
ADL: Mass. set new record for antisemitic incidents in 2024
Some records and record-breaking events are worth celebrating.
Consider John Korir, of Kenya, who raced to victory in Monday's Boston Marathon. His brother, Wesley, won in 2012. That makes them the first siblings to ever win the nation's premier road race.
And there's Sharon Lokedi, also of Kenya, who won the women's race and set a new course record in the doing of it.
She finished ahead of Hellen Obiri, the defending women's champ, who was looking to become the first woman to three-peat at the Marathon since 1999, CBS News reported.
Then there are the records you wish would remain unbroken: Like the fact that 2024 marked the fifth straight year that there were more antisemitic incidents in New England than the year before, shattering the previous year's record.
That ignominious data point comes from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) New England's latest Audit of Antisemitic Incidents, an annual audit of the hate that continues to thrive in our midst.
The civil rights group recorded 638 incidents of assault, harassment and vandalism across the five-state New England region in 2024, including Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont.
Read More: The U.S. has a political violence problem. Can we solve it before it's too late? | John L. Micek
That's up from the 2023 tally of 623 incidents, according to the ADL.
The number of antisemitic incidents across New England has risen steadily since 2020, when the ADL recorded 109 such incidents.
That increase is a 'stark reminder that antisemitism continues to impact our communities,' Samantha Joseph, the group's regional director, said in a statement.
The rise of attacks against Orthodox Jews was 'particularly concerning,' Joseph said, noting that the 'alarming manifestations of antisemitism in 2024 instill fear and are reminders that much work remains to be done.'
So, where does Massachusetts fall in all this? Nowhere good.
The Bay State charted 438 antisemitic incidents last year, the fifth-highest nationwide behind New York (1,437), California (1,345), New Jersey (719) and Pennsylvania (465).
That's a 188% increase from the 152 incidents recorded in 2022. And it's effectively unchanged from the 439 that were recorded in 2023, according to the ADL's data.
That 2024 tally for Massachusetts breaks down to 276 reported incidents of harassment, 157 incidents of vandalism (an 11% increase from the 141 incidents in 2023), and five assaults.
Of the state's 351 cities and towns, 108 saw at least one antisemitic incident, according to the report. Boston logged 96 such incidents last year, according to the report.
The ADL recorded 12 cases where Orthodox Jews were specifically targeted for harassment, compared to the four incidents across the five-state region in 2023.
The majority — 10 of them — took place in Massachusetts, the civil rights group said.
One particularly graphic example included a man yelling at a Jewish child — 'You are a Jew, [expletive] you' — while he shopped with his mother at a kosher grocery store, the civil rights group said.
And a lot of those incidents took place in settings where people are supposed to be learning how to appreciate and celebrate their differences: New England's college campuses.
They ranged from someone replacing the Star of David on an Israeli flag with a swastika at Smith College to a Berklee College of Music student telling a classmate that 'Jews belong in the oven.'
Then there were the threatening emails sent to Jewish student organizations at Brown University and the Rhode Island School of Design.
All told, the region's college campuses saw 151 incidents of antisemitism last year, up from 81 in 2023 and way up from the 15 reported in 2022.
Taken together, that's an 86% year-over-year increase on college campuses between 2023 and 2024.
The ADL was quick to point out that it was not trying to conflate general criticism of Israel or anti-Israel activism with antisemitism. And 'legitimate political protest, support for Palestinian rights or expressions of opposition to Israeli policies' was not included in its audit.
Still, this increase came amid campus protests and arrests tied to Israel's prosecution of its war against the terrorist group Hamas, which is dragging into its third year.
But, really, no place was safe. The ADL reported antisemitic incidents in K-12 public schools, public parks, private businesses and homes.
And there was the terror of striking the region's Jewish population in their own safe spaces: schools, community centers and synagogues.
In October 2023, for instance, two worshippers in Springfield who had to leave a rideshare early after they were harangued for praying in a 'terrorist Israel institution,' according to the report.
Antisemitism commissions at the state and federal levelsthat are trying to tackle the issue with varying levels of success.
The former has held informational hearings, while critics say the latter is a barely covert effort to undermine the rule of law and to undermine academic freedom.
No one's questioning that there's a problem. You don't have to look any further than the headlines to find evidence of that.
The new data drop comes just about two weeks after the nation's antisemitism problem was thrust into the headlines once more with news that a lone attacker had set fire to the official residence of Pennsylvania's governor.
State Police ushered Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro, who is Jewish, his family and guests out of the neo-Georgian building in the state capital of Harrisburg. The night before, they had celebrated Passover.
Shapiro, a former state attorney general, has taken heat for his support for Israel, with some branding him 'Genocide Josh.'
