logo
San Francisco's mayor is starting to unite fractured city

San Francisco's mayor is starting to unite fractured city

Gulf Today18-04-2025

Democrats nationally may be in turmoil, but liberals in San Francisco are hopeful the new mayor's collaborative approach will help solve entrenched problems in a city recently known for its bitter infighting and chaotic streets. Daniel Lurie, an heir to the the Levi Strauss fortune and anti-poverty nonprofit founder with no elected experience, beat out incumbent London Breed in November after spending nearly $10 million of his own money.
Voters embraced his promise to make government work again after years of San Francisco attracting national attention for its empty downtown, open-air drug use and sprawling tent encampments.
Earnest and affable, Lurie is often outside City Hall, talking to merchants and residents, both housed and unhoused. He's reached out to supervisors, including those who feuded with Breed, asking questions and inviting input on thorny topics.
In an interview marking 100 days in office, Lurie said San Francisco is cleaning up its act with safer streets. He brushed off concerns over the involvement of corporate executives in his administration and declined to talk about Republican President Donald Trump's potential impact on San Francisco. 'I was elected to turn this city around,' Lurie said. 'And I want everybody in San Francisco to know that their mayor is focused on getting results for San Franciscans.'
Some elected officials feel hopeful about working together again after years of gridlock. Connie Chan, a progressive supervisor, says she's already had more discussions with Lurie than she ever had with Breed. 'We feel cautiously optimistic despite a lot of attacks that we've seen from the federal government on San Francisco as a city and, of course, California as a state,' Chan said. Frustrations over car break-ins and retail theft have simmered for years, with voters ousting progressive District Attorney Chesa Boudin in June 2022, and approving measures last year to expand police powers.
Lurie has inherited a city where reported crime and the number of visible tents are down, thanks in part to inroads made under Breed for more housing. Lurie's policy goals are similar to his predecessor — more police and more shelter and treatment options. But he also has the advantage of being a new face with no stated aspirations for higher office, someone who can recruit business executives and fellow philanthropists for their time and money. His board-approved fentanyl legislation expedites hiring and contracting for new behavioral health initiatives and expanded shelter capacity. He wants to add 1,500 new shelter beds and has streamlined outreach programs.
And he's proposed rezoning to build more housing.
Lurie has taken to stopping the car to jump out and talk to people who appear to be in distress. He asks if they want help — even though it's not always available. And he wants to drive home the message that San Francisco will no longer let people do what they want in public at the expense of others. 'That behaviour just can't be tolerated any longer because families are scared,' Lurie said. Some leaders on the left have given him the benefit of the doubt, granting him powers they likely would not have given his predecessor. Chan, for instance, endorsed legislation ceding board oversight to Lurie to battle the fentanyl crisis, after seeing how committed he was to listening to and compromising with her office on the proposed legislation.
Lurie has announced new rules around distributing free drug use paraphernalia, going against the city's decades-old practice of promoting harm reduction. City-funded nonprofits will have to offer treatment options before giving out supplies; they will no longer be allowed to distribute smoking supplies, like tin foil and pipes, in parks and sidewalks. The changes will make it more difficult to engage drug users for whom abstinence is not an immediate option, advocates said.
Tyler TerMeer of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation, which provides assistance to people dealing with substance abuse, said he's disappointed in the policy shift but hopeful that Lurie will listen to experts who've been doing this work for decades. While overdose deaths were down last year from 2023, there were still roughly 630 that were recorded in the city.
Lurie founded the nonprofit Tipping Point Community in 2005, which has raised more than $400 million to house, employ and educate people living in poverty. Its work has won Lurie fans among advocates working to keep people off the city's streets. At the same time, he comes from a family that is deeply embedded in San Francisco's history and identity: He is an heir to the Levi Strauss & Co. fortune through his mother, Mimi Haas.
He's turned to that circle for two new boards stacked with Silicon Valley leaders and other business executives to address downtown's battered image and bring back tourists and tech workers. The boards include executives from Google and Gap as well as philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, crypto billionaire Chris Larsen and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Lurie's recruiting of rich CEOs has raised concerns among some who say the wealthy already have plenty of influence.
'I'm not one to trust billionaires all that much with the direction that they'll take our city, or our country as we're seeing right now,' said Anand Singh, president of Unite Here Local 2, which represents hotel workers. But, he added, 'the mayor has demonstrated that he does want to listen to working people.'
Lurie said criticism over the influence of tech and money in city politics 'divided San Francisco in the past' and that this is a new San Francisco. 'I want business to be here. I want those jobs here. I want that tax revenue here,' he said. 'And I want them to be part of rebuilding San Francisco.' Lurie's political honeymoon may soon end — he must figure out how to solve what is at least an $800 million gap in the city's budget over the next two years. He didn't say what might be cut but said he is ready to make tough decisions.
Supervisor Jackie Fielder, a progressive Democrat, said she appreciates Lurie's candidness and has been impressed with how he engages with constituents and supervisors. But Fielder introduced a proposal this week that could test the collaborative spirit. Her measure would grant children the right to shelter, which would upend Lurie's current policy of limiting homeless families to 90 days at a shelter.
She hopes Lurie remembers that tech companies may come and go but neighborhood businesses and communities will remain. 'He has done a good job of shaking as many hands as possible but when it comes to policy decisions, we will see in his budget what are his actual priorities,' she said.
Associated Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US and China set for trade talks in London
US and China set for trade talks in London

