Call for recruitment to support solar panel drive
A solar panel company has called for a recruitment drive to support a government announcement for mandatory panels on the the majority of new-build homes from 2027.
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said the move was "just common sense" and solar panels would save the typical household £500 a year on energy bills.
The regulations will require developers to add panels unless the buildings fall under certain exemptions such as being covered by shade.
Terry Hayward, managing director of Solar Select in Droitwich, said the move could lead to issues with getting skilled labour in place.
He said: "In 2027 companies will gear up for it and start their own in-house training, but obviously it helps if it's government-backed for apprenticeship schemes."
He also said it was important the buildings had a "sensible amount" of panels fitted.
"I'm sure the industry will welcome this move," he said. "What we'd like to also see is a sensible amount of panels put on there."
Solar panels, or photovoltaics, capture the sun's energy and convert it into electricity to use in your home.
According to the Energy Saving Trust, domestic solar panels are generally about 3.5kWp (kilowatt peak) - meaning they typically generate that much power at peak conditions.
The government said the new rules would be included in the Future Homes Standard published in the autumn but there would be a transitional period for developers to adjust to the regulation changes.
North Herefordshire's Green Party MP Ellie Chowns said she was glad the "government had seen sense" on making solar panels mandatory but was also cautious.
"We should be making sure they're properly insulated, we should be making sure they're flood resilient, and [that they're] prevented from overheating," she added.
Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Most new build homes must have solar panels - Miliband
Energy Saving Trust
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Well-known Sydney tar ponds activist Bruno Marcocchio dies
The environmental activist probably best remembered for leading the fight to clean up the infamous Sydney tar ponds in Nova Scotia has died. Bruno Marcocchio, who believed the remnants of the steel industry in Cape Breton were a danger to people's health and safety, died of cancer on Wednesday, according to family. He was 75. Elizabeth May, the federal Green Party leader, was executive director of the Sierra Club of Canada and worked with Marcocchio, who was Atlantic conservation director for the environmental organization. May said their work started before the tar ponds battle, fighting herbicide spraying and Agent Orange in the 1980s. But for much of the following two decades, Marcocchio was front and centre carrying signs and speaking out at public meetings, pushing for federal remediation of the tar ponds — a toxic, sludge-laden portion of Muggah Creek that contained waste from the coking process that hardened coal for steelmaking. "Bruno's work was really meaningful and important in continuing to fight for a real cleanup," May said. After years of wrangling, the federal government approved a $400-million solidification and stabilization process that included mixing concrete into the sludge, encapsulating the toxins. The area was then covered with topsoil and grass and is now known as Open Hearth Park. May said the process was not a real cleanup, but a coverup. She said Marcocchio was uncompromising and selfless in his drive to raise awareness of the dangers to people's health from having toxic waste in the middle of a community. "He wasn't the only one who knew it, but he was very effective in giving voice to it," she said. Marcocchio was arrested in 2001 during a public meeting in Sydney where the federal government was delivering the results of soil testing in the Whitney Pier neighbourhood next to the tar ponds. "I think his legacy is one that shows one person can make a huge difference," May said. "One voice makes a difference, and even if that voice is occasionally being hauled out of meetings ... more than ever, we need more Bruno Marcocchios in this world." May said she and Marcocchio weren't just colleagues, but close friends. She was also close with Marcocchio's wife, Roberta Bruce, who died in 1992 from cancer. Neal Marcocchio said his mother's death played a part in his father's motivation. "With the Sydney tar ponds, probably losing his wife at a young age was a big factor in him being concerned about the health and safety in Cape Breton with the cleanup and people's health history," he said. His father also opposed oil and gas exploration off western Cape Breton in 2003 and fought for environmental protections for the proposed liquefied natural gas plant in the Strait of Canso in 2006 and the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric project in 2012. Marcocchio said he was proud that his father had the courage of his convictions, but said he was also a great hockey dad. Last battle: cancer "He gave me a ton of good advice," Marcocchio said. "He was so helpful and like I had to be accountable in sports and work hard and follow directions." Marcocchio said his father battled cancer for the last seven years, showing the same strength he displayed in his career fighting for the environment. Bruno Marcocchio's daughter, Sara Bruce-Marcocchio, said even though her father was a single parent, she fondly remembers cross-Canada family camping trips. "Dad was an amazing father," she said. "He never skipped a beat and raised us on his own." An obituary with details of a celebration of life is expected to be published next week. MORE TOP STORIES
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Miliband's latest misstep will pile unnecessary costs upon developers
Ed Miliband's attempt to lead this country was resoundingly rejected at the ballot box in 2015. Given his influence within the present Government, he may have had the last laugh. The Energy Secretary appears to have emerged triumphant in a clash with embattled Chancellor Rachel Reeves, securing the future of a £13 billion funding allocation for insulating properties across Britain, and very possibly triggering further tax rises this autumn. Having secured access to the fruits of your wallet, Mr Miliband has now turned his sights to redefining British architecture. Under plans revealed today, developers will be forced to install solar panels in the 'vast majority' of new houses, and gas boilers will effectively be banned in newbuilds in favour of heat pumps. The Energy Secretary claims that the moves could save households £500 a year on their energy bills, but appears to have neglected to consider the likely effect on development costs. There are few objections to people choosing to install solar panels, or choosing to buy a house with a heat pump. That builders confronted with market demand are not already supplying them suggests, however, that any premium people are willing to pay for these features will not cover the costs of installing them. The last thing Britain's capacity constrained housing market needs is another effort to pile unnecessary costs upon developers. Measures to ease building are drastically needed. Regrettably, Mr Miliband seems to think otherwise. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
German lawmakers criticize plan to curb refugee family reunification
German lawmakers have criticized the government's plans to suspend family reunification for some groups of refugees. The German lower house of parliament held its first consultation on a draft bill on the suspension on Friday, at which Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt reiterated his desire to limit irregular migration. There is "no single switch that can be flipped to solve the problem of illegal migration," Dobrindt said. Instead, he said, a variety of measures at the national and European level were necessary. His comments sparked outrage from lawmakers from the Greens and The Left party, who argued that family reunification was not irregular migration, but an orderly procedure in which it was clear who was entering the country. Green Party lawmaker Schahina Gambir criticized the planned reform as inhumane, saying that "families belong together" and charging that anyone who blocks legal routes is promoting human trafficking. Clara Bünger, of The Left party, described the draft bill as "anti-Christian" and "anti-family." The proposed bill aims to suspend family reunification for two years for people holding so-called "subsidiary protection status," who are allowed to remain in Germany due to the threat of political persecution in their homelands, despite lacking formal refugee status. The bill says that almost 400,000 residents have subsidiary protection. Around three-quarters are reportedly Syrian nationals. The bill foresees that these people will only be able to bring close family members - spouses, children and, in the case of unaccompanied minors, parents - to Germany in exceptional cases. Family reunification for people with subsidiary protection is already restricted to 1,000 relatives in total per month, unlike for those with refugee status.
