Edison to bury power lines in areas destroyed by Eaton and Palisades fires
Edison will bury more than 150 miles of power lines in Altadena and Malibu in the wake of January's deadly and devastating Eaton and Palisades fires in Southern California. The underground lines, which are widely considered by experts to be much safer than overhead equipment, will replace damaged infrastructure in high-fire-risk areas in the two cities over the next several years, as part of a comprehensive infrastructure rebuilding plan.
Burying power lines is pricey, as much as $3 million per mile for larger transmission lines, and digging up paved roads and other portions of established neighborhoods can be time consuming and tricky.
Southern California Edison, a subsidiary of Edison International, said it will seek funds "from various entities" to cover the estimated $860 million to $925 million cost, as well as seeking cost-saving measures wherever possible. That includes possible joint design projects and laying common trenches with Los Angeles County and CalTrans, and exploring using telecommunications trenches.
SCE will seek to recover costs from customers via a limited rate hike through the California Public Utilities commission, a spokesman said, but are also seeking donations from government agencies, nonprofits or wealthy individuals who wish to contribute to making neighborhoods safer.
"SCE expects to file applications at the CPUC to recover the costs and will continue to seek funds from federal, state and local governments, along with philanthropic organizations and technology partners, to offset total project costs," SCE spokesman Jeff Monford said.
SCE said in a news release that, "the plan focuses on increasing reliability and long-term resilience."
The company — and perhaps its ratepayers — also face potential high costs from numerous lawsuits alleging live power lines and a transmission tower on a dry, flammable hillside right above Altadena and Pasadena caused the Eaton Fire, which killed 18 people and levelled entire city blocks of homes, places of worship and businesses.
SCE laid out its initial plan in a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom summarizing its planned work, the likely costs and "areas for collaboration" with local, state and federal government; nonprofit and technology partners; and community members.
Cost, state Public Utilities Commission rules "and other considerations must be weighed before moving forward," the company said in the letter.
In a news release, Pedro J. Pizarro, president and CEO of Edison International, SCE's parent company, said, 'Just three months have passed since the devastating wildfires, and all of us at Edison continue to keep those affected in our thoughts. We're working closely with state and county leaders and the communities of Altadena and Malibu to rebuild wildfire-impacted areas stronger than ever."
He added, 'SCE's rebuilding plan will underground electrical distribution infrastructure where feasible and make the most of breakthrough technologies to reduce wildfire risk.
'SCE said "the plan focuses on increasing reliability and long-term resilience."
It calls for undergrounding of new distribution equipment, typically the smaller lines that bring power to homes and businesses, including 130 circuit miles, which includes nearly all distribution power lines in High Fire Risk Areas within the burn scars of the affected communities — plus 23 circuit miles in areas of Altadena not in high-fire-risk areas. An additional 19 circuit miles in Altadena are being evaluated. Company officials said the plan was developed with input from the impacted communities and public officials.
In its letter to Newsom, SCE officials thanked the governor for an executive order streamlining environmental reviews to build power infrastructure, and discussed costs of its planned work.
"A major barrier to undergrounding is cost compared to covered conductor and other grid hardening alternatives. We value your recent executive order promoting undergrounding and efforts to reduce associated red tape and delays. This, along with other measures such as extended road closures, helps speed up and drive down the cost of undergrounding," the letter reads. "For example, SCE recently completed all steps from design to civil work for undergrounding a line segment in Altadena in just five weeks — work that would have taken two years under normal conditions."
But it added, "Even with this important support, undergrounding still requires more upfront capital, and costs would need to be meaningfully reduced to underground more circuit miles.
SCE said nearly half of the undergrounding costs relate to civil work, about $300 to $350 million including trenching and paving. It said coordinating with Los Angeles County and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), including aligning on planning and construction timelines, and a 'one trench' policy with telecommunications companies, "are important levers."
"SCE is also exploring opportunities to proactively lay telecommunications conduit in trenches used for undergrounding electrical distribution infrastructure."
The utility said it will "harden" above-ground lines by coating them in fireproof materials.
