logo
‘I was punched in the face': The teachers navigating a tidal wave of parental abuse

‘I was punched in the face': The teachers navigating a tidal wave of parental abuse

Telegraph12-03-2025

When a head teacher calls in a parent because their child has assaulted another pupil, they might reasonably expect a reaction of shock, embarrassment, upset or, at worst, defensiveness.
What Sean McNamee got was a punch in the face.
'The boy was getting into trouble and getting involved in fights, but I knew there were pressures at home,' says the primary school head. 'I had to suspend him for the attack on another child, and I hoped when his mum came to collect him, we could have a chat and form a plan of what to do. But she arrived at school, came in the door, saw me and punched me.'
Shaking with disbelief and concerned for his staff, McNamee followed the parent as she marched up the stairs into the classroom, got her child and marched out, all the while hurling abuse at horrified staff and children.
Despite its appalling nature, the head's experience is not rare.
Survey findings released in the first week of March by the National Association of Head Teachers reveal that four in five school leaders have been subjected to verbal or physical abuse, threats, harassment or online trolling in the past 12 months. Like McNamee, one in 10 suffered physical violence.
The vast majority of the 1,600 respondents think that this abuse is on the rise, with more than a third warning it is becoming almost endemic.
'When certain parents phone up, staff in the school office recognise the number and want to let it ring because they know they will have to face a torrent of expletives,' says McNamee, who runs St Paul's Primary, in Belfast.
School leader Debra Walker has been slapped across the face by a parent, threatened with murder by another and had to call the police when a woman came into school 'screaming and shouting' after taking exception to a psychologist's report about her child.
Walker, the chief executive of the Iris Learning Trust, which runs three primary schools in the north-east of England, cites a parent, upset about a coat going missing, screaming in the face of a teacher who was seven months pregnant. Another colleague was spat at.
In yet another case, Kevin Flanagan, the head teacher of Pensby High School in Wirral, was subjected to a campaign of harassment by Keith and Stephanie Critchley, including turning up at his family home and verbally abusing him at the school gates, after their daughters were given detentions.
What such incidents seem to demonstrate, coupled with worsening pupil behaviour and high absence rates across the country, is the collapse of the social contract between parents and schools.
Experts such as Amanda Spielman, the former head of Ofsted, point to an undermining of trust and a growing perception that school is 'optional', fuelled by the Covid school lockdowns and a series of strikes by teachers. Progressive school policies on sex education and gender identity have left some families suspicious about what is being taught, while others argue that schools are not 'woke' enough.
At the same time, a wider culture which prioritises individual needs, desires, self-expression and wellbeing is increasingly at odds with traditional notions of discipline and with school rules and structures; the kinds of rules and structures that seem to apply less and less to other areas of work and life.
Making matters worse is social media, where one parent's grumble can spread like wildfire, creating a 'them versus us' mentality that breeds discontent.
Mini mutinies among parents abound, from complaints about children having to change into PE kits to unfounded claims of bullying, says McNamee.
And in an era when there is hypervigilance about safeguarding, parents are also increasingly inclined to believe whatever their child tells them.
''My child does not tell lies' is a phrase I hear quite a lot,' says the head. 'That might be so, but their perceptions of an event are often very different to the reality.'
Other teachers report similar issues: 'Pupils sometimes misreport incidents and parents immediately resort to aggression rather than discuss the situation and identify misunderstandings,' says one NAHT member.
Barry Smith, a former school leader known for his strict discipline policies, thinks that what happens in schools reflects what happens in society.
'Authority has been eroded in schools, and across society and teachers can be on the receiving end of that,' he says.
For some parents, taking to Facebook and criticising the school is 'how they demonstrate to their peer group 'Look what a good parent I am''.
'You get lots of likes, and positive strokes and people respond with 'Yeah, you tell them'; it gives them validation,' says Smith.
Geraint Edwards, the head teacher at Hitchin Priory School, in Hertfordshire, has also noticed an increasing readiness to use the school complaints procedure, sometimes vindictively.
'Parents often won't be satisfied by the answer. They just won't let things go,' he says. 'They contact the governors and Ofsted. Every complaint becomes incredibly time-consuming, drawn out and energy-sapping, and detracts me from the strategic work I should be doing.'
At the heart of many parental challenges – on everything from toilet breaks and uniform policy to the sanctions used by schools – is a feeling that their particular child's needs are not being met. And the list of 'needs' is expanding exponentially.
At McNamee's school, the number of pupils flagged up because of concerns about social, emotional and behavioural development is rapidly increasing. A recent check on one class revealed it applied to 18 out of 21 children.
Yet St Paul's Primary is allocated just six educational psychologist slots a year and there are 14 children on the waiting list, with increasingly frustrated parents.
'We have no extra resources to deal with this explosion of special educational needs [SEN],' says McNamee. 'We spend all our time and effort trying to maintain the status quo. Every corner you turn there is another obstacle.'
Smith, too, highlights the rise of the special needs agenda.
'There is an explosion of people being diagnosed with autism or ADHD or anxiety,' he says. 'It is an expanding market; at one point it was naughty boys, then it was girls who were undiagnosed and now it is adults. It's a money-making industry.'
School must make 'reasonable adjustments' for children with additional needs – needs that do not necessarily have to have the official diagnosis that can trigger extra funding.
But who decides what 'reasonable adjustments' are? Should a child prone to outburst or who has anxiety be allowed time-outs, a part-time timetable and no detentions? If a child has 'sensory issues', should the rule on school shoes not apply to them?
'Heads feel they have to bow down to an increasing set of demands and unrealistic expectations because they are afraid parents will go to Ofsted, turn up at the school gates or attack them on social media,' says Smith.
'They are afraid they will be seen as not being inclusive and breaching the law around protected characteristics. But these demands chip away at the rules and structures that maintain order. Schools can have up to 2,000 teenagers milling around each day. The rules and structures are there for a reason; it risks the whole thing breaking down.'
According to Smith, 80 per cent of senior leadership's time is spent dealing with 20 per cent of pupils and parents.
'If you have a school of 1,000 children, with 10 per cent from difficult families; that is 100 families you have to handle day in, day out,' he says. 'The time that schools are devoting to these children and families is time not being spent on other pupils.'
Some parents are deflecting their own shortcomings onto schools, suggests Hitchin Priory's Edwards.
'In the society we live in, it is sometimes very difficult to criticise, openly, the parents and their roles and responsibilities,' he says. 'There are parents that delegate their responsibilities and look for who to blame. That is a generalisation, but it is also a fact in some cases.'
He points out that children spend only about 18 per cent of time in school: 'The rest of the time they are with their parents – what are they doing?' he asks. 'Some parents need to reflect rather than blame – I've said that a few times and it doesn't go down very well.'
McNamee feels teachers have no choice but to 'move forward because there is no escape'. Schools cannot exclude a pupil because of the behaviour of their parents. The 'punishment' for the mother who punched McNamee was a ban from school grounds and a visit by police. In time, there was even a degree of rapprochement between the pair.
McNamee believes the world around us mirrors and even condones the kind of aggressive behaviour that some parents are subjecting schools to.
'Look at how JD Vance and Donald Trump rounded on President Zelensky,' he says.' It worries me; that willingness to pick a fight. Children see it and it legitimises that behaviour. It is a dangerous way for us to be.'
Meanwhile, the head teacher does his job, but the environment takes its toll: 'Your body gets used to being on high alert' he says. 'I don't know the last time I had a full night's sleep; Sundays are terrible.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FBI director Kash Patel reveals bombshell breakthrough that'll have Anthony Fauci trembling: 'We're on to him'
FBI director Kash Patel reveals bombshell breakthrough that'll have Anthony Fauci trembling: 'We're on to him'

