Alaska is upholding our end. Congress must protect federal energy commitments.
The Port of Seward, with a docked cruise ship, is seen on June 19, 2024, from Race Point on Mount Marathon. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/alaska Beacon)
Alaska has a long history of leadership in renewable energy. The state's Renewable Energy Fund, for example, has helped build more than 100 operating projects across Alaska — enabling rural communities to reduce their reliance on costly diesel, and slowing the Railbelt's consumption of Cook Inlet's dwindling natural gas supplies.
Renewable energy investments build real projects in Alaska, generating savings for ratepayers and building our energy security. That's why, as former Republican and Democratic Alaska legislators, we went to bat for policies and investments that helped develop our state's vast renewable resources.
State investment in renewable energy is now bringing in major federal dollars thanks to legislation approved by Congress in 2021 and 2022. The current version of the state budget for the coming year includes close to $100 million in funding for renewables — primarily from federal sources.
Federal investments will support a range of energy projects across the state. There are funds to help electrify port infrastructure in Seward, upgrade rural power systems, weatherize homes to reduce Alaskans' home heating bills, and begin long-needed transmission improvements. These and more projects are described in a recent report, Securing Our Energy Future: Perspectives from Alaskans on the Importance of Federal Clean Energy Incentives.
U.S. Senators Dan Sullivan and Lisa Murkowski have been working to ensure previously awarded energy funds are delivered as promised. But there is a fight ahead. The future of federal clean energy incentives is at risk in the coming federal budget process. Our congressional delegation understands the benefits of these federal clean energy incentives for Alaska — and they need to know Alaskans are behind them.
Please join us in urging our delegation — Sen. Sullivan, Sen. Murkowski, and Rep. Begich — to safeguard these powerful tools so Alaska's commitment to renewable energy gets the federal partnership we deserve.
Lesil McGuire, Alan Austerman, Beth Kerttula, Charisse Millett and Harry Crawford are former Alaska lawmakers with a combined 70 years of service in the Alaska Legislature representing constituents in Juneau, Southcentral and Interior Alaska.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
5 hours ago
- Washington Post
Trump administration weighs broad cancellation of California funding
The Trump administration is considering pulling a broad swath of federal funding from the state of California, according to two federal officials familiar with the plan and records obtained by The Washington Post. The plan could run afoul of an existing federal court injunction and would almost certainly face fresh legal challenges. A senior White House official stressed Saturday that no final decision on blocking the funds has been made.


CNN
10 hours ago
- CNN
Trump preparing large-scale cancellation of federal funding for California, sources say
Source: CNN The Trump administration is preparing to cancel a large swath of federal funding for California, an effort that could begin as soon as Friday, according to multiple sources. Agencies are being told to start identifying grants the administration can withhold from California. Sources said the administration is specifically considering a full termination of federal grant funding for the University of California and California State University systems. 'No taxpayer should be forced to fund the demise of our country,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement Friday afternoon, criticizing California for its energy, immigration and other policies. 'No final decisions, however, on any potential future action by the Administration have been made, and any discussion suggesting otherwise should be considered pure speculation.' Singling out one state for massive cuts would be an unusual move, but President Donald Trump has long made Democratic-led California a target. Just last month, he threatened to withhold federal funding from California over a transgender athlete's participation in a sporting event — the latest example of the president trying to use funding as leverage to enact his agenda. The administration recently cut $126.4 million in flood prevention funding projects, and Trump repeatedly went after the state's handling of devastating wildfires earlier this year. The president and California Gov. Gavin Newsom have also publicly feuded for years. Two sources said that the administration is targeting California universities over alleged antisemitism on campus, an issue the schools have made efforts to address over the past year. The administration has already taken steps to punish Harvard and Columbia universities for similar reasons. The UC system is the state's third largest employer, and both systems are major engines of research in the biotechnology and medical fields, among others. It is unclear how the school systems plan to fight back, though it is possible they could be represented by the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, a Democrat. CNN has reached out to Bonta's office, the UC system and the CSU system for comment. California Rep. Zoe Lofgren, the top Democrat on the Science, Space and Technology Committee, said, 'Trump is a bully. We've now heard from sources that he may be intending to cut grants to California because we didn't vote for him and we're Democratically inclined. … I will fight back on this. This will be immediately challenged in court.' Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, another California Democrat, said: 'Whatever cruel crusade the President may announce against California, we will fight back.' California's state legislature appropriated $25 million in its budget for efforts to fight Trump administration policies and has spent only approximately $5 million of that so far, a source said. GOP Rep. Darrell Issa of California, who said he was unaware of the imminent grant cancellations, told CNN he recently met with university representatives who were concerned about the future of their funding. 'Every university, every research organization, pretty much I saw them passing through here the last two days,' Issa said. Issa told CNN his message to the fearful university representatives was, 'We're going to advocate for essentials, but I sent them back and said come to me with specifics. Come to me with the grant and the justification, and I'll advocate for that. But I'm not going to advocate for no cuts; you just get more money every year. That's how we got in this problem.' This story has been updated with additional information. See Full Web Article
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Experts uncover unexpected benefits of combining solar panels with livestock: 'Enough ... energy to power 70,000 homes'
The Myrtle solar farm in Brazoria County, Texas, is a shining example of sustainability that spans 2,400 acres of former pasture land and eliminates the need for fuel-powered lawnmowers. The facility, which was completed in 2023, is one of many renewable energy projects that have helped keep the state in the top three for installed solar capacity, alongside California and Florida. It is run by TotalEnergies, a Paris-based oil company, and features 705,000 photovoltaic cells and a herd of grass-munching sheep to help maintain the landscape, according to a report by ABC13. "Myrtle renewable power plant consists of two parts. One is a solar power plant of 380 megawatts that is generating enough clean and clear energy to power 70,000 homes," said Ahmed Sari, a construction manager who oversaw the project and spoke to the outlet. The solar power plant is complemented by a 225-megawatt battery storage system that's connected to support the local electrical grid as needed. These are crucial to expanding renewable resources such as solar and wind, helping store energy for use during peak demand hours. Agrivoltaics is a term used to describe the combination of solar power and farming, which frequently produces harmonious results. Many of these facilities use the shade provided by solar panels to give solace to crops and livestock while fostering natural habitats for pollinators. "We have sheep grazing under the solar panels in order to control vegetation in a very sustainable manner," said Marie Maitre, Total's external communications manager, per the report. The sheep get to enjoy a considerable amount of grazing land and shade, and groundskeepers don't need to use gas-guzzling lawnmowers or dangerous pesticides. This reduces maintenance costs, potentially lowering rates for consumers. Solar and wind installations accounted for 97.8% of all new U.S. electrical capacity in the first quarter of 2025, while dirty fuels such as gas and oil made up the meager difference, proving that the shift to more sustainable energy sources is gaining traction. Tesla and Honda have made deals to power their local operations with solar power generated in the state, and a new photovoltaic facility began production earlier this year. Do you think solar panels are an eyesore? Absolutely not Only in certain areas They always look bad I don't have an opinion Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Recent data showed that Texas has nearly 80% more solar, wind, and battery capacity combined than California, although the Golden State may have an edge in solar installations alone. A little competition can only help in our quest to shift to sustainable energy and ditch pollution-generating alternatives. "We are going to need all the energy types that we can have in order to meet the growing demand for energy of our growing world population," Maitre concluded. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.