely become a referendum on martial law and its fallout, and the ruling conservatives haven't made a clean break from Yoon. A strong majority of South Koreans say in polls they want a change in national leadership. Supporters of Kim Moon-soo, who appears on a screen in the top right of the image, wave flags during an election campaign rally in Seoul. Lee has said he won't rush trade talks with the U.S.; Kim has vowed to push for an immediate summit with President Trump on tariffs if elected. Trump could also apply pressure to the next president to share more of the cost of the U.S. troops stationed in South Korea. The U.S. president could also restart denuclearization talks with North Korea. Rising tensions with China will also likely be a challenge for the next president. Beijing has irritated Seoul recently by installing observation buoys in the Yellow Sea near the two countries' shared maritime border. Write to Timothy W. Martin at


The Hindu
38 minutes ago
- The Hindu
South Koreans vote for new President in wake of Yoon's ouster over martial law
Millions of South Koreans are voting Tuesday (May 3, 2025) for a new President in a snap election triggered by the ouster of Yoon Suk Yeol, a conservative who now faces an explosive trial on rebellion charges over his short-lived imposition of martial law in December. Pre-election surveys suggested Mr. Yoon's liberal archrival, Lee Jae-myung, appeared headed for an easy win, riding on deep public frustration over the conservatives in the wake of Mr. Yoon's martial law debacle. The main conservative candidate, Kim Moon Soo, has struggled to win over moderate, swing voters as his People Power Party remains in a quagmire of internal feuding over how to view Mr. Yoon's actions. This election serves as another defining moment in the country's resilient democracy, but observers worry a domestic divide worsened by Mr. Yoon is far from over and could pose a big political burden on the new President. The past six months saw large crowds of people rallying in the streets to either denounce or support Mr. Yoon, while a leadership vacuum caused by Mr. Yoon's impeachment and ensuing formal dismissal rattled the country's high-level diplomatic activities and financial markets. The winning candidate will immediately be sworn in as President on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) for a single, full term of five years without the typical two-month transition period. The new President will face major challenges, including a slowing economy, President Donald Trump's America-first policies and North Korea's evolving nuclear threats. The election commission says voting began at 6 a.m. (GMT +0900 hrs) at 14,295 polling stations nationwide that will close at 8 p.m.. Observers say the winner could emerge as early as midnight. Mr. Lee, whose Democratic Party led the legislative effort to oust Mr. Yoon, has emerged as the clear front-runner in opinion surveys released in recent weeks. In a Facebook posting on Tuesday (June 3, 2025), Mr. Lee called for voters to "deliver a stern and resolute judgement" against the conservatives following the months of political turmoil. Around 2.5 million people had cast their ballots nationwide as of 8 a.m., the National Election Commission said. More than 15 million people had already voted during a two-day early voting period last week, accounting for nearly 35% of the country's 44.4 million eligible voters. Final pitches made by rival candidates In his final campaign speeches Monday (June 2, 2025), Mr. Lee promised to revitalise the economy, reduce inequality and ease national divisions. He urged the people to vote for him, arguing that a win by Mr. Kim would allow Mr. Yoon's "rebellion forces" to return. "If they somehow win, that would mean the return of the rebellion forces, the destruction of democracy, the deprival of people's human rights, the normalisation of martial law and our country's downfall into a backward, third-world nation," Mr. Lee told the crowd gathered at a Seoul park. Mr. Kim, a former Labour Minister under Mr. Yoon, warned that a Lee win would allow him to wield excessive power, launch political retaliation against opponents and legislate laws to protect him from various legal troubles, as his party already controls parliament. Mr. Lee "is now trying to seize all power in South Korea and establish a Hitler-like dictatorship," Mr. Kim told a rally in the southeastern city of Busan. Lee's positions would impact nation's direction Mr. Lee, who led the opposition-led campaign to oust Mr. Yoon, has been a highly divisive figure in South Korean politics for years. As a former child labourer known for his inspirational rags-to-riches story, Mr. Lee came to fame through biting criticism of the country's conservative establishment and calls to build a more assertive South Korea in foreign policy. That rhetoric has given him an image as someone who can institute sweeping reforms and fix the country's deep-seated economic inequality and