As MSNBC columnist Michael A. Cohen has pointed out, blaming Shapiro for the actions of a foreign government, helmed by fellow Jews, on the other side of the world is the "definition of antisemitism."
And since the start of Israel's war in 2023, data have shown an increased belief in anti-Jewish tropes, with particular growth among younger Americans.
So, how do you stop one of history's oldest hate crimes? There are no easy solutions.
But one group, the Foundation to Combat Antisemitism, founded by New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, is doing what it can through a mixture of media campaigns, partnerships and public education efforts.
Those blue squares you've seen on Kraft's lapel? That's the symbol of his organization.
'Our mission is to educate and inspire unengaged Americans to stand up to Jewish hate by recognizing that hate of any kind increases hate of all kinds,' Kraft said on the organization's website.
And it's as good as any place to start. So that next year, all we're talking about is the records that were broken on Boylston Street.
Mass. gave the U.S. its Constitution. Why it matters more than ever| Bay State Briefing
US-Canada relations tested as border library faces new restrictions | John L. Micek
3 UMass poll numbers that could worry Republicans. And 1 for Democrats | John L. Micek
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
32 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democrats squaring off in Virginia primaries say one name a lot: Trump
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Two Virginia Democrats are battling Tuesday to be their party's nominee for attorney general. Yet, the name mentioned most in their campaigns is not that of their opponent, but rather a man who lives just over the Arlington Memorial Bridge: President Donald Trump. The barrage of changes Trump has wrought to American culture in the first few months of his second White House residency has ignited the campaigns of Virginia Democrats Jay Jones and Shannon Taylor as they appeal unrelentingly to the most devout swaths of their base ahead of down-ballot primary elections. The primary will also determine the party's nominations this year for lieutenant governor and some contested seats in the House of Delegates. In one of only two states electing governors in November — the other is New Jersey — the caustic anti-Trump rhetoric could be a hint of what voters nationwide will hear from Democrats in next year's midterm elections, when the stakes will be higher. Virginia's nominees for governor have been settled by default. Democrat Abigail Spanberger became her party's nominee after running unopposed, and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears was the only contender who gathered enough signatures to be on the ballot. The other statewide races are for attorney general and lieutenant governor, and Democrats in both contests seem to be vying to top each other with anti-Trump rhetoric and caustic ads. Republicans are not hosting statewide primaries this year, so only Democrats will pick a nominee for lieutenant governor. It's a part-time position that pays about $36,000 a year but is often a stepping stone to higher office. Six Democrats want the job , and most of them have pushed ad after ad on the airwaves and online about their commitment to taking on Trump if elected to the mostly ceremonial role. In the contest for attorney general, Jones and Taylor are competing in much the same way. Turnout is likely to be sluggish, which means firing up base voters is widely seen as the way to go. The last time a left-wing candidate for governor ran unopposed, roughly 142,000 Democrats voted for an attorney general nominee compared with more than 485,000 this past election cycle. Still, the AG's race has been spicy, more so when the candidates' criticism isn't directed at each other. Jones and Taylor have lambasted the White House and argued that the administration's actions should be litigated in court. When they are not lamenting Trump, their attacks are directed toward incumbent Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares, who is seeking reelection. In their respective campaigns, the Democrats argue that Miyares submits to the president by not suing him. They say that sets him apart from more progressive attorneys general across the United States, who are going to court over such things as birthright citizenship and elections . Their main message: A Democrat will take the White House to trial when Miyares won't — and saving democracy starts there. 'The job is to protect Virginians, to fight for them, to work for them, to keep us safe,' Jones said while campaigning in June in Falls Church, Virginia, adding, 'I don't understand why he is not going after them.' Last month, Taylor told a room full of Democratic voters that Miyares would enable Trump's overreaches in Virginia, and potentially double down on institutions that don't comply with the president. Either way, 'the result is the same for Virginians: getting hurt,' she said. In a wide-ranging interview in May, Miyares said he identifies as a balls-and-strikes Republican. The former Virginia Beach state delegate, elected top prosecutor in 2021, worked to reduce violent crime. He sought settlements from Big Pharma. When he felt President Joe Biden's administration overstepped, he went to court . But as Trump was ushered into office for a second term, Miyares entered new political terrain. Unlike most other states, Virginians will elect their attorney general this November, nearly a year after the country voted for the president and his consequential agenda. Miyares has waded into the political arena. He often spars on social media with progressive prosecutors throughout Virginia for being too lenient in prosecuting criminal cases. Still, Miyares rebuffed the notion that suing Trump is his top concern. He said the Democrats looking to replace him fail to understand the nature of his position. The attorney general touted meaningful work his office has shouldered: holding listening sessions for crime victims, designating resources to support law enforcement and beefing up his office's prosecutions of child support cases. He flashed his law enforcement badge, tucked within a leather wallet, and described the emblem as a guidepost for being an effective people's prosecutor. 'They seem very obsessed with Donald Trump, whereas I'm obsessed with how am I going to keep Virginians safe?' Miyares said. ___ Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Who Voted For Trump In 2024 Are Sharing How They Really Feel About The Tariffs
