
Academia and industry in Pakistan: two planets speaking different languages
I still vividly recall the days of 2011 when I enrolled in a French language class at Lahore's National University of Modern Languages (NUML). Studying the world's fifth most popular language was an enjoyable experience.
The rules of the language are different from English, with many conjugations and a rich vocabulary with words having strange accents. I enjoyed the taste of this new language. After about 14 years, I can remember only a few words and rules of the French language, as I could not practice French in Pakistan. And that's not unusual.
Since I joined academia in 2017, I started to learn another language used exclusively in academia. The language of course and program learning objectives, academic writing, publications, research proposals, and funding proposals. During an academic semester, faculty is busy with preparing and marking quizzes, assignments, exams, and projects. This isolated ecosystem operates in its own linguistic and functional domain as an academic semester is replete with the activities in the language of academia, and one living in this ecosystem gets an occasional chance to meet with the people speaking the language of industry.
The title of a book has always attracted me: 'Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus.' The title resonates much with the current situation of academia and industry; both are living on different planets, at least in Pakistan.
In developed countries, a common habitat is established and nurtured. Both parties can coexist, interact, and cooperate there. But in a country like Pakistan, there is no common habitat; they continue to live on their own planets and speak their languages.
Despite a strong will and desire to create a common habitat for industry-academic interaction, there are no remarkable success stories. Both planets, while orbiting around the sun (symbolizing the government), rotate in their orbits and only sometimes get an opportunity for alignment. On such rare occasions, academia and industry meet, perhaps in a conference or collaborative discussion. These meetings are usually cordial, filled with attempts to understand each other's perspectives. But as quickly as they arrive, these moments pass, and both return to their respective silos and get busy in their operations.
Depending on its current priorities, the government may step in as an intermediary and catalyst at this moment of alignment. In developed countries, the two coexist within a shared ecosystem. The so-called triple helix model exists and thrives there, while in developing countries like Pakistan, only the jargon is used without any meaningful action plan.
I met an industry guy a few days back. He was originally from the planet Academia but jumped to the planet Industry once both planets aligned. He candidly remarked that academia in Pakistan is not only bogged down in activities purely related to semester work but also happy to remain in this cycle. Since the industry in Pakistan is not thriving, academia gets a valid excuse for not leaving the planet.
On the other hand, the industry is busy tackling their productivity issues and expects solutions to their problems instantaneously without feeling the need to invest in research and development. They don't trust academia, and academia doesn't bother to endure the pain of talking a foreign language and going to unfavourable territories. The government often tries to create a middle ground but unfortunately has a lot of other unnecessary tasks always at hand, putting industry-academia linkage on the back burner.
The Higher Education Commission (HEC) in Pakistan launches many funding opportunities for academia, including the National Research Program for Universities (NRPU), Grand Challenge Fund, Technology Transfer Fund, etc., with an essential requirement to have industrial partners to qualify for the fund. Academia, to fetch these opportunities, tries to learn and speak the language of industry and tries to understand their problems.
But it is startling to know that there is no tangible, verifiable, and bankable record of the contribution of academia towards solving the industrial problems, even with HEC. If there are any success stories at all, the record is generally not made public because of insecurities and so-called breaches of information.
In a massive effort by the government of Pakistan, multiple National Centres of Excellence (artificial intelligence, big data and cloud computing, cybersecurity, robotics and automation, etc.) were inaugurated in 2017 to make a common habitat for academia and industry. After years of inception and work, clear and verifiable results are not known to either academia or industry. There might be some success stories, but no breakthrough and grandeur tale to tell. The majority of academia continues to speak their language and refuses to switch to the other.
Industry complains about academicians' bookish approach, and academia complains about industry's non-cooperative behaviour and demand for solutions overnight. The government enjoys looking at both parties blaming and tries to provide some opportunities to both whenever it gets a relief from other pressing matters in the name of reviving the Triple Helix model.
The story continues without much result, as Pakistan ranks 91st in the Global Innovation Index, and the top university ranks 315th in the world QS ranking of higher education institutes. While standing at the 110th position in the Global Competitiveness Index, if Pakistan wants to excel, a few essential steps might be as under:
• Academia needs to understand the importance of understanding the language of industry and should not abstain from learning it.
