I potty trained my kids in three days – it's not that hard
The potty training age is creeping up alarmingly, warn scientists – who are trying to find ways to reduce the 300,000 nappies sent to landfills globally every minute.
Researchers at University College London (UCL) are asking parents from across the world to share their potty training experiences and techniques as part of The Big Toilet Project, to hopefully figure out a way to reverse the trend.
'I understand this is a sensitive and difficult issue for many families,' said Professor Mark Miodownik, who is heading the project. 'I found toilet training my kids very difficult. We are doing this research because there is a potential win-win situation here. Finding effective and safe ways to toilet train children earlier helps the child, helps the parents, reduces costs to the family, and reduces plastic waste.'
I can tell his team point blank: I potty trained my kids in three days – it's not that hard. I read Gina Ford's Potty Training in One Week – I got it done far quicker. My kids were out of nappies by the age of around two. One of the main takeaways is to dedicate a full week of staying at home to potty train as soon as they are ready – and don't use pull-ups.
Let children run around feral and follow them with a potty – if that means putting up with pee all over the place, who cares? Just get the job done and go out again into the world. Tick – another milestone completed and it's helping the environment.
According to UCL's study, however, the average toddler is potty trained at three – about nine months later than its grandparents – and there are warnings from teachers and schools that one in four kids are starting school without being fully potty trained.
Scientists are blaming the 'too good and too cheap' nappies for the slow pace of potty training. Experts claim they are so superior in absorbency that children aren't aware when they are even wet, meaning they don't learn when they need the toilet. Also, now that we aren't burdened with the dreadful chore of washing Terry towel nappies, parents aren't motivated to potty train as quickly.
But the scientists are making a big mistake - don't blame the nappies, blame the parents.
I'm not wishing to potty shame, but, really – what's the big deal? A key culprit is the child-led approach to parenting – or ' gentle parenting ' – in which you can't possibly force your child to use a potty.
Instead, parents introduce it in a namby-pamby way, like you might a bowl of peas, as something they might be interested in – or might not be. No pressure at all! The view is, if it takes five years, then respect the children's comfort zone. But the emphasis on pandering to a child's rhythm with something like potty training means that it could literally take years to accomplish.
I've heard potty training horror stories – and seen them too. I've seen kids of tiger mums so stressed out from potty training, they have developed phobias. One mum in Kew Gardens pulled out a mini potty-style loo with a fake flush and loo roll holder. Others, like comedian Katherine Ryan, potty trained her three kids almost from birth 'as soon as they can listen to a story'. They were out of nappies by the age of one and crawling to the toilet. Good for her – at least some parents have got the right idea.
It's potty to send your child to their first day of school in absorbent pull-ups – and expect teachers to potty train them. Teachers have better things to do than pick up the pieces from lazy (or fashionable) parenting trends.
My advice to the scientists is: Don't bother getting parents to complete a five-minute survey – or record monthly progress in a toilet training diary. Just tell parents to potty train children as soon as they hit 18 months to two years – or earlier if kids are ready – and prepare to stay at home for a week. It's really that simple.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists are BAFFLED after discovering a giant planet orbiting a tiny star
Astronomers have discovered a strange giant planet orbiting a tiny star - and nobody knows how it got there. The star is a distant red dwarf known as TOI-6894 which is just a fifth the mass of our own sun and shines 250 times more faintly. According to all known theories of planetary formation, a planet this small should only be home to small planets the size of Earth or Mars. However, scientists have been baffled to discover a massive gas giant slightly larger than Saturn orbiting this tiny sun. Located about 240 light-years from Earth in the constellation Leo, TOI-6894 is now the smallest known star to host a large orbiting planet. In a paper published in Nature Astronomy, the researchers reveal that this tiny star is a full 60 per cent smaller than the previous record holder. Although the orbiting gas giant isn't quite larger than its star, they are much closer in size than should normally be possible. Co-author Dr Vincent Van Eylen, an astronomer from UCL, says: 'It's an intriguing discovery. We don't really understand how a star with so little mass can form such a massive planet!' The star TOI-6894 (pictured) is about 240 light-years from Earth in the constellation Leo. It is the smallest star to host a large planet in its orbit (circled in red) In our solar system, the sun is 10 times the size of Jupiter, the largest planet in orbit. By contrast, TOI-6894 is just 2.5 times larger than its only orbiting planet, known as