Onion Lake Cree Nation to proceed with its legal challenge of Alberta sovereignty act
EDMONTON - Alberta's bill lowering the bar for a separation referendum has spurred a First Nation to push ahead with a legal challenge against the premier's flagship sovereignty act.
Danielle Smith has said her Alberta Sovereignty Within a United Canada Act is needed to push back on what the province believes is unconstitutional federal encroachment into provincial jurisdiction.
But Onion Lake Cree Nation Chief Henry Lewis said that law has always been about undermining federal authority and asserting provincial control, which goes against his community's Treaty 6 relationship with the Crown.
'I want to respectfully remind the premier that this land that we stand on today is treaty land and is not yours to take or make sweeping decisions about,' he said at a news conference in Edmonton on Thursday.
He announced the legal challenge is moving forward a day after Smith's government passed a bill significantly lowering the threshold for citizens to prompt a referendum, including one on seceding from Canada.
The First Nation, which straddles the Alberta-Saskatchewan boundary, filed a statement of claim in 2022, but lawyer Robert Hladun said the community put it on pause, hoping for a resolution with the government.
'We waited for consultation, waited for some participation. We waited for some respect. None of that happened,' he said.
Another lawyer representing the community, Michael Marchen, said the sovereignty act is an effective derogation of Onion Lake Cree Nation's sovereignty and jurisdiction, and they are asking for the court to declare it have no legal force.
'It was enacted wholly without input, consultation or consideration of the plaintiff's concerns, which is contrary to the spirit of (the) treaty and in derogation of the honour of the Crown,' he said.
Smith has said she wants Alberta to stay in Canada, but Lewis says the referendum legislation signals that the province is pushing a separatist agenda.
'I stand here today to remind the premier and her government that we do not stand by and allow our treaty to be violated, disregarded and pushed aside while the talk of separation continues,' said Lewis.
Smith's United Conservative government has faced backlash from Indigenous leaders since the referendum bill's introduction in the house more than two weeks ago. On Thursday, hundreds of protesters rallied in front of the legislature to condemn it and demand it be repealed.
Smith has repeatedly said that any referendum question must not violate the constitutional rights of First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples, and must uphold and honour the treaties.
Smith has said she's working to gain respect for Alberta within a united Canada, and she doesn't want to see the Alberta separatist movement grow into a large, mainstream political party.
She's also said the latest bill is about giving Albertans a say on whatever issue is important to them through direct democracy.
Justice Minister Mickey Amery, offering an amendment to the referendum bill late Wednesday evening, said the government has been listening to Indigenous concerns.
It now includes a clause stating that nothing in a referendum is to deviate from existing treaty rights.
In a Thursday statement, he said the government will be filing a statement of defence in response to Onion Lake Cree Nation's lawsuit 'in due course.'
'Alberta's government is deeply committed to honouring and respecting all treaty rights enshrined in the Constitution – that will not change,' Amery said.
Lewis said of the government's assertion that it respects treaty rights: 'It's nothing.'
Greg Desjarlais, grand chief of the Confederacy of Treaty 6 First Nations, told reporters outside the legislature that by passing Amery's referendum bill, Smith's government is sowing division among Albertans and dishonouring all treaty people.
Desjarlais said the amendment isn't strong enough, and that he wasn't consulted until the bill was already tabled in the legislature.
'They have to repeal the bill,' he said. Echoing Lewis, he said there is no treaty with the province, only the Crown.
He said the rally at the legislature Thursday shows 'we're tired of being pushed around.'
Desjarlais said First Nations leaders will be seeking an audience with King Charles to reaffirm the treaty. They are also planning a trip to Ottawa, but not at the invitation of Smith.