Janet Wilson is senior environment reporter for The Desert Sun and co-authors USA Today Climate Point. She can be reached at jwilson@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: Edison to bury power lines in areas destroyed by Eaton, Palisades fires

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
11 hours ago
- CBS News
Trump signs measure to block California's 2035 ban on new gas-powered cars; state sues
President Donald Trump signed a resolution on Thursday that blocks California's first-in-the-nation rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035. The state quickly announced it was challenging the move in court, with California's attorney general holding a news conference to discuss the lawsuit before Trump's signing ceremony ended at the White House. The resolution was approved by Congress last month and aims to quash the country's most aggressive attempt to phase out gas-powered cars. Trump also signed measures to overturn state policies curbing tailpipe emissions in certain vehicles and smog-forming nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks. Trump called California's regulations "crazy" at a White House ceremony where he signed the resolutions. "It's been a disaster for this country," he said. It comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests. It's the latest in an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and heavily Democratic California over issues including tariffs, the rights of LGBTQ+ youth and funding for electric vehicle chargers. The state is already involved in more than two-dozen lawsuits challenging Trump administration actions, and the state's Democratic Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the latest one at a news conference in California. Ten other states, all with Democratic attorneys general, joined the lawsuit filed Thursday. "The federal government's actions are not only unlawful; they're irrational and wildly partisan," Bonta said. "They come at the direct expense of the health and the well-being of our people." The three resolutions Trump signed will block California's rule phasing out gas-powered cars and end the sale of new ones by 2035. They will also kill rules that phase out the sale of medium- and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and cut tailpipe emissions from trucks. In his remarks at the White House, Trump expressed doubts about the performance and reliability of electric vehicles, though he had some notably positive comments about the company owned by Elon Musk, despite their fractured relationship. "I like Tesla," Trump said. In remarks that often meandered away from the subject at hand, Trump used the East Room ceremony to also muse on windmills, which he claimed "are killing our country," the prospect of getting electrocuted by an electric-powered boat if it sank and whether he'd risk a shark attack by jumping as the boat went down. "I'll take electrocution every single day," the president said. When it comes to cars, Trump said he likes combustion engines but for those that prefer otherwise, "If you want to buy electric, you can buy electric." "What this does is it gives us freedom," said Bill Kent, the owner of Kent Kwik convenience stores. Kent, speaking at the White House, said that the California rules would have forced him to install "infrastructure that frankly, is extremely expensive and doesn't give you any return." The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents major car makers, applauded Trump's action. "Everyone agreed these EV sales mandates were never achievable and wildly unrealistic," John Bozzella, the group's president and CEO, said in a statement. Newsom, who is considered a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, and California officials contend that what the federal government is doing is illegal and said the state plans to sue. Newsom said Trump's action was a continuation of his "all-out assault" on California. "And this time he's destroying our clean air and America's global competitiveness in the process," Newsom said in a statement. "We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters." Newsom later Thursday doubled down on his state's assertion of its right to set environmental regulations. He signed an executive order requiring state air regulators to propose new rules further limiting air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks if a court ultimately upholds California's rules that Trump sought to kill. Trump's signing of the resolutions comes as he has pledged to revive American auto manufacturing and boost oil and gas drilling. The move follows other steps the Trump administration has taken to roll back rules that aim to protect air and water and reduce emissions that cause climate change. The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed repealing rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Dan Becker with the Center for Biological Diversity, said the signing of the resolutions was "Trump's latest betrayal of democracy." "Signing this bill is a flagrant abuse of the law to reward Big Oil and Big Auto corporations at the expense of everyday people's health and their wallets," Becker said in a statement. California, which has some of the nation's worst air pollution, has been able to seek waivers for decades from the EPA, allowing it to adopt stricter emissions standards than the federal government. In his first term, Trump revoked California's ability to enforce its standards, but Democratic President Joe Biden reinstated it in 2022. Trump has not yet sought to revoke it again. Republicans have long criticized those waivers and earlier this year opted to use the Congressional Review Act, a law aimed at improving congressional oversight of actions by federal agencies, to try to block the rules. That's despite a finding from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, that California's standards cannot legally be blocked using the Congressional Review Act. The Senate parliamentarian agreed with that finding. California, which makes up roughly 11% of the U.S. car market, has significant power to sway trends in the auto industry. About a dozen states signed on to adopt California's rule phasing out the sale of new gas-powered cars.


