Education Department Orders Schools To Stop All Racial Discrimination
Last Friday, the Department of Education released a "Dear Colleague" letter directing educational institutions to stop all forms of racial discrimination in essentially all aspects of their operations, including "admissions, hiring, promotion, compensation, financial aid, scholarships, prizes, administrative support, discipline, housing, graduation ceremonies, and all other aspects of student, academic, and campus life."
The letter, from Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor, mostly reiterates existing civil rights prohibitions on racial discrimination, as well as the 2023 Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard that barred race-based affirmative action in college admissions.
"If an educational institution treats a person of one race differently than it treats another person because of that person's race, the educational institution violates the law," the letter reads. "The Department will no longer tolerate the overt and covert racial discrimination that has become widespread in this Nation's educational institutions. The law is clear: treating students differently on the basis of race to achieve nebulous goals such as diversity, racial balancing, social justice, or equity is illegal under controlling Supreme Court precedent."
While the letter primarily focuses on existing legal protections against race-based discrimination, it also singles out more nebulous forms of apparent discrimination in educational institutions. "Other programs discriminate in less direct, but equally insidious, ways," the letter reads. "[Diversity, equity, and inclusion] programs, for example, frequently preference certain racial groups and teach students that certain racial groups bear unique moral burdens that others do not."
Obviously, the Education Department is well within its rights to remind schools that they can't discriminate against students based on race. But the DEI-related provisions could also create confusion and possibly cause some colleges to suppress academic freedom in the name of eliminating DEI. After President Donald Trump signed several executive orders banning DEI programs in the federal government, West Point went so far as to disband several student cultural organizations.
"I think, what the letter is mostly meant to signal is a change in enforcement priorities. Most of what it's saying here is not new at all. But I think what they're trying to communicate is that they're going to enforce these laws with a different emphasis," says Robert Shibley, special counsel for campus advocacy at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a First Amendment organization. Shibley says the passage focused on DEI programs could lead to confusion and overreach, depending on how schools interpret it.
"The way 'teach' is going to be interpreted, is going to be very important when looking at this 'Dear Colleague' letter," Shibley says. " I do think there's legitimate concerns to be had there. And I think it's important that the department clarify that sooner rather than later."
Shibley also noted that universities shouldn't jump to overly broad interpretations of letters like this without further clarification.
"I think it's also incumbent on universities to be responsible when they are figuring out how to apply these….Universities need to have a common sense approach to making a good faith effort to follow this kind of guidance. But that doesn't mean that they have to do things that are manifestly unjust at a moment's notice."
How schools will ultimately interpret the letter remains to be seen, but if what happened at West Point is any indication, some colleges may do far more than merely follow decades-old civil rights law.
The post Education Department Orders Schools To Stop All Racial Discrimination appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Broward judge denies violating judicial conduct code over deepfake AI call
Broward County Judge Lauren Peffer in a new court filing Friday formally denied the ethics charges filed against her, stemming from her promotion of a scandalous book and a deepfake AI recording during her campaign last year. In the routine filing with Florida's Supreme Court, Peffer denied the Judicial Qualifications Commission's charges filed last month that she violated judicial ethics rules that govern 'inappropriate political activity.' Peffer, a first-time judicial candidate, won her seat in August and began her term in January. During her campaign, which centered on trustworthiness and ethics in the judiciary, Peffer referenced in an endorsement interview with the South Florida Sun Sentinel editorial board a book written and published by a former courthouse employee in the Orlando area called, 'The Ninth Circus Court of Florida, My 30-Year Job from Hell!' The book, written by someone who had been terminated, 'portrays the judiciary in the Ninth Judicial Circuit as corrupt and incompetent and attacks the character' of numerous judges, including current Chief Judge Lisa Munyon, according to the JQC's charging document. Peffer wrote in response to a Sun Sentinel editorial board questionnaire that the book's 'recent revelations' had 'highlighted an image crisis within Florida's judiciary,' according to the JQC's notice of formal charges. At the time Peffer cited the book in the Sun Sentinel interview, it lacked any published reviews and appeared to have generated no public discourse or impact, the Sun Sentinel previously reported. Asked by the Sun Sentinel about evidence of the book creating public mistrust, Peffer sent the newspaper a link to an 18-minute recording of what purported to be a phone call about the book between Munyon, state Supreme Court Chief Justice Carlos Muñiz and Justice Renatha Francis, according to the notice of charges. But the recording was fake, likely made with generative AI, and could be deemed so by 'any reasonable person,' the JQC said in its notice of charges. Broward judicial candidate drops Orlando author's self-published tell-all from her campaign stump speech Peffer was forwarded the link to the recording 'by another lawyer,' her response filed Friday said. Peffer in her response to the charges on Friday acknowledged that she had not 'carefully listened to the call but had a recollection that the judiciary was being criticized in the recording' and did not try to determine its veracity before providing it to the newspaper. 