Trump marks tumultuous first 100 days in office with rally in Michigan
Speaking at a rally in Michigan to mark his first 100 days in office, US President Donald Trump has promised to bring back jobs to the United States.
Dubbed an 'achievement speech' by the White House, the rally on Tuesday at the Macomb County Community College comes amid slumping approval ratings and dismal consumer confidence as Trump has pursued norm-busting trade, immigration and government overhauls.
Still, Trump hailed what he called 'the most successful first 100 days of any administration in the history of our country'.
'And that's according to many, many people,' he added. 'And everyone is saying it… We've just gotten started'.
The president walked onto the stage to God Bless the USA by Lee Greenwood, as he did on the campaign trail.
He quickly shifted to his familiar rally fare, saying his administration was 'ending illegal immigration', 'taking back our jobs', 'restoring the rule of law' and getting what he called 'woke lunacy and transgender insanity the hell out of our government'.
He also took jabs at former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris, continued his years-long attack on the US media and falsely claimed that Democrats attempted to 'rig' the 2024 election.
Trump then pivoted to his tariff policy, which has roiled global markets and caused disquiet among industry leaders.
Hours earlier, Trump signed an executive order seeking to ease some tariff pressures amid pushback from US auto manufacturers. The order would prevent 'stacking' of Trump's various tariffs on auto part imports for vehicles manufactured in the US.
His administration has imposed 25 percent tariffs on foreign auto imports, blanket 10 percent levies on nearly all trade partners, 25 percent tariffs on steel and aluminium, as well as 25 percent tariffs on trade with Mexico and Canada not covered under a pre-existing deal.
Trump has framed the moves as part of a hard reset to force industries back to the US, a claim he repeated to reporters in his Michigan speech.
'They all want to come back to Michigan and build cars again,' he said. 'You know why? Because of our tax and tariff policy.'
Reporting from the rally, Al Jazeera's Patty Culhane said the location was significant. Trump won the so-called battleground state of Michigan in the election last year, but the state, and its reliance on the auto industry, could be one of the hardest hit by his tariff policy.
'We're just about 20 miles [32km] down the road from Detroit, Michigan. That's the home of the 'Big Three' automakers: General Motors, Ford and Stellantis,' Culhane said.
'We've seen automakers really come out against these tariffs because virtually no car is made completely in the United States, as Donald Trump wants to see happen,' she said.
'Meanwhile, in the crowd, you see a lot of T-shirts that say 'UAW', the United Auto Workers union. The union came out in favour of these tariffs because they believe, in the long run, it will force companies to bring jobs back to the US.'
Recent polls have shown the enthusiasm among Trump's supporters at the Michigan rally is not reflected among the wider public, with nearly every major pollster finding higher disapproval than approval for the president in recent days.
These included separate Morning Consult and New York Times/Siena polls that showed 54 percent disapproval, a Marist College poll that showed 53 percent disapproval and an Ipsos poll that recorded 55 percent disapproval.
Trump dismissed the polls as 'fake' and run by a 'bunch of crooked people'.
Hours earlier on Tuesday, The Conference Board, an organisation that tracks views on the US economy, released new data showing tanking US consumer confidence.
Confidence fell 7.9 points to 86 in April as Trump's tariff rollout caused widespread economic uncertainty, the lowest level since May 2020 at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.
While no new trade deals have been reached since the country-specific tariffs were announced, and then paused, Trump told his supporters that officials were 'coming from all over the world to see your president'.
