Rachel Reeves delivers major update on transport cash for North and Midlands
Chancellor Rachel Reeves will confirm £15.6 billion of funding for local transport projects to overhaul creaking transport systems outside of London ahead of the Spending Review
Rachel Reeves will announce plans today to pour billions of pounds into transport in the North and the Midlands.
Ahead of next week's Spending Review, the Chancellor will confirm £15.6 billion of funding for local transport projects to overhaul creaking transport systems outside of London.
Mayors are expected to get cash to extend the metros in Tyne and Wear, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, along with a renewed tram network in South Yorkshire and a new mass transit system in West Yorkshire.
In a speech in Greater Manchester, Ms Reeves is expected to say that 'a Britain that is better off cannot rely on a handful of places forging ahead of the rest of the country".
She will warn that the 'result of such thinking has been growth created in too few places, felt by too few people and wide gaps between regions, and between our cities and towns".
The Chancellor is expected to rip up Treasury spending rules to reprioritise investment outside of London and the South East - allowing her to splash tens of billions of pounds on road, rail and green energy projects.
The current rules assess investment in areas with booming economies as having the biggest impact on growth, which tends to favour projects in the South of England.
But Ms Reeves decided to shake up these rules earlier this year, with details expected alongside the Spending Review next week.
The news will come as a boost to Labour MPs who are concerned over the threat from Reform UK in their heartlands, as well as the prospect of cuts to day-to-day spending.
Today's package includes £2.4 billion for the West Midlands to fund an extension of the region's metro from Birmingham city centre to the new sports quarter, and £2.1 billion to start building West Yorkshire Mass Transit by 2028.
Greater Manchester will receive £2.5 billion for projects including new tram stops in Bury, Manchester and Oldham and an extension of the tram network to Stockport.
A £1.5 billion investment in South Yorkshire will include £530 million to renew the region's trams, while the East Midlands will receive £2 billion to design a new mass transit system between Derby and Nottingham.
In the south, the West of England will receive £800 million, including £200 million to develop mass transit links between Bristol, Bath, South Gloucestershire and north Somerset.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, said: 'For too long, people in the North and Midlands have been locked out of the investment they deserve.
"With £15.6bn of Government investment, we're giving local leaders the means to drive cities, towns and communities forward, investing in Britain's renewal so you and your family are better off."
It comes as Ms Reeves was locked in talks with senior ministers over departmental budgets for the next three years, which will be set out in next week's Spending Review.
Deputy PM Angela Rayner is still battling to hammer out a settlement on issues like building affordable homes and day-to-day spending on local government and homelessness. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is also reportedly yet to sign off her deal.
Unprotected departments such as the Home Office and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government are facing real-terms cuts in their spending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
20 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Birmingham residents could suffer bin misery until Christmas
Birmingham residents could suffer bin misery until Christmas Unite says the cuts will leave many unable to pay their bills, rents and mortgages Rubbish has piled up in the city (Image: Darren Quinton/Birmingham Live ) Nearly 400 Birmingham bin workers facing brutal pay cuts have voted to continue industrial action, Unite, the UK's leading union, said today. The ballot, which resulted in 97 per cent of workers voting in favour of strike action on a 75 per cent turnout. It means strike action could last until December. Strikes began in January after the council told the bin workers they would face pay cuts of up to £8,000 – a quarter of their wages for some. Unite says the cuts will leave many unable to pay their bills, rents and mortgages. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here Bins have been piling up in the city (Image: Joseph Walshe / SWNS ) Bin workers in Birmingham have been striking since January and walked out indefinitely in March in a dispute over job and pay cuts. Piles of black bags in the streets and overflowing wheelie bins have led to an influx of rats in some parts of the city. Article continues below The city council made a renewed offer to the workers last week after mediated negotiations, but Unite said it was too little and too late. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'After smearing these workers in public since January and telling them to accept a fair and reasonable offer that never existed, the council finally put a proposal in writing last week. 'True to form, the proposal came weeks late and was not in line with the ballpark offer discussed during Acas talks in May. "It had been watered down by the government commissioners and the leader of the council despite them never having been in the negotiations. 'It beggars belief that a Labour government and Labour council is treating these workers so disgracefully. "It is hardly surprising that so many working people are asking whose side Labour is on. 'The decision makers at Birmingham council need to get in the room and put forward an acceptable offer. "Unite will not allow these workers to be financially ruined – the strikes will continue for as long as it takes. "Unite calls on the decision makers to let common sense prevail in upcoming negotiations.' A council spokesperson said: 'This is a service that needs to be transformed to one that citizens of Birmingham deserve and the council remains committed to resolving this dispute. 'We have made a fair and reasonable offer that we have asked Unite to put to their members and we are awaiting their response.' The council denied that its leader or the commissioners had watered down any offer, and said Unite's ballot was not a response to its latest offer made through Acas. Article continues below
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Wise goes to the US. Will its founder's supercharged voting rights follow?
