When will the 2025 conclave bring a new pope? Here's how long it's taken to see white smoke in the past
How locals revolted when it took nearly 3 years to choose a pope
This week, 133 Catholic cardinal electors will choose a new pope in a secretive, centuries-old ritual called a conclave. On Wednesday, the electors — among the church's most senior officials — will be locked inside the Vatican's Sistine Chapel to hold as many rounds of voting as prove necessary to select the next pontiff.
Here's what you need to know about the process and how long it might take.
When does the 2025 papal conclave start?
The conclave begins on Wednesday, May 7 — 16 days after Pope Francis' death.
It's one of the oldest methods of electing a head of state that's still in use today, and its basic protocols have barely changed for 800 years.
In order to become a pope, a candidate need only be Catholic and male. However, for centuries, popes have only been chosen from among the Catholic cardinals, the church's most senior officials.
The conclave takes place in the Sistine Chapel, behind sealed doors. Along with all Vatican staff involved in the process, the cardinal electors take an oath of secrecy, and the chapel is swept for listening devices.
The 133 electors participating this time around can hold one round of voting in the afternoon of the first day of the conclave, which consists of two ballots. To be elected pope, a candidate must garner two-thirds of the votes plus one. If the first round isn't conclusive, voting continues into a second day.
From the second day onward, there are two rounds of voting each day, one in the morning and one in the afternoon.
If there is no two-thirds majority after three days of voting, the process is paused for a day to allow time for the cardinals to pray and discuss their options.
How long have conclaves taken to choose new popes in the past?
There is no time limit set for how long a conclave can take. The cardinal electors continue to vote until a two-third-plus-one majority is achieved.
The shortest conclave on record was in 1503, when it took the cardinals only 10 hours to choose Pope Pius III as the new pontiff.
The longest conclave on record took almost three years.
The election of a successor to Pope Clement IV in 1268 dragged on for so long — 1,006 days — that locals in the town of Viterbo, where it was held, locked the cardinals in the room where they had gathered until they reached a decision.
That is where the name still used for the process of selecting a new pope — "conclave," which translates to "under lock and key" — came from.
After that marathon conclave, Pope Gregory X was finally elected in September of 1271.
How long is the 2025 papal conclave expected to last?
There is no way to predict how long a conclave will take, but guidance can perhaps be taken from recent history.
The last three popes have been elected in two or three days.
In 2013, Pope Francis was elected after five ballots held over two days. In 2005, Pope Benedict XVI was elected after four ballots. In 1978, Pope John Paul II was elected over two days after eight ballots.
Why does the papal conclave use white smoke?
After each round of voting, the paper ballots are burned. If a pope has not been elected, black smoke rises from the chimney above the chapel. If a pope has been elected, white smoke rises.
Initially, only black smoke was part of the conclave tradition, rising from the chimney as a result of ballots being burned after an unsuccessful round of voting.
White smoke was first used in 1914, when Cardinals decided the light colored smoke should announce the selection of a new pope, Georgtown University reported.
Now, to ensure the result of each ballot is clear, chemicals are burned alongside the ballots in each round to color the smoke black or white.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
8 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
U.S. Supreme Court 9, Wisconsin Supreme Court 0
Justice Sonia Sotomayor's unanimous opinion last week in favor of a Catholic Charities nonprofit was a good win for religious liberty, and we've already discussed what it says about the Supreme Court. Permit us to add a final thought, which is that the 9-0 decision is a humiliation for the Wisconsin Supreme Court's new 4-3 liberal majority. The state jurists had denied a religious tax exemption to a local diocese's Catholic Charities Bureau (CCB) and associated groups. Their activities were 'secular in nature' and didn't involve teaching the faith or supplying religious materials, the Wisconsin court said. It rejected almost out of hand the First Amendment argument that ultimately won the day.
