Someone paid $2,138 for a reservation at a French Quarter restaurant. Should this be outlawed?
Getty Images
People are buying and selling table reservations at iconic New Orleans eateries for eye-popping amounts via third-party websites, often without the restaurant's knowledge.
Critics want lawmakers to ban the burgeoning online business they consider a racket, arguing that it undermines the fine-dining experience and could potentially leave restaurants with empty tables. However, proponents of the practice say it benefits both diners and restaurants when done properly.
Some iconic restaurants topped the list during a recent scan of the New Orleans section of Appointment Trader, one of several platforms designed to let people with scheduling conflicts sell highly coveted reservations on the open market. A Saturday night reservation at Brennan's later this month is available for a suggested bid of $235 — a discount compared to the whopping $2,138 someone paid for a four-top at Antoine's during the Super Bowl weekend.
Are those prices based on genuine demand for seating at the restaurants, or is it artificially inflated by technology built to cash in on wealthy tourists desperate to dine in the city's elite culinary corners?
That's a question Louisiana lawmakers will try to answer in the coming months as they consider House Bill 90, sponsored by Rep. Troy Hebert, R-Lafayette. The legislation could ban companies such as Appointment Trader, Dorsia and Wuw Wuw from operating in Louisiana.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Specifically, Hebert's bill prohibits third-party companies from offering or arranging reservations at any restaurants that have not agreed to the service through a contract.
Hebert could not be reached for comment, but the Louisiana Restaurant Association, a trade group that asked Hebert to file the legislation, said it is modeled after similar laws recently enacted in other states such as New York. They all describe the legislation as a measure to prevent 'restaurant reservation fraud.'
Appointment Trader, founded in 2021, lets users buy and sell reservations and appointments of all kinds through auction-style bidding. Sellers can set their own asking prices, and bidders can make offers at any rate. Additionally, prospective buyers can use the platform as a concierge service, offering a fee to any user who can secure them a reservation at a particular establishment.
In its early days, the platform was limited mostly to hotspots such as New York, Los Angeles, Chicago and Las Vegas. It has since gained popularity and expanded into smaller markets including New Orleans and virtually anywhere else one has a reservation they want to sell. As of Thursday, the platform had clocked over $6 million in trades within the last 12 months.
In a phone interview, Louisiana Restaurant Association spokeswoman Wendy Waren said platforms like Appointment Trader are selling reservations without the restaurants' permission or knowledge. If no one buys the reservations, tables just sit empty, which can cause seating delays or prevent genuine customers from getting a reservation and actually bringing business to the restaurant, she said.
'It creates artificial scarcity,' Waren said. 'It's like somebody's hijacking the process.'
'Our backs are really against the wall': New Orleans restaurants brace for new tariffs
New York hospitality trade groups have accused the platforms of using software bots to snap up reservations and sell them on what they call a 'black market.'
Appointment Trader founder Jonas Frey said he is just trying to solve a problem with a legitimate service that can benefit all parties, particularly the restaurants. The 37-year-old software engineer is a German immigrant who came to the U.S. five years ago and came up with the idea for his platform while waiting in a long line at his local motor vehicles office in Las Vegas. He now lives in Miami with his wife and is serious about maintaining legitimacy on his platform, he said.
'I've basically lived in a computer all my life, and nothing gives me more joy — well almost nothing — than when thousands of people use the software I built to solve a problem in their life,' Frey said.
In phone interviews this week, Frey explained how users on his platform must sell at least half of the reservations that they post or risk account suspension. This prevents people from trying to book all the available tables and hoard them to create artificial demand. Also, the free-market style platform means that unsold reservations put downward pressure on the prices in a given area, he said.
The app is still quite new in the New Orleans market as there have only been a handful of transactions, so the current 90-day average bid prices have been skewed by reservations sold during special events such as the Super Bowl. Frey said those 'one-offs' are not the norm.
