logo
Harvard scientist accused of smuggling frog embryos indicted on new charges

Harvard scientist accused of smuggling frog embryos indicted on new charges

The Star5 hours ago

Kseniia Petrova, a Russian-born scientist and research associate at Harvard University, leaves the John Joseph Moakley United States Courthouse after she was released from U.S. federal custody, while awaiting trial in a criminal case in Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Reba Saldanha/File Photo
BOSTON (Reuters) -A Russian-born scientist at Harvard University accused of smuggling frog embryos into the United States was indicted on Wednesday on additional charges nearly two weeks after her lawyers secured her release from U.S. custody.
Federal prosecutors in Boston said a grand jury returned an indictment charging Kseniia Petrova, 30, with one count of concealment of a material fact, one count of false statement and one count of smuggling goods into the United States.
Prosecutors had charged her in May only with smuggling. The two new charges add to her criminal exposure and were filed after her lawyers last week urged a magistrate judge to dismiss the initial criminal complaint.
Petrova's lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Prosecutors secured the indictment after Petrova was granted bail on June 12. She had been detained for months after U.S. immigration authorities took her into custody on February 16 at the airport in Boston upon her return from a trip to France.
Her supporters said she was detained as part of the practice by President Donald Trump's administration of targeting international students and academics for visa revocations and detention as part of his hardline immigration agenda.
Prosecutors said U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents stopped Petrova, who works at Harvard Medical School, after her checked duffle bag was flagged for inspection, revealing the frog embryos.
Petrova has said her boss asked her to bring back frog embryo samples for experiments. But prosecutors said the embryos constituted biological material that should have been declared to customs officials at the port of first arrival.
Prosecutors said that when she was approached by law enforcement, Petrova initially denied carrying any biological material in her baggage, and later claimed to be unsure she was required to declare the embryos when entering the United States.
But prosecutors said one of Petrova's colleagues had texted saying that she needed to make sure she got permission to bring samples back.
Petrova's visa was then canceled and immigration officials took her into custody with the intent of deporting her back to Russia, a prospect Petrova has said she feared after protesting Russia's war in Ukraine.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Leslie Adler)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Comparing US Iran strike to Hiroshima, Trump plays down intelligence report
Comparing US Iran strike to Hiroshima, Trump plays down intelligence report

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Comparing US Iran strike to Hiroshima, Trump plays down intelligence report

THE HAGUE: U.S. President Donald Trump compared the impact of American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites to the end of World War Two on Wednesday, arguing that the damage was severe even though available intelligence reports were inconclusive. His comments followed reports by Reuters and other media outlets on Tuesday revealing that the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency had assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear program by just a few months, despite Trump and administration officials saying it had been obliterated. "The intelligence was ... very inconclusive," Trump told reporters at a NATO summit on Wednesday while meeting with Secretary General Mark Rutte. "The intelligence says, 'We don't know, it could have been very severe.' That's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know.' It was very severe. It was obliteration." The Trump administration has not disputed that the DIA assessment exists, but Trump described it as preliminary. In a series of at-times testy exchanges at a press conference later in the day, Trump sharply criticized journalists for their reporting on the assessment. He suggested the reports were an attack against the pilots who flew the bombing mission over the weekend targeting Iran's key nuclear sites. Trump said the U.S. strikes were responsible for ending the war between Israel and Iran. "When you look at Hiroshima, if you look at Nagasaki, that ended a war, too," Trump said, referring to a pair of U.S. nuclear strikes on Japan in 1945 that essentially ended World War II. "This ended a war in a different way." SUCCESS OF IRAN STRIKES CRUCIAL FOR TRUMP Trump has an uneasy relationship with the U.S. intelligence community, and the success of the strikes is politically critical to him. His right-leaning supporters had argued loudly beforehand that such military intervention was inconsistent with Trump's domestic-focused "Make America Great Again" agenda and his promise to avoid foreign entanglements. Trump has countered by insisting that Iran must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon - a goal that an accurate, decisive attack would support. He was flanked at both appearances by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who also cast doubt on the reliability of the DIA assessment. Hegseth in particular cast much of his fury at the news media. "When you actually look at the report - by the way, it was a top secret report - it was preliminary, it was low-confidence," Hegseth said in the appearance alongside Rutte. "This is a political motive here." He said the FBI was investigating a potential leak. Rubio suggested that those responsible for sharing the report had mischaracterized it, saying: "This is the game they play." At the summit, NATO member states announced their joint intention to raise defense spending to 5% of gross domestic product, which the Trump administration pointed to as a significant foreign policy victory. At the concluding press conference, Trump referenced a statement from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission - that country's nuclear regulator - assessing that Iran's nuclear program had been set back by "many years." He said the U.S. plans to meet with the Iranians next week to discuss next steps regarding their nuclear program, but he said he did not think Iran would want to get back into "the nuclear business" after the strikes.