Dubai Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Dubai Eye

US and China set for trade talks in London

Three of US President Donald Trump's top aides will meet with their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for talks aimed at resolving a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will represent the United States in the talks, Trump announced in a post on his Truth Social platform without providing further details. China's foreign ministry said on Saturday that vice premier He Lifeng will be in the United Kingdom between June 8 and June 13, adding that the first meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism would be held during this visit. "The meeting should go very well," Trump wrote. Trump spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday in a rare leader-to-leader call amid weeks of brewing trade tensions and a dispute over critical minerals. Trump and Xi agreed to visit one another and asked their staffs to hold talks in the meantime. Both countries are under pressure to relieve tensions, with the global economy under pressure over Chinese control over the rare earth mineral exports of which it is the dominant producer and investors more broadly anxious about Trump's wider effort to impose tariffs on goods from most US trading partners. China, meanwhile, has seen its own supply of key US imports like chip-design software and nuclear plant parts curtailed. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 in Geneva to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump returned to the presidency in January. That preliminary deal sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and US indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses. Still, that temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives. China sees mineral exports as a source of leverage. Halting those exports could put domestic political pressure on the Republican US president if economic growth sags because companies cannot make mineral-powered products. In recent years, US officials have identified China as its top geopolitical rival and the only country in the world able to challenge the United States economically and militarily.

The Republican Party's fiscal hawk era is officially over
The Republican Party's fiscal hawk era is officially over

Gulf Today

time12 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

The Republican Party's fiscal hawk era is officially over

There is no constituency for debt reduction, which is a fancy way of saying voters don't care that the federal balance sheet is roughly $37 trillion in the red — and growing. This simple fact of American politics goes a long way toward explaining why President Donald Trump, with the help of congressional Republicans, is pushing a sweeping reconciliation package of tax cuts and fresh domestic spending priorities that is projected to add approximately $3.8 trillion to the swelling federal debt. Politics is a service business and Trump and his Capitol Hill allies are aiming to please the customer. So they've loaded up the reconciliation package, dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, with a series of crowd-pleasers — expansions of existing tax breaks plus some brand-new ones. Yes, there are spending cuts. The version of the legislation that passed in the House of Representatives and is now up for consideration in the Senate includes reductions to Medicaid and other budget line items. But there's nothing in the bill that results in a net decrease in the debt. Even the proposed changes to Medicaid face an uncertain future, thanks to GOP opposition in the Senate. That's because the sort of substantial spending cuts and programme reforms required to break Washington's addiction to borrowing would be wildly unpopular. For instance, any meaningful attempt to balance the books probably requires both raising taxes and overhauling Medicare and Social Security. That's not a recipe for winning elections. As concerning as the US debt load is becoming for bond markets and some finance titans (and the few fiscal hawks left in Washington), most Americans have more urgent concerns, said David Winston, a Republican pollster who has been surveying voters for more than 25 years. 'There's another issue hitting voters that's a bigger deal, and that's inflation,' he told me. 'When you're looking at an economic situation where there's something that's pressing people at a personal level, it's not that the deficit isn't important, it is. But being able to pay bills and deal with things on a weekly basis and keep up with all your costs takes precedence.' Winston is right — and that's not to mention the fact that so many voters are convinced the looming debt bomb can be diffused by eliminating waste, fraud and abuse in government spending. But this isn't a new phenomenon. Voters generally, particularly on the left, have always found some reason or another for opposing legislation that asks them to participate in the solution to Washington's fiscal challenges. It's why tax hikes on the so-called rich are so popular and such an easy political message to wield. What has changed is the Republican Party and the voters it represents. Without question, Republican presidents prior to Trump were complicit in running up the debt. But in the pre-Trump era defined by President Ronald Reagan, fiscal responsibility and small government had currency with grassroots conservatives who formed the heart of the GOP base. But today's Republican base voters are different than their forebearers, courtesy of a Trump populist makeover. The 45th and 47th president over the past decade attracted legions of working-class voters to the Republican Party. For the most part, these newer Republicans are former Democrats who joined the GOP for cultural reasons; for instance, they passionately oppose abortion rights and support gun rights. Notably, they brought with them their preference for government safety-net programs and general lack of concern about the debt (qualities that have long defined grassroots Democrats). Simultaneously, suburban voters inclined to value fiscal responsibility generally, and debt reduction specifically, have drifted away from the GOP. The result is a Republican governing coalition much more enamored of government spending than it used to be and far less concerned about the federal debt, even though it has grown to more than 120% of the entire US economy — problematic to say the least. Brad Todd, a veteran Republican strategist in Washington and coauthor of The Great Revolt; Inside the Populist Coalition Reshaping American Politics, has closely monitored this electoral transformation. 'The voters who are additive to the coalition as a result of Donald Trump are voters who are not only comfortable with entitlements. They're wary of anybody that might cut them. One of the reasons these voters were not Republican for a long time is because they believed the Democrats' scare tactics on entitlements,' Todd told me. 'The realignment works both ways. Some of the voters Republicans have lost are upscale suburbanites who are fiscal conservatives.' 'Republicans tried to do privatised Social Security accounts; A to Z budgeting; baseline budgeting; line-item veto; balanced budget amendment,' he added. 'We've tried all those innovations, none of them resulted in winning elections. Culture does result in winning elections and so Donald Trump just came along and made the party about culture and not conservative economics.' David M. Drucker, Tribune News Service

