logo
Republicans are barreling toward remaking the internet

Republicans are barreling toward remaking the internet

The Verge7 hours ago

For years, protecting kids online has been touted as one of the only issues Republicans and Democrats could agree on. Last year, nearly the entire Senate voted to pass a substantive kids online safety bill in an exceedingly rare show of bipartisanship. Right before the vote to pass the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), then-Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) praised the joint effort, saying, 'It shows the chamber can work on something important, that no one let partisanship get in the way of passing this important legislation.'
But an event this week in Washington previewed how that conversation may take a different tone under President Donald Trump's second term — one where anti-porn rules, conservative family values, and a push for parents' rights take center stage.
The Federal Trade Commission workshop held on Wednesday — billed as 'The Attention Economy: How Big Tech Firms Exploit Children and Hurt Families' — was more aggressively partisan than past tech-focused events. Originally announced with the milder tagline 'Monopolizing Kids' Time Online' at the end of the Biden administration, the Trump-era event deprioritized the academics and industry stakeholders found at similar FTC workshops.
In their place was a string of Republican regulators and lawmakers, alongside analysts from 'family values' groups and conservative think tanks, including the Heritage Foundation, organizer of Project 2025. Remarks were delivered by Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Katie Britt (R-AL), FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson, and the agency's other two Republican commissioners (the ones that remained after Trump broke Supreme Court precedent to attempt to fire their Democratic counterparts.)
Blackburn and Britt have both co-sponsored what are billed as bipartisan online safety rules: the KOSA for Blackburn and the Kids Off Social Media Act (KOSMA) for Britt. For years, these bills have been described as addressing common-sense problems with social media, like cyberbullying and addictive features that keep teens reaching for their phones. Both their Republican and Democratic backers constantly downplayed concerns that, for instance, KOSA might be used to make web platforms censor LGBTQ content. And many remarks at the FTC panel echoed common bipartisan talking points — FTC Commissioner Mark Meador, for example, riffed on the common comparison of the social media industry's lobbying and marketing efforts to those of Big Tobacco.
Alongside calls for things like stronger privacy protections, Ferguson mentioned 'cancel culture' in his opening remarks
But that earlier, bipartisan framing came together under Democratic President Joe Biden and a split Congress. With Republicans in control of all three branches of government, the tone has shifted. Alongside calls for things like stronger privacy protections, Ferguson mentioned 'cancel culture' in his opening remarks, saying that 'no parent wants their child canceled or exposed to public humiliation for some youthful indiscretion online.' The framing of his comments and those from other participants focused on giving parents more 'control' and tools to monitor their children — a proposal that has bipartisan support but is a particular concern of the Republican 'parents' rights' movement.
Throughout the day, other speakers — several of whom have worked on efforts to exclude trans girls from sports or prevent the use of puberty blockers or other gender-affirming treatment — referenced Christian or family values in their remarks. Joseph Kohm, director of public policy at the Family Policy Alliance, said it's not just Big Tech standing in the way of protections for kids online, but also the broader 'sex industry,' which he says includes 'prostitution, sex trafficking,' and porn. Kohm charged that this industry wraps itself in the banner of free speech but really is trying to ensure unfettered access to addictive porn sites to protect 'a business model built on taking advantage of kids without parental consent and leaving them broken.' (Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee recently introduced a plan to wholesale ban online porn.)
Matthew Mehan, associate dean at the conservative Christian Hillsdale College, criticized teens' constant need to track their friends' locations as a sort of 'mob mentality,' comparing the practice to 'a bunch of orca whales' constantly locating each other 'because you don't know how to orient yourself. It's because you don't have relationships with God, your family, your work, your school, your community.'
The lineup could be taken as a targeted message at the very people who have previously stood in the way of kids online safety reform: fellow Republicans. Last year, the main roadblock to passing KOSA was House Republican leadership, which failed to put the bill to a vote after the Senate passed it 91-3. While Congress managed to speedily pass the Take It Down Act this year after first lady Melania Trump's endorsement, the future of KOSA and other bills remains uncertain.
At this point, Republicans, who control both chambers of Congress, don't necessarily need to convince Democrats to support online regulation. But locking out industry-aligned groups — not just conventional Big Tech companies but the tech world more broadly — could inspire pushback.
The Cato Institute called the event 'a one-sided airing of grievances against tech companies'
'Small tech innovators like our members can offer essential, real-world expertise on policy implementation, technical feasibility, and the operational requirements of maintaining user privacy and safety,' ACT | The App Association, a trade group for small and medium-sized tech companies, wrote in a letter to Ferguson. 'A balanced, inclusive dialogue would better equip the Commission to craft more effective policies to protect children online and avoid implementation challenges seen in recent policy proposals.'
Even the Cato Institute, the Koch-founded libertarian think tank, called the event 'a one-sided airing of grievances against tech companies' in a blog post ahead of the workshop. Cato free expression and technology fellow David Inserra wrote that he was initially invited to participate, but that 'the real disappointment is that we lost the chance to have a fruitful discussion featuring different perspectives on an important policy issue.'
Amid the shift in tone, though, the FTC event still turned out parents who lost their kids after struggling with online harms. For those parents, passing reforms that they believe could save kids like their own is still the top priority, regardless of which party currently controls the agenda. 'Parents aren't asking for a pass. They're asking for help,' said Maurine Molak, a parent advocate whose teen son, David, died by suicide after experiencing cyberbullying. 'This is a collective action problem, and it takes all of us working together to find common ground.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

Washington Post

time19 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries is set to take effect Monday amid escalating tension over the president's unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday , applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban , his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the U.S. are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado , saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas . The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa . The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.

Can You Trust Anybody?
Can You Trust Anybody?

Wall Street Journal

time20 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Can You Trust Anybody?

Who can you trust anymore? Just before leaving office, President Biden railed against a 'tech-industrial complex' claiming, 'The truth is smothered by lies told for power and for profit.' Hmmm, was he referring to the coverup of his own health decline and the sharp-as-a-tack charade? Can we trust presidents? The press? Anyone? We're told to trust the process. Trust the system. Even trust the science. Trust always starts with a belief in truth and adds in a little integrity, reliability and character. Often, it's more faith than belief. Being trustworthy is the first attribute of Boy Scout Law. How quaint. We're told to trust 'experts.' I like to say, 'I trust them about as far as I can throw them.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store