Kamala Harris Says LA Protest 'Overwhelmingly Peaceful' Calls Trump 'Cruel'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Former Vice President Kamala Harris defended the "overwhelmingly peaceful" protesters in Los Angeles while criticizing President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops as a "dangerous escalation" and "cruel" on the third consecutive day of violent clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement.
Harris' statement notably did not condemn the violence that has characterized the ongoing demonstrations, marking a stark contrast with Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass's explicit condemnation of destructive behavior.
Taking to social media, Mayor Bass posted a statement on Friday, saying, "This morning we received reports of federal immigration enforcement actions in multiple locations in Los Angeles."
"As Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Bass said. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. My office is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations. We will not stand for this."
The protests, which began last week in response to federal immigration enforcement operations by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), have escalated into sustained confrontations involving rock-throwing, alleged Molotov cocktails, burning vehicles, and arrests across multiple Los Angeles locations.
My statement on what's unfolding in Los Angeles. pic.twitter.com/rujs8mrVPK — Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) June 8, 2025
This is a developing story and will be updated when more information is available.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
LAPD Chief Pushes Back on Trump National Guard Claim
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Chief Jim McDonnell said the protests and riots in portions of downtown Los Angeles on Wednesday are "nowhere near" the level of needing the National Guard, denouncing President Donald Trump's assertion that without the troops, the city would be "burning to the ground." Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment on Wednesday. Why It Matters Since his January 20 inauguration, Trump has implemented sweeping change, mainly through executive orders, and has prioritized immigration control as a key pillar within his second administration. Trump last month utilized the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a wartime law granting the commander in chief authority to detain or deport non-citizens. The implementation was originally blocked in federal court and sparked a contentious legal back-and-forth. The president also campaigned on the promise of mass deportations and appointed Tom Homan as his administration's border czar to execute his agenda. What To Know Protests broke out on Friday in reaction to numerous U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids throughout Los Angeles. Amid the ongoing tumult, city officials including Mayor Karen Bass implemented a curfew for portions of downtown, from 8 p.m. Tuesday to 6 a.m. Wednesday, and it was extended into Wednesday night as well. The LAPD warned that people who break the curfew and who are not exempt—like first responders, credentialed media and those who live in the affected area—will be subject to arrest. While speaking to CNN's Kaitlan Collins, McDonnell said that Wednesday was a "better day," adding that it is "calmer." "No, we were not in a position to request the National Guard," McDonnell said. "We have a protocol that we work up through; first we bring in all internal resources to bear on the issue, whatever it is. Then we mobilize the department or part of the department to be able to get everybody out there dealing with the issue. If we don't have the capacity at that point to be able to do that, then through the sheriff we request mutual aid and we get our law enforcement partners from police departments and sheriff's departments throughout the Southern California region to assist us in doing what it is we need to do." "We're at that level now," McDonnell added. "And we're nowhere near a level where we would be reaching out to the governor for National Guard at this stage. And my hope is that things are going in the right direction now and that we wouldn't have had to have done that, or we won't either." Trump said in part on Wednesday while speaking to reporters that if he didn't bring in the National Guard and the Marines, the city of Los Angeles would be "burning to the ground, just like it was a number of months ago." The president's reference was to the deadly wildfires that inundated Los Angeles County, torching thousands of buildings and displacing thousands of Angelenos. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom in a formal address to the Golden State on Tuesday ripped Trump and his administration for inflaming an already combustible situation. Newsom also denounced any violence or harm to law enforcement, vowing to prosecute any lawlessness. Protesters confront California National Guard soldiers and police outside a federal building on June 9 as protests continue in Los Angeles following three days of clashes with police after a series of immigration raids. (Photo... Protesters confront California National Guard soldiers and police outside a federal building on June 9 as protests continue in Los Angeles following three days of clashes with police after a series of immigration raids. (Photo by) More What People Are Saying Newsom posted to X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Trump is politicizing our military and pulling them off critical missions to further his own agenda." Trump said on Truth Social Wednesday: "If our troops didn't go into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now, just like so much of their housing burned to the ground. The great people of Los Angeles are very lucky that I made the decision to go in and help!!!" California Attorney General Rob Bonta posted to X on Wednesday: "18 Attorneys General from across the nation speaking out against the President's abuse of power. The Trump Administration's unlawful efforts to force federalized national guard forces and the U.S. military to patrol our streets is deeply alarming and cannot go unchecked." Bass said on X Wednesday: "Curfew remains in effect tonight 8 PM - 6 AM for Downtown Los Angeles to stop bad actors who are taking advantage of the President's chaotic escalation. If you do not live or work in Downtown L.A., avoid the area and follow guidance from law enforcement. Vandalism and violence will not be tolerated." What Happens Next There is a hearing scheduled for 1:30 p.m. Thursday to discuss the legality of the National Guard activation in Los Angeles.
Forbes
42 minutes ago
- Forbes
Is Domestic Use of the Military the New Normal?