TechCrunch
11 hours ago
- TechCrunch
Paragon says it canceled contracts with Italy over government's refusal to investigate spyware attack on journalist
Spyware maker Paragon accused the Italian government of refusing its help in investigating whether a journalist was spied on with its technology, according to a statement on Monday. In the statement first reported by Haaretz, Paragon claimed it was this refusal that prompted the company to cut ties with its Italian government customers. 'The company offered both the Italian government and parliament a way to determine whether its system had been used against the journalist in violation of Italian law and the contractual terms,' read the statement. 'As the Italian authorities chose not to proceed with this solution, Paragon terminated its contracts in Italy.' Paragon confirmed to TechCrunch that the statement was accurate. After TechCrunch contacted Paragon's executive chairman John Fleming for comment, Emily Horne, who works for Westexec Advisors, responded saying the company is 'referring all media queries' to the statements in the Haaretz article. This is the first time a spyware provider has publicly stated it cut ties with a specific customer after reports of abuse. The spyware maker's accusation is the latest twist in a scandal that erupted in January, when WhatsApp revealed a mass-hacking campaign targeting its users. The messaging app giant said it alerted around 90 users that they were targeted with spyware made by Paragon, a company co-founded by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak (pictured). Paragon, which has a contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has marketed itself in the U.S. and Europe as ostensibly a more responsible vendor compared to its predecessors in the industry. Francesco Cancellato, the director of news website Fanpage who was the first person to come forward saying he received WhatsApp's notification, is the journalist that Paragon referred to in the statement. Contact Us Do you have more information about Paragon Solutions, and this spyware campaign? From a non-work device, you can contact Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai securely on Signal at +1 917 257 1382, or via Telegram and Keybase @lorenzofb, or Do you have more information about Paragon Solutions, and this spyware campaign? From a non-work device, you can contact Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai securely on Signal at +1 917 257 1382, or via Telegram and Keybase @lorenzofb, or email . You also can contact TechCrunch via SecureDrop Paragon's statement is a response to a report published last week by an Italian parliamentary committee known as COPASIR, which investigated the spyware scandal in the country. The committee concluded there was no evidence that Cancellato had been a target of Italy's two intelligence agencies, AISI and AISE, which it confirmed were Paragon customers. Hours after Haaretz published Paragon's statement, the Italian government rebuffed Paragon's remarks, saying that the decision to first suspend and then terminate the contract with Paragon was mutual, according to unnamed sources quoted by Italian news wire ANSA. The sources were also quoted as saying that the Department of Information for Security (DIS), the Italian government body overseeing AISE and AISI, refused Paragon's help to check the logs on the agencies' Graphite spyware systems because doing so would have exposed confidential data to a private foreign company, and compromised national security. Allowing Paragon to help, the sources claimed, would have compromised the reputation of Italian intelligence agencies among its international peers. COPASIR and the Italian government, which is led by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, did not respond to TechCrunch's requests for comment. Cancellato responded to Paragon's statement in a video posted on Fanpage. 'Who is lying in this story? COPASIR or Paragon?' he said. 'To find out, all we have to do is ask Paragon to officially tell us who spied on Fanpage. They said they can find out? We want them to tell us once and for all,' said Cancellato. In late April, Fanpage reporter Ciro Pellegrino said he had received a notification from Apple that he had been targeted with government spyware. COPASIR's investigation did not mention Pellegrino's case. COPASIR, on the other hand, confirmed that other victims of Paragon spyware were lawfully targeted. Those are Luca Casarini and Giuseppe Caccia, who work for the Italian nonprofit Mediterranea Saving Humans, which rescues immigrants who try to cross the Mediterranean Sea; and David Yambio, the president and co-founder of Refugees in Libya, a non-government organization active in Italy. All of them, COPASIR said, were lawfully investigated for their activities related to alleged illegal immigration. On the other hand, COPASIR concluded that there was no evidence of surveillance against Mattia Ferrari, a priest who works on the rescue ship of Mediterranea Saving Humans, who also received a notification from WhatsApp. In a statement to ANSA on Monday, COPASIR said that it was willing to declassify the contents of the hearing it held with Paragon representatives on April 9 to defend its work in the inquiry. The statement said COPASIR was surprised by Paragon's statement.
Forbes
14 hours ago
- Forbes
Low Turnout In Italian Vote Ends Hopes For Shorter Citizenship Wait
Getty Creative A measure presented to Italians via referendum, to reduce the waiting time for Italian citizenship, has failed after nowhere near enough people showed up to vote on it. The result - unsurprising given widespread political opposition to the measure - means millions of people will continue to wait well more than ten years for citizenship and Italy remains an outlier in the EU on the matter. The measure, if passed, would have reduced the official residency requirement for documented residents to attain citizenship from ten years to five, bringing Italy in line with most other European member states. In practice, the wait can be considerably longer than ten years. Activists campaigning for the reform argued that such a long process is a needless wait for people who are already well-integrated into Italian society, many having spent much of their life there, and have shown their attachment to the country. Citizenship confers various legal privileges, depending on the issuing country, including the right to vote, run for public office and sometimes participate in certain labor markets. More broadly, citizenship is considered valuable to many immigrants as it represents the acceptance of the host country, as well as a level of security offered by a permanent status. There is also a whole raft of discriminations based on someone not being a citizen - beyond what one might consider 'standard' discrimination. People who may have full language and cultural fluency in a country, for instance, may still find themselves more easily rejected from accommodation, jobs and other services than are people with the right passport, as working with citizens is seen as less of a risk or hassle. At the same time, citizenship - and the pathway towards it - is seen as a strong motivator for the integration of migrants of all classes. The gradual acceptance into both the social and democratic systems of a country offers milestones for someone to learn to live in the country as best they can. Conversely, the systematic refusal to allow even very long-term residents seen in some countries is seen as a method for creating a multi-tiered society, with those denied citizenship feeling and being perceived as permanently 'other' to their host society. Such dynamics are occasionally weaponized, as seen recently in the U.K. when the government announced plans to permanently bar refugees from citizenship if they arrived by boat. It is estimated the Italian measure would have sped up the process for between two and three million people lawfully resident in Italy. The fact that it was rejected - even though it would have applied to people with residence permits rather than an 'amnesty' for undocumented migrants - is no surprise given anti-immigration political tone in Italy. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who was elected on a campaign platform heavily featuring immigration and has led a campaign to reduce arrivals and even target NGOs, campaigned against the citizenship measure, encouraging voters simply not to show up to keep turnout low.
