Connecticut woman accused of holding stepson captive must wear GPS tracker, judge says
A woman accused of holding her stepson captive for 20 years was ordered to wear a GPS monitor as a condition of her bail, a Connecticut judge ruled Friday.
Kimberly Sullivan, 56, entered a not guilty plea at the hearing two weeks after Waterbury Police arrested her on charges of kidnapping her 32-year-old stepson, who was
found emaciated during a fire
at her home.
The judge ordered Sullivan to submit to GPS tracking while denying the prosecution's request to place her under house arrest.
Sullivan had previously appeared in court
on Wednesday
, but the judge did not allow to her enter a plea and gave her lawyers two days to respond to the motion to modify her bail.
She is charged with kidnapping, unlawful restraint, cruelty and reckless endangerment. Her next court date is in late April.
Sullivan's stepson allegedly started the fire on Feb. 17 in an attempt to draw first responders to the house where he claims he was being held captive.
"I wanted my freedom," the man said,
according to police
.
The man weighed just 69 pounds when first responders discovered him in a small room. He told investigators Sullivan had imprisoned in the room since he was approximately 11 years old.
He claimed his stepmom never took him to a doctor or dentist and gave him barely enough food to survive.
"He was, without exaggeration, akin to a survivor of Auschwitz's death camp," the prosecutor said.
Sullivan was in charge, the man told investigators, but his father, who died in 2024, and stepsisters knew about his treatment.
Waterbury Police and the Connecticut Department of Children and Families did welfare checks on the home 20 years ago, when he was first removed from school, but critics claim there were no follow-ups, which allowed the alleged abuse to unfold.
Tony Aiello
contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Cops violated man's civil rights by putting tracker on car in driveway, judges rule
Police must have judicial permission to do more than a visitor could on residential property, court rules. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor) The New Jersey State Police violated a suspect's constitutional rights when troopers entered his driveway to attach a GPS tracker to his car under a warrant that only allowed them access to the man's vehicle, an appellate panel ruled Tuesday. The three-judge panel found officers violated state and federal constitutional protections by entering Maurice Johnson's driveway to attach the tracker because the communications data warrant they obtained for the device did not authorize them to enter the property. 'The [warrant] did not expressly authorize entry onto the driveway. Nor did the State Police seek prior judicial authorization to enter onto defendant's residential property when they abandoned the plan to install the device on a public street or parking lot,' the court wrote. The court granted Johnson's motion to suppress evidence gleaned from the improperly placed tracker. GPS data obtained from the tracker revealed a pattern of stops consistent with drug dealing, authorities said, and eventually led police to a storage unit in Johnson's name that held drugs, guns, and 'a substantial sum of money,' the court said. A lower court judge had rejected Johnson's request to toss the fruits of the communications data warrant, finding that the driveway was not afforded Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches because it was unfenced, unlike the rest of the parcel. The appeals court said the driveway, however accessible, was protected from unreasonable search and seizure. 'The fact the particular area where the subject vehicle was parked was not protected from the weather does not mean it was not protected from physical incursion under the United States and New Jersey Constitutions,' the panel wrote. The judges acknowledged that police can have an implied license to approach a home's front door — as any private citizen might — but said police officers veered away from the front door to plant the tracker, 'thus exceeding the spatial boundaries of any 'customary invitation' that might be granted to a visitor such as a delivery person.' An implied license, which allows people to, for example, knock on a front door or deliver a package without committing trespass, did not permit authorities to enter the driveway so they could put a tracker on Johnson's car, they added. 'Simply put, installing a concealed GPS device is not something a visitor or delivery person would be expected and permitted to do,' the court wrote. The state's arguments, which compared officers' actions to a private vehicle repossession, were unconvincing because the Fourth Amendment protects against state intrusion, not against private debt collectors, they added. Portions of the warrant that left the manner of the tracking device's installation to officers' discretion likewise did not allow them to enter the driveway because both state and federal constitutions require warrants to 'particularly describe' the locations they allow officers to search, the judges found. 'The [warrant's] reference to the need 'to minimize the chances of detection of the device by the person whose vehicle is the subject of this warrant' was not some kind of code authorizing physical entry onto unspecified private property,' the court wrote. Whether police sincerely believed the warrant allowed them to enter the driveway was irrelevant, the judges said. A lower court discarded findings from a separate search warrant that authorized officers to look through Johnson's home because officers did not knock and announce themselves before entering, as the warrant required. But the lower court declined to suppress evidence secured through the improperly applied GPS tracker. The drugs, guns, and money discovered in Johnson's storage unit formed the basis for the warrant authorizing a search of his home, according to Tuesday's ruling. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Harris County woman charged after putting GPS devices in spouses vehicles
