DPH chief: Mass. prepared to maintain vaccine access
BOSTON (SHNS) – The state public health chief called the firing of all 17 members of a federal vaccine advisory panel 'troubling' on Wednesday, while acknowledging that Massachusetts officials have been bracing for such a scenario.
On Monday, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. dismissed all members of the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, or ACIP. President Joe Biden's administration had appointed all 17 members, including 13 in 2024, and 'these appointments would have prevented the current administration from choosing a majority of the committee until 2028,' Kennedy's office said.
'In dismissing the members, the secretary stated his intention to repopulate the committee and to hold the scheduled ACIP meeting June 25 to June 27,' Public Health Commissioner Robbie Goldstein said. 'This news is troubling. It amends a science-based process that has informed vaccine recommendations and promoted vaccine access for decades. The future of federal vaccine policy is unclear.'
In a statement Monday, Kennedy said the move was 'necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science.' New members were not announced but Kennedy's office said they will 'ensure that government scientific activities are informed by the most credible, reliable, and impartial scientific evidence available.'
At a virtual state Public Health Council meeting Wednesday, Goldstein said it's unclear if new ACIP members 'will continue to use evidence and science to guide our vaccine recommendations and vaccine policy.'
'We've been been preparing for a number of scenarios, including this one, and we are well positioned to respond and maintain access to vaccines across the state,' Goldstein said. 'Starting in November, we've been analyzing the legal and regulatory landscape, identifying resources that could be used to guide vaccine recommendations, strengthening our data systems to understand vaccine effectiveness, and building a coalition of like-minded, evidence-based public health organizations in this state and others.'
The Massachusetts Vaccine Purchasing Advisory Council, which helps distributes vaccines recommended by the ACIP, is slated to meet Thursday in Waltham.
At a public hearing on Friday, Massachusetts parents and medical providers urged state lawmakers to scrap religious exemptions for school immunization requirements. The plea came amidst measles outbreaks in the U.S. Meanwhile, vaccine opponents lamented potential state infringements on their faith and personal beliefs.
Students from preschool to college are required to receive a bevy of vaccines, including for polio, Hepatitis B, and measles, mumps and rubella, according to the state Department of Public Health.
State law allows students to seek medical and religious exemptions, and refiled bills from Rep. Andy Vargas and Sen. Edward Kennedy (H 2544 / S 1557) would eliminate the religious carveout for immunizations required in public, private and charter K-12 schools. Under the proposals, schools must submit data annually to DPH about how many students are vaccinated and how many received a medical exemption — with that information then made publicly available.
'Three of our Northeast neighbors — Connecticut, Maine and New York — have eliminated their non-medical vaccine exemptions in recent years,' Katie Blair, executive director of Massachusetts Families for Vaccines, told the Joint Committee on Public Health. 'They have seen subsequent improvements in immunization rates, increasing the herd immunity protection that their most medically vulnerable residents depend upon. It's time for Massachusetts to do the same.'
The committee reported the legislation out favorably at the end of last session on Dec. 16. Democrats in the Health Care Financing Committee did not advance the proposal.
The majority of vaccine exemptions are for religious reasons in Massachusetts, according to DPH. Some western and southeastern parts of the state, especially on the Cape and Islands, have higher rates of vaccine exemptions, and those areas 'may be more susceptible to disease outbreaks because these students are not fully protected,' DPH says.
Kyle Abrahamson, a biomedical engineer, said he opposed the bills because they encroach on his 'free exercise of religion' and constitute 'tyrannical overreach' from state government. Abrahamson argued that removing the religious exemption would force him to choose between his faith and his child's education.
He also spoke against Sen. Becca Rausch's so-called Community Immunity Act (S 1618) that would preserve religious vaccine exemptions but strengthen the exemption process and improve data reporting.
'Parents — not the state, nor any medical professional or anybody else — but parents are the paramount advocates for their own children,' Abrahamson said. 'If H 2554, S 1557 and S 1618 move forward, the state is taking away parents' faith and forcing parents to put their faith in them.'
Julie Booras, co-founder of Health Rights Massachusetts, said she 'strongly' opposes all school-related vaccine bills before the committee. She testified in support of a Rep. John Gaskey bill (H 2431) that would block the state from requiring COVID-19 shots, mRNA vaccines or gene-altering procedures to enroll in K-12 schools, colleges or universities, as well as to enter private businesses or seek employment.
'This bill is critical to ensure the injustices of the COVID era can never happen again,' Booras said. 'Despite all of the information now available about the physical, emotional and financial harms caused by the COVID countermeasures, nothing has changed. No meaningful action has been taken to rein in the sweeping powers granted to the governor and public health agencies by the Massachusetts Legislature.'
