Lack of genetic diversity among red squirrels poses disease threat, study finds
Worryingly low levels of genetic diversity make Scotland's red squirrels especially vulnerable to disease, a study has shown.
Researchers at the University of Edinburgh said this could explain why the mammals are so slow to develop resistance to the squirrelpox virus, which is carried by non-native grey squirrels and fatal to reds.
The study saw researchers analyse the entire genetic code of 106 red squirrels from across Scotland and Formby in north-west England.
They found the species had lower levels of genetic diversity than some of the world's most endangered animals, including the Iberian lynx and the Amur tiger.
Genetic diversity is important for species' survival as it helps them adapt to environmental changes, as well as making them more resilient to threats like disease and habitat loss.
Researchers pointed out that the squirrels' movement across Scotland is restricted by natural and man-made barriers, including the Cairngorm mountains in the north and cities in the central belt.
This has resulted, they said, in squirrels living in pockets of isolated populations, with the north east of Scotland being one of the only areas the animals can move freely from north to south.
Red squirrels are endangered in the UK and considered a conservation priority in Scotland, a key stronghold for the animals.
Study lead Dr Melissa Marr, from the University of Edinburgh, said the study was the first to use 'whole genomes' to study Scotland's red squirrels.
'Historical records show that they have faced many threats in the past, and this is clearly reflected in their DNA which shows worryingly low levels of diversity,' she said.
'By highlighting this low genetic diversity, and how their populations are spread over the landscape, our findings offer critical new information to help secure the future of this iconic native species for generations to come.'
The researchers said continued genetic monitoring and interventions are urgently needed to improve the species' diversity and boost conservation efforts.
They suggested 'translocating' squirrels between populations could be one way of introducing more genetic diversity.
Samples for the study were sourced from the red squirrel disease surveillance programme at the University of Edinburgh's Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, which has been analysing red squirrel mortality across Scotland for 20 years.
The study team also included scientists from Forestry and Land Scotland (FLS) and National Museums Scotland (NMS), which provided additional samples for the study.
Dr Andrew Kitchener, senior curator of vertebrate biology at NMS, described the important role the museum's collections played in the research.
'Samples from red squirrels in our natural sciences collection from different populations in Britain covering the last 30 years have enabled this study to look at population changes over that time, and for any regional variation.
'This underlines the importance of collections like ours at NMS, amassed over the long-term, which enables us to reflect changes in the environment over time.
'In addition to physical specimens, we have in recent years established a growing biobank of tissue samples, which are crucial in providing high quality DNA for whole genome studies such as this one.'
The study, which is published in the journal Evolutionary Applications, was funded by UKRI-NERC and the University of Edinburgh, FLS and CryoArks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27-05-2025
- Yahoo
Scientists create first soft robots that can walk off machine that makes them
Scientists in Scotland have created the first soft robots that can walk straight out of the machines that make them. The flexible, four-legged devices were developed using a new 3D printing system, which could pave the way for the use of intelligent soft robotic systems with no electronic parts. Soft machines – made from compliant materials such as soft plastics – have huge potential for use in areas such as nuclear decommissioning, the biomedical sector and in space, researchers say. A lack of standardised design and manufacturing processes, expense and the need for specialist expertise has so far limited real-world use of the devices, experts say. A team from the University of Edinburgh sought to overcome these challenges by developing a low-cost, desktop 3D printing system for creating soft robots. READ MORE: Scottish tech company reveals plans to double job numbers Heriot-Watt team achieves a revolution in photonics Augmented reality tech transforming visits to Scottish castles to go global Their user-friendly setup can be assembled for less than £400 using off-the-shelf parts. The team demonstrated the capabilities of their new system by creating robots made solely from a soft plastic material and powered by air pressure. Once printed, the palm-sized devices are connected to a compressed air supply before walking out of the machine on which they were made. Building and operating the new system – known as the Flex Printer – requires little prior knowledge, with first-time users able to assemble it and begin making robots in just a few days, the team says. They have made their designs publicly available to broaden access to soft robotic technologies and to help foster collaboration and improvements to the system. Soft robot walks off machine (Image: University of Edinburgh) The findings are published in the journal Device, part of the prestigious Cell Press group of journals. The research was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). The lead engineer on the project was Maks Gepner, with support from Jonah Mack, both PhD students in the Centre for Doctoral Training in Robotics and Autonomous Systems. The lead academic was Professor Adam A. Stokes, Head of the Institute for Bioengineering at The University of Edinburgh. Maks Gepner, of the University's Schools of Engineering and Informatics, said: 'It used to take years to figure out how to print using these materials. Using our new platform, anyone can now easily print things which were previously thought to be impossible. This is a game-changer for engineers and artists alike. 'Our hope is that this technology will help drive the next wave of research breakthroughs. Without the long-standing manufacturing and design bottlenecks holding it back, we believe soft robotics is ready to make a major real-world impact."
