Most Americans Want More Public Land, Not Less, Poll Shows
Americans are unified around our public lands, and the majority want more and better-funded public lands — not less, according to a new polling report from the Trust for Public Land. Published Wednesday, the report surveyed more than 4,000 U.S. residents from different backgrounds and political persuasions. It shows broad, bipartisan opposition to recent moves by the Trump Administration to expedite the sale of federal lands and to reduce funding and layoff staff at the federal agencies that manage those lands.
As TPL points out in its report, the broad support for public-land protections in the U.S. is only growing as the demand for accessible public lands and outdoor recreation increases. Along with record-breaking visitation numbers at America's National Parks in 2024, the number of visitors on BLM and Forest Service lands has shot up in recent years. Participation in outdoor recreation is also steadily climbing, according to the latest figures from the Outdoor Industry Association.
'We are living in a golden age of outdoor recreation,' TPL's CEO Dr. Carrie Besnette Hauser says in the report. 'People want greater protection of existing lands, and they are eager for more opportunities to explore and connect to new landscapes.'
Around 71 percent of the survey's respondents said they oppose the sale of existing public lands 'to the highest bidder,' and 74 percent said they oppose the closure of any public lands, including facilities like campgrounds and visitor centers. Roughly 62 and 63 percent of respondents said they oppose reductions in funding and layoffs at public-land management agencies, respectively.
Those numbers align pretty well with a previous survey, released in January and conducted by Colorado College, which found that 65 percent of Westerners oppose the transfer of federal lands to states, and 89 percent of them want to keep National Monument designations in place. This polling data was timely, as it followed a series of layoffs at federal agencies like the National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service, and continued attempts by legislators to divest of federal public lands and transfer their ownership to the states.
Read Next: How Seriously Should We Take the Sale of Federal Lands? Very Seriously, Experts Say
Since the survey by Colorado College only focused on eight Western states, TPL says the more recent national polling report helps widen that lens. Working with the data analytics firm YouGov, TPL's web-based poll reached 4,501 people from across the U.S. The sample of respondents was weighted to be representative of U.S. Census data. It was then divided into subgroups based on the respondents' presidential votes. This allowed TPL to show the breakdown in responses from Trump voters and Harris voters, along with a breakdown by all U.S. residents regardless of their voting record.
As one example, respondents were asked whether they support or oppose the closure of national public lands — including visitor centers, campsites, trails, and recreation areas — in an effort to reduce federal spending. Seventy-four percent of all U.S. residents said they opposed these closures. This included 64 percent of Trump voters and 89 percent of Harris voters. During a time of intense partisanship, those numbers speak volumes about the importance of public lands to everyday Americans.
'Few, if any, issues draw such support and agreement across generations, political parties, geographies, and demographics,' TPL points out in its report. 'Selling or transferring public lands contradicts hard data and public opinion.'
That's because America's public lands provide abundant hunting, fishing, and recreation opportunities, and they are are one of our greatest economic engines, especially in rural areas. These shared landscapes are the backbone of a $1.2 trillion outdoor recreation industry, according to TPL's research. The group points out that in Colorado alone, the outdoor recreation economy brought in roughly $17.2 billion in 2023 and supported around 132,000 jobs, accounting for 4.3 percent of all statewide employees.
Read Next: As Trump Attempts to Reform Federal Government, Hunters and Anglers Face 'Unintended Consequences'
'What's often overlooked is that public lands aren't just places we protect — they're engines we can activate' TPL's National Board of Directors chair Lucas St. Clair says in the report. 'They support our physical and mental health. They power local economies through outdoor recreation. And they remind us that shared spaces can still unite a divided nation. In a time when public lands are increasingly under threat, we need to protect and expand them, not shrink them.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's Administration Has Asked Ally Serbia to Accept Deportees
President Donald Trump's administration is pushing Serbia and other Balkan nations to take in migrants deported from the US, according to people familiar with the matter. The requests to countries in the region are ongoing and part of a broader strategy to find foreign governments willing to receive migrants sent from the US, including some who originally entered under Biden-era protections, according to the people, who requested anonymity because the talks were private.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ex-Trump Aide Spells Out How Elon Musk Could Gain Ultimate Revenge On The President
Former White House communications director Alyssa Farah Griffin explained Wednesday why she believes tech billionaire Elon Musk could now actually 'tank Donald Trump's entire legislative agenda.' Griffin, a co-host on ABC's 'The View,' warned that Musk's vocal opposition to Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful' spending bill could sway Republicans in Congress, especially those worried about the consequences to their seats if they cross the world's richest person. Musk recently slammed the bill as a 'disgusting abomination' for how it will hike the national debt. He had previously staked his reputation on slashing federal spending in his now-ended role running Trump's unofficial Department of Government Efficiency. Trump, for now, has remained silent on Musk's criticism. Griffin, who served in the Trump administration during his first term, noted how the bill has measures on energy, border security and extends Trump's tax cuts. 'If Republicans decide, 'Oooh, we don't want to get on the wrong side of Elon,' that is what Donald Trump is banking it all on,' she continued. 'And that is kind of devastating for his administration.' 'On the flip side, those Republicans, if you're in a House district, you're like, 'I'm afraid of Donald Trump,' but Elon Musk, because of the dark money system we live in, he can come in and primary you by just pouring millions and millions into your race.' All Musk needs to do, she suggested, is 'peel off a handful of Republicans' to tip the balance of power in the House. Watch here: Critics Cackle Over Mike Johnson's Awkward Confession About Elon Musk Phone Call 'You Wussed Out': David Mamet Reveals Trump's 20-Minute Call After He Committed A MAGA Sin Critics Gasp At Trump Official's 'The Thing That Matters' Declaration