• Academia needs to come out of its comfort zone and match the expectations of industry, especially during the summer semester, when faculty may get some time from their regular academic routine. Current industry placement programmes for faculty by the universities are not enough to make it happen.
• Industry should establish connections with academia and share their problems while continuing to get quick-fix solutions from abroad to solve their immediate problems until a local solution is available.
• The government should accord priority to act as a catalyst for industry-academia linkage if Pakistan's academia and industry fail to speak and understand each other's languages, the country risks slipping so far behind the global innovation curve, that catching up may one day become an impossible dream.
(The writer is a professor at the Department of Engineering Management, NUST)
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Palestinian detained in France after rabbi hit with chair
PARIS: A Palestinian man was taken into custody after he threw a chair at a rabbi on a cafe terrace in a wealthy Paris suburb, a police source told AFP, in an attack France's main Jewish association condemned as antisemitic. According to the source, the suspect attacked Rabbi Elie Lemmel in the western Paris suburb of Neuilly-sur-Seine. Lemmel, who wore a traditional kippah cap and a long beard, was taken to hospital with a head injury. The assailant was arrested. Wife of detained Palestinian Columbia student says she was naive to believe he was safe from arrest The attacker is a Palestinian man residing illegally in Germany, said a source close to the case, adding that the man benefits from a status that offers a form of protection for people who cannot be deported to a conflict zone. An investigation has been launched into aggravated assault, prosecutors said. The rabbi said he had been attacked twice in the space of a week. Last Friday he was attacked in the northwestern town of Deauville when three drunk individuals hit him in the stomach. On Friday, the rabbi was talking to a person he had arranged to meet when he was attacked, receiving 'a huge blow to the head'. 'I fell to the ground and heard people shouting 'stop him', and I realised that I had just been attacked,' he told broadcaster BFMTV. 'I am very afraid that we are living in a world where words are generating more and more evil,' he said. The French Jewish community, one of the largest in the world, has faced a number of attacks and desecrations of memorials since the Gaza war erupted on October 7, 2023. In January, the Representative Council of Jewish Institutions of France (CRIF) deplored what it called a 'historic' level of antisemitic acts. While welcoming the fact that attack was not fatal, Prime Minister Francois Bayrou deplored 'the radicalisation of public debate.' 'Day after day, our country is plagued by clashes fuelled by hatred,' he told reporters, also pointing to assaults against 'our Muslim compatriots'. The CRIF condemned 'in the strongest possible terms the anti-Semitic attack on the rabbi'. 'In a general context where hatred of Israel fuels the stigmatisation of Jews on a daily basis, this attack is yet another illustration of the toxic climate targeting French Jews,' the CRIF said on X. Yonathan Arfi, the CRIF president, said: 'Nothing, not even solidarity with the Palestinians, can ever justify attacking a rabbi.' France's Holocaust memorial, three Paris synagogues and a restaurant were vandalised with paint last week. A judge has charged three Serbs with vandalising the Jewish sites 'to serve the interests of a foreign power', a judicial source said on Friday. In 2024, a total of 1,570 antisemitic acts were recorded in France, according to the interior ministry. Officials say the number of such crimes has increased in the wake of the attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 by Palestinian militant group Hamas, which resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people. The attack was followed by relentless Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip, which the Hamas-run health ministry has said resulted in the deaths of at least 54,677 people, and an aid blockade.


