Uinta Basin Railway group looks to fund project with $2.4 billion in federal bonds
Anglers fish on the Colorado River near an idle Union Pacific freight train in western Grand County on June 12, 2023. (Chase Woodruff/Colorado Newsline)
The group pushing for a rail line in eastern Utah that would allow the state to ramp up oil production is hoping to fund the project through $2.4 billion in U.S. Department of Transportation bonds.
The Seven County Infrastructure Coalition for years has been lobbying for the 88-mile Uinta Basin Railway, which would connect the oil-rich region of northeastern Utah to national rail lines, facilitating the export of waxy crude oil to refineries on the Gulf Coast.
To pay for the railway, the coalition — which consists of representatives from Dagget, Carbon, Duchesne, Emery, San Juan, Servier and Uintah counties — approved a resolution last month announcing its intent to seek $2.4 billion in private activity bonds from the U.S. Department of Transportation.
That's a $500 million increase from 2023, when the coalition passed a similar resolution seeking $1.9 billion in federal bonds.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The railway extension could allow for the transport of an estimated 350,000 barrels of oil each day, massively increasing the state's oil production. The refineries in Salt Lake City, for instance, currently have a market capacity of 85,000 barrels per day.
But connecting the Uinta Basin to national rail lines means increased oil exports through Colorado, which has proved to be a major sticking point. In 2022, environmental groups and Colorado's Eagle County sued the coalition, arguing that the federal Surface Transportation Board — the agency tasked with the environmental review — fell short in its analysis, failing to consider the risks of the railroad expansion.
The project cleared a major roadblock in May after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a prior court ruling that found the environmental review was incomplete. The ruling returns the case to a lower court for consideration.
'This was not only a win for the Seven County Infrastructure Coalition and counties in the state of Utah, but a win for the United States in being able to move forward with a major infrastructure project,' said Greg Miles, a Duchesne County Commissioner who sits on the board of the coalition, during a public meeting Thursday. 'There's a lot of things that oil does for us in our lives.'
And although it still faces regulatory and legal hurdles, the coalition has made several moves over the last month toward financing the railroad. On Thursday, it heard public comments related to the bonds.
The Department of Transportation's Private Activity Bonds program is a tax-exempt financing option from the federal government aimed at supporting private-public partnerships. The program has financed bridge replacements, highways, rail lines and other transportation-related ventures.
U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of controversial Utah oil train
That $2.4 billion is the total estimated cost for the project, according to the coalition, although it's unclear how much money will come from private investments.
But funds for the bond program are running dry. According to the department's data, there's only $500 million left to allocate, the program having dished out $29.4 billion of its $30 billion cap. It's up to Congress to replenish the program.
'How is the coalition going to get this money? And when?' asked Deeda Seed with the Center for Biological Diversity during the meeting Thursday.
Seed also raised concerns over the 'ballooning' cost of the railway, which has increased in the last few years.
'How does this project pencil out? We have no clue, the public has no clue, especially when President Trump hopes the price of oil will decline to $40 to $50 per barrel,' she said.
Just about all of the roughly two-dozen commenters on Thursday spoke against the railway, and using bonds to fund it — they cited concerns over the project's rising cost, potential harm to wildlife and habitat, the negative impact on air quality, and how a derailment could harm the Colorado River and the people who rely on it for drinking water.
'I deplore subsidizing the increase of oil production in the Uinta Basin, which will increase the ozone and air pollution, at a time when all federal subsidies are being cut for renewable energy,' said Joan Entwistle, a Summit County resident. 'It's just another example of how we're putting the thumb on the scale for fossil fuels.'