I was pretty shocked the other day to read about actual price differences caused by tariffs, and I wanted to learn specifically about how Trump voters feel about the tariffs — whether they think they're a good idea or not. So, I decided to ask Trump voters to tell me what they really think about the tariffs; and, for good measure, I turned to the answers to a post on the subreddit Ask Trump Supporters that asked, "Do Trump supporters see the new tariff policy as a smart negotiating tactic with allies, or is there concern it could backfire?" Here are some people's answers: 1."I love the idea of Trump pushing the tariffs. It will teach the consumer what is really important to be spending their money on and learn how to be conservative. Plus bring back the businesses to the grand ol' USA." —Anonymous, 72 years old, Kansas City, Missouri 2."Not me, but my grandad. He has said that he regrets voting for Trump, even though he hates Harris. One, the tariffs are going to make his small business (golf balls) suffer, and he's worried about my business (cosmetics) suffering, too." "Two, he thinks Trump has dementia, because of the way Trump has been talking and stuff. He also thinks Trump is really violent. Also, my grandad was absolutely horrified when Elon did the Nazi salute thing (why did everyone just forget about this?) because, even though my grandad is Catholic, he has multiple Jewish friends, and was actually the one who kickstarted my interest in the history of the Holocaust. When Trump made that 'joke' about wanting to be the new Pope, that was the breaking point for him." —Anonymous 3."Good decision, time will prove it was a good one." —Anonymous, 78, Moline, Illinois 4."Tariffs are not going to help small businesses or consumers. A tariff is a tax that is passed on to the consumer. The government will collect this tax. What they will do with it is anyone's guess." "Trump lied to his voters. Tariffs increase prices of goods and services. Once prices go up they will never come down. Many small businesses will close as they will not be able to pay the insurmountable prices added to products which were already too high. Many people will lose their jobs, and things will just get worse. Meanwhile, Trump is making all types of deals in the Middle East for his business. God bless America." —Anonymous 5."My boyfriend voted for him in 2016, 2020, and 2024, and he still argues that China (or whoever) pays the tariffs." —Anonymous, 46, California Related: This FSU Student Had A Scathing Message For Donald Trump, And It's Going Mega Viral 6."Absolutely genius. Europe is already buckling. They want reciprocal free trade, but are not yet willing to remove VAT on imports and all the other shenanigans they pull to restrict trade. Trump is not falling for it." —u/whateverisgoodmoney "What exactly has been gained by all this chaos?" —u/dsteffee "Nothing yet. Trump is offering time to negotiate. But in a few months, deals come off the table, and they must suffer the tariffs or comply." —u/whateverisgoodmoney 7."Well, I'm skeptical and on the fence. There are countries that totally deserve, like, a 300% tariff, like China. And I've always been very, VERY suspicious of a global economic system that seems to favor a country like China just too much. Let's see what happens." —u/Ivan_Botsky_Trollov "I just don't get how this hurts China. How does this not favor China more and potentially catapult China into being the reserve currency/preeminent economic superpower? To me this feels like the US just conceding the top spot for nothing, while China gets to swoop into all of these other countries and say, 'We've got you, we won't abandon you like the US did,' slowly building their sphere of influence until they have the political and military cache to strongarm the US in diplomatic situations." —u/Ok-Release1928 8."I hope it's just a negotiating tactic in order to get other countries to lower their tariffs against us, something everyone should support. But I think Trump might actually just love tariffs and hate deficits." —u/flyingchimp12 Related: "There's No More Hiding Their Ideology" — People Cannot Believe This "Terrifying" Post By Trump Is Real 9."It's a risky gambit, I won't deny that. But what we were doing was unsustainable and going to bankrupt us in time, most likely much sooner than we'd like, and I don't hear Democrats offering any better alternatives, just screaming, 'Trump Bad!'" "What Trump's trying to do — if it succeeds — could pay off big-ly, enough that even the more moderate of Trump's opponents might be forced to admit that he did a good thing. Heck, if Trump can simply get the countries with tariffs on us right now to lower their existing tariffs in exchange for our previous tariff rates, that alone would do a lot. If we can get reciprocal tariffs with countries that enjoy other benefits from the US, such as funding or alliance stuff, even better." —u/Jaded_Jerry 10."This isn't about making life easier for investors. Sure, once a new business is established, it'll be more competitive with experience, and perhaps