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

FBI director Kash Patel reveals bombshell breakthrough that'll have Anthony Fauci trembling: 'We're on to him'

The Trump administration has allegedly 'found' the cell phone Dr Anthony Fauci used during the Covid pandemic, the president's intelligence head revealed. FBI director Kash Patel revealed on the latest episode of the Joe Rogan Experience that he and leaders like Senator Rand Paul have been on the hunt for any devices Fauci used while advising Americans during the pandemic. Patel said while Paul and health secretary Robert F Kennedy 'are doing a great job' finding the origins of Covid, the team had struggled for years to find Fauci's phone and other devices. But this week, the team 'had a great breakthrough.' Patel told Rogan the FBI had just found a phone Fauci used at the time, mere days before the podcast was filmed. It's unclear exactly when the phone was used and how they verified it belonged to Fauci. Patel did not specify how they seized it or what the team's 'multiple investigations' thus far on the origins of Covid have found. He also cautioned Americans 'shouldn't jump to the conclusion that everything's in there' and that incriminating data could have been deleted. However, he called the bombshell 'a victory for the American people' and said his team is immediately working to comb through any data on the device. Patel said: 'We found it, and at least we can tell the American people we've been looking because it is of public importance to figure out, did that guy lie? Did he intentionally mislead the world and cause countless deaths? 'We owe those answers to the American people, and the best evidence ever is always the people's evidence who created it. So now we're going to go and exploit those hard drives.' 'We did find it, we're not done, we're still looking and we're on the case.' Patel did not specify how his team got the old phone or how they verified it was Fauci's. Generally, a warrant is required to seize a cell phone, even for a government official. There are no publicly available warrants out against Fauci currently. Mounting evidence has suggested Covid may have originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, with some reports estimated '80 to 95 percent certainty.' The Chinese government has always denied the lab-leak theory and maintained Covid was the product of an animal spillover. American agencies like the FBI and CIA believe a lab leak is the most likely possibility. Patel did not say on the podcast what he thinks. Dr Richard Ebright, a professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University, previously told 'The main points are clear: All informed persons - without exception - knew by early 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 likely entered humans through a research-related incident in Wuhan. 'But most chose to lie or to stay silent.' Fauci has denied all accusations of Covid being 'covered up' or originating from a lab. Patel said: 'My mission has always been to put out the truth, whatever the consequences, whoever it's against.