In a market such as New Orleans, diners can typically get reservations without paying if it's a normal weekend, but it can be next-to-impossible at certain restaurants in other cities. Reservation trading lets people sell valuable bookings that they, for whatever reason, can't use or no longer want,
When someone has a coveted reservation but a scheduling conflict prevents them from using it, they might not bother calling to cancel, leading to what restaurants call 'no-show reservations.'
Just a few no-shows can disrupt a restaurant's operations and cost it thousands in lost sales. Approximately 28% of American diners have admitted to ghosting on their reservations, according to a 2021 OpenTable survey.
'Wouldn't it be better for everyone if you could just resell it?' Frey asked.
Lisa Blount, director of marketing for Antoine's, said she's all in favor of entrepreneurs figuring out new ways to make money in the restaurant industry. She's less worried about no-shows because Antoine's requires credit cards to make reservations, but she does have a few other concerns.
At Antoine's and other fine dining eateries, the staff take a lot of time to learn about their customers when they make a reservation, Blount said. They might be on a tight schedule, have diet restrictions or could be visiting for a special occasion. This kind of information allows the restaurant to make preparations with food ordering, shift scheduling and other arrangements.
'There's a lot more to coming to our restaurant than just buying a ticket,' Blount said. 'We try to know a lot about you before you even get in the door.'
Blount said she worries that trading or selling reservations to unknown customers could stymie a restaurant's ability to offer its best level of service. She also said she hates the idea of an unwitting customer paying for a reservation and then showing up and seeing empty tables because it turned out to be a slow evening. The customer would feel scammed, and it could damage the restaurant's reputation, she said.
Still, Blount said she's open to the concept of reservation trading if there are ways to control for those kinds of issues.
Frey said he is actively trying to partner with restaurants to make the app better for all parties. His platform currently takes a 30% cut of each transaction, and he offers partner restaurants an equal share of the net proceeds. So far, Frey said he has not landed any partnership agreements as he tries to keep his company alive through an onslaught of state legislation.
Seafood testers find Shreveport restaurants deceiving customers with foreign shrimp
Bans on reservation trading apps are already in place in New York and Arizona, and a similar bill is currently pending in the Illinois legislature.
Some large corporations could lose a chunk of their business if reservation trading catches on. Restaurant booking platforms such as OpenTable and Resy are free for customers to use. They make money by charging restaurants a fee for every reservation made through their app.
Platforms like Appointment Trader threaten to disrupt the online booking sector by flipping that business model on its head. Under Frey's partnership model, restaurants would get paid just to let customers inside.
But all that depends on genuine demand existing in a particular market area.
'There's so many restaurants here,' Blount said from her New Orleans office. 'We're not New York.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
‘The girls are fighting' AOC mocks Trump-Musk break-up
She had her popcorn ready. A smug Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez had a snarky six-word comment for broken-up bros President Trump and former 'First Buddy' Elon Musk. 'Oh man . . . the girls are fighting, aren't they?' the socialist lawmaker gloated in a story she shared to her 9.2 million Instagram followers Friday. Advertisement 3 AOC gloated as she commented on the bromance beak-up. instagram/aoc The gleeful remark, which came outside the US Capitol, was in response to a journalist asking the New York congresswoman for her two cents on the highly public spat. 3 Big, beautiful break up: President Trump and former 'First Buddy' Elon Musk are no longer an item. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement AOC, who previously blasted the once-burgeoning bromance and called Musk 'one of the most unintelligent billionaires I have ever met,' went on to say, 'I told you so.' 'This was something that was a long time coming. . . . These two huge egos were not long for being together in this world as friends,' she mocked. 'We'll see what the impacts of it are legislatively.' 3 The two men engaged in a public spat this week, trading insults on their respective platforms. Getty Images Advertisement AOC previously slammed Trump's big beautiful bill — which is at the center of the feud between the former BFFs. The social media tiff escalated quite quickly this week, after Musk called Trump's budget bill a 'pork-filled . . . abomination,' and the president accused the Tesla CEO of having 'lost his mind.'


