logo
Downtown developer pulls offer to sell gravel lot to city for $1

Downtown developer pulls offer to sell gravel lot to city for $1

Yahoo04-04-2025

Apr. 3—MITCHELL — The Mitchell City Council changed its mind about an empty parking lot downtown, and now the owner of that parking lot has, too.
Downtown developer John Adamo has withdrawn his offer to sell the empty gravel lot at the corner of Third Avenue and Main Street to the city of Mitchell for $1. Adamo was willing to sell the empty lot on the condition that the city turn it into a parking lot.
Adamo confirmed with the Mitchell Republic that he sent a letter to the city to take the gravel lot off the purchasing table. The Mitchell Republic received the letter anonymously in the mail.
"Adamo did not seem happy that we didn't want to do exactly what he wanted, but that's his choice. It's his land," Mitchell Mayor Jordan Hanson told the Mitchell Republic.
In 2024, the city council budgeted for the empty lot to be paved in 2025. The city council, during its regular meeting on March 17, decided to table the proposed purchase in favor of developing the lot to bring more businesses downtown and to clarify intentions with Adamo. Now, the city will not have to pay to install a parking lot or the cost to maintain it.
"The city actually paid for the demolition of that building," Hanson said, referring to the building that once stood on the empty gravel lot.
In a letter dated March 20, Adamo laid out his thoughts about the city's decision not to proceed with a public parking lot.
"My interest is to have an amicable and collaborative relationship with the city," Adamo wrote.
Adamo refuted that the parking lot purchase was an effort to bail him out.
"My decision to give those lots to the city for $1 represented a significant loss for me, and a substantial benefit to the city.... Me giving land to the city for free cannot represent a "bail out" of me," Adamo wrote.
"I think there's five of us sitting around this table that's been snookered," council member Mike Bathke said during the March 17 council meeting.
Bathke questioned if Adamo fulfilled his developer's agreement in regard to constructing a new building on the empty lot.
Adamo sought to set the record straight on his obligations regarding the empty lot.
"My commitment was to rehabilitate the Western Building, and I have fully satisfied that obligation. It has been restored at private expense [mine] and is now a credit to the Mitchell community. The money spent rehabilitating that historic building was spent in the Mitchell community, as will be the money generated by that building in the future," Adamo wrote.
Adamo's Kitchen, coming soon, is across the street from the empty lot on the ground level of the Western building, which Adamo also owns.
The South Dakota Historical Preservation Office and the U.S. National Park Service has recognized the quality of the work performed, according to Adamo.
The terms of the paperwork that transferred the lot ownership to Adamo frees him from any obligation to build a structure there, according to Adamo.
Adamo wanted to "fill in the gaps and misinformation with the facts."
"I wish I could spend more time in Mitchell. It is a city full of vibrant and innovative people. I am very proud to be part of Mitchell, and it has been, and continues to be, a wonderful experience for me to participate in improving things in the community," Adamo wrote.
Adamo called city staff a "real pleasure" and "model of efficiency" compared to the bureaucracy from California, where he is from.
A contributing factor to the council's decision to not add a parking lot is that there are 16 parking lots in the Main Street area with about 1,100 parking spaces.
"I hoped to put some new businesses there cause that's what we need, but that's not what he wants," Hanson said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Venezuela signs nine oil deals to counter US sanctions
Venezuela signs nine oil deals to counter US sanctions

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Venezuela signs nine oil deals to counter US sanctions