Back in 2021, the arrival on the London stock market of Wise, a rapidly expanding money transfer company, generated a feelgood factor at a useful moment. It came a month after overhyped Deliveroo flopped on debut. And, since Wise was a pure fintech business, as opposed to a pizza delivery outfit with an app, there was reason to think the UK might be getting its act together in the sector that politicians swoon over. Shoreditch's finest, and its Estonian founders, would show the way in UK fintech. Wise sported a £9bn valuation. Now the company wants to switch its primary listing to New York in search of a wider pool of investors, more active trading in its shares and 'a potential pathway to inclusion in major US [stock market] indices'. A secondary listing will be retained in London, but we know what usually happens. Nine-tenths of the share trading gravitates to the primary location. The obligatory description on these occasions – 'a fresh blow for London' – applies. Wise, with revenues of £1.2bn and underlying pre-tax profits of £282m, is a bad one to see succumb to the temptations of New York. Rachel Reeves may take note. The chancellor is cajoling UK pension funds to shove cash into private markets (at a moment when even private equity insiders worry that the golden years for returns could be over) but it is the public markets that are more in need of love and affection from No 11. She won't do it (almost certainly), but the first step would be to cut the UK's uncompetitive 0.5% rate of stamp duty on share purchases. There is plenty of evidence that a reduction would pay for itself in increased trading. Yet let's not overlook a weirdness about Wise's move – and an unanswered question. The oddness is that the company, now so keen on getting into a US index, never tried to enter a UK one. At flotation, its dual-class share structure meant it could not be included in FTSE indices. Why not now join the grown-ups? With a £12bn valuation these days, Wise would rank halfway up the Footsie. It would be a big fish. The danger in having the main listing in New York is that the firm will be a relative minnow in a tech pond populated by the trillion-dollar likes of Nvidia. But that's a risk its founder, Kristo Käärmann, is clearly prepared to take in pursuit of greater US visibility for 'major US growth opportunities'. Or perhaps the dual voting structure is a bigger part of the story. Wise's statement described the US listing as having 'a structure that aligns with US market practices including those of our US-listed tech peers, which we believe allows us to remain laser-focused on delivering our mission'. That sounds suspiciously like a reference to the enhanced voting rights that now allow Käärmann to own 18% of the shares but have 50% of the votes. Such unequal arrangements cause little fuss in the US, but they remain controversial in the UK, even if they are now allowed for index-inclusion purposes after a change in the rules a couple of years ago. A key point about Käärmann's supercharged rights, however, is that they are due to expire next summer under a 'sunset clause' agreed at listing. Wise could, if it wished, ask its UK shareholders for an extension but that may cause a row in itself – a sunset is meant to mean what it says. Perhaps the company thinks it is easier to wrap continued enhanced rights into a package where the main element is the change of main listing. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Käärmann offered zero clarity on whether he wants to keep his supercharged rights. 'It depends on the structure we are going to land on,' he said, adding that all would be clear in the formal circular later this month. Curious. London's acceptance of dual rights – but, critically, only with a five-year sunset clause – was meant to be a way to entice UK tech founders to list in London. It was a pointless change if it just encourages them to leave when the sun is about to set.