corruption. His critics view him as a dangerous populist who relies on political division and backpedals on promises too easily. On foreign policy, Mr. Lee has not made any contentious remarks recently and has steadfastly vowed to pursue pragmatic diplomacy. He has called South Korea's alliance with the U.S. the foundation of its foreign policy and promised to solidify a trilateral Seoul-Washington-Tokyo partnership, a stance that is not much different from the position held by South Korea's conservatives. Experts say there aren't many diplomatic options for South Korea as it tries to address Mr. Trump's tariff hikes and calls for South Korea to pay more for the cost of the U.S. military presence, as well as North Korea's headlong pursuit of nuclear weapons. Experts say that has made both Mr. Lee and Mr. Kim avoid unveiling ambitious foreign policy goals. Mr. Lee's government still could become engaged in "a little bit of friction" with the Trump administration, while Mr. Kim's government, which prioritise relations with Washington, will likely offer more concessions to the US, said Chung Jin-young, a former dean of the Graduate School of Pan-Pacific International Studies at South Korea's Kyung Hee University. Chung predicted Mr. Lee won't be able to pursue overly drastic steps on foreign policy and security, given the country's foreign exchange and financial markets are very vulnerable to such changes. Mr. Lee has preached patience over Mr. Trump's tariff policy, arguing it would be a mistake to rush negotiations in pursuit of an early agreement with Washington. Mr. Kim has said he would meet Mr. Trump as soon as possible. On Monday (June 2, 2025), South Korean trade officials held an emergency meeting to discuss a response to Mr. Trump's announcement that the U.S. will raise tariffs on steel and aluminium products to 50% beginning June 4. South Korea's central bank last week sharply lowered its 2025 growth outlook to 0.8%, citing the potential impact of Mr. Trump's tariff hikes and weak domestic demand worsened by the political turmoil of past months. Prospects for improved North Korea relations are unclear Relations with North Korea remain badly strained since 2019, with the North focused on expanding its nuclear arsenal while refusing dialogues with South Korea and the US. Since his second term began in January, Mr. Trump has repeatedly expressed his intent to resume diplomacy with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, but Mr. Kim has so far ignored the offer while making Russia his priority in foreign policy. Mr. Lee, who wants warmer ties with North Korea, recently acknowledged it would be "very difficult" to realise a summit with Mr. Kim Jong Un anytime soon. Mr. Lee said he would support Mr. Trump's push to restart talks with Mr. Kim Jong Un, which he believed would eventually allow South Korea to be involved in some projects in North Korea. Foreign policy strategists for Mr. Lee understand there isn't much South Korea can do to bring about a denuclearisation of North Korea, said Paik Wooyeal, a professor at Seoul's Yonsei University. He said Mr. Lee also doesn't share the Korean nationalistic zeal held by ex-liberal President Moon Jae-in, who met Mr. Kim Jong Un three times during his 2017-22 term.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
South Koreans vote for new president in wake of Yoon's ouster over martial law
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Millions of South Koreans are voting Tuesday for a new president in a snap election triggered by the ouster of Yoon Suk Yeol, a conservative who now faces an explosive trial on rebellion charges over his short-lived imposition of martial law in surveys suggested Yoon's liberal archrival, Lee Jae-myung, appeared headed for an easy win, riding on deep public frustration over the conservatives in the wake of Yoon's martial law main conservative candidate, Kim Moon Soo, has struggled to win over moderate, swing voters as his People Power Party remains in a quagmire of internal feuding over how to view Yoon's election serves as another defining moment in the country's resilient democracy, but observers worry a domestic divide worsened by Yoon is far from over and could pose a big political burden on the new past six months saw large crowds of people rallying in the streets to either denounce or support Yoon, while a leadership vacuum caused by Yoon's impeachment and ensuing formal dismissal rattled the country's high-level diplomatic activities and financial winning candidate will immediately be sworn in as president Wednesday for a single, full term of five years without the typical two-month transition period. The new president will face major challenges, including a slowing economy, President Donald Trump 's America-first policies and North Korea's evolving nuclear election commission says voting began at 6 am (GMT +0900 hrs) at 14,295 polling stations nationwide that will close at 8 pm. Observers say the winner could emerge as early as