Trump defends Iran strikes, compares to WWII bombings
Trump defends Iran strikes, compares to WWII bombings

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Trump defends Iran strikes, compares to WWII bombings

THE HAGUE: U.S. President Donald Trump compared the impact of American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites to the end of World War Two on Wednesday, arguing that the damage was severe even though available intelligence reports were inconclusive. His comments followed reports by Reuters and other media outlets on Tuesday revealing that the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency had assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear program by just a few months, despite Trump and administration officials saying it had been obliterated. "The intelligence was ... very inconclusive," Trump told reporters at a NATO summit on Wednesday while meeting with Secretary General Mark Rutte. "The intelligence says, 'We don't know, it could have been very severe.' That's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know.' It was very severe. It was obliteration." The Trump administration has not disputed that the DIA assessment exists, but Trump described it as preliminary. In a series of at-times testy exchanges at a press conference later in the day, Trump sharply criticized journalists for their reporting on the assessment. He suggested the reports were an attack against the pilots who flew the bombing mission over the weekend targeting Iran's key nuclear sites. Trump said the U.S. strikes were responsible for ending the war between Israel and Iran. "When you look at Hiroshima, if you look at Nagasaki, that ended a war, too," Trump said, referring to a pair of U.S. nuclear strikes on Japan in 1945 that essentially ended World War II. "This ended a war in a different way." SUCCESS OF IRAN STRIKES CRUCIAL FOR TRUMP Trump has an uneasy relationship with the U.S. intelligence community, and the success of the strikes is politically critical to him. His right-leaning supporters had argued loudly beforehand that such military intervention was inconsistent with Trump's domestic-focused "Make America Great Again" agenda and his promise to avoid foreign entanglements. Trump has countered by insisting that Iran must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon - a goal that an accurate, decisive attack would support. He was flanked at both appearances by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who also cast doubt on the reliability of the DIA assessment. Hegseth in particular cast much of his fury at the news media. "When you actually look at the report - by the way, it was a top secret report - it was preliminary, it was low-confidence," Hegseth said in the appearance alongside Rutte. "This is a political motive here." He said the FBI was investigating a potential leak. Rubio suggested that those responsible for sharing the report had mischaracterized it, saying: "This is the game they play." At the summit, NATO member states announced their joint intention to raise defense spending to 5% of gross domestic product, which the Trump administration pointed to as a significant foreign policy victory. At the concluding press conference, Trump referenced a statement from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission - that country's nuclear regulator - assessing that Iran's nuclear program had been set back by "many years." He said the U.S. plans to meet with the Iranians next week to discuss next steps regarding their nuclear program, but he said he did not think Iran would want to get back into "the nuclear business" after the strikes.

When Hadi Awang's son-in-law has a crystal ball foretelling first Chinese PM emerging in 2058
When Hadi Awang's son-in-law has a crystal ball foretelling first Chinese PM emerging in 2058

Focus Malaysia

timean hour ago

  • Focus Malaysia

When Hadi Awang's son-in-law has a crystal ball foretelling first Chinese PM emerging in 2058

AS twice former primer Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad dropped by the National Health Institute (IJN) yesterday (June 25) to visit his foe-turned-friend Tan Sri Hadi Awang, one would have expected the latter to comment on the alleged racial incitement unleased by his son-in-law Zaharuddin Muhammad. Riding on the recent appointment of Datuk Johnny Lim Engh Seng as the first Chinese military officer to climb to the rank of Lieutenant-General in the Malaysian Armed Forces (ATM), the Singai Buloh PAS chief has made headlines with his prophecy that Malaysia can now expect 'its first Chinese Prime Minister – the 50th – by 2058'! In all frankness Zaharuddin would probably not have earned the wrath of DAP national adviser Lim Guan Eng had he not attached on his Facebook post image of the Melaka-born officer who was recently conferred the prestigious three-star rank in the country's military. At best, the retaliation could be milder if he were to stick to his insinuation that 'both parents of the (imaginary) Kg Sungai Baru-born PM were granted Malaysian citizenship via the Malaysia My Second Home scheme 23 years earlier'. Interestingly, Zaharuddin has uploaded back his controversial post which he had deleted earlier by justifying that his action was not one of cowardice but because 'it was swamped by cybertroopers whose only intention is to destroy truth'. Sadly, no PAS backing He further defended his action that while he had 'no explicit or implicit' intention to belittle Johnny Lim's military promotion, this should not be made a precursor to the appointment of a non-Muslim/non-Bumiputera PM appointment in the future. On this note, Zaharuddin has contemplated taking legal action against DAP's deputy secretary-general Steven Sim Chee Keong on grounds of prejudice by having accused him of criticising Johnny Lim's appointment by virtue of him (Johnny Lim) being a Chinese. Also under his legal radar is social news site World of Buzz which Zaharuddin claimed had spined his original post with the headline 'PAS Politician Warns that Firat Malaysian Chinese Lientenant-General Will Lead to Non-Malay PM in the Future'. Whatever said and done, the joke is that PAS is seemingly distancing itself from defending the son-on-law of the Islamist party's supreme leader but instead chooses 'to celebrate diversity'. 'The appointment of Datuk Johnny Lim as ATM's Lieutenant-General is a historic event that should be celebrated by all citizens, not questioned, let alone belittled simply because of his racial background,' justified party secretary-general Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan. 'The ability, achievement, progress and success of any Malaysian in any field is good news for all, not the other way around. Congratulation from PAS to Lieutenant-General Datuk Johnny Lim.' With such tone, one wonders if Zaharuddin would be dealt a similar blow that befell Perak state assembly opposition leader and former Perak commissioner Razman Zakaria who did not receive any party backing following a slew of slanders on political opponents. – June 26, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store