not need tariffs to be competitive in four years." "What it's really about is empowering those willing to do work, and making those businesses viable before the next presidency. I'm sure some tariffs will remain in four years, and hopefully the next president sees the wisdom in maintaining them." —u/neovulcan 11."I think it's more than a negotiating tactic, though he is obviously using them to that effect at times. But I think Trump is not a free trader at his core, and do not think his goal is just to get other countries to lower their trade barriers to zero (they won't do that anyway)." "I think Trump views us as having gone way too far in the direction of maximizing short-term profit by eating the seed corn of industry, so to speak. It's a long-term and potentially watershed policy shift with huge ramifications. There are definitely nerves and there are definitely risks." —u/KnownFeedback738 12."I don't have confidence that the tariff policy laid out last week will be successful. They were also calculated incorrectly, and Trump likely exceeded the legal authority he is using to levy the tariffs." —u/Gaxxz 13."Somehow, back in the 1950s-1980s, people managed to buy lots of American goods without even owning credit cards, generally. I wonder if local manufacturing jobs helped. The 1970s oil crisis created inflation twice as high as it's ever been in your life (unless you're over 50). And nobody even knows. By the Reagan '80s boom, it was forgotten. All it did was spur the invention of fuel-efficient cars." Scott McPartland / Getty Images, NBC —u/itsakon 14."More competition for workers in USA means wages go up." "30% extra import tax means the cost price of a Nike shoe they sell for $90 in the USA goes up from 10 dollars to 13 dollars. Nike can decide if they charge the three dollars extra to customers, take it from their enormous yearly profit, or if they build more shoe plants in the USA so there is more work in the USA. If they choose A or B then the government has three dollars they don't have to get somewhere else." —u/lordtosti 15."We don't have enough thinking-type jobs to sustain young US workers. I don't know if the country will make more money, but the goal is better jobs than young workers currently can access." —u/noluckatall 16."It's a risk. But Trump is not the habit of letting things age — he wants to make deals. Some countries he might want to keep tariffs on, if it's judged to be good for the US. Otherwise, tariffs should be lower a year from now." —u/jackneefus finally: "I honestly don't know; at this point, I'm waiting to see what happens." —u/beyron What do you think? I'm interested in hearing all your opinions down in the comments below. Or, if you have something to say but prefer to stay anonymous, you're more than welcome to write in to the anonymous form below. Please note: some comments have been edited for length and/or clarity. Also in In the News: Well, Well, Well, For The Second Time In 2 Weeks, People Are Letting JD Vance Know EXACTLY How They Feel About Him In Public Also in In the News: This Dem Lawmaker Is Going Viral For His Extremely Shady Question To Secretary Kristi Noem Also in In the News: This Conservative Said He Wears A Fake ICE Uniform For A Really, Really, Really Gross Reason
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dozens of Wisconsin cities holdng 'No Kings' protests against Trump
Wisconsinites in more than 50 towns and cities are expected to take to the streets Saturday, June 14, as part of what organizers say will be the largest nationwide protest yet against President Donald Trump's second-term agenda. More than 100 pro-democracy advocacy groups are working together to organize "No Kings" protests across the country, with actions planned in more than 1,500 cities, according to its website. Spearheading the effort is the national organizing group, 50501 — short for "50 protests, 50 states, 1 movement." The group's local chapter, 50501 Milwaukee, also helped organize an anti-Trump protest in downtown Milwaukee on June 10. That followed local reports of federal arrests and the Trump administration's crackdown against demonstrations in Los Angeles. Hundreds gathered in Cathedral Square Park, before marching to Milwaukee's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement offices. The protests take their name from the idea that in the United States, we don't have kings — a reference to Trump's own language about himself and his perception of virtually unchecked power. Saturday's protest in Milwaukee will be held in Cathedral Square Park. It coincides with Trump's military parade — expected to cost upwards of $30 million — to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the U.S. Army and his own birthday. Organizers said scheduling the protests for the same day as the parade was deliberate. "President Trump wants tanks in the street and a made-for-TV display of dominance for his birthday," No Kings organizers wrote. "A spectacle meant to look like strength. But real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else." In Madison, a protest is scheduled from 2 to 5 p.m. at Library Mall, 715 State St. In the Milwaukee area, No Kings protests will be held in the following places: Milwaukee: Noon to 2 p.m. in Cathedral Square Park, 520 E. Wells St. This will likely be the largest protest in the greater Milwaukee area. Shorewood: 2 to 3:30 p.m. at Oak Leaf Trail Bridge & Capitol Drive. Greenfield: 10 to 11 a.m., South 76th Street & West Layton Avenue. Brookfield: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. 19400 W. Bluemound Rd. Waukesha: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., 321 Wisconsin Ave. This story is developing and will update through the day. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Dozens of Wisconsin cities holdng 'No Kings' protests against Trump