Opinion - Modern tech is making it harder and harder to get away with crimes
In the 2002 film 'Minority Report,' starring Tom Cruise and directed by Steven Spielberg, society has developed a system called 'Pre-crime,' where a trio of psychics predict murders before they happen. Law enforcement acts on these visions, apprehending would-be perpetrators and preventing crimes before they ever occur.
While the story raises ethical and philosophical questions about free will and due process, it also presents a provocative vision of a world where violent crime is virtually eliminated through early intervention.
We don't have psychics foreseeing crimes today, but modern technology is quickly closing the gap between when a crime is committed and when the offender is identified. Cutting-edge tools — such as automated license plate readers, networked video surveillance, drones, forensic analysis and advanced artificial intelligence platforms capable of rapidly ingesting and analyzing large volumes of data — are revolutionizing public safety.
We are standing on the verge of a new era where committing a crime without being identified and caught is increasingly difficult. If the likelihood of being apprehended continues to rise, could this change the calculus for potential criminals? And if so, how might it reshape criminal behavior?
Today's law enforcement environment is evolving rapidly thanks to the integration of several key technologies.
Automated license plate readers capture and store data from passing vehicles, helping to solve crimes ranging from car thefts to violent felonies. In many cases, hits by license plate readers provide the first solid lead in an investigation, allowing law enforcement to quickly connect suspects to crime scenes.
High-definition closed-circuit camera networks, increasingly supplemented by drone deployments, offer real-time situational awareness. Drones, particularly in first-responder programs, can arrive at scenes faster than ground units, providing live video feeds to responding officers and investigators.
Gunshot detection systems and other environmental sensors alert authorities the instant an incident occurs. The integration of this data into real-time crime centers helps officers respond to crimes in progress and identify patterns across jurisdictions.
Artificial intelligence and machine learning platforms are revolutionizing investigations by automating the analysis of massive volumes of data — from surveillance video to license plate records to social media. These tools can detect patterns and generate leads in minutes, not days.
A recent example illustrating the power of this technological convergence is the case of Luigi Mangione. In December 2024, law enforcement arrested Mangione for the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, highlighting the power of public surveillance and community engagement.
Despite attempts to conceal his identity with a mask, the clarity of the footage from various cameras that caught images of Mangione before and after the murder made identification and capture possible. This case exemplifies how the integration of real-time camera networks, public alerts and the human element of recognition accelerates apprehension timelines, reinforcing the notion that evading detection is increasingly untenable for premeditated offenders.
Research consistently shows that the certainty of being caught has a greater deterrent effect on crime than the severity of punishment. Criminologist Daniel Nagin has emphasized that it is the likelihood of apprehension — not the severity of punishment — that primarily dissuades criminal activity.
Most offenders, particularly those committing premeditated crimes, believe they will get away with it. In fact, studies suggest that many offenders perceive little or no risk of apprehension. However, as law enforcement leverages technology to more consistently and visibly close that gap, that perception may begin to shift.
If potential offenders begin to see that crimes are solved quickly and that data trails are difficult to escape, the perceived risk of getting caught increases — and with it, the potential to deter criminal behavior.
It is important to distinguish between different types of criminal behavior when discussing deterrence. Technologies that increase the certainty of apprehension are most likely to affect premeditated crimes such as burglary, car theft and organized retail theft. These crimes involve a level of planning, where offenders weigh risks and rewards.
Crimes of passion or those committed in moments of emotional rage or fear are different. In such cases, offenders often act impulsively without considering consequences. These crimes are less likely to be deterred by the presence of cameras, sensors or forensic tools. Therefore, while the technologies discussed can significantly reduce deliberate criminal activity, their effect on impulsive or emotionally charged crimes will likely be more limited.
