Ahmad Zahid, Fadillah Hail Dads As ‘Captains Of The Family' In Father's Day Tribute
GENERAL
KUALA LUMPUR, June 15 (Bernama) -- In a heartfelt Father's Day message, Deputy Prime Ministers Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof paid tribute to fathers nationwide for their unwavering love and quiet sacrifices that shape families and strengthen society.
Both leaders likened fathers to the 'captain of the family,' a steadfast figure who navigates life's challenges to steer loved ones safely forward.
In a Facebook post, Ahmad Zahid reflected that a father's love is seldom spoken but is present in every effort, prayer and drop of sweat shed without complaint.
'Behind a calm face and steady steps lie countless sacrifices. He may say little, yet his presence shields the family, his strength carries them, and his love binds them together.'
He added that every man who fulfils a paternal role—be it father, grandfather, uncle or other father‑figure—is 'the anchor in life's storm, the strength of the family and the backbone of the nation.'
Ahmad Zahid, who is also Rural and Regional Development Minister, urged Malaysians to cherish their fathers while they still can, embracing them with love, and offering heartfelt prayers for those who have passed on.
In a separate post, Fadillah highlighted this year's Father's Day theme, 'Ayahku Kapten Keluarga' (My Father, the Captain of the Family), which captures the pivotal role of fathers as protectors and pillars of strength.
'A father always wants the best for his family—safety, happiness, completeness—even if it means sacrificing everything he has,' said Fadillah, who is also Minister of Energy Transition and Water Transformation.
Fadillah noted that fathers are not only providers but role‑models of character and virtue, offering unconditional love and tireless devotion without expecting anything in return.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Cambodia seeks ICJ ruling over border tensions with Thailand
BANGKOK: Cambodia said on Sunday it had asked the International Court of Justice to resolve its border disputes with Thailand, after a flare-up in their long-running row led the Southeast Asian neighbours to mobilise troops on both sides of the border. A Cambodian soldier was killed in a brief skirmish on May 28 in a confrontation over the 820-km (510-mile) frontier, parts of which are undemarcated and claimed by both nations. "Cambodia chooses a peaceful resolution based on international law through the ICJ mechanism for solving the border dispute," Prime Minister Hun Manet posted on his Facebook page. The post showed a picture of Deputy Prime Minister Prak Sokhonn holding an envelope that Hun Manet said contained a formal letter to the ICJ in The Hague, often called the World Court. The Thai Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Cambodia's move. Bangkok has previously said it has never recognised the court's jurisdiction and prefers to settle the disputes through bilateral mechanisms. Talks on border demarcation over the weekend between officials from both countries were inconclusive with both sides pledging to de-escalate tensions and continue dialogue. Cambodia said in a statement that it had proposed to Thailand the two countries should jointly bring the four dispute areas to the ICJ and that these areas should no longer be included in future bilateral talks on border demarcation. Cambodia also said that it would begin legal proceedings at the ICJ independently, despite Thailand's rejection of the court's jurisdiction. Thailand, on the other hand, made no mention of the four disputed areas or the ICJ, saying only that "both sides will continue discussions and joint implementation" of border demarcation talks. Thailand is set to host the next meeting in September. Hun Manet said the disputes at the four border areas, including the one where the fatal clash took place, are "complicated and have high risks of armed clashes and where bilateral mechanisms cannot solve." He did not disclose the contents of the letter, which were not visible in the picture. Cambodia has twice successfully sought ICJ resolutions, in 1962 on the ownership of the disputed Preah Vihear temple and in 2013, after it sought clarification of jurisdiction of the land around the temple. Although both governments have pledged to handle the issue through dialogue and to calm nationalist fervour, Bangkok has threatened to close the border and cut off electricity supplies to its neighbour. Phnom Penh announced it would cease buying Thai electric power, internet bandwidth and produce. It has also ordered local television stations not to screen Thai films.--REUTERS
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Of private data and public use
WHENEVER the government says it is collecting personal data, Malaysians get the jitters. Can't blame them. One thought that crosses the mind of some people is: is Big Brother keeping watch on us? The other and more common concern is about leakages, of which there have been far too many without any serious consequences to those who were responsible. Understandably, the recent announcement by Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil that Putrajaya is collecting phone call data from telecommunication companies for policymaking brought back the old anxiety, especially when they learnt that discussions between the government and the telcos have been going on since 2023. Phone call data is itself a fear-generating phrase. Does it mean data on all calls one makes are collected? Early communication would have helped allay the people's fears, but transparency isn't Malaysia's strong point. Putrajaya has to work hard on it. The government must understand people's fears. Every day, people are bombarded with numerous anonymous calls and text messages. Neither the telcos nor our regulators seem to be able to put a stop to such an invasion into our private world. Some even know the names of the phone owners. How did they get access to the names and phone numbers? Can't blame the people for suspecting it to be an inside job. People do recognise the government's need to work with personal data to deliver their services efficiently and effectively in this highly digitalised world. But their concern is how the personal information is collected, stored and shared. Not just telcos collect personal data, but all manner of companies do that. The important thing is robust oversight by regulators. Making the non-compliant accountable is critical. Since 2017, only about 20 companies have been compounded or fined for personal data breaches under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (PDPA), some even for processing personal information without consent or permits. Thankfully, the amended PDPA that came into effect in January comes with a bigger bite. Data controllers and data processors face a fine of up to RM1 million or imprisonment of up to three years or both for non-compliance. As under the unamended act, gathering evidence remains a huge challenge as the lawbreakers delete the data once non-compliance is detected. Some have described the hunt for evidence as a cat-and-mouse game, only more vicious. So where does this leave the people whose personal data has been made public by unlawful means? The tort of invasion of privacy, which is a well-developed civil remedy in several common law countries, isn't recognised in Malaysian jurisprudence. A court or two appeared to have thought it was a recognised tort, but higher courts have overruled such judicial activism. Perhaps the answer lies in the statutory introduction of the tort. Some will argue that there is no need for one because the PDPA is there, but they forget that it doesn't address civil remedies. Until such time when invasion of privacy does become a recognised tort in Malaysia, either through the courts or statutory introduction, people must seek recourse through other torts such as breach of confidence or negligence.
Barnama
3 hours ago
- Barnama
PGRS AGM First Before Any Decision On Sabah Assembly Dissolution, Says Hajiji
TUARAN, June 15 (Bernama) -- Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor said the date for the dissolution of the Sabah state assembly may be announced only after the annual meeting of Parti Gagasan Rakyat Sabah (PGRS) at the end of July, potentially paving the way for the 17th state election. However, Hajiji, who is also the Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) coalition chairman and PGRS president, said the exact date for the dissolution has not been fixed, despite speculations suggesting it may occur in late July or early August. 'Not yet... we will hold the (PGRS) AGM first at the end of July,' he told reporters after officiating the Sulaman PGRS division annual conference here today. bootstrap slideshow The current five-year term of the 16th Sabah state assembly will expire automatically on Nov 11. Hajiji said the ruling coalition is ready to face any party in the state election, and any decision to work with other parties will be made by the GRS Supreme Council. Hajiji also said that this year's PGRS AGM will be significant, as it will be held just ahead of the anticipated state election. bootstrap slideshow 'My reminder and advice to members is to stay united. Close ranks and strengthen the party machinery in preparation for the upcoming election,' he said. In his opening speech earlier, Hajiji reminded PGRS and GRS leaders and members to learn from the current political situation and to counter opposition misinformation spread on social media. 'We must be smart in distinguishing between slander and lies, and what the government has truly accomplished. Never be swayed by the opposition's falsehoods.