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump will ban X for ‘national security' reasons if nasty feud with Elon Musk escalates: AI guru
An influential techie predicts President Trump will ban Elon Musk's X if the feud between the two titans escalates. The bromance came to an abrupt end this week in a very public and ugly way, as both men traded insults on their respective platforms. Now former a former Disney child star turned AI guru says the hostility could lead to a government ban of the social-media platform under national-security pretexts. Advertisement 5 Big, beautiful break-up: the bromance came to an abrupt and ugly end this week. Getty Images 'The President possesses executive authority to declare X a national security risk, which would permit him to ban the platform outright,' said Devan Leos, co-founder of Undetectable AI, a tool embraced by 15 million users which claims to make AI-generated text sound more human. 'Elon's a very smart person – yet he's prone to kind of having these mood swings and going on these campaigns and tirades. I think there's only so much Elon can do before Trump is ultimately going to invoke a show of force,' Leos told The Post. Advertisement 'An executive order is definitely something Trump could do to say, 'hey, I'm the one who's in control, I'm president, I am the commander in chief.'' 5 Former Disney actor Devan Leos co-founded Undetectable AI in 2023. Devan Leos/ Instagram Things spiraled quickly this week, after Musk called Trump's big, beautiful bill a 'pork-filled…abomination,' which led the president to accuse the tech billionaire of having 'lost his mind' and falling victim to 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'Musk now faces a difficult choice. He can ban Trump from X in retaliation, but that would almost certainly trigger an executive response from the White House,' Leos predicted. Advertisement Leos believes Trump could invoke Musk's security clearance – or even the South African-born billionaire's recent claim that Trump is part of the Epstein files – as justification that the Tesla CEO's X rants could pose a national security threat. 5 Before he turned to AI, Leos was most famous for staring in the Disney series 'Mighty Med.' Penske Media via Getty Images 'If there's anything related to that that could be the true, or if he is referencing something that is classified or privileged information, that could be considered a national security threat,' he said. Leos believes the legal framework for a ban already exists, and that Trump would likely invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Advertisement 5 The men traded insults on their respective social media platforms. 5 Things got ugly real quick after Musk's last day in government as part of DOGE a week ago. realDonaldTrump/TruthSocial He also thinks the spat will lead to discussions about regulating social media platforms and their influence on politics. Trump said Friday he has zero interest in speaking to Elon Musk amid their escalating feud.

2 hours ago
Trump's new drone orders aim to counter threats while encouraging flying cars and supersonic flights
WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump wants to counter the threats drones pose to national security under new rules released Friday, while also aiming to make it possible for Americans to fly faster than the speed of sound and expedite the development of the flying cars of the future. The three executive orders will encourage the Federal Aviation Administration to expedite rules to allow companies to use drones beyond their operators' line of sight, while also imposing restrictions meant to help protect against terrorism, espionage and public safety threats. Drones are already used in a variety of ways, including bolstering search and rescue operations, applying fertilizer, inspecting power lines and railroad bridges, and even delivering packages. But the war in Ukraine has highlighted how drones could be used in a military or terrorist attack — a concern as the World Cup and Olympics approach in the U.S. There also have been espionage cases where drones have been used to surveil sensitive sites. And White House officials said drones are being used to smuggle drugs over the border, and there are concerns about the potential for a disastrous collision between a drone and an airliner around an airport. 'These orders also address the growing threat of criminal, terrorist and foreign misuse of drones in U.S. airspace. We have a responsibility to protect and restore airspace sovereignty,' said Michael Kratsios, assistant to the president and director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. With major events like the World Cup scheduled in the U.S. next year, Sebastian Gorka, senior director for counterterrorism on the National Security Council, said it's crucial to protect the airspace above large public events. A federal task force will be created to review drone threats and existing terrorism task forces will look at drones. 'Drones are a disruptive technology. They have an amazing potential for both good and ill,' Gorka said. 