Glasgow sex attacker raped woman he met on Tinder dating app
Glasgow sex attacker raped woman he met on Tinder dating app

Glasgow Times

time7 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

Glasgow sex attacker raped woman he met on Tinder dating app

Rian Hood put the victim through a horror ordeal during a campaign of abuse at his hands. The 34-year-old ex-clothes shop supervisor denied being physically or sexually violent - even claiming in a bizarre video clip that the woman had instead hurt him. Hood was convicted of rape and engaging in a course of abusive behaviour following a trial at the High Court in Glasgow. After the verdicts, jurors learned he is already serving a seven-and-a-half-year jail term imposed in 2022 for preying on four other women. He is expected to learn his fate for this latest crime when he returns to the dock later this month. Hood, formerly of the city's Knightswood, told jurors how he was initially in contact with the woman via Tinder. He stated he had never used the dating app before as "you hear all these horror stories". READ MORE: Teenager in court on attempted murder charge after boy, 15, injured in East End It was not until early 2020 that the pair physically met. He had been aware at the time of allegations made by one of the victims in the later 2022 trial. Hood claimed he told the woman in this latest case about the then accusations. He said there was "not much reaction" from her. Hood went on to move in with the woman and her mother at their home in the west of the city during one of the Covid lockdowns in 2020. He said: "It was a bit intense, but we managed it well." Hood insisted there was "seldom" any sexual contact between him and the victim while there. The woman, however, told how he stood on her face and then forced himself upon her during one attack. READ MORE: Four men jailed after £6m corruption and bribery probe at health boards Denying it happened, Hood claimed: "We would not really do much in her mum's house as it was just awkward." The abuse also took place at other flats in the north of Glasgow. His lawyer Frances Connor put to him at one stage: "Any truth that you wanted cocaine so you could have sex for hours and hours?" He refuted this, insisting the drug would have had the "opposite effect" on him. Miss Connor also asked if anything had occurred without the woman's consent. Hood again denied this. The lawyer went on: "Anything ever happened when she was asleep?" He then claimed: "No, I would never have woken her up as she was a grouch if you did." READ MORE: 'Sickened': Police officer faces sack after 'shocking' racist jibe Hood added any evidence of him "choking" the woman only happened during consensual sex. The attacker was also physically abusive, which had included a claim he had hurled Chinese spring rolls at her. He instead alleged the woman had previously "erupted" at him after confronting him about cheating on her. Jurors were shown a mobile phone clip recorded by the woman where a drunk and topless Hood claimed he could not walk as she had "broke" his toe by allegedly throwing a towel at him. Lord Colbeck adjourned sentencing for reports. In the previous trial, Hood had been convicted of 10 charges of similar abuse against four women between 2010 and 2020. His lawyer said at the time how his life had been "somewhat blighted by a gambling addiction" which had affected his relationships. He first faced allegations involving the latest victim in 2023 while serving the seven and a half year sentence.

Urgent warning as 45 people die after buying food preservative poison online
Urgent warning as 45 people die after buying food preservative poison online