Yahoo
23-05-2025
- Yahoo
Aliens Might Be Talking, but Our Ears Aren't Quantum Enough to Hear Them, a Scientist Says
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: For 75 years, scientists have consistently pondered the Fermi Paradox, which asks why we don't hear from other civilizations when there are so many Earth-like worlds in the galaxy. A recent study analyzes whether these civilizations might be using quantum communication technologies beyond our own, which could explain why we don't 'hear' them. Although interstellar quantum communication is possible, the technology to detect such communications is still far from our reach. In 1950, Enrico Fermi asked the question that all of us have likely pondered at some point in our lives: Where are all of the aliens? He wasn't the first to consider this question—Soviet sci-fi legend Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, for one, asked a similar query in some of his unpublished manuscripts—and he certainly wouldn't be the last. If anything, the question has accumulated ever greater urgency as astronomers have slowly realized that there are likely billions of Earth-like planets in our galaxy alone, and we're discovering more tantalizing, potentially-life-supporting planetary candidates all the time. This 'Fermi Paradox' has spawned dozens of theories, ideas, and hypotheses in the 75 years since. Maybe a 'Great Filter' lies in our distant past—the unlikely development of eukaryotic cells is a compelling candidate—or maybe (and this is the real bummer) it still lies ahead in our future. Are the aliens just not interested? A galaxy-spanning intelligence scoring a solid 'III' on the Kardashev Scale would likely be indifferent about a sub-I species intent on poisoning its own atmosphere. In other words, maybe we're an ant among giants. Or, maybe more simply, aliens are reaching out to us, but we're just not listening—not in the right way, at least. In a study published back in 2020 in the journal Physical Review D, University of Edinburgh physicist Arjun Berera determined that quantum communication—that is, communication that leverages photon qubits rather than the more classical radio waves we use today—could maintain what's known as coherence over interstellar distances. This idea got Berera's colleague Lantham Boyle, a fellow theoretical physicist at the University of Edinburgh, to start pondering if aliens throughout our galaxy (and beyond) could be using communication technologies outside of the classical realm (specifically quantum communication) that we simply can't hear. 'It's interesting that our galaxy (and the sea of cosmic background radiation in which it's embedded) 'does' permit interstellar quantum communication in certain frequency bands,' Boyle told back in September. This curiosity eventually led to the writing of a paper, which has been uploaded to the pre-print server arXiv, titled 'On Interstellar Quantum Communication and the Fermi Paradox.' In the paper, Boyle sets out to determine if an institute like the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) could somehow incorporate quantum communication detection as part of their never-ending search for interstellar beings. While the answer to that question is technically yes, it's practically a very strong, no-bones-about-it 'no.' The problem is the size of the dish we'd need to construct in order to hear this quantum convo. For example, Boyle calculated that interstellar quantum communication would need to use wavelengths of at least 26.5 centimeters in order to avoid quantum depolarization due to the cosmic microwave background (CMB). That's all well and good, but that means that to communicate quantumly with Alpha Centauri—the nearest star to our own—we'd need a diffraction-limited telescope with a diameter of roughly 100 kilometers (60 miles), which is an area larger than the city of London. To put it mildly, SETI doesn't have that kind of budget. 'We have seen that the sender must place nearly all of their photons into our receiving telescope, which implies that the signal must be so highly directed that only the intended receiving telescope can hope to detect any sign of the communication,' Boyle wrote. 'This is in sharp contrast to classical communication, where one can broadcast photons indiscriminately into space, and an observer in any direction who detects a small fraction of those photons can still receive the message.' Of course, if such an advanced civilization is capable of overcoming these engineering challenges, it's also likely that they could just glimpse our little corner of the cosmos and know we're not technologically equipped to hear what they're sending. So, who knows? Maybe some silicon-based lifeforms orbiting a M-type star in the Large Magellanic Cloud have a regular quantum correspondence with the reigning Kardashev III civilization in Andromeda all about the peculiar apes on one particular spiral arm of the Milky Way that won't return their calls. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Yahoo