Venezuela's state-run oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), has reportedly signed at least nine new agreements with foreign service providers, including two Chinese companies, to maintain oil production and sustain foreign currency inflows following the exit of Chevron due to US sanctions. The contracts allow foreign companies to operate existing wells and sell the output, diverging from PDVSA's traditional exclusive trading rights, reported Bloomberg, citing undisclosed sources. These agreements are part of President Nicolás Maduro's strategy to offset the withdrawal of Western oil majors, whose licences expired after the US Government declined to extend sanctions waivers. Chevron, responsible for nearly a quarter of Venezuela's oil production, saw its licence expire in early April, according to Bloomberg. The company had until 27 May to complete wind-down activities. Licences for other US service providers, namely Halliburton, Schlumberger, Baker Hughes, and Weatherford International, also expired in early May. Venezuela Vice-President and Oil Minister Delcy Rodriguez said: 'PDVSA has a plan to keep producing oil despite the US' unilateral coercive measures.' The new contracts allocate operational rights to foreign companies over blocks in Zulia state and the Orinoco Belt, Venezuela's main oil regions. PDVSA will hold at least a 50% stake in the crude output, with the partner companies managing operations and receiving a share of oil sales. These companies will also benefit from certain tax exemptions. PDVSA will finance its portion of investment through crude shipments. The companies involved include Aldyl Argentina, Anhui Guangda Mining Investing and China Concord Resources, according to internal PDVSA documents reviewed by Bloomberg. A US company, North American Blue Energy Partners, affiliated with energy investor Harry Sargeant III's Global Oil Management Group, signed a deal but reportedly withdrew due to the inability to secure a US operating licence. National Assembly Member of the Energy Committee William Rodríguez told the news agency that: 'The only way Venezuela can maintain and increase its production is by relying on private local and international companies that don't care about US sanctions. Unlike 2019, when sanctions first hit, there is a framework in place to operate outside the US banking system and a structured market with ally countries, including China, Iran and Russia.' Unlike earlier joint ventures, these 20-year contracts do not require approval from Venezuela's National Assembly. They are authorised under President Maduro's anti-blockade law, which bypasses traditional legislative processes and restrictions on foreign participation in the oil sector. Although Chevron can no longer produce oil in Venezuela, it holds a waiver to conduct equipment maintenance in the country. PDVSA predicts that the nine blocks under these 20-year contracts will yield a combined 600,000 barrels per day with $20bn (1.97trn bolivars) in capital expenditure, according to the document. The company plans to sign additional contracts in the coming months, partially reversing the oil nationalisation policies of late president Hugo Chavez from the mid-2000s, the report added. "Venezuela signs nine oil deals to counter US sanctions – report" was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Palantir CEO Warns of AI Arms Race With China
Palantir CEO Warns of AI Arms Race With China

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Palantir CEO Warns of AI Arms Race With China

Palantir (PLTR, Financials) CEO Alex Karp said Thursday that artificial intelligence poses serious risks and that the ongoing AI arms race will ultimately be won by either the United States or China. There are positive and negative consequences, and either we win or China will win, Karp told CNBC's Squawk on the Street. He emphasized that the U.S. currently holds an advantage due to corporate willingness to embrace new technologies, but said Western allies, particularly in Europe, are lagging behind and must learn from the U.S. approach. In the interview, Karp also addressed a recent New York Times report suggesting Palantir is assisting the Trump administration in gathering data on American citizens. He denied the claim, stating, We are not surveilling Americans. The Denver-based data analytics and AI software firm has gained 74% year to date as investors bet on the company's growing role in U.S. government contracts and defense applications. While the stock continues to outperform broader tech peers, Karp acknowledged investor concerns around its valuation. You don't like the price, exit, he said. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

This uranium company wants to break the grip that foreign state corporations have on U.S. nuclear fuel
This uranium company wants to break the grip that foreign state corporations have on U.S. nuclear fuel

CNBC

time6 hours ago

  • CNBC

This uranium company wants to break the grip that foreign state corporations have on U.S. nuclear fuel