'We will increase the enforcement of current laws to deter two types of individuals: evildoers and idiots — the clueless and the careless.' The orders direct the FAA to expedite a new rule restricting drone flights over sensitive sites and work with the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security to better enforce laws on illegal drone use. The FAA has been testing systems to detect and counter drones that the White House would like to expand to deal with threats to public safety and national security. Among the methods being examined: Using radio signals to jam drones or force them to land. Authorities are weighing whether to deploy high-powered microwaves or laser beams to disable the devices. The order will allow state and local authorities to be trained to respond to unauthorized drones and expand the government's ability to counter them. The NFL praised that move because all of the league's games outside the Super Bowl are protected only by local and state officials, and an increasing number of drones have violated their airspace. Law enforcement agencies also may receive additional training on how to use drones themselves to ensure safety around major events. One of Trump's orders directs the FAA to eliminate the 1973 speed restriction that prohibits flights over Mach 1 and replace it with a noise standard. New technology in supersonic aircraft can allow the planes to fly faster than the speed of sound without a disruptive sonic boom being heard on the ground, but the regulations still ban those flights over land. A plane developed by Boom Supersonic became the first independently funded jet to break the sound barrier this year. 'The reality is that Americans should be able to fly from New York to LA in under four hours,' Kratsios said. 'Advances in aerospace engineering, material science and noise reduction now make overland supersonic flight not just possible, but safe, sustainable and commercially viable.' Blake Scholl, founder and CEO of Boom Supersonic, said a renaissance in supersonic passenger travel is made inevitable with the repeal of the ban. 'We're grateful to President Trump for his leadership — this important step allows us to accelerate development of our Overture supersonic airliner,' Scholl said. Several companies are also developing flying cars for use as taxis and delivering cargo. They are likely still at least a couple of years away from being ready, but orders are designed to remove regulatory barriers to their development. 'Flying cars are not just for 'The Jetsons.' They're also for the American people,' Kratsios said. The executive orders don't ban Chinese-made drones, including those by DJI that are popular in the U.S., but the Trump administration said it will prioritize American-made drones in federal procurement programs and open up grants to help state and local first responders buy U.S. drones. The White House said it would seek to reduce the U.S. reliance on foreign-made drones and restrict foreign devices in sensitive areas. 'This executive order marks a long-overdue investment in drone deterrence,' said Craig Singleton, a senior China fellow at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 'Drone warfare isn't a future threat — it's already here.' The administration also is mandating national security reviews of some Chinese drone makers. That 'underscores that drone supply chains ... are now national security flashpoints,' Singleton said. The orders also tighten rules on wireless transmission tech, which Singleton said would disrupt the ability of Chinese drones to transmit data back to Beijing. States and the federal government are increasingly wary about Chinese technology. At least six states and Congress have passed laws to restrict government purchases of Chinese drones because of concerns about spying. That's part of a slew of more than 240 anti-China measures state legislatures have considered this year. But most commercial drones sold in the United States are made in China, and many Americans have come to rely on them. The Chinese models are widely known for their high performance and are generally significantly cheaper than American-made drones. The FAA has generally prohibited drones from operating outside operators' line of sight because of safety concerns, but the agency has granted hundreds of waivers to Amazon and some other companies, including utilities and railroads, to use drones farther away. Drone manufacturers and users have long wanted rules that spell out the framework for such flights because they see that as a natural next step to unlock the technology's potential. The head of the trade advocacy group Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International, or AUVSI, testified to Congress this week that the FAA missed a deadline for approving such rules last year. On Friday, Michael Robbins, chief executive officer of AUVSI, applauded the Trump administration for advancing policies that he said would ensure U.S. leadership in drone innovation, security, operation and manufacturing. He called it 'a historic day for the drone industry in the United States.'