Gov. Josh Stein proposes public school bond, stipend for teachers in school administrator's conference speech
RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — Some of the best state leaders in education are coming together for the 2025 North Carolina Association of School Administrators conference.
Thursday, hundreds of administrators got the chance to join in on sessions and hear from educators on the state of schools.
Governor Stein also spoke at the conference.
In front of a large crowd, he highlighted his proposed budget when it comes to education.
He called on the importance of recruiting and retaining teachers.
He also highlighted teacher pay raises, a proposed $300 stipend to help teachers offset costs in the classroom and the importance of cell phone-free classrooms.
In addition, he also discussed his proposed $4 billion public school bond to fix aging schools.
'I recognize that a number of the issues I've talked about involve money but here's the thing we can afford these things if we prioritize these things. We don't have to squander money the way we are with private school vouchers,' said Stein.
State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Mo Green, also spoke at the conference Thursday. He told the crowd he is in the process of doing a listening and learning tour to hear from teachers and students across the state about their biggest needs for North Carolina private schools.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Stein is making the conservative case for FEMA
It's a classic Trump-era irony: The president's polarizing voice has triggered a burst of bipartisan agreement. When President Donald Trump floated the notion of scrapping FEMA entirely after Hurricane Helene, it sounded like the start of another bare-knuckle partisan fight. Instead, it sparked a rare consensus: FEMA is flawed, but it's also essential. Right now, the surprisingly high-profile defender of that notion is North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein. And in another ironic twist, the most liberal governor North Carolina has ever elected is sounding . . . conservative. Over the past two weeks, Stein has launched a media blitz to rescue FEMA from its own dysfunction — and from the president's crosshairs. He's appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, penned an op-ed in USA Today, lobbied Republican U.S. Sens. Thom Tillis and Ted Budd and written directly to the Trump administration with proposed reforms. His argument is simple: Disaster response is a core function of the federal government, and it saves money and gets better results if states don't go it alone. 'It's about streamlining and reforming and improving FEMA, not eliminating it,' Stein said in a recent podcast interview with Spectrum News. That may not sound revolutionary, but in today's political climate, it's a noteworthy response. Where many Democrats, like former Gov. Roy Cooper, may have used Trump's comments to raise money or fire up the base, Stein is taking a different tack. He's responding thoughtfully, and with a message that Republicans might actually hear. FEMA makes for a convenient punching bag. After any disaster, emotions are raw as survivors try to make sense of their losses. When calls go to voicemail or a form gets rejected on a technicality, the natural response is anger. Police officers often talk about trying to give people grace because they recognize they're meeting everyone on the worst day of their life. FEMA workers are in the same position but may not always realize it, or be equipped to respond. That doesn't mean FEMA gets a pass, of course, and there were plenty of problems with its response to Hurricane Helene. Red tape kept people waiting for temporary housing. It took multiple calls from elected officials to get FEMA to extend hotel vouchers to keep people from being turned out into a snowstorm. North Carolina's own shortcomings made matters worse. An after-action report from the state's Emergency Management Division showed deep cracks in the response to Helene — unclear communications, insufficient coordination with counties and a lack of planning around debris and housing. FEMA may have failed in some areas, but so did the state. Still, it would've been easy — even expected — for Stein to point fingers or escalate the fight as President Trump continues down the path toward eliminating FEMA. Instead, he's lowering the temperature. Trump's proposal to eliminate FEMA might be a negotiation tactic rather than a policy plan. He's known for throwing rhetorical grenades to draw people to the table. Some see that as bluster, while others see leverage. Either way, if the goal is to force FEMA to improve, there's plenty of common ground. And Stein is proving to be an effective messenger. He's called for FEMA to be faster, more flexible, and less redundant. He wants a single application process, more upfront money for permanent repairs and greater use of block grants to give states more discretion. This isn't the burn-it-down approach of the MAGA right, nor is it a progressive defense of bureaucracy. It's something rarer these days: a sober, statesmanlike argument for targeted federal responsibility and reform. As a conservative, I've long believed in limiting federal power. I've written before that North Carolina should stop waiting on Washington and take control of its own future. So I sympathize with Trump's instinct to scrap FEMA entirely. There's philosophical merit to the idea. The federal government tries to do too much. State governments are more nimble, more accountable. Pushing power down is almost always the right move. But not in every case. President Reagan famously said the nine scariest words in the English language were: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' And yet Reagan also signed the Stafford Act — the law that governs FEMA to this day. That law has real flaws, and some of them are exactly what we're grappling with now. That's another classic Trump-era irony. The liberal governor of North Carolina is defending FEMA with a Reaganesque argument, to preserve a program the Gipper helped create. I still believe in federalism. But on this one, Stein has convinced me. FEMA needs to stay.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
4 Ways To Protect Your Investments When Fake News Creates Market Volatility
While the stock market is driven by earnings growth over the long run, on a daily basis, the twin emotions of fear and greed can override economic fundamentals. This has been brought into sharp focus in 2025, as the stock market has gyrated wildly in reaction to the Trump administration's ever-changing tariff policy. Read More: Find Out: Part of the problem has been that 'fake news' regarding the specifics of the tariffs has leaked into the financial press, creating market volatility as investors alternately panic and rejoice at the latest headlines. The resultant up-and-down moves in prices have been tough to handle, even for veteran investors. Here are some steps you can take to protect your investments — and your peace of mind — when fake news creates market volatility. Stocks are a long-term investment vehicle. In fact, if you don't plan on holding your stocks for at least five years, most advisers recommend you stay out of the stock market completely. This is because short-term fluctuations and longer-term bear markets could depress the value of your portfolio for months or even years, and selling out when the market is low is a losing strategy. To ride out these inevitable dips, it's essential to keep a long-term perspective. Over time, what seem like dramatic short-term moves end up being only barely noticeable blips on a long-term