'The tariffs are being imposed at a level of 50% for steel. Clearly, that is going to raise the prices. Railroads are notorious for cost overruns,' said David Bennett, also a Summit County resident.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Veterans Arrested on Capitol Grounds on Eve of DC Parade, Trump Birthday
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Veterans rushed the steps of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., during a protest against President Donald Trump and the upcoming parade celebrating the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, prompting local authorities to arrest several people. Why It Matters Trump has planned for a parade commemorating the Army's anniversary, which will take place on Flag Day and coincides with Trump's 79th birthday. Plans for the parade called for around 6,600 soldiers, at least 150 vehicles and 50 helicopters to follow a route from Arlington, Virginia, to the National Mall, according to documents obtained by the Associated Press. This will carry an estimated cost of around $45 million. This follows staffing cuts to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as part of the Trump administration's mission to slash what it deems waste, fraud and abuse in federal government spending. Thuy Nguyen on Friday speaks outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., during a protest of Saturday's parade for the Army's 250th anniversary, which falls on President Donald Trump's birthday. Thuy Nguyen on Friday speaks outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., during a protest of Saturday's parade for the Army's 250th anniversary, which falls on President Donald Trump's About Face: Veterans Against the War What To Know The U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) told Newsweek in an email statement that around 75 people attended the protest outside the Supreme Court, where demonstrators initially gathered. However, 60 of those protesters soon broke off and tried to force their way onto the steps of the Capitol, pushing through a police perimeter and bike rack, at which point USCP officers started to detain individuals. "USCP arrested approximately 60 demonstrators," the statement read. "All will be charged with unlawful demonstration and crossing a police line. Additional charges for some will include assault on a police officer and resisting arrest." The protesters wore army fatigues over shirts that read "Veterans Against Fascism," and they carried signs with slogans saying such things as "Veterans Say Military Off Our Streets" and "Money For People, Not Parades." Kevin Benderman on Friday addresses demonstrators outside the U.S. Supreme Court at a protest of Saturday's parade for the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, which falls on President Donald Trump's birthday, in Washington, D.C. Kevin Benderman on Friday addresses demonstrators outside the U.S. Supreme Court at a protest of Saturday's parade for the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, which falls on President Donald Trump's birthday, in Washington, About Face: Veterans Against the War Fox News Senior Congressional Correspondent Chad Pergram in a post to X, formerly Twitter, reported that two of the people arrested were taken to the hospital for "further treatment." Progressive political action committee VoteVets over the Memorial Day weekend posted a message of heavy criticism against Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency. "Gutting VA will result in delayed appointments and substandard care, leading directly to more veteran deaths. In fact, as reports and internal documents now prove, Elon Musk's wrecking ball is causing systems to fail, putting veterans at risk," Kayla Williams, Iraq War veteran and senior policy adviser at VoteVets, wrote in a post on X. "It's a slap in the face to all who have worn the uniform in defense of our nation," Williams added. Rebecca Roberts on Friday speaks outside the U.S. Supreme Court during a protest of Saturday's parade celebrating the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, which falls on President Donald Trump's birthday, in Washington, D.C. Rebecca Roberts on Friday speaks outside the U.S. Supreme Court during a protest of Saturday's parade celebrating the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, which falls on President Donald Trump's birthday, in Washington, About Face: Veterans Against the War The veterans' protest on Friday is merely a taste of what Trump might expect over the weekend: Another veterans group, Refuse Fascism, plans to lead a protest on Saturday, citing a need to take a stand "against the misuse of the military by President Donald Trump," according to WUSA 9. Protest group 50501 (50 protests, 50 states, one movement) has urged members and supporters to reserve free tickets to the parade and then not attend in an effort to create a sparse crowd and lackluster display. What Happens Next The parade is set for Saturday, but the forecast from the National Weather Service has predicted a 60 percent chance of rain, with a thunderstorm possible after 2 p.m. "While it doesn't look like a washout, a few thunderstorms can be around especially during the middle to late afternoon hours," AccuWeather meteorologist Alex DaSilva previously told Newsweek.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Please do not go to the airport': Sliver Airways leaves travelers stranded after airline abruptly shuts down