As we continue to adopt increasingly advanced crime-solving technologies, we must also confront important ethical and legal questions. Surveillance, data aggregation and predictive tools raise legitimate concerns about privacy, civil liberties and bias. To ensure these technologies serve the public good, law enforcement agencies must implement strong oversight, transparency and accountability practices. Community trust is not guaranteed but must be earned and maintained through responsible use.
Society may never reach the predictive capabilities portrayed in 'Minority Report,' but we are undeniably moving into a time where committing a serious crime and remaining unidentified is becoming harder with each passing year. That shift has real potential to reduce victimization, increase clearance rates and change the mindset of potential offenders.
The challenge ahead will be ensuring that this new era of crime-solving is deployed in a way that is equitable, ethical and focused on public safety. If done right, we may find ourselves entering a golden age of justice — not because crime disappears, but because it becomes truly difficult to get away with.
Mike Moulton is a retired chief of police for the City of El Cajon, California, with 29 years of service in law enforcement. He is a fellow at the Future Policing Institute and a member of the California Police Chiefs Association, the International Association of Chiefs of Police and the Police Executive Research Forum.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Luigi Mangione had diary where he wrote about plans to kill UnitedHealthcare CEO
The Brief Court documents are shedding new light on the murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson. New York state prosecutors say Luigi Mangione had a diary where he wrote about his plans to kill the healthcare executive, months before he was gunned down in New York City. In Wednesday's 82-page filing, prosecutors justified adding terrorism to Mangione's first-degree murder charge. NEW YORK (FOX 9) - Prosecutors say, to Mangione, Thompson and UnitedHealthcare were symbols of the healthcare industry and what the 27-year-old considered a deadly greed-fueled cartel. What we know When Luigi Mangione was arrested by police in Altoona, Pennsylvania, last December, prosecutors say they recovered a red notebook he used as a diary among his possessions. They say the diary includes several entries that explain Mangione's intent and motive to deliberately assassinate Brian Thompson, the CEO of United Healthcare, the country's largest health insurance company. The backstory Prosecutors say an entry in August 2024 reads, "I finally feel confident about what I will do. The details are coming together. And I don't feel any doubt about whether its right/justified." He goes on to write, "The target is insurance. It checks every box." Then, in October of last year, about a month and a half before Thompson was shot and killed outside the midtown Manhattan hotel where United Healthcare's annual investors conference was scheduled to be held, Mangione writes: "The investor conference is a true windfall. It embodies everything wrong with our health system, and - most importantly -- the message becomes self-evident." Prosecutors say Mangione references Ted Kaczynski, saying the Unabomber made some good points, but he crossed the line from anarchist to terrorist by indiscriminately mail bombing innocent people. In his diary, prosecutors say Mangione writes "...instead of carrying out a bombing, one should "wack" the CEO at the annual parasitic bean counter convention. It's targeted, precise and doesn't risk innocents." "The point is made in the news headline 'Insurance CEO killed at annual investors conference.'" What they're saying In the filing, prosecutors wrote, "If ever there were an open and shut case pointing to defendant's guilt, this case is that case. Simply put, one would be hard-pressed to find a case with such overwhelming evidence of guilt as to the identity of the murderer and the premeditated nature of the assassination."