President Donald Trump's push to dramatically increase nuclear power in the U.S. will require a tremendous amount of fuel, but the country remains heavily dependent on foreign state-owned companies for its supplies, the CEO of the only publicly traded uranium enricher in the world told CNBC. "There's barely enough Western enrichment, if at all, to satisfy existing operating plants," Centrus Energy CEO Amir Vexler said in an interview. "If the nuclear industry is to add all this generation capacity, there will have to be a tremendous amount of enrichment capacity that's added." Trump issued a series of executive orders on nuclear power last month that set a target for the U.S. to quadruple the sector's capacity to 400 gigawatts by 2050. Nuclear energy is one of the few issues in deeply polarized Washington these days that enjoys some level of bipartisan support. Trump's push expands on former President Joe Biden's goal to triple nuclear power by midcentury. Most nuclear plants worldwide use low-enriched uranium, or LEU. The U.S. relied on foreign countries for around 70% of the fuel for its reactors in 2023, according to data from the Energy Information Administration. About 27% of U.S. fuel purchases came from Russia that year, one of the principle geopolitical foes of the U.S. But Russian uranium will be forced out of the U.S. supply chain by 2028 at the latest, after Biden signed legislation in 2024 to ban imports over Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The U.S. faces a looming nuclear fuel supply gap due to the loss of Russian uranium. Western enrichment capacity, meanwhile, is dominated by two players that are not American owned. They are France's Orano and a British-Dutch-German consortium called Urenco, according to the World Nuclear Association. The European enrichers are reliable partners and have done a good job supporting the market, Vexler told CNBC. But trade tensions threaten to disrupt global supply chains, he said on the Centrus first-quarter earnings call. "We don't have any domestic fuel cycle capacity, almost at all," Vexler told CNBC, referring to American-owned companies. "We don't mine anything, we don't convert anything. We don't enrich anything. We rely on others. And others are all state-owned enterprises, maybe with a few minor exceptions." The only commercial enrichment facility operating in the U.S. is owned by Urenco, the European consortium. It is located in Eunice, New Mexico. Centrus wants to break the stranglehold that state-owned corporations have over the U.S. nuclear fuel supply chain. "The circumstances in the market are such that we believe and we're staking everything we have on the fact that the market needs another enricher," Vexler said. "It needs competition." Trump directed federal agencies on May 23 to develop a plan to expand uranium enrichment capabilities in the U.S. to meet the needs of the civilian and defense sectors. The president's order is sparse on concrete details about how domestic enrichment will be stood up in the U.S. But Centrus' stock has gained 46% as of Thursday's close since Trump's announcement as Wall Street sees the company playing a key role in the effort. The company's shares have risen more than 7% this week as Meta's deal to buy nuclear power from Constellation Energy has reinforced the view that demand is increasing as the tech sector hunts for electricity for its data centers. Centrus is one of just two companies that are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to produce low-enriched uranium in the U.S., the other being Urenco. Bethesda, Maryland-based Centrus is also the only company in the U.S. that has a license to produce a type of fuel that some next-generation nuclear plant designs, such as small modular reactors, are planning to use. The U.S. wasn't always dependent on foreign countries. It was the first country to enrich uranium for the commercial market and was a dominant player in the market through the 1980s. The federal government owned and operated the nation's enrichment facilities during that period. The U.S. sold its enrichment business through a company called the United States Enrichment Corp. in a public offering in 1998. USEC went bankrupt in 2014 as nuclear plants struggled to compete against cheap natural gas and support for the industry declined in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan. Centrus emerged from the reorganization of USEC later that year and is now profitable. "We were just not able to compete with other government, state-owned competitors," said Vexler, who took over the helm at Centrus in 2024. When times got tough for the industry, national governments in Europe and Russia would not allow their state-owned enrichers to fail, he said. Centrus operates an enrichment plant in Piketon, Ohio, about 95 miles east of Cincinnati that could one day supply a major portion of U.S. nuclear fuel needs. The Ohio facility has a footprint the size of the Pentagon and could produce enriched uranium equivalent to about 25% of the total purchased by U.S. power plants in 2023, according to Centrus. This is nearly equivalent to the amount of enriched uranium imported from Russia that year. "If that is not sufficient, if domestic requirements, national security requirements, export requirements exceed that, then obviously we have the capability to expand as well," Vexler said. The Ohio plant has not launched commercial operations yet. It is currently producing a small amount of the fuel that the developers of advanced reactor designs are banking on, called high-assay low-enriched uranium, or HALEU. The Department of Energy buys the fuel that Centrus produces. Centrus' main business right now is importing LEU for U.S. nuclear plants with contracts that run through 2040. It has a waiver to import Russian LEU through 2025 and has applied for waivers through 2027. Under U.S. law, exceptions that allow Russian imports will cease by 2028. Centrus plans to transition away from its trading business as it stands up its domestic enrichment capacity. The vast majority of the enriched uranium produced in Ohio will be sold on the commercial market and potentially for export, Vexler said. "I would certainly aim for us to not only backfill sort of the vacancy that the Russians are creating, but I also hope that we're going to gain market share, both in the LEU and in the HALEU market," Vexler said. But this will require some level of government support given the state-owned competition, he said. Congress has passed $3.4 billion to support domestic enrichment and reduce U.S. dependence particularly on Russia. Centrus is one of several companies competing for the funding. "We've always said that it has to be a public-private partnership," Vexler said. "We've been raising our own funds. We've been raising our own financing. We will contribute significantly to this, but we have to have government support." "There is a path here where we could have a prosperous, commercially competitive American industry," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store