chart of the market. You can protect your investments by keeping that in mind, understanding that the ups and downs of the market eventually smooth themselves out. See Next: If other investors are going to make bad decisions based on emotion, there's no reason you can't take advantage of that. If fake news drives the market down 5% in a single day, it could be a great opportunity to pick up more shares of the quality stocks or ETFs in your portfolio. Even if the news turns out to be true, if you're a long-term investor, adding to your positions when they are 'on sale' can be a good way to boost your returns in time. Picking up additional shares when the market is low can be a prudent way to invest for the long run. But offloading positions you were thinking of selling anyway, when investors are falsely euphoric, can be another. While you shouldn't sell stocks just because the market is up on any given day, when fake news is creating upside volatility, it can be an opportunity. This is especially true if you're already considering selling a position, either to take a profit or to jettison an underperforming stock. This shouldn't be confused with day trading or timing the market — it's just a good way to sell stocks you wanted to unload anyway when the market hands you 'free money.' For some investors, the best option to protect their portfolios is to take a step back from the financial press. While total ignorance of what's going on in the market isn't advisable, neither is watching the financial news 24/7. At any given moment, the commentary on TV could make you feel like you're missing out on a big opportunity, or conversely, that the world is completely falling apart and you should sell everything. Being too close to the action makes it more likely that you will overtrade, making investment decisions based on emotion instead of good sense. This is one reason why most advisors recommend you only rebalance your portfolio every quarter, or even once per year. Simple as it sounds, for investors who are prone to have an emotional reaction to the stock market, the best option could be to just turn off the TV. In the era of social media, information is disseminated in the blink of an eye. In some cases, this can be beneficial. However, with the proliferation of fake news, it can also be a curse. Many traders, trying to get an edge on the markets, will instantly react to certain news headlines, even if they are unverified or just flat-out untrue. AI trading is exacerbating these swings, as computers can automatically make moves in thousandths of a second. As an individual investor, you have no control over these market movements. But you do have control over how you manage your portfolio. If you can avoid making emotional decisions, stick to your long-term investment plan, and selectively take advantage of big swings in the market, you'll end up with the best results. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck This article originally appeared on 4 Ways To Protect Your Investments When Fake News Creates Market Volatility
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
4 Ways To Protect Your Investments When Fake News Creates Market Volatility
While the stock market is driven by earnings growth over the long run, on a daily basis, the twin emotions of fear and greed can override economic fundamentals. This has been brought into sharp focus in 2025, as the stock market has gyrated wildly in reaction to the Trump administration's ever-changing tariff policy. Read More: Find Out: Part of the problem has been that 'fake news' regarding the specifics of the tariffs has leaked into the financial press, creating market volatility as investors alternately panic and rejoice at the latest headlines. The resultant up-and-down moves in prices have been tough to handle, even for veteran investors. Here are some steps you can take to protect your investments — and your peace of mind — when fake news creates market volatility. Stocks are a long-term investment vehicle. In fact, if you don't plan on holding your stocks for at least five years, most advisers recommend you stay out of the stock market completely. This is because short-term fluctuations and longer-term bear markets could depress the value of your portfolio for months or even years, and selling out when the market is low is a losing strategy. To ride out these inevitable dips, it's essential to keep a long-term perspective. Over time, what seem like dramatic short-term moves end up being only barely noticeable blips on a long-term chart of the market. You can protect your investments by keeping that in mind, understanding that the ups and downs of the market eventually smooth themselves out. See Next: If other investors are going to make bad decisions based on emotion, there's no reason you can't take advantage of that. If fake news drives the market down 5% in a single day, it could be a great opportunity to pick up more shares of the quality stocks or ETFs in your portfolio. Even if the news turns out to be true, if you're a long-term investor, adding to your positions when they are 'on sale' can be a good way to boost your returns in time. Picking up additional shares when the market is low can be a prudent way to invest for the long run. But offloading positions you were thinking of selling anyway, when investors are falsely euphoric, can be another. While you shouldn't sell stocks just because the market is up on any given day, when fake news is creating upside volatility, it can be an opportunity. This is especially true if you're already considering selling a position, either to take a profit or to jettison an underperforming stock. This shouldn't be confused with day trading or timing the market — it's just a good way to sell stocks you wanted to unload anyway when the market hands you 'free money.' For some investors, the best option to protect their portfolios is to take a step back from the financial press. While total ignorance of what's going on in the market isn't advisable, neither is watching the financial news 24/7. At any given moment, the commentary on TV could make you feel like you're missing out on a big opportunity, or conversely, that the world is completely falling apart and you should sell everything. Being too close to the action makes it more likely that you will overtrade, making investment decisions based on emotion instead of good sense. This is one reason why most advisors recommend you only rebalance your portfolio every quarter, or even once per year. Simple as it sounds, for investors who are prone to have an emotional reaction to the stock market, the best option could be to just turn off the TV. In the era of social media, information is disseminated in the blink of an eye. In some cases, this can be beneficial. However, with the proliferation of fake news, it can also be a curse. Many traders, trying to get an edge on the markets, will instantly react to certain news headlines, even if they are unverified or just flat-out untrue. AI trading is exacerbating these swings, as computers can automatically make moves in thousandths of a second. As an individual investor, you have no control over these market movements. But you do have control over how you manage your portfolio. If you can avoid making emotional decisions, stick to your long-term investment plan, and selectively take advantage of big swings in the market, you'll end up with the best results. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying The 10 Most Reliable SUVs of 2025 This article originally appeared on 4 Ways To Protect Your Investments When Fake News Creates Market Volatility Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