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Musk-Trump breakup puts $22bn of SpaceX contracts at risk, jolting US space program
WASHINGTON: About $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts are at risk and multiple U.S. space programs could face dramatic changes in the fallout from Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's explosive feud on Thursday. The disagreement, rooted in Musk's criticism of Trump's tax-cut and spending legislation that began last week, quickly spiraled out of control. Trump lashed out at Musk when the president spoke in the Oval Office. Then in a series of X posts, Musk launched barbs at Trump, who threatened to terminate government contracts with Musk's companies. Taking the threat seriously, Musk said he would begin 'decommissioning' SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft used by NASA. Hours later, however, Musk appeared to reverse course. Responding to a follower on X urging him and Trump to 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days,' Musk wrote: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Still, Musk's mere threat to abruptly pull its Dragon spacecraft out of service marked an unprecedented outburst from one of NASA's leading commercial partners. Under a roughly $5 billion contract, the Dragon capsule has been the agency's only U.S. vessel capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station, making Musk's company a critical element of the U.S. space program. The feud raised questions about how far Trump, an often unpredictable force who has intervened in past procurement efforts, would go to punish Musk, who until last week headed Trump's initiative to downsize the federal government. SpaceX will not decommission Dragon, Musk says If the president prioritized political retaliation and canceled billions of dollars of SpaceX contracts with NASA and the Pentagon, it could slow U.S. space progress. NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but said: 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met.' Musk and Trump's tussle ruptured an extraordinary relationship between a U.S. president and industry titan that had yielded some key favors for SpaceX: a proposed overhaul of NASA's moon program into a Mars program, a planned effort to build a gigantic missile defense shield in space, and the naming of an Air Force leader who favored SpaceX in a contract award. Taking Dragon out of service would likely disrupt the ISS program, which involves dozens of countries under a two-decade-old international agreement. But it was unclear how quickly such a decommissioning would occur. NASA uses Russia's Soyuz spacecraft as a secondary ride for its astronauts to the ISS. Spacex's rise SpaceX rose to dominance long before Musk's foray into Republican politics last year, building formidable market share in the rocket launch and satellite communications industries that could shield it somewhat from Musk's split with Trump, analysts said. 'It fortunately wouldn't be catastrophic, since SpaceX has developed itself into a global powerhouse that dominates most of the space industry, but there's no question that it would result in significant lost revenue and missed contract opportunities,' said Justus Parmar, CEO of SpaceX investor Fortuna Investments. Under Trump in recent months, the U.S. space industry and NASA's workforce of 18,000 have been whipsawed by looming layoffs and proposed budget cuts that would cancel dozens of science programs, while the U.S. space agency remains without a confirmed administrator. Trump's nominee for NASA administrator, Musk ally and billionaire private astronaut Jared Isaacman, appeared to be an early casualty of Musk's rift with the president when the White House abruptly removed him from consideration over the weekend, denying Musk his pick to lead the space agency. Trump on Thursday explained dumping Isaacman by saying he was 'totally Democrat,' in an apparent reference to reports Isaacman had donated to Democrats. Isaacman has donated to some Republican but mostly Democratic candidates for office, according to public records. Musk's quest to send humans to Mars has been a critical element of Trump's space agenda. The effort has threatened to take resources away from NASA's flagship effort to send humans back to the moon. Trump's budget plan sought to cancel Artemis moon missions beyond its third mission, effectively ending the over-budget Space Launch System rocket used for those missions. Trump, Musk feud explodes with threats of cutting contracts, backing impeachment But the Senate Commerce Committee version of Trump's bill released late on Thursday would restore funding for missions four and five, providing at least $1 billion annually for SLS through 2029. Since SpaceX's rockets are a less expensive alternative to SLS, whether the Trump administration opposes the Senate's changes in the coming weeks will give an indication of Musk's remaining political power. SpaceX, founded in 2002, has won $15 billion of contracts from NASA for the company's Falcon 9 rockets and development of SpaceX's Starship, a multipurpose rocket system tapped to land NASA astronauts on the moon this decade. The company has also been awarded billions of dollars to launch a majority of the Pentagon's national security satellites into space while it builds a massive spy satellite constellation in orbit for a U.S. intelligence agency. In addition to not being in U.S. interests, former NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver said canceling SpaceX's contracts would probably not be legal. But she also added, 'A rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable.'