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump has demolished the liberal myth. Migrants shouldn't be treated equally
Sometimes the best policies are the ones that produce the shrillest wails from the Left. Such may be the case with Trump's latest travel ban, which by rights should spark serious soul-searching in Britain. Overnight, the President announced restrictions on the citizens of 12 countries. This was a response to the recent terror attack on Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, is alleged to have thrown firebombs and sprayed burning petrol at a Jewish vigil on Sunday in support of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. Although Egypt is not on the list, Homeland Security officials said Mr Soliman was in the country illegally, having overstayed a tourist visa, but that he had applied for asylum in September 2022. So far, so Trumpian. (He took similar measures during his first term, after all, and they were repealed by Joe Biden who called them 'a stain on our national conscience'.) But then came the kicker. 'We will not let what happened in Europe happen in America,' Trump said. Ouch. If the months of Trump 2.0 have so far shifted the Overton window across the West, allowing even the likes of Sir Keir Starmer to contemplate – at least rhetorically – tackling immigration, then such a travel ban should be welcomed on these shores as well. Already, the usual suspects are accusing Trump of being 'racist'. But a glance at the range of countries on the list shows that this is not a question of race, or even religion. Rather, it is a question of homeland security, and that holds a stark lesson for Britain. A few months back, official data revealed that though foreigners comprise just 15 per cent of the population of our country, they commit 41 per cent of all crime and up to a quarter of sex crimes. In the first nine months of 2024, almost 14 per cent of grooming suspects were Pakistani, five times their share of the population. Two nationalities – Afghans and Eritreans – were more than 20 times more likely to account for sexual offence convictions than British citizens, according to the data. Overall, foreign nationals were 71 per cent more likely than Britons to be responsible for sex crime convictions. Based on convictions per 10,000 of the population, Afghans with 77 convictions topped the table with a rate of 59 per 10,000, 22.3 times that of Britons. They were followed by Eritreans, who accounted for 59 convictions at a rate of 53.6 per 10,000 of their population. In March 2025, data from the Ministry of Justice revealed that foreigners, who claim £1 billion a month in benefits, were also responsible for large proportions of violence, robbery, fraud and drug offences, between 2021 and 2023. There was no data for terrorism offences or acts of anti-Semitism. But does anybody want to hazard a guess? Which brings us to a fundamental question. Why? Why does Britain need to allow the criminals of the world to come to our shores to abuse women and girls, run criminal enterprises, foster terrorism and anti-Semitism, and claim benefits in the process? Obviously not all foreigners from these countries behave in this way. But facts aren't racist. Large numbers are pulling down our pants, spanking our buttocks and pulling them up again. In fact, the problem is not one of race but one of politics and culture. In my new book, Never Again? How the West Betrayed the Jews and Itself, which is coming out at the end of September, I look at groundbreaking research published in April by cognitive scientists Scott Barry Kaufman and Craig Neumann. They found that 'citizens in democratic countries have more benevolent traits, fewer malevolent traits, and greater well-being' than those living under autocratic regimes. Based on a study of 200,000 people from 75 countries, people living under autocracies were found to be much more likely to exhibit the 'Dark Triad' of negative personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. In democracies, by contrast, more people displayed the 'Light Triad' of humanism, faith in humanity and 'Kantianism', or treating people with dignity in their own right rather than viewing them as a means to an end. Obviously, this is not related to race. Russians are hardly black, but they hardly live in a democracy either. It is a case of cognitive development. The problem occurs when, in an age of global travel, 'Dark Triad' migrants who grew up in despotic regimes encounter gullible 'Light Triad' officials in the democracies, whose empathies are easily played upon. That is why we find British judges ruling that an Albanian convict should avoid deportation because his son had an aversion to foreign chicken nuggets, a Pakistani drug dealer could stay so he could teach his son about Islam, and a paedophile of the same nationality should not be sent home since it would be 'unduly harsh' on his own children. These real-life cases, reported by the Telegraph, provide a clear collision of the 'Dark Triad' traits in the criminals and the 'Light Triad' tendencies in the judges. It is a chemical reaction waiting to happen, and the vast majority of the population, wherever they are born, are suffering the consequences. In other words, we are being taken for fools. No foreign criminal has a God-given right to set up home in Britain just because he fancies it. This is our home, and although we are delighted to welcome strangers, that generosity should be withdrawn from those who nick our television and threaten our children – even if their own happen to like the chicken nuggets in our fridge. Trump has now thrown down the gauntlet. What is the British Government going to do to set our own house in order? Will it take an anti-Semitic outrage like the firebombing in Colorado before the Prime Minister takes action? Will he take action even then? Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.