whose Democratic Party led the legislative effort to oust Yoon, has emerged as the clear front-runner in opinion surveys released in recent weeks. In a Facebook posting on Tuesday, Lee called for voters to "deliver a stern and resolute judgement" against the conservatives following the months of political 2.5 million people had cast their ballots nationwide as of 8 am, the National Election Commission said. More than 15 million people had already voted during a two-day early voting period last week, accounting for nearly 35% of the country's 44.4 million eligible pitches made by rival candidatesIn his final campaign speeches Monday, Lee promised to revitalise the economy, reduce inequality and ease national divisions. He urged the people to vote for him, arguing that a win by Kim would allow Yoon's "rebellion forces" to return."If they somehow win, that would mean the return of the rebellion forces, the destruction of democracy, the deprival of people's human rights, the normalisation of martial law and our country's downfall into a backward, third-world nation," Lee told the crowd gathered at a Seoul a former labour minister under Yoon, warned that a Lee win would allow him to wield excessive power, launch political retaliation against opponents and legislate laws to protect him from various legal troubles, as his party already controls "is now trying to seize all power in South Korea and establish a Hitler-like dictatorship," Kim told a rally in the southeastern city of positions would impact nation's directionLee, who led the opposition-led campaign to oust Yoon, has been a highly divisive figure in South Korean politics for a former child labourer known for his inspirational rags-to-riches story, Lee came to fame through biting criticism of the country's conservative establishment and calls to build a more assertive South Korea in foreign policy. That rhetoric has given him an image as someone who can institute sweeping reforms and fix the country's deep-seated economic inequality and critics view him as a dangerous populist who relies on political division and backpedals on promises too foreign policy, Lee has not made any contentious remarks recently and has steadfastly vowed to pursue pragmatic diplomacy. He has called South Korea's alliance with the US the foundation of its foreign policy and promised to solidify a trilateral Seoul-Washington-Tokyo partnership, a stance that is not much different than the position held by South Korea's say there aren't many diplomatic options for South Korea as it tries to address Trump's tariff hikes and calls for South Korea to pay more for the cost of the US military presence, as well as North Korea's headlong pursuit of nuclear weapons. Experts say that has made both Lee and Kim avoid unveiling ambitious foreign policy government still could become engaged in "a little bit of friction" with the Trump administration, while Kim's government, which prioritise relations with Washington, will likely offer more concessions to the US, said Chung Jin-young, a former dean of the Graduate School of Pan-Pacific International Studies at South Korea's Kyung Hee University Chung predicted Lee won't be able to pursue overly drastic steps on foreign policy and security, given the country's foreign exchange and financial markets are very vulnerable to such has preached patience over Trump's tariff policy, arguing it would be a mistake to rush negotiations in pursuit of an early agreement with Washington. Kim has said he would meet Trump as soon as Monday, South Korean trade officials held an emergency meeting to discuss a response to Trump's announcement that the US will raise tariffs on steel and aluminium products to 50% beginning June Korea' s central bank last week sharply lowered its 2025 growth outlook to 0.8%, citing the potential impact of Trump's tariff hikes and weak domestic demand worsened by the political turmoil of past for improved North Korea relations are unclearRelations with North Korea remain badly strained since 2019, with the North focused on expanding its nuclear arsenal while refusing dialogues with South Korea and the his second term began in January, Trump has repeatedly expressed his intent to resume diplomacy with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, but Kim has so far ignored the offer while making Russia his priority in foreign who wants warmer ties with North Korea, recently acknowledged it would be "very difficult" to realise a summit with Kim Jong Un anytime soon. Lee said he would support Trump's push to restart talks with Kim Jong Un, which he believed would eventually allow South Korea to be involved in some projects in North policy strategists for Lee understand there isn't much South Korea can do to bring about a denuclearisation of North Korea, said Paik Wooyeal, a professor at Seoul's Yonsei said Lee also doesn't share the Korean nationalistic zeal held by ex-liberal President Moon Jae-in, who met Kim Jong Un three times during his 2017-22 term.