New York Times
12 hours ago
- New York Times
Do Californians Really Pay Trump's Bills?
In his escalating conflict with President Trump, Gov. Gavin Newsom suggested last week that California had some leverage over the federal government. 'We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back,' he wrote on X. 'Maybe it's time to cut that off.' His office followed up with a news release titled 'Californians pay Trump's bills.' In case you missed it, California is the biggest 'donor state' in the country — providing around $83 billion more to the federal government than it receives from the federal government — nearly three times as much as the next biggest 'donor state.' Though Mr. Newsom has since said he wouldn't ask state residents to withhold federal taxes, he said he still felt the need to respond to Mr. Trump's threats to cut off federal funding to the state and to the deployment of active duty military to Los Angeles amid protests. The term 'donor states' might be relatively obscure, but it captures a dynamic that underlies many national policy debates. And it taps into longstanding philosophical questions about whether it's fair that some states prop up the country more than others — and whether that's the right way to look at things in the first place. Most of the donor states are rich, blue states. Think Massachusetts, New Jersey, Washington and, yes, California. The 'recipient states' are mostly poor states like New Mexico, West Virginia and Mississippi. There are a few exceptions, like Virginia, a blue state whose residents receive, on net, about $12,000 in federal contracts and wages more than they pay in taxes. On average, residents from recipient states receive about $3,000 more than they pay. There are a few different ways one could calculate these figures (more on that later), but the Rockefeller Institute has been tabulating estimates for years, and its numbers, shown above, are often the ones cited by politicians themselves. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump admits immigration crackdown is hurting farmers, hotels
President Trump Thursday admitted his immigration crackdown is hurting farms and hotels that rely heavily on undocumented immigrants for low-wage labor. As immigration protests spread from Los Angeles to other cities, Trump said he would consider tweaking his harsh mass deportation policy to spare the crucial agriculture and hospitality industries. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' Trump wrote on his social media site. 'This is not good. We must protect our Farmers, but get the criminals out of the USA. Changes are coming.' Trump rarely admits mistakes, especially on a signature policy issue like his promise to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, who are key workers in industries like agriculture and hospitality, along with food processing and restaurants. It's not clear what immigration or enforcement changes Trump might consider. Democrats wasted little time calling out Trump as a hypocrite on immigration. 'Turns out, chasing hard working people through ranches and farms and snatching women and children off the streets is not good policy,' California Gov. Gavin Newsom tweeted. In April, Trump suggested at a cabinet meeting that undocumented farm and hotel workers should be given permission to live and work in the U.S. if they fulfill certain conditions. There have been no follow-up proposals since. His Republican allies have repeatedly rejected comprehensive immigration reform efforts, some of which include provisions to allow undocumented immigrants to work in the U.S. or a path to citizenship, which they deride as 'amnesty for illegals.' Trump and administration officials have repeated vowed to escalate mass deportations, even as critics and economists point out the critical role undocumented immigrants play in the U.S. economy. About 40% of U.S. farmworkers are undocumented, according to the Agriculture Department. At least 1.1 million undocumented people work in the hospitality industry, which includes hotels and restaurants — about 31% of the workforce, according to estimates from an immigration advocacy group. Trump's Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency has recently ramped up efforts to snare suspected undocumented immigrants at workplaces, schools and even courthouses as the White House pushes to increase the number of deportations. Raids on places where workers gather to seek employment, like parking lots of home improvement stores, sparked the protests in Los Angeles last week. Trump has escalated the confrontation by ordering National Guard troops and even Marines into the fray. Immigrant rights groups have planned protests for Saturday in cities across the country, including Los Angeles and New York. The rallies will coincide with Trump's military parade in Washington D.C., which is billed as a 250th anniversary party for the U.S. Army but also coincides with the president's 79th birthday.