'Not with her,' he said. 'On our own.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 15, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cody Smith honored with Richard Webster medallion in education
JOPLIN, Mo. — A local university is honoring the service and achievements of a southwest Missouri lawmaker. Missouri Southern State University presented its Richard Webster Medallion to Cody Smith. MSSU leaders cited the former state representative's eight years in Jefferson City and especially his commitment to furthering education. Smith, who also the House Budget Chair, termed out of his representative seat in December. He told us he enjoys seeing the progress being one on the university's 'Roy Blunt Health Science Innovation Center' which benefitted from state funding during his tenure. 'That will be really impactful for the community and region at large, helping young people get into those health science professions that are extremely valuable to them and to our community. And we need more doctors and nurses and technicians. And the more that we can do that locally the better,' said Cody Smith. 'Cody Smith has had a tremendous impact on our state, our region. But certainly, on our university. Not only in terms of not only funding, but advocacy. His understanding of the importance of education. We are deeply grateful for what he has done for this university,' said Dr. Dean Van Galen. This is just the fourth time MSSU has awarded the Webster Medallion, which focuses on civil service. Other recipients have been Ron Richard, Gary Nodler and Robert Warden. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Sir John A. Macdonald statue back in view at Queen's Park after five years boarded up
TORONTO - The Sir John A. Macdonald statue outside the Ontario legislature is back in full view after spending the past five years in a box. The statue of Canada's first prime minister has been under hoarding since 2020, when it was vandalized with pink paint. The monument was one of many that were targeted across the country amid anti-racism protests and as Canadians grappled with the history of residential schools. Macdonald is considered an architect of the country's notorious residential school system, which took Indigenous children from their families in an effort to assimilate them. Progressive Conservative and Liberal members of a non-partisan board of the legislative assembly agreed earlier this month on a motion to remove the hoarding after the statue is cleaned. Speaker Donna Skelly says she recognizes the sensitivities surrounding Macdonald and welcomes Ontarians to come and share their views peacefully. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Major projects will be slowed by court challenges if rights are violated: B.C. chief
OTTAWA - The regional chief for British Columbia said Wednesday that governments should not speed up major projects at the expense of First Nations rights — and warned that projects will be slowed down by court challenges if First Nations are not consulted from the start. 'We're asking the government to follow your own laws,' Terry Teegee said, citing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples that the federal government adopted. The government of Prime Minister Mark Carney introduced major economic legislation last week. The bill has two parts — one to break down federal barriers to internal trade and the other to fast-track major projects. It sets out five criteria to determine whether a project is in the 'national interest.' Those criteria include the project's likelihood of success, whether it would strengthen the country's resiliency and advance the interests of Indigenous Peoples, and whether it would contribute to economic growth in an environmentally responsible way. But First Nations leaders say their interests weren't considered when the legislation was being drafted and they were given just one week to review and bring comments forward on a briefing document on the bill. 'It's probably going to take a lot longer to get approval for some of these projects because we're going to end up in court,' Teegee said. 'This is where we end up.' The national chief of the Assembly of First Nations agreed. 'It's not about the bill itself. It's about the process. And I think that ramming something through when you should be hearing from Canadians, from industry, from First Nations … is the wrong way to go,' Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said. 'You don't want to end back up in court. You don't want to have civil unrest. Why not just invite us to the table?' First Nations leaders have warned that widespread protests and blockades are possible if governments don't obtain affected Indigenous communities' free, prior and informed consent, as required by the UN declaration. The federal government has said that declaration doesn't amount to a veto — a statement Justice Minister Sean Fraser walked back last week following criticism from Woodhouse Nepinak. Teegee said 'no government has a veto, meaning that when we come to a decision, all governments come into the room to make a decision together.' 'First Nations, certainly as a part of this, need to be part of the decision-making process,' he added. Even groups that generally support development are raising concerns about the federal government's plan. Mark Podlasly, CEO of the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, said he was 'surprised' First Nations were only given seven days to review parts of the legislation before it was introduced. 'The answer will not automatically be 'no' from First Nations when a project comes along. It's just that Indigenous rights and involvement has to not only be included, but respected. That hasn't happened a lot in the Canadian past,' he said. 'There's also a question on the environment, and there's a question about who bears the impact of these projects if they're rushed through. It's going to be Indigenous Peoples, especially in parts of the country where there's mining or energy sources (on lands) that are integral to our lifestyle, our cultural practices.' Podlasly said that while the federal legislation 'seems to have Indigenous participation at its core,' it's not clear what that participation will look like, especially under the tight two-year approval timeline the government seeks. He said First Nations can support projects and many do — but they don't want to be 'caught at the back end' of decisions made without their knowledge or consent. 'We're all operating with seven days' notice. That's what we're operating with. And time will tell,' he said. The Assembly of First Nations is holding an emergency chiefs meeting on Monday to discuss what to do next. Woodhouse Nepinak vowed to follow their direction and said a legal review of the legislation is ongoing. 'We need time,' Woodhouse Nepinak said. 'And we're not being given that time.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