TOI-6894b. The planet is slightly larger than Saturn and a bit smaller than Jupiter, but far less dense than either. Despite its size, the planet's mass is only 56 per cent that of Saturn and just 17 per cent that of Jupiter. However, this isn't the only unusual feature of this cosmically mismatched pair. Due to this planet's size, TOI-6894b sits 40 times closer to its star than Earth does to the sun and completes an entire orbit in just three days. That proximity makes the planet much hotter than Earth - and not a good candidate for alien life - but it is nowhere near as hot as scientists would expect. Most exoplanets spotted by astronomers are what scientists call 'hot Jupiters'. These are massive gas giants with temperatures exceeding 1,700°C (3,100°F). However, since the red dwarf sun is so cool the planet's atmosphere is just 147°C (300°F) which has big implications for its chemical makeup. Professor Amaury Triaud, of the University of Birmingham, says: 'Based on the stellar irradiation of TOI-6894b, we expect the atmosphere is dominated by methane chemistry, which is very rare to identify. 'Temperatures are low enough that atmospheric observations could even show us ammonia, which would be the first time it is found in an exoplanet atmosphere.' But the strangest thing of all about this distant planet is that, according to our best theories, it shouldn't exist at all. Scientists' best explanation for how planets form is called the core accretion theory. The birth of a planetary system begins with a large cloud of gas and dust - called a molecular cloud - that collapses under its own gravity to form a central star. Leftover material spinning around the star in what is called a protoplanetary disc forms planets as the material clumps together under its own gravity. In the case of gas giants like Saturn or Jupiter, they first form a heavy core which pulls in and traps gas with its gravitational pull. Small stars leave small protoplanetary discs which shouldn't contain enough material for a massive gas giant core to form. However, the presence of a Saturn-sized planet orbiting this tiny red dwarf now suggests that this theory can't be completely accurate. Lead author Dr Edward Briant, who completed the work at both UCL's Mullard Space Science Laboratory and the University of Warwick, says there are two possible explanations. The planet may have formed through an 'intermediate core-accretion process' in which a protoplanet forms and slowly gathers gas without becoming big enough to trigger the normal runaway gas accretion. 'Alternatively, it could have formed because of a gravitationally unstable disc,' says Dr Briant. 'In some cases, the disc surrounding the star will become unstable due to the gravitational force it exerts on itself. 'These discs can then fragment, with the gas and dust collapsing to form a planet.' Since red dwarf stars are extremely common in the universe, revealing how TOI-6894b formed could have big consequences for our search for exoplanets. Co-author Dr Daniel Bayliss, of the University of Warwick, says: 'Most stars in our galaxy are actually small stars exactly like this, with low masses and previously thought to not be able to host gas giant planets. 'So, the fact that this star hosts a giant planet has big implications for the total number of giant planets we estimate exist in our galaxy.' The atmosphere of TOI-6894b is due to be observed by the James Webb Space Telescope within the next 12 months. By measuring the distribution of material within the planet astronomers will be able to work out the size and structure of the core. This should allow scientists to determine which, if any, of these theories is correct. However, until then, how this tiny star came to have such a large planet in its orbit will remain a perplexing mystery. Scientists study the atmosphere of distant exoplanets using enormous space satellites like Hubble Distant stars and their orbiting planets often have conditions unlike anything we see in our atmosphere. To understand these new world's, and what they are made of, scientists need to be able to detect what their atmospheres consist of. They often do this by using a telescope similar to Nasa's Hubble Telescope. These enormous satellites scan the sky and lock on to exoplanets that Nasa think may be of interest. Here, the sensors on board perform different forms of analysis. One of the most important and useful is called absorption spectroscopy. This form of analysis measures the light that is coming out of a planet's atmosphere. Every gas absorbs a slightly different wavelength of light, and when this happens a black line appears on a complete spectrum. These lines correspond to a very specific molecule, which indicates it's presence on the planet. They are often called Fraunhofer lines after the German astronomer and physicist that first discovered them in 1814. By combining all the different wavelengths of lights, scientists can determine all the chemicals that make up the atmosphere of a planet. The key is that what is missing, provides the clues to find out what is present. It is vitally important that this is done by space telescopes, as the atmosphere of Earth would then interfere. Absorption from chemicals in our atmosphere would skew the sample, which is why it is important to study the light before it has had chance to reach Earth. This is often used to look for helium, sodium and even oxygen in alien atmospheres.