'They want to make a deal,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Oil markets are spooked as Iran-Israel tensions escalate
Israel's strike on military and nuclear sites, and Iran's retaliation, have rocked already strained global supply chains. As airlines suspend flights to Tel Aviv, Tehran and other airports across the region, oil companies, shipping firms, and regulatory agencies are scrambling amid growing concerns that key trade routes like the Strait of Hormuz could be caught in the crossfire. Merchant shipping is still passing through the Strait of Hormuz, but with increased caution. Iran has previously threatened to close this critical trade route in response to Western pressure. Even the suggestion of such a move has already sent shockwaves through global markets, and the price of oil has risen. United States President Donald Trump's latest rhetoric has done little to ease those concerns. He warned that if Iran does not 'make a deal', there could be more 'death and destruction'. 'If the United States is perceived to be involved in any attacks, the risk of escalation increases significantly,' Jakob Larsen, chief safety and security officer with shipping association BIMCO, told the Reuters news agency. As of 4:00pm in New York (20:00 GMT), Brent crude prices, which are considered the international standard, are 5 percent higher than yesterday's market close. Oil futures spiked more than 13 percent at one point, reaching their highest levels since January. Any closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic trade route between the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, through which roughly 20 percent of the world's global oil output travels, would likely drive oil prices even higher. This could intensify inflationary pressures globally, and particularly in the US. The price surge comes on the heels of a better-than-expected Consumer Price Index report in the US earlier this week, which showed prices increased by just 0.1 percent for the month. Energy costs remain a key inflation driver. Petrol prices, in fact, fell 2.6 percent during the period. Consumer sentiment, too, jumped for the first time in six months as tariff fears eased. However, the new conflict could cut short the relief that US consumers had expressed, according to analysts from JPMorgan Chase. 'Sustained gains in energy prices could have a dire impact on inflation, reversing the months-long trend of cooling consumer prices in the US,' commodity researchers for JPMorgan Chase said in a note released on the heels of the strike. 'We continue to believe that any political policies that might drive oil and inflation higher would likely yield to Trump's primary objective of maintaining low energy prices—a campaign promise,' analysts Natasha Kaneva, Prateek Kedia, and Lyuba Savinova wrote. The markets more broadly dropped on the news. The S&P 500 tumbled 1.1 percent, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 1.7 and the Nasdaq is 1.3 percent lower. 'Today, as you can see from the markets, whether it's the S&P, whether it's Bitcoin, things have been kind of stable or flat. So there's a little bit of a wait-and-see approach. Oil is acutely affected simply because Iran is such a significant part of the global oil supply. But thus far, Israel has refrained from hitting in any severe fashion the oil infrastructure of Iran. Should that change, that will obviously have a much more dramatic impact,' Taufiq Rahim, an independent geopolitical strategist and Principal for the 2040 Advisory, told Al Jazeera. If shipping through the critical seaway were suspended, even temporarily, the International Energy Agency said it is well supplied to release emergency reserves, if needed. However, that comes with the risk of depletion. There are 1.2 billion barrels in its strategic reserves. The world uses about 100 million barrels of oil per day. 'If it does rise to the level of closing the Strait of Hormuz, well, now that's going to be the biggest oil shock of all time,' Matt Gertken, chief geopolitical strategist and senior vice president at BCA Research, a macroeconomic research firm, told Al Jazeera. OPEC Secretary-General Haitham al-Ghais criticised the IEA for its statement that it could release strategic reserves, saying it 'raises false alarms and projects a sense of market fear through repeating the unnecessary need to potentially use oil emergency stocks'. This comes amid increased pressure for the group of oil-producing nations to increase output. Earlier this month, OPEC+ members agreed to raise production by 411,000 barrels for the month of July. The Strait of Hormuz remains open for now. Countries, including Greece and the United Kingdom, have advised ships to avoid the Gulf of Aden, the body of water between Yemen and Somalia that connects to waterways that are close to Israel, and to log all voyages through the Strait, according to documents first seen by Reuters. Further escalation on the horizon? Iran could attack Iraq to reduce the global oil supply to further escalate tensions. In January 2024, Iran attacked Iraq, which it said was in retaliation for armed attacks within its own territory, The New York Times reported. 'We should assume that we're going to lose both Iranian and Iraqi oil production, which brings us to the point where we could be seeing five to seven million barrels per day taken offline,' Gertken told Al Jazeera. Gertken believes Iran would do this to provoke the West. 'They have to take out some oil supply, but not attack Saudi Arabia or close the Strait of Hormuz because, of course, that would ensure that the US enters the conflict. They need to target some regional production [where] they can have plausible deniability [and blame] some militant group.'