Trump says Musk relationship over, warns of 'serious consequences' if he funds Democrats
Trump says Musk relationship over, warns of 'serious consequences' if he funds Democrats

Al Etihad

timea day ago

  • Al Etihad

Trump says Musk relationship over, warns of 'serious consequences' if he funds Democrats

7 June 2025 22:33 BEDMINSTER (Reuters)Donald Trump said on Saturday his relationship with his billionaire donor Elon Musk is over and warned there would be "serious consequences" if Musk funds US Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the president's sweeping tax and spending a telephone interview with NBC News, Trump declined to say what those consequences would be, and went on to add that he had not had discussions about whether to investigate if he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said, "I would assume so, yeah.""No," Trump told NBC when asked if he had any desire to repair his relationship with Musk."I have no intention of speaking to him," Trump Trump said he had not thought about terminating US government contracts with Musk's StarLink satellite internet or SpaceX rocket launch companies. Musk and Trump began exchanging insults this week, as Musk denounced Trump's bill as a "disgusting abomination." Musk's opposition to the measure complicated efforts to pass the legislation in Congress, where Republicans hold only slim majorities in the House of Representatives and bill narrowly passed the House last month and is now before the Senate, where Trump's fellow Republicans are considering making changes. Nonpartisan analysts estimate the measure would add $2.4 trillion to the $36.2 trillion US debt over 10 years, which worries many lawmakers, including some Republicans who are fiscal said on Saturday he is confident the bill would get passed by the US on July 4 Independence Day holiday."In fact, yeah, people that were, were going to vote for it are now enthusiastically going to vote for it, and we expect it to pass," Trump told have strongly backed Trump's initiatives since he began his second term as president on January 20. While some Republican lawmakers have made comments to the news media expressing concern about some of Trump's choices, they have yet to vote down any of his policies or nominations. DELETED MUSK POSTS Musk has deleted some social media posts critical of Trump, including one that signaled support for impeaching the president, appearing to seek a de-escalation of their public feud, which exploded on Thursday. During his first term as president, the House, then controlled by Democrats, twice voted to impeach Trump but the Senate both times acquitted White House and Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Saturday on the deleted posts. People who have spoken to Musk said his anger has begun to recede and they thought he would want to repair his relationship with of the X posts that Musk appeared to have deleted was a response to another user posting: "President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and (Vice President) JD Vance should replace him." Musk had written "yes."On Theo Von's "This Past Weekend" podcast - recorded on Thursday as the feud between Trump and Musk unfolded and released on Saturday - Vance called Musk's criticism of Trump a "huge mistake.""I'm always going to be loyal to the president, and I hope that eventually Elon kind of comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear. But I hope it is," said Vance, describing Musk as an "incredible entrepreneur."Trump named Musk to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending, lauding him at the White House only about a week ago for his work as head of the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk cut only about half of 1% of total spending, far short of his brash plans to axe $2 trillion from the federal budget.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store