Hospital price transparency bill in Washington Legislature gets reworked
(Photo by Getty Images)
A bill in the Washington Legislature to make hospital pricing more transparent for consumers is still in play, but its scope has narrowed during the legislative process.
'I don't think this bill really, frankly, does anything anymore,' said Steve Fenberg, a patient rights advocate who supported the original bill. 'I think it's a shame.'
Senate Bill 5493 intended to give the state's Department of Health the ability to enforce a 2021 federal rule that required hospitals to provide transparent pricing. The idea was to provide patients with clearer information about how much they would pay for care and to spur competition that could help drive down costs.
'We're on an unsustainable trajectory for health care costs, we are not bending the curve,' said Sen. Marcus Riccelli, D-Spokane, the bill's sponsor. 'We need to relieve burdens on patients and consumers from our broken system and do actual things that will drive costs down.'
Advocates have raised concerns over the lack of compliance with the federal rule, while hospitals say it takes time to adjust to new requirements.
'The understanding of what compliance and transparency mean has sort of evolved over time,' since the 2021 federal rule, said Andrew Busz, a policy director with the Washington State Hospital Association.
When the rule first took effect, hospitals were required to upload 'machine readable files,' which are large, not considered accessible or understandable to most consumers, and mainly used by researchers, insurers, and data aggregators, Busz explained.
Over time, the rule required hospitals to upload 'shoppable services' — a consumer-friendly list of around 300 medical services, such as imaging, surgeries, and maternity care.
At the federal level, hospitals that do not comply with these requirements are first issued a warning notice. If the noncompliance continues, it can lead to a corrective action plan or civil monetary penalties.
In Washington, 20 hospitals out of the 114 in the state have been issued warning notices and no further action has been needed, according to a list provided by the hospital association.
'It's fairly common for state or federal agencies, when something rolls out that's new, to give organizations kind of time to be compliant, these are new requirements,' said Chelene Whiteaker, senior vice president for government affairs with the Washington State Hospital Association.
States like Colorado have been taking action in recent years to enforce the federal requirements and the Washington bill is in that mold.
Riccelli suggested Washington has been lagging behind other states in moving ahead with the new transparency measures. 'We see red states, blue states, and purple states, moving forward with price transparency a little more aggressively,' he said.
When the bill was first introduced this year, it had three main components: requiring hospitals to comply with the federal regulations and to submit data to the state's Department of Health; giving the state enforcement authority, and calling for the state to develop an interactive price comparison tool — similar to one in Colorado.
Hospitals that don't comply would have been subject to civil fines ranging up to $10,000 per violation. Proceeds from fines would have gone toward creating the tool for people to search and compare hospital prices.
The version of the bill the Senate passed unanimously on March 11 did not include the enforcement provisions.
'I made some changes that I would rather not have made, but we did just to kind of keep something moving on in this session. I contemplated not moving it forward, but I do see value,' Riccelli said, adding that both Republicans and Democrats have struggled with getting behind transparency measures.
Whiteaker said that the hospital association pushed for the changes so that the state bill complemented the federal regulations, rather than duplicating or distracting from them.
The most recent version of the bill would require the state's hospitals to comply with the federal rules and submit price data to the state's Department of Health, which would track compliance. It sets a July 1, 2027 deadline for hospitals to publish the data and calls for annual updates after that.
The complexity of health insurance and factoring in copays, deductibles, and whether a hospital accepts someone's insurance is often what makes health care difficult to navigate.
'The payment mechanisms and rate structures are actually determined by the carriers, not by the hospitals,' Busz said, adding that the type of insurance someone has typically has more of an effect on what a patient pays than the rates a hospital charges.
Also, while price estimate tools exist on hospital websites now, it can be difficult for someone to predict what services they may need.