'Judge Peffer acknowledges that she should have more carefully listened to the recording before referencing it in her answers to the editorial board. In responding to these proceedings, Judge Peffer listened to the recordings without distraction, and it was immediately apparent that the purported phone call was a 'deep fake,'' her response said. However, she denied that she shared the recording 'despite clear evidence of its inauthenticity,' as the JQC alleged in its charges. In her response, Peffer also admitted that she never read the disgruntled employee's book before referencing it to the Sun Sentinel and did not research the claims the employee made. 'Judge Peffer did not intend to promote the validity of the book but instead, she intended to point to the book as an example of criticism of the judiciary,' her response said. She previously acknowledged issues with the book in a July interview with the Sun Sentinel and said she would stop citing it. Peffer denied that she 'ignored' the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee's training on campaign ethics as the notice of charges alleged and denied that she 'helped facilitate the former employee's farce,' according to her response.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings' events to protest Trump, military parade happening Saturday
WASHINGTON () — Nearly 2,000 protests of the Trump Administration are scheduled to coincide with the massive military parade in D.C. on Saturday. National action group, No Kings, which recently protested on President's Day in D.C. to support federal workers amid widespread government cuts, promotes the weekend protests in communities within every state. 'We're coming together to say, 'no kings' in the United States of America today or any day,' said Chris Adair, social media coordinator of We of Action Virginia, an advocacy group promoting election fairness and civil rights. Military displays on the National Mall spark mixed feelings for some 'We said it in 1776. We'll say it again this year,' Adair added. Drivers should expect to see protestors staged along the pedestrian bridge overpasses, local town squares and highly trafficked corridors before and during the military parade, which is slated for just after 6 p.m. near the White House, according to Adair. President Donald Trump was asked about the No Kings protests by a reporter this week at the White House. 'No kings? I don't feel like a king. I have to go through hell to get stuff approved,' Trump said. Army 250: Could weather impact the military parade in DC? The president also told reporters in the Oval Office this week that anyone protesting the parade in D.C. 'will be met with very heavy force.' 'We are exercising a First Amendment privilege, that is the right to protest, that is the right to free speech. We can organize peacefully, and we will, peacefully,' Adair said of Trump's comments on protests. No King's website says that weapons are not brought to any protests. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
The gaslighting of Alex Padilla is already in full swing on the right
Lunging men are perceived as dangerous. In an America that has long weaponized descriptions of how men of color look and move to justify use of force, that is especially true of dark men lunging at white women. So when Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said after Sen. Alex Padilla interrupted her news conference Thursday that 'people need to identify themselves before they start lunging' — it's hard to believe it wasn't meant to be an intentionally loaded word, with loaded results. For those of you who don't watch Fox and other right-wing media, I'll fill you in on how Noem's description played out. Padilla, the Trumpian version of the story now goes, got what he deserved: He busted into a press conference uninvited, they say, pushed his way toward the stage and failed to identify himself. Just ask my inbox. 'Here is what your article should have said,' wrote one fan of my column about the incident. ''DEI appointee Senator Alex Padilla, dressed like a truck driver and acting like a potential attacker or mental case, burst into a press conference being conducted by a high ranking member of the Cabinet and started shouting and interrupting her.'' Another reader put that dog-whistle racism more succinctly. 'No Juan above the law,' the reader quipped. We'll get to whether Padilla lunged or not and just how dangerous a lunge really is. But the larger issue is the alternate reality the Trump administration is building to cultivate fear and build support for a military crackdown. The ask isn't that we believe Padilla was a threat, but that we believe that America has devolved into a immigrant-induced chaos that only the military can quell, and that Trump needs the powers of a king to lead the military to our salvation. So the question isn't really whether Padilla lunged or not — since, as the video shows, it's clear he was nowhere close to Noem and had no intent to harm — but rather why Noem chose to call it a lunge. 