There's missing a flight, and then there's missing every flight because your airline just went bankrupt. That's what happened to hundreds of travelers this week when Silver Airways, a Florida-based regional carrier, abruptly announced it was ceasing operations effective immediately. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) Passengers flying between Florida, the Bahamas and the Caribbean were left at airports with no warning, no alternative flight plans and no customer service reps in sight. 'We regret to inform you that we are ceasing operations as of today, June 11, 2025,' the airline posted on Instagram. "Please do not go to the airport." The bankruptcy came with zero notice and even fewer answers, raising questions for customers who already paid for tickets. Here's what led to the airline's sudden nosedive — and what to do if your summer vacation just hit major turbulence. Silver Airways has officially flown its last mile. Roughly five months after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the Florida-based airline grounded all flights — and not because of stormy weather. In a recent statement, the company revealed it had sold its assets to another airline holding company as part of a restructuring effort. But instead of reviving the brand, the new owner decided to ground all operations. 'In an attempt to restructure in bankruptcy, Silver entered into a transaction to sell its assets to another airline holding company, who unfortunately has determined to not continue Silver's flight operations,' the airline wrote in a statement. Silver had hoped the bankruptcy would help secure new capital and offer a path toward financial recovery. Instead, the collapse has left travelers stranded and staff without jobs — a costly detour for everyone involved. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it If you're one of the many people left grounded by Silver's sudden shutdown, don't expect a refund from the airline itself. In its final Instagram post, the company made it clear that customers won't be reimbursed directly. But all hope isn't lost. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, you might be able to recover your money depending on how you paid. If you bought your ticket with a credit card, you can file a dispute with your card issuer under the Fair Credit Billing Act. Be sure to include a copy of your ticket and receipt, and clearly explain that the airline has ceased operations and failed to deliver the service you paid for. Just don't wait too long. You typically have 60 days from the date your statement was issued — the one that includes the airfare charge — to file the dispute. If you booked through a travel agent or third-party site, it's worth reaching out to see if they can help secure a refund or offer any alternatives. Some agencies have extra protections or recourse built into their services. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Boston Globe
11 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Federal judge blocks Trump's firing of Consumer Product Safety Commission members
Attorneys for the plaintiffs argued the case was clearcut. Federal statute states that the president can fire commissioners 'for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause' — allegations that have not been made against the commissioners in question. Advertisement But attorneys for the Trump administration assert that the statute is unconstitutional because the president's authority extends to dismissing federal employees who 'exercise significant executive power,' according to court filings. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox agreed with the plaintiffs, declaring their dismissals unlawful. He had previously denied their request for a temporary restraining order, which would have reinstated them on an interim basis. That decision came just days after the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority declined to reinstate board members of two other independent agencies, endorsing a robust view of presidential power. The court said that the Constitution appears to give the president the authority to fire the board members 'without cause.' Its three liberal justices dissented. Advertisement In his written opinion filed Friday, Maddox presented a more limited view of the president's authority, finding 'no constitutional defect' in the statute that prohibits such terminations. He ordered that the plaintiffs be allowed to resume their duties as product safety commissioners. The ruling adds to a larger ongoing legal battle over a 90-year-old Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey's Executor. In that case from 1935, the court unanimously held that presidents cannot fire independent board members without cause. The decision ushered in an era of powerful independent federal agencies charged with regulating labor relations, employment discrimination, the airwaves and much else. But it has long rankled conservative legal theorists who argue the modern administrative state gets the Constitution all wrong because such agencies should answer to the president. During a hearing before Maddox last week, arguments focused largely on the nature of the Consumer Product Safety Commission and its powers, specifically whether it exercises 'substantial executive authority.' Maddox, a Biden nominee, noted the difficulty of cleanly characterizing such functions. He also noted that Trump was breaking from precedent by firing the three commissioners, rather than following the usual process of making his own nominations when the opportunity arose. Abigail Stout, an attorney representing the Trump administration, argued that any restrictions on the president's removal power would violate his constitutional authority. After Trump announced the Democrats' firings, four Democratic U.S. senators sent a letter to the president urging him to reverse course. 'This move compromises the ability of the federal government to apply data-driven product safety rules to protect Americans nationwide, away from political influence,' they wrote. The Consumer Product Safety Commission was created in 1972. Its five members must maintain a partisan split, with no more than three representing the president's party. They serve staggered terms. Advertisement That structure ensures that each president has 'the opportunity to influence, but not control,' the commission, attorneys for the plaintiffs wrote in court filings. They argued the recent terminations could jeopardize the commission's independence. Attorney Nick Sansone, who represents the three commissioners, praised the ruling Friday. 'Today's opinion reaffirms that the President is not above the law,' he said in a statement.