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Luigi Mangione's Chilling Diary Reveals Motive on CEO Killing
A red notebook could hold the motive behind one of the most jarring killings in corporate America. ABC News reported that according to a new court filing, diary entries written by 27-year-old Luigi Mangione reveal his thinking before he allegedly gunned down UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Manhattan last December. Mangione, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges, was arrested hours later at a McDonald's in Pennsylvania. The handwritten entries detail Mangione's rage against the health insurance industry and his belief that a high-profile killing could ignite a broader conversation. 'The target is insurance,' he wrote in August 2024. 'It checks every box.' The Manhattan District Attorney's Office filed the notebook excerpts in response to Mangione's legal team, which sought to pause or dismiss the case. Prosecutors argue that the writings—alongside the fact that shell casings at the scene were etched with the words 'delay,' 'deny' and 'depose'—show clear intent to commit murder in furtherance of terrorism. Mangione, a former Ivy League student from a privileged background, allegedly viewed the killing as a way to strike at what he saw as systemic greed. 'Do you bomb the HQ? No. Bombs=terrorism,' he wrote. 'Targeted, precise and doesn't risk innocents.' Prosecutors say the killing triggered a cascade of threats against health insurance employees, forcing UnitedHealthcare to pull executive headshots from its website, hire private security, and advise employees to stop wearing branded clothing. Despite the violence, Mangione has become a cult-like figure to some online. A legal defense fund has raised more than $1 million, and many frustrated with rising health costs have voiced support. The motive, authorities argue, wasn't personal. It was symbolic. 'He chose UHC solely because they were the largest,' the filing reads. The entry explains Mangione's motive in this high-profile, shocking case. Luigi Mangione's Chilling Diary Reveals Motive on CEO Killing first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 6, 2025
Fox News
11 hours ago
- Fox News
UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story
UnitedHealthcare is suing British newspaper The Guardian for defamation, alleging that the outlet falsely accused them of enticing nursing homes to enroll in a special program that works to restrict medical expenses for elderly patients. "The Guardian knowingly published false and misleading claims about our Institutional Special Needs Program, forcing us to take action to protect the clinician-patient relationship that is crucial for delivering high-quality care. The Guardian refused to engage with the truth and chose instead to print its predetermined narrative," UnitedHealthcare told Fox News Digital in a statement. The Guardian article, published May 21, claimed that UnitedHealthcare is pursuing cost-cutting tactics that jeopardize the health of nursing home patients. The article claims that the health insurance giant provides what amounts to secret bonuses to enroll in a program that stations medical staff that reports directly to UnitedHealthcare, and in practice works to reduce hospitalizations for patients, some of whom allegedly may urgently need the care. The article also claims UnitedHealthcare financially entices nursing homes to join their "Institutional Special Needs" program, and allegedly illegally had nursing homes share confidential patient data with the insurer so that it could skirt federal law and market programs to patients – some of whom lack the capacity to make financial decisions on their own – and families. The Guardian also alleged that UnitedHealthcare leaned on nursing home staff to convince patients to sign DNR's, even if they had expressed a desire for all medical options to be used to save their life. "A recent article published by The Guardian presents a narrative built largely on anecdotes rather than facts. It is unfortunate that the article misrepresents a program that, in reality, improves health outcomes for seniors through on-site clinical care, personalized treatment plans, and enhanced coordination among caregivers. We stand firmly behind the integrity of our programs, which consistently receive high satisfaction ratings from our members," UnitedHealthcare said in a statement in response to the article in May. The lawsuit alleged that The Guardian used a "heavily cropped screenshot" of an internal UnitedHealthcare email which they claim, when seen in full, contradicts their reporting. The suit also accuses The Guardian of "gratuitously" linking its report to the assassination of their former CEO Brian Thompson. "The Guardian knew these accusations were false, but published them anyway," the lawsuit stated. The Guardian told Fox News Digital it stood by its reporting. "The Guardian stands by its deeply-sourced, independent reporting, which is based on thousands of corporate and patient records, publicly filed lawsuits, declarations submitted to federal and state agencies, and interviews with more than 20 current and former UnitedHealth employees – as well as statements and information provided by UnitedHealth itself over several weeks. It's outrageous that in response to factual reporting on the practice of secretly paying nursing homes to reduce hospitalizations for vulnerable patients, UnitedHealth is resorting to wildly misleading claims and intimidation tactics via the courts," a representative from The Guardian said. When asked by Fox News Digital for clarification regarding the "heavily cropped screenshot," a representative for The Guardian said the image was in fact a "visual illustration" and the so-called missing information was provided "in an on-record comment and a denial from UnitedHealth" in the proceeding paragraph. The Guardian rep also claimed that UnitedHealthcare never asked the press outlet to alter the image.