'It was very disingenuous of Kristi Noem to make the claim that he lunged at her,' Joan Donovan told me. She's an expert on disinformation and an assistant professor of journalism at Boston University. 'The Trump administration is salivating over a major contestation that would allow them to roll the military out into any old town,' she said. 'They are making it seem as if without this kind of major intervention and excessive force, that these people are ungovernable.' Padilla, the son of Mexican immigrants, is known to be a level-headed guy. My colleague Gustavo Arellano describes him as a 'goody-two-shoes.' But these aren't level-headed days. Padilla said that he was in the federal building on Thursday for a briefing with a general, because for weeks he's been trying unsuccessfully to get answers about how deportations are being handled. That briefing was delayed by Noem's news conference, and so — escorted by federal authorities who knew exactly who they were escorting, Padilla said — he went to listen to Noem in the hopes of getting some information. Padilla said he got fed up listening to her remarks about criminals and invasions and tried to ask a question, while moving forward past the wall of television cameras. In the videos I've watched, multiple federal agents — seemingly some from Homeland Security and the FBI — block his way then begin pushing him back. Padilla seems to continue to push forward, but is overpowered and forced into the hallway. It's here where he's taken to the ground and cuffed. It's hard to see a lunge in there. And if there was one, it was from at least a good 10 feet away from Noem, at a minimum. Use-of-force expert Ed Obayashi told me that in situations such as this, law enforcement officers are expected to use their judgment on what is a danger. 'They were trying to keep him from approaching,' Obayashi said, pointing out it was the officers' job to protect Noem. 'They were trying to do what they could under the circumstances to prevent him from getting closer.' But, he added, from what we can see in the videos, it doesn't look like Padilla showed 'intent' to cause harm and he was really far away. Distance makes a difference when judging whether a lunge is a threat. 'It doesn't seem like he was going to rush up,' Obayashi said. So, to be fair to officers who may or may not have at first realized they were manhandling a U.S. senator, they had a job to do and were doing it, even if a bit zealously. But Noem knows better. It's hard to imagine she didn't recognize Padilla, who served on her confirmation committee and is the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship and Border Safety. And if she didn't, her confidant and close advisor Corey Lewandowski certainly did. Padilla told the New York Times that he was being detained in the hallway 'when of all people, Corey Lewandowski ... comes running down the hall and he starts yelling, 'Let him go! Let him go!'' And of course, Padilla was yelling that he was a senator, and forcefully denies any lunge. 'I wasn't lunging at her or anybody, and yes, I identified myself,' he said on CNN. Noem, of course, could have said something in the moment to defuse the situation. She could have asked Padilla back into the room to answer his question. Padilla said the two met after the news conference and spoke for about 15 minutes, which means Noem knew his intentions when she later accused him of 'lunging.' So what could have been handled as an unfortunate encounter was instead purposely upgraded for propaganda purposes. Shortly after Noem's statement, the White House press secretary posted on X that Padilla 'recklessly lunged toward the podium,' cementing that narrative into right-wing conscientiousness. For weeks, the Trump administration has been ramping up its war on dissent. Weeks before Padilla was handcuffed, U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) was indicted by a grand jury for 'forcibly impeding and interfering' with federal law enforcement after a scuffle outside of a New Jersey ICE detention center. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested during the same incident, but charges were later dropped. In April, Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested inside her own courthouse after being accused of helping an immigrant appearing in her court to evade ICE officers by allowing him to exit through a public door. And just before the Padilla incident, Noem claimed that federal agents would remain in Los Angeles despite protests, where hundreds have been cited or arrested. By Friday, Marines had been deployed in Los Angeles, with little clarity on whether their guns contained live rounds and under what circumstances they were authorized to fire. 'We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city,' Noem said, right before Padilla interrupted. Liberate an American city. With troops. Quash dissent. With fear. A survey last fall by PRRI found that 26% of Republicans say that 'it is necessary for the progress of this country that the president has the power to limit the influence of opposing parties and groups.' It also found that there is a 'strong overlap among Americans who hold Christian nationalist and authoritarian views.' 'If it is the case that Trump and Kristi Noem and Pete Hegseth are going to continue arresting Democratic representatives, then that is authoritarianism,' Donovan said. 'Those are the people whose job it is to represent the common man, and if they can't do that because they're so bogged down with false charges or trumped-up charges, then we don't live in a democracy.' Padilla may have lost his trademark cool during that press conference, but Noem did not. She knew exactly what she was saying, and why. A Padilla asking questions is a threat to Trump. A Padilla lunging becomes a threat to society, one that only Trump can stop.