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Musk-Trump breakup puts $22 billion of SpaceX contracts at risk, jolting US space program
WASHINGTON: About $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts are at risk and multiple U.S. space programs could face dramatic changes in the fallout from Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's explosive feud on Thursday. The disagreement, rooted in Musk's criticism of Trump's tax-cut and spending legislation that began last week, quickly spiraled out of control. Trump lashed out at Musk when the president spoke in the Oval Office. Then in a series of X posts, Musk launched barbs at Trump, who threatened to terminate government contracts with Musk's companies. Taking the threat seriously, Musk said he would begin 'decommissioning' SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft used by NASA. Hours later, however, Musk appeared to reverse course. Responding to a follower on X urging him and Trump to 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days,' Musk wrote: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Still, Musk's mere threat to abruptly pull its Dragon spacecraft out of service marked an unprecedented outburst from one of NASA's leading commercial partners. Under a roughly $5 billion contract, the Dragon capsule has been the agency's only U.S. vessel capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station, making Musk's company a critical element of the U.S. space program. The feud raised questions about how far Trump, an often unpredictable force who has intervened in past procurement efforts, would go to punish Musk, who until last week headed Trump's initiative to downsize the federal government. SpaceX will not decommission Dragon, Musk says If the president prioritized political retaliation and canceled billions of dollars of SpaceX contracts with NASA and the Pentagon, it could slow U.S. space progress. NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but said: 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met.' Musk and Trump's tussle ruptured an extraordinary relationship between a U.S. president and industry titan that had yielded some key favors for SpaceX: a proposed overhaul of NASA's moon program into a Mars program, a planned effort to build a gigantic missile defense shield in space, and the naming of an Air Force leader who favored SpaceX in a contract award. Taking Dragon out of service would likely disrupt the ISS program, which involves dozens of countries under a two-decade-old international agreement. But it was unclear how quickly such a decommissioning would occur. NASA uses Russia's Soyuz spacecraft as a secondary ride for its astronauts to the ISS. Spacex's rise SpaceX rose to dominance long before Musk's foray into Republican politics last year, building formidable market share in the rocket launch and satellite communications industries that could shield it somewhat from Musk's split with Trump, analysts said. 'It fortunately wouldn't be catastrophic, since SpaceX has developed itself into a global powerhouse that dominates most of the space industry, but there's no question that it would result in significant lost revenue and missed contract opportunities,' said Justus Parmar, CEO of SpaceX investor Fortuna Investments. Under Trump in recent months, the U.S. space industry and NASA's workforce of 18,000 have been whipsawed by looming layoffs and proposed budget cuts that would cancel dozens of science programs, while the U.S. space agency remains without a confirmed administrator. Trump's nominee for NASA administrator, Musk ally and billionaire private astronaut Jared Isaacman, appeared to be an early casualty of Musk's rift with the president when the White House abruptly removed him from consideration over the weekend, denying Musk his pick to lead the space agency. Trump on Thursday explained dumping Isaacman by saying he was 'totally Democrat,' in an apparent reference to reports Isaacman had donated to Democrats. Isaacman has donated to some Republican but mostly Democratic candidates for office, according to public records. Musk's quest to send humans to Mars has been a critical element of Trump's space agenda. The effort has threatened to take resources away from NASA's flagship effort to send humans back to the moon. Trump's budget plan sought to cancel Artemis moon missions beyond its third mission, effectively ending the over-budget Space Launch System rocket used for those missions. Trump, Musk feud explodes with threats of cutting contracts, backing impeachment But the Senate Commerce Committee version of Trump's bill released late on Thursday would restore funding for missions four and five, providing at least $1 billion annually for SLS through 2029. Since SpaceX's rockets are a less expensive alternative to SLS, whether the Trump administration opposes the Senate's changes in the coming weeks will give an indication of Musk's remaining political power. SpaceX, founded in 2002, has won $15 billion of contracts from NASA for the company's Falcon 9 rockets and development of SpaceX's Starship, a multipurpose rocket system tapped to land NASA astronauts on the moon this decade. The company has also been awarded billions of dollars to launch a majority of the Pentagon's national security satellites into space while it builds a massive spy satellite constellation in orbit for a U.S. intelligence agency. In addition to not being in U.S. interests, former NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver said canceling SpaceX's contracts would probably not be legal. But she also added, 'A rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable.'