Vaccine supporters had emphasized new urgency over removing religious exemptions as they invoked the worsening measles outbreak in Texas and other hotspots. Texas has logged 744 measles cases since January, causing 96 people to be hospitalized and two deaths among school-aged children, according to the Texas Department of State Health Services.
There were 1,168 confirmed measles cases and three confirmed deaths across the U.S. as of June 5, according to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Massachusetts has not recorded any cases.
'Measles is an awful disease with dangerous complications and side effects,' Dr. Richard Moriarty, a retired pediatric infectious disease specialist, said. 'With cuts in health care funding, how are we going to pay if there are outbreaks? Outbreaks are very expensive.'
Moriarty did not specify the funding cuts, but the Trump administration has moved to slash billions of dollars in public health grants and congressional Republicans are advancing proposals to drastically cut Medicaid dollars to states.
'Measles is so infectious, we need 95% of a population immunized to prevent an outbreak,' Moriarty continued. 'We thought our schools were good in Massachusetts, but if you take a deep dive into them, 119 kindergartens have MMR rates less than 90%, 31 schools are below 80% in Massachusetts, 19% of our schools didn't even bother to report their immunization rates this year, and 24% report their rates only on rolling three-year averages.'
Supporters emphasized that vaccine skepticism and misinformation is more common across the country, and the landscape is also marked by shifting federal vaccine recommendations and immunization schedules.
'My colleagues are spending so much time just re-educating parents who have trusted the medical system for years and now have been instilled with this fear, which is completely based on misinformation,' said Dr. Christina Hermos, division chief of infectious disease at UMass Memorial Children's Medical Center. 'The frontline pediatricians are burning out having these conversations. We're already having a crisis of people going into primary care across this nation.'
Kennedy last month announced the CDC is no longer recommending COVID vaccines for healthy children and pregnant individuals.
Goldstein on Wednesday said that COVID vaccines remain available. He stressed that vaccinating pregnant women can protect newborn babies who cannot get immunized yet.
'I want to be clear: We know that COVID vaccination prevents severe illness, hospitalization and death in those at risk, which includes children and pregnant people,' Goldstein said. 'DPH will continue to lift up the data and the evidence that are available to inform our recommendations. And we'll work with insurers, health care providers and others across the state to maintain access to evidence-based safe vaccines.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Under RFK Jr., Vaccine Approval Is Getting More Politicized, Not Less
"Vaccines have become a divisive issue in American politics," asserted Health and Human Services Secretary (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in his June 9 Wall Street Journal op-ed. "Public confidence is waning." This is true. But the HHS secretary bears responsibility for much of that division and waning confidence. And he's just made it worse. How? Kennedy has politicized the U.S. vaccine approval process by summarily firing all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) earlier this week. Typically appointed to four-year terms, Kennedy has taken the unprecedented step of prematurely sacking the entire panel. Two days later, he announced his selection of eight new members, many of whom are chiefly famous for espousing contrarian views with respect to vaccine safety and efficacy. So what did Kennedy find wrong with the original ACIP panel? The secretary asserted that it "has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interests" stemming from members' "immersion in a system of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms that enforce a narrow pro-industry orthodoxy." At least in his Journal op-ed, the secretary offers no evidence of any unreported or improper conflicts of interest among those he just fired. It is worth noting that the fired ACIP members were vetted before they were appointed and that they each declare any conflicts that later emerge before each of the committee's meetings. What about RFK Jr.'s vague claims hinting at nefarious "immersion in a system of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms" on the part of committee members? If your automobile keeps stalling out, you take your jalopy to a trained mechanic for diagnosis and repair. If your computer system has been hacked, you seek help from qualified computer engineers. You earnestly hope that your mechanics and computer engineers are fully immersed in their respective systems of industry-aligned incentives and paradigms—that is, you hope they are experts who know what they are doing. Looking over the pre-firing ACIP membership list, they chiefly appear to be immersed in the fields of immunology, vaccinology, and epidemiology. In other words, they, on the face of it, have the training you would expect them to have in order to expertly diagnose the relative safety and efficacy of vaccines. For the most part, the new appointees are notably lacking in such professional expertise. The HHS secretary gives his game away when he characterizes his wholesale firing as being "above any pro- or antivaccine agenda." With respect to his new ACIP appointees, Kennedy promised that "none of these individuals will be ideological anti-vaxxers." That's great. After all, an anti-vaccine agenda makes as much