The Brief Maria Gonzalez has been charged and is wanted for unlawfully installing GPS devices in her spouse's vehicles. Precinct 4 says their investigation dates back to 2023. Chris Tritico, Senior Legal Analyst for FOX 26, shared what you can do legally when it comes to tracking individuals. HARRIS CO, TX - Harris County Precinct 4 Constables say they need your help. They are looking for Maria Guadalupe Gonzalez, who is wanted for installing GPS devices illegally on her spouse's vehicle. Precinct 4 constables' office say Gonzales has been charged with a Class A misdemeanor. They add that this all started back in August 2023. The backstory "You have to get a subpoena for the investigation for the GPS records and ownership of all that is what has led us today to be able to file charges against the suspect," said Capt. Jose Garza. Precinct 4. "So it is my understanding they are not together, as of now, but the relationship then and what started all of this is closed for the investigation." "So there were several places that she did show up, which led us to further believe she was the one tracking, because she would not have known where these locations were," said Garza. Local perspective We also spoke with FOX 26 Senior Legal Analyst Chris Tritico about the legal ramifications of putting a tracking device on a car or using tracking apps, software and air tags like many people do. "If you own that vehicle, or you're leasing a vehicle, and it's your lease, and you're letting your spouse or your loved one use it, you can place the tracking device in the vehicle because you own it," Tritico said. "Phones now have this ability for family apps if you do that if you buy a phone for your child, and you put that app on there to know where your child is, that's not going to be a violation of the law because that is your phone, and you get to do that with your child. Once that child turns 18, that child has every right to turn that off. If your parent has dementia, yes, it would technically be a violation of the law, but I don't know of any court that would hold someone responsible under those circumstances," Tritico added. Precinct 4 Constables say a warrant has been issued for Maria Gonzalez's arrest. If convicted, she could face a $4,000 fine and one year in jail. If anyone has information, Precinct 4 says call their office immediately. The Source FOX 26 Reporter Leslie DelasBour spoke with Harris County Constable Precinct 4 and FOX 26 Senior Legal Analyst about the case.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Defendants accused in death of developmentally disabled woman to appear in court
BERNALILLO — Two caregivers charged in connection with the death of a disabled woman found clinging to life in the back of a van at the U.S.-Mexico border now stand accused of violating the conditions of their release, prompting prosecutors to ask a judge to lock them up until their trial. Angelita Chacon and Patricia Hurtado appeared before 13th Judicial District Judge Christopher Perez for a hearing Monday on allegations they removed their GPS ankle monitors and were in communication with each other, but the judge did not issue a ruling. Instead, Perez granted their attorneys' request to delay the hearing, which he said will probably be set within two weeks. Both women hurried out of the courtroom afterward, and neither one of their attorneys returned a message seeking comment. The alleged violations of Chacon and Hurtado's conditions of release is the latest twist in a caretaker abuse case that shook New Mexico and the state's Developmental Disability Waiver program after Mary Melero, who was under Chacon's care, was discovered unresponsive and wrapped in a blanket in the back of a passenger van after an inspection at the Bridge of the Americas Port of Entry in El Paso in February 2023. 060225_GC_ChaconHurtadoHearing_02rgb.jpg Patricia Hurtado is shown in the state District Court in Sandoval County on Monday for a hearing on the conditions of her release. The incident triggered a sweeping review of the so-called DD Waiver program and in-person wellness checks on everyone in the program across New Mexico. Melero, who had autism and was in a state-run program for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, was severely dehydrated and drugged when she was found by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents. She also had numerous open wounds, including chronic bedsores with exposed bone, bruises and lacerations on various parts of her body, as well as ligature marks consistent with prolonged restraint, according to court documents. After Melero was transported to a hospital in El Paso, medical staff determined her wounds were at different stages, suggesting Melero was a victim of chronic abuse. After spending more than a month in the hospital, Melero was removed from life support and died. Chacon, who was Melero's primary caregiver, was charged with five criminal counts, including abuse or neglect of a resident resulting in death. Hurtado, who was Chacon's live-in girlfriend at the time, also was charged with abuse of a resident resulting in death. Supplemental indictments allege the women made fraudulent claims to receive Medicaid benefits for the Customized Community Support program for caring for Melero, as well as Chacon's special-needs son. After they were arrested, an order setting their conditions of release required both, among other provisions, to be placed on electronic monitoring and not to have direct or indirect contact with each other, which prosecutors alleged they violated. "The defendants were alleged to have violated their conditions of release by taking off their ankle monitor and communicating with each other — very clear disregard for the judge's order — so we had requested that the conditions of release be revoked and that that they be remanded into custody," Joseph Martinez, acting director of the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit at the New Mexico Department of Justice, said in an interview outside the courtroom. "The judge granted the defense's continuance request to have the hearing very shortly, so we will be prepared at that hearing to request that both defendants be remanded into custody," he said. 060225_GC_ChaconHurtadoHearing_03rgb.jpg State District Judge Chris Perez speaks Monday during a hearing for Angelita Chacon and Patricia Hurtado on Monday. A motion to revoke Hurtado's conditions of release alleges she "admitted to having removed her GPS ankle monitor to leave the county" after an informant alerted authorities. "The informant stated ... she was concerned for her safety because defendant had been sending her 'threatening text messages' after she had witnessed defendant's violations of her conditions of release," documents state. "Pretrial Services also claims that Patricia admitted to remaining in physical and telephonic contact with her co-defendant and even giving Ms. Chacon money ... to pay her bills." The state's motion to revoke Chacon's conditions of release alleges Hurtado told authorities Chacon had removed her ankle monitor to leave the state. "The defendant's conduct of removing her GPS monitor and leaving her county of residence so close to her trial setting highlights the degree to which she represents a risk of flight," documents state. Martinez called the allegations against Chacon and Hurtado "horrific." "Our job at the New Mexico Department of Justice is to hold bad actors accountable," he said. "That's why we are doing our absolute best to bring justice to the vicim in the case and to make sure that everything is investigated and prosecuted thoroughly."