BBC News
5 days ago
- BBC News
Microbiome: First bacteria we meet can keep us out of hospital
The first bacteria our bodies meet – in the hours after we're born – could protect us from dangerous infections, UK scientists have shown, for the first time, that good bacteria seem to halve the risk of young children being admitted to hospital with lung researchers said it was a "phenomenal" finding and could lead to therapies that boost good bacteria in early encounters with microbes are thought to be crucial in how our immune system come out of the womb sterile, but this doesn't last for long. All the nooks and crannies of the human body become home to a world of microbial life, known as the microbiome. Researchers at University College London and the Sanger Institute investigated the earliest stages in our body's colonisation by bacteria, fungi and collected stool samples from 1,082 newborns in the first week of life. The team then performed a massive genetic analysis on all the DNA in the samples to work out exactly which species were present and how common they were in each then tracked what happened to those babies, using hospital data, for the next two years. One particular early inhabitant of the human body, Bifidobacterium longum, seemed to have a protective 4% of babies with this species would spend a night in hospital with a lung infection over the next two years. Babies with different starter-bacteria were two-to-three times more likely to need to stay in is the first data to show the formation of the microbiome affects the risk of infection."I think it's really phenomenal. It's amazing to be able to show this. I'm excited," Prof Nigel Field, from UCL, told the BBC. How are these bacteria doing it? The most likely culprit for children ending up in hospital is respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), but what joins the dots between this and B. longum?That is the "million dollar question" for Prof know B. longum starts off digesting breast milk which both contains food for the baby and encourages good bacteria. The exact details have not yet been worked out, but either the bacteria themselves or the compounds they make by digesting food are interacting with the immune system "and are influencing the way in which the immune system matures and is able to recognise friend from foe," according to Prof protective bacteria were found only in babies that came into the world via a vaginal delivery rather than a caesarean. Even then they were not discovered after every vaginal researchers say their findings do not justify the practice of vaginal seeding, where some new parents smear babies with a swab taken from the vagina. The good bacteria seem to be coming from the end of the mother's digestive system, an idea known in the field as the "first lick"."I feel pretty confident in saying that vaginal seeding is not a good thing," said Prof the long-term ambition is to come up with microbial therapies – like a probiotic yogurt – that could be given to babies to set their microbiomes on a healthy Louise Kenny, from the University of Liverpool and a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist, said: "A caesarean section is often a life-saving procedure, and can be the right choice for a woman and her baby."She said that while the benefit was seen only in babies born vaginally, it was not in every child born that way so "further research is needed to create a full, nuanced picture".
BBC News
6 days ago
- BBC News
New flora and fauna at Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park
A variety of flora and fauna are thriving in east London's Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, where more species of bee, bird, wasp and lichen have been the 2012 Olympic Games, the Stratford site was mostly industrial wasteland with contaminated soil, polluted waterways and extensive fly-tipped latest discoveries were made in a recent "bio-blitz", an intensive biological survey with experts from the London Natural History Society, UCL and Hackney Tom Bellamy said: "I have been really surprised at the biodiversity that's been achieved here in such a short time – especially considering how polluted a lot of the ground here was before the London 2012 Games." The survey identified three species of bee now in the park: the coastal leafcutter, sickle-jawed blood bee and the large sharp-tailed bee. It also recorded a species of hyper-parasitic wasp and a species of cuckoo wasp, 23 species of butterfly, 42 bird species, as well as 23 species of eels, kestrels, house martins, sand martins, the nationally scarce black mining bee and large scabious mining bee, and the soft-winged flower beetle - a threatened species across Europe - were all found in East Village, the site of the Athletes' Village during the 2012 Games. Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park ecologist Mr Bellamy said: "We have kingfishers, otters, eels and it's incredible that nationally scarce species of bees have been found here."Part of my job is to establish breeding populations for a wide variety of select species that we want to breed on the park. "I'm proud of what's been achieved so far but there is always more we can do."