Powys County Times
34 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
MP: Grenfell-style mistakes could be repeated over battery storage regulation
The Government risks repeating the mistakes of Grenfell unless safety regulations on battery storage units are brought forward, an MP has warned. Liberal Democrat John Milne said there were 'alarming parallels' with the systemic failure which led to the west London tower block fire. Currently there are no laws which specifically govern the safety of battery energy storage systems (Bess), according to the House of Commons library. However, individual batteries could be subject to product safety regulations. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Milne accused the Government of being 'too complacent' as he called for enforceable regulations for the design and construction of the storage systems. The MP for Horsham said: 'The Grenfell disaster was the end result of many failings by both individuals and companies, but at its heart it was a failure of regulation. 'The rules left things wide open for exploitation by cost-cutting developers, and that is exactly what happened. 'Just as with lithium-ion batteries, a new technology, in this case cladding, was being used at scale for the first time without proper understanding of the risks. The time to act is now.' He continued: 'The Government itself has responded to all questions from myself and others to say that it considers the present regulatory regime to be robust. I am tempted to say pride comes before a fall. 'In the last few weeks a Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesman has stated that battery fires at storage sites are rare in the UK, we already have high standards in place that require manufacturers and industry to ensure batteries are safe throughout their lifespan. 'This is just too complacent. 'Fires as a result of cladding were also incredibly rare, but that did not save 72 lives at Grenfell.' Mr Milne said the industry would benefit from clear guidance, before adding: 'Any guidance needs to cover-off a number of areas, including transport of batteries to the site, design and construction, fire-fighting, ongoing inspection and decommissioning. 'In the short term, if the Government is for any reason still reluctant to regulate, perhaps it could issue clear national guidelines which are capable of being updated annually. 'Enforcement might then take place through the insurance industry, who would be likely to insist that any new applications followed such guidelines, as no project can go ahead without insurance, it is enforcement by the back door. 'Grenfell was a wholly predictable tragedy. A similar fire at Lakanal House in Camberwell, which killed six people, should have made us understand the risk, but the warning wasn't heeded and history took its course. 'We can't go back in time to stop Grenfell, but we can act now to avoid making the same mistake again with battery energy storage systems.' Elsewhere in the debate, Conservative MP for Mid Buckinghamshire Greg Smith said there should be minimum distances between battery storage sites and housing. Mr Smith said: 'This is not a debate about the principle of energy storage, although I am in principle opposed to such schemes taking agricultural land and challenging our food security, but today's debate, which is deeply concerning, and what this House must urgently address, are the real, growing, and too often overlooked safety implications of these installations, particularly when placed in close proximity to villages, and rural road networks ill-equipped to support them.' He added: 'At the very least the Government should introduce clear national guidelines on the siting of Bess installations, including minimum separation distances from residential properties, fire resilience standards, mandatory site-specific risk assessments and restrictions on placing these facilities on, or near, rural roads.' SNP MP for Aberdeen North, Kirsty Blackman, said developers should pay towards fire mitigation measures. She said: 'If we're saying to those organisations that are creating the battery storage sites, you will need to pay for the fire safety assessment, you will need to consult the local fire and you will need to pay for the training of those local fire teams in tackling fires at battery energy storage sites, I think that would be the most reasonable way forward. 'Ask them to pay for that training, because it's them that are going to be making a huge profit off it.' Energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said: 'It is often claimed that there is no regulation in this sector because there is no specific law addressing battery safety. This is simply untrue. 'The safety and standards of batteries are assured throughout their life cycle. The Government is therefore confident that the safety risks posed by grid-scale batteries are relatively small and well managed.'