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US Marines arrive at Los Angeles federal sites as court battle unfolds
The United States Marines have deployed to Los Angeles following criticism and legal battles over whether President Donald Trump had the authority to use the military to quell civilian protests without state approval. On Friday, Major General Scott Sherman of the US Army confirmed that 200 Marines were arriving in southern California to protect a federal building. A total of 700 Marines have been authorised for deployment to the region. 'I would like to emphasise that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities,' Sherman said during a briefing. The Marines join National Guard troops already in the Los Angeles area following the eruption of protests on June 6, when residents took to the streets to express their displeasure with President Trump's immigration raids, some of which targeted local hardware stores and other workplaces. While many of the demonstrations were mostly peaceful and limited to a small part of the city, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) did experience tense clashes with some protesters, who hurled objects and set driverless Waymo vehicles on fire. Police responded with flashbangs, tear gas and rubber bullets. Trump, meanwhile, dubbed the protesters 'bad people' and 'insurrectionists' and announced the deployment of the National Guard on the evening of June 7. The president cited Title 10 of the US Code, which allows a president to call up the National Guard if there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion' against the federal government. Trump and his allies framed the demonstrators as part of a migrant 'invasion' imperilling the US. 'To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States,' Trump wrote in a presidential memorandum. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president had authorised the National Guard's deployment to a state without the governor's permission. The last time was to protect civil rights protesters who were marching through segregated Alabama and faced threats of violence. Presidents have called up the National Guard to address domestic unrest in the years since, but only with the cooperation of local authorities. In 1992, for instance, then-President Bill Clinton answered a request from California's governor at the time to send National Guard members to address the Rodney King protests in Los Angeles. Trump's decision to circumvent the authority of California's present-day governor, Gavin Newsom, has led to a legal fight over whether he exceeded his powers as president. Newsom filed a lawsuit to block the use of military troops outside of federal sites, and on Thursday, a pair of court decisions left the future of the recent deployment unclear. First, on Thursday afternoon, District Court Judge Charles Breyer of San Francisco sided with Newsom, calling Trump's actions 'illegal' and a violation of the US Constitution. In his 36-page decision, Breyer ruled that the Trump administration had failed to show a danger of rebellion in Los Angeles. 'While Defendants have pointed to several instances of violence, they have not identified a violent, armed, organized, open and avowed uprising against the government as a whole,' he wrote. 'The definition of rebellion is unmet.' He added that he was 'troubled' by the Trump administration's argument that a protest against the federal government could be tantamount to rebellion, warning that such logic could violate the First Amendment right to free speech. 'Individuals' right to protest the government is one of the fundamental rights protected by the First Amendment, and just because some stray bad actors go too far does not wipe out that right for everyone,' Breyer said. He called for an injunction against Trump's use of National Guard members, saying 'it sets a dangerous precedent for future domestic military activity' and 'deprives the state for two months of its own use of thousands of National Guard members'. Nearly 4,000 members of the California National Guard have been authorised for deployment to Los Angeles under Trump's command. But the Trump administration quickly appealed Judge Breyer's injunction. By late Thursday, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals had temporarily blocked the injunction, allowing Trump to continue using the National Guard until a hearing could be held on the matter next week. On Friday, Trump celebrated that decision on his social media platform, Truth Social. 'The Appeals Court ruled last night that I can use the National Guard to keep our cities, in this case Los Angeles, safe,' Trump wrote. 'If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now. We saved L.A. Thank you for the Decision!!!' Newsom, meanwhile, has continued his call for Trump to end what he framed as illegal control of the National Guard. He has also accused the military presence of heightening tensions with protesters, not dissipating them. '@RealDonaldTrump, you must relinquish your authority of the National Guard back to me and back to California,' Newsom wrote on social media Thursday. He has called the Republican president's federalisation of the National Guard an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'. The California governor is seen as a possible Democratic contender for the presidency in the 2028 election cycle.
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘What's happening in LA is not about LA'
NewsFeed 'What's happening in LA is not about LA' | #AJOPINION Donald Trump is using the Los Angeles anti-deportation protests as a pretext to use the US military against domestic critics and his threats to invoke the Insurrection Act should be taken seriously, warns the American Civil Liberties Union's Sarah Mehta.