17-05-2025
- Yahoo
AI models can't tell time or read a calendar, study reveals
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. New research has revealed another set of tasks most humans can do with ease that artificial intelligence (AI) stumbles over — reading an analogue clock or figuring out the day on which a date will fall. AI may be able to write code, generate lifelike images, create human-sounding text and even pass exams (to varying degrees of success) yet it routinely misinterprets the position of hands on everyday clocks and fails at the basic arithmetic needed for calendar dates. Researchers revealed these unexpected flaws in a presentation at the 2025 International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). They also published their findings March 18 on the preprint server arXiv, so they have not yet been peer-reviewed . "Most people can tell the time and use calendars from an early age. Our findings highlight a significant gap in the ability of AI to carry out what are quite basic skills for people," study lead author Rohit Saxena, a researcher at the University of Edinburgh, said in a statement. These shortfalls must be addressed if AI systems are to be successfully integrated into time-sensitive, real-world applications, such as scheduling, automation and assistive technologies." To investigate AI's timekeeping abilities, the researchers fed a custom dataset of clock and calendar images into various multimodal large language models (MLLMs), which can process visual as well as textual information. The models used in the study include Meta's Llama 3.2-Vision, Anthropic's Claude-3.5 Sonnet, Google's Gemini 2.0 and OpenAI's GPT-4o. And the results were poor, with the models being unable to identify the correct time from an image of a clock or the day of the week for a sample date more than half the time. Related: Current AI models a 'dead end' for human-level intelligence, scientists agree However, the researchers have an explanation for AI's surprisingly poor time-reading abilities. "Early systems were trained based on labelled examples. Clock reading requires something different — spatial reasoning," Saxena said. "The model has to detect overlapping hands, measure angles and navigate diverse designs like Roman numerals or stylized dials. AI recognizing that 'this is a clock' is easier than actually reading it." Dates proved just as difficult. When given a challenge like "What day will the 153rd day of the year be?," the failure rate was similarly high: AI systems read clocks correctly only 38.7% and calendars only 26.3%. This shortcoming is similarly surprising because arithmetic is a fundamental cornerstone of computing, but as Saxena explained, AI uses something different. "Arithmetic is trivial for traditional computers but not for large language models. AI doesn't run math algorithms, it predicts the outputs based on patterns it sees in training data," he said. So while it may answer arithmetic questions correctly some of the time, its reasoning isn't consistent or rule-based, and our work highlights that gap." The project is the latest in a growing body of research that highlights the differences between the ways AI "understands" versus the way humans do. Models derive answers from familiar patterns and excel when there are enough examples in their training data, yet they fail when asked to generalize or use abstract reasoning. "What for us is a very simple task like reading a clock may be very hard for them, and vice versa," Saxena said. RELATED STORIES —Scientists discover major differences in how humans and AI 'think' — and the implications could be significant —If any AI became 'misaligned' then the system would hide it just long enough to cause harm — controlling it is a fallacy —Researchers gave AI an 'inner monologue' and it massively improved its performance The research also reveals the problem AI has when it's trained with limited data — in this case comparatively rare phenomena like leap years or obscure calendar calculations. Even though LLMs have plenty of examples that explain leap years as a concept, that doesn't mean they make the requisite connections required to complete a visual task. The research highlights both the need for more targeted examples in training data and the need to rethink how AI handles the combination of logical and spatial reasoning, especially in tasks it doesn't encounter often. Above all, it reveals one more area where entrusting AI output too much comes at our peril. "AI is powerful, but when tasks mix perception with precise reasoning, we still need rigorous testing, fallback logic, and in many cases, a human in the loop," Saxena said.