'There's no real perfect way to anticipate what the costs are going to be,' Busz said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Appendix Cancer Has Quadrupled in Millennials
Credit - Science Photo Library—Getty Images Cancer is generally a disease of old age. But researchers are increasingly finding that certain types—including colon, breast, stomach, and pancreatic cancers—are hitting people younger than 50 far more commonly than they used to. In a new report, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, researchers at Vanderbilt University focus on a relatively rare cancer—appendiceal cancer, which occurs in the appendix—and found that its rates are also rising, especially among millennials. Andreana Holowatyji, assistant professor of hematology and oncology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and her colleagues analyzed data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program, a cancer registry that includes patients from 1975 to 2019. The scope of the dataset allowed them to look for generational differences in cancer rates. They specifically tracked appendix cancer, which for many years was misclassified as colorectal cancer since the appendix sits at the start of the large intestine. Recent studies have shown an increase in colorectal cancers among those under 50, and Holowatyji wanted to learn if the same trend was occurring for appendix cancer. 'We don't know what the risk factors are for appendix cancer, and seeing whether there are generational effects could help us to continue to put the pieces together of this complex puzzle,' she says. Read More: The Race to Explain Why More Young Adults Are Getting Cancer In their analysis, which involved more than 4,800 people diagnosed with appendix cancer, rates of the cancer tripled among those born in 1980—and quadrupled among those born in 1985—compared to people born in 1945. Rates increased in every birth cohort after 1945. In that time, rates of appendectomies remained about the same, which the researchers say largely rules out the possibility that more cases were detected from appendectomies performed. It's likely not a single factor but the interaction of several that contributes to an increased cancer risk in this age group, such as rising rates of obesity and metabolic syndrome as well as environmental exposures, Holowatyji says. 'The challenging thing now is to disentangle not only what these exposures are, but what molecular changes these exposures cause, and what the consequences of those changes are on our cells that may end up increasing the risk of carcinogenesis,' she says. Much more data is needed to better understand appendiceal cancer, and that starts with greater awareness and better diagnosis. Because it's rarer than colorectal cancer, Holowatyji says health care professionals and the public should be more attuned to potential symptoms and not ignore or dismiss them. These can include general complaints like bloating, changes in bowel movements, and loss of appetite. If they persist, people should see their doctor. Half of appendix cancers are diagnosed after it has already spread, so being more vigilant and intervening early could lead to better outcomes. 'While rare, appendix cancer is rising,' she says. 'Individuals know their bodies best, and if they experience any changes or symptoms, those aren't things they should overlook." Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Arizona lawmakers are creating a dangerous double standard with military tobacco exemption
Photo by Douglas Sacha | Getty Images Arizona's legislature is poised to pass a bill that could endanger the very individuals we seek to honor, and ironically, those who keep us safe. Senate Bill 1247 aims to raise the legal age for purchasing and possessing tobacco products from 18 to 21, aligning state law with federal regulations. However, a carve-out in the bill introduces a troubling exception: Active-duty military personnel, including members of the National Guard and reserves, would still be permitted to buy and use tobacco products at 18. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Supporters of this carve-out argue that, if young adults are old enough to fight and die for their country, they should be allowed to make their own choices about tobacco use. While this point of view may appear respectful, it inadvertently creates a two-tiered system of health protection, suggesting that the health of our young service members is less valuable than that of other Arizona citizens. By allowing young military personnel to access tobacco products, we are not honoring their service but rather exposing them to substances that could lead to lifelong addiction and serious health issues. This exception undermines the very purpose of SB1247, which is to conform the state minimum legal age (18) to buy or possess a tobacco product to the federal minimum legal age (21). Furthermore, this policy sends a conflicting message. While we restrict tobacco use among Arizona citizens to promote public health, we permit it among our troops, suggesting their well-being is a secondary concern. This is not only illogical but also deeply disrespectful to those who serve. The dangers of tobacco use for young people are well-documented. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly 9 out of 10 adults who smoke cigarettes daily first tried smoking by age 18. The National Cancer Institute states that cigarette smoking is the leading preventable cause of disease and death in the United States, as smoking causes cancers of all the following: lung, esophagus, larynx (voice box), mouth, throat, kidney, bladder, liver, pancreas, stomach, cervix, colon and rectum, as well as acute myeloid leukemia. As a personal injury attorney, I've seen firsthand the devastating effects of tobacco-related illnesses. Our laws must reflect a commitment to the health and safety of all citizens, especially those who have dedicated themselves to protecting our nation. Let's truly honor our service members by ensuring they receive the same health protections as everyone else. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
State looks to tackle heart issues in schools
Photo illustration by Getty Images. Seconds count when it comes to matters of the heart, an issue state legislators are trying to tackle in schools. Signed into law last month, House Bill 869 mandates all public and private schools have a cardiac response plan in case of an emergency. Additionally, it puts $240,000 in state money toward training coaches, school staff and parents to spot the signs of cardiac emergencies as well. The funds can be used to purchase automatic external defibrillators. During the bill's House hearing, Jackie Semmens, a lobbyist with the American Heart Association, said the survival rate of a serious cardiac arrest event generally is about 10%. However, if a person gets a shock within the first minute of the heart stopping, the survival rate is 90%, she said. There's about 23,000 cases of sudden cardiac arrest in children each year, she added. 'Additionally, our schools are community gathering centers, and having the AED present at athletic events can not only save a child's life, but it can save the life of anyone at the event, parents, teachers, grandparents,' Semmens said. 'In our rural schools, having this equipment available is especially important as the time for first responders to arrive on scene may be significant.' Rep. Melissa Romano, a Helena Democrat who brought the legislation, said that of 590 school buildings in Montana, there were about 175 registered AEDs. There likely are more AEDs than that, but still a shortfall. Romano said the idea goes back to a conference she attended in Kentucky. She brought the idea back, mulled it over and worked with the Montana High School Association to craft something that could work for everyone. She has kids involved in sports, too. 'As a parent, you know, the more you learn about sudden cardiac arrest, it's like, 'Oh goodness, this is actually something that we could help prevent,' Romano said. 'If we just have the right equipment in the right places.' Serious cardiac events for children are rare, but the training also means if coaches have problems the equipment is already there. But it has happened in Montana, including a tragedy last year when a high schooler at soccer practice in Kalispell was sent to the intensive care unit after a lightning strike. An AED was used on scene. More than 10 years ago, Columbia Falls athletic director and athletic trainer Troy Bowman saw this first hand. A child collapsed, Bowman and a nurse began CPR and had another teacher retrieve an AED device, which they used with success. 'Later that evening, we were able to visit with him and his family and the young man, he was a freshman at the time, graduated, was able to play golf,' Bowman said during a House hearing for the bill. 'He had an undiagnosed heart condition, which led to his collapse.' Brian Michelotti, the executive director of the MHSA, said the organization's sports medicine's advisory committee has been at work on the issue of cardiac issues in student athletes. In fact, the group had a meeting shortly after Damar Hamlin, a player for the Buffalo Bills, whose heart stopped during an NFL game after he was hit during a play. Hamlin was immediately treated on the field and was able to return to play professional football. 'It was kind of the trigger that really put our sports medicine committee in full gear to make sure that we were doing stuff with AED training and emergency action planning,' Michelotti said. Many schools already have a plan in place. Anaconda Athletic director and basketball coach Dakota Norris said they have a cardiac emergency plan, which has also been the case at previous jobs, he added. Butte Central boys basketball coach Brodie Kelly has had players with heart issues before and he saw the legislation as a good thing. There's many types of injuries coaches have to deal with, Kelly said. 'My thought, is that as coaches, we're in position where these kids could be dealing with any of those issues, and the more educated we are, the more prepared to deal with it, the better,' Kelly said. Additionally, the legislation also extends to middle schools, which haven't been under the same stipulations as high schools. The MHSA has no authority over middle schools, Michelotti said, but they were happy to implement this bill to help them.