A demonstrator holding a sign reading "Marines!!! Where Were You Jan. 6" confronts police during a ... More protest following federal immigration operations in Los Angeles on June 9, 2025. President Donald Trump's administration said on June 9 that it was sending 700 US Marines and thousands more National Guard troops to Los Angeles, sparking a furious response from California's governor over the "deranged" deployment. Protests in Los Angeles, home to a large Latino population, broke out on June 6, triggered by immigration raids that resulted in dozens of arrests of what authorities say are illegal migrants and gang members. (Photo by RINGO CHIU / AFP) (Photo by RINGO CHIU/AFP via Getty Images) President Trump's decision to send thousands of National Guard members and hundreds of Marines to Los Angeles may mark a turning point in civil-military relations in the United States with ramifications for years to come. The Marines are trained to fight foreign adversaries, not rein in political demonstrators on U.S. soil. This kind of deployment is supposed to be rare. Routine use of the military is outlawed under the Posse Comitatus Act, except where explicitly authorized by law. The Posse Comitatus Act consists of one sentence: 'Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.' A case in which Congress has authorized the use of troops in a domestic role is the Insurrection Act. The Brennan Center for Justice describes the provisions of the act as follows: 'Under this law, in response to a state government's request, the president may deploy the military to suppress an insurrection in that state. In addition, the Insurrection Act allows the president — with or without the state government's consent — to use the military to enforce federal law or suppress a rebellion against federal authority in a state, or to protect a group of people's civil rights when the state government is unable or unwilling to do so.' Do street demonstrations against the administration's immigration policy constitute an insurrection, or are they an example of people exercising their constitutional right to petition for redress of grievances? There is no doubt that the president has an expansive view of when and how he can try to intimidate demonstrators to the point of threatening violence, as evidenced by his threat that anyone who protests the June 14th military parade in Washington will be 'met by heavy force.' Many veterans have criticized the administration's use of the military as a law enforcement agency, but none more clearly than Major Paul Eaton (retired), who noted that the United States didn't see the need to stage military parades in the best because 'there was no questioning the power and global reach of our military –and because our greatest strength was our democracy. Today, that democracy is under attack [and] From one perspective, the June 14th parade is a one day spectacle that many Americans will see as a welcome thank you to military personnel who have risked their lives on missions that were defined as protecting America. There is room for disagreement about that. But there should be little or no disagreement that deploying troops against protesters sets a dangerous precedent that puts our democracy at risk. Stephen I. Vladeck, a Georgetown University law professor, has placed the Trump administration's use of the military in historical perspective: 'It's not that we haven't had presidents use the military domestically before. . . It's that there has been such a clear factual predicate [but] [t]here's really no history of using those authorities for what really are partisan political purposes, more than they are public safety restoration purposes.' Long after the June 14th parade is over and forgotten, the question of the proper role of the military in a democratic society will remain. It's time to open up that debate – in Congress, in the media, and in homes and workplaces all over America. We can't afford to sit this one out.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Military expert: Deploying National Guard to LA an ‘overstep' by Trump
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — President Donald Trump's response to protests against deportation and immigration raids in Los Angeles is sending shockwaves across the country, including here in Rhode Island. A second night of 8 p.m. curfews is set to begin Wednesday in parts of LA as demonstrations continue in opposition to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. 12 News military analyst Lt. Gen. Reginald Centracchio (ret.) called Trump's decision to deploy more than 4,000 National Guard members and mobilize 700 Marines to LA a 'mixed scenario.' 'President Trump decided to go ahead and activate the guard with very little coordination with [California Gov. Gavin Newsom]. And the governor's pushing back on that,' Centracchio told 12 News. Centracchio explained that typically, governors request National Guard support only after all local law enforcement resources have been exhausted. He reiterated that during peacetime, the governor is the commander-in-chief of the National Guard and has the authority to call it into state active duty, as the president has the authority to call the guard into federal duty. While guard members are currently supporting law enforcement in LA, he said, their federal status oversteps the governor's authority. 'That should be the process. Not the other way around,' he said. READ ALSO: Attorney questions ICE's transfer of Providence woman days before immigration hearing Newsom described the move as an 'assault on democracy.' In a nearly nine-minute address Tuesday, Newsom condemned what he called the federal government's 'illegal militarization' of LA. 'This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers and even our National Guard at risk,' Newsom said. He accused Trump of choosing 'escalation, theatrics and force' over public safety and drew a connection to the Jan. 6 Capitol riots, saying Trump 'is not opposed to lawlessness and violence, as long as it serves him.' 'Trump and his loyalists thrive on division because it allows them to take more power and exert even more control,' he added. Though the situation remains centralized in LA right now, Newsom stressed that the issue at hand is much larger than protests or the state of California. 'This is about all of us. This is about you. California may be first, but it clearly will not end here,' he said. 'Other states are next. Democracy is next. Democracy is under assault before our very eyes.' Looking ahead, Trump is arranging a large military parade through the streets of Washington, D.C. on Saturday, June 14, to mark the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. The date also coincides with Flag Day and Trump's birthday. In response, 'No Kings' protests are being planned across the country Saturday as a 'nationwide day of defiance.' According to organizers, the demonstrations are intentionally happening everywhere except the nation's capital, aiming to show that 'real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else.' In Rhode Island, a 'No Kings Rhode Island' protest is scheduled from noon to 2 p.m. Saturday at the State House, while a separate 'No Kings Providence' event is planned from 1 to 3 p.m. at India Point Park. RELATED: Providence joins nationwide protests over LA immigration raids Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