Daily Mirror

timea day ago

  • Daily Mirror

Urgent warning as 45 people die after buying food preservative poison online

A coroner has identified at least EIGHT British victims who have used online forums for advice about ending their lives and purchasing an unnamed chemical used as a food preservative A food preservative poison has been used by at least 45 people to commit suicide after searching online forums for advice about ending their lives, a coroner warned today. Eight British victims - Matthew O'Reilly, Samuel Dickinson, Shaun Bass, Matthew Price, Chantelle Williams, Kelly Walsh, William Armstrong and Andrew Brown - have been identified after taking the unnamed poisonous chemical. Cops have launched a global probe and traced 85 people in the UK and Europe who had either died after taking the poison or purchased it with a view to ending their lives, it has been revealed. At least 45 of those are known to have died, it was confirmed. Details of the deaths emerged in eight separate Prevention of Future Death reports issued by Senior Coroner for Manchester West, Timothy Brennand. Writing to the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, to raise concerns, he said that reporting restrictions had been imposed on the cases due to an "ongoing criminal investigation in the United Kingdom, Europe and the United States of America". In his reports into the "cluster" of eight deaths in his region, he did not identify the poison except to say it is a food preservative but also "reportable poison as well as a reportable explosives precursor". "The police investigation into one UK based source of supply revealed in 247 cases separate supplies of 500 grams of less of [REDACTED] to customers in the UK and Europe, police established that 85 of these individuals who were traceable had either died as the consequence of self-ingestion of the substance, or had purchased it with a view to having the means to use this method to end their life in circumstances," he said. In each of these instances, he said: "The vendors of the [REDACTED] were not aware of this potential misuse of the substance. "The small quantities being purchased had been incorrectly evaluated to be an increase in individuals pursuing recreational home-curing/food preservations as a hobby, being an artefact of 'lockdown' living following the COVID national pandemic emergency. "Vendors were unaware that their website/details were being distributed as part of internet information platforms designed to aid, abet, assist or promote suicide methods. "From the specific example of 247 supplies in a 12 month period, police established that 45 purchasers were confirmed as deceased (these deaths were in relation to supplies to UK customers and purchasers from abroad) and only 15 purchases were confirmed to have taken place for legitimate purposes." Mr Brennand also warned about the availability of websites that give advice on how to take your own life. He wrote: "The police investigation revealed the ability of members of the public to access a number of websites, primarily created in the USA, Canada and Mexico that promoted information as to how to access: A) Poisons that could bring about death b) How, in what way and with with other necessary preparations (in particular -antiemetic medications) the poisons should be administered. c. Sourcing such poisons/chemicals/medications in the UK and abroad." Student Matthew O'Reilly, 18, was discovered collapsed and unresponsive within his locked room at his student accommodation in Salford, Greater Manchester in September 2020. He died from a 'deliberate act of recent self-ingestion,' Mr Brennand said. Samuel Dickenson, 33, died in March 2020 in Wigan having left a suicide note. "Police recovered a padded postal envelope addressed to the deceased next to an opened sealable sachet bag labelled '[REDACTED] – Pure 99.9% 50g' that the deceased had acquired on the 21st of February 2020 from an internet-based company licensed to sell controlled poisons, including [REDACTED]," Mr Brennand said. Shaun Bass, 23, died in February 2020, in Bolton "having ingested a significant quantity of [REDACTED] that he had acquired earlier in the month from an internet-based company licensed to sell reportable poisons". He had suffered from depression and anxiety. Mathew Price, 37, died in June 2021, at his home in Bolton. "Post-mortem samples revealed the deceased had recently consumed a significant and fatally toxic quantity of [REDACTED]," his Prevention of Future Death report said. "[An] email sent to family members contained unequivocal expressions of the deceased's intention." Andrew Brown, 45, was found dead in August 2023 in circumstances that puzzled investigators as his motive still remains 'unclear'. Mr Brown - who had a history of mental health issues - obtained the poison online months before his death, was found by a family member, and was found with an "Advanced Decision to Refuse Treatment" document by his bed. The coroner said the most likely scenario that led to his death was a "fleeting, ill-considered, irrational self-harming ideation". William Armstrong, 24, purchased the poison on the internet "from a source in Russia", having shown symptoms of a psychotic illness. Mr Armstrong checked into a hotel, ingested the poison and 15 minutes later called 999 to report what happened. He was dead when they arrived 90 minutes later. Kelly Walsh, 45, was found dead in February 2021 at home in Atherton, having ordered the poison "from an internet-based supplier in Lithuania". Her actions were "deliberate and intentional" and she had a declining mental health. Chantelle Williams, who had a "complex medical history", first ingested a "significant but non-fatal" dose of the substance in 2019 and checked into Salford Royal Hospital where she received care. ‌ Twice she managed to order the poison while still on the Keats Ward at the hospital and ingest the poison, with the second incident killing her in May 2020. Coroner Mr Brennand added: "The published Guidance... does not give specific guidance or suggested training to sellers, particularly [REDACTED] acquired by members of the public, particularly over 'online marketplaces' in circumstances of the purchase on a 'one off' basis for the means of self-harming. "Whilst there is a legal duty on persons selling this substance to report 'suspicious' transactions within 24 hours to the Home Office, the purchase of small quantities is being presumed to be connected to the many legitimate uses of the substance (such as food preservation, fertilizer etc) rather than in fact, being evaluated as a member of the public seeking purchase of modest quantities used as their chosen means by which to end life. "The current Home Office guidance and supporting video, leaflet and posters do not reference [REDACTED] as a specific example of concern and focuses on the phenomenon of 'malicious' misuse and not deliberate misuse in the sense of suicide/self-harm." The Home Office is required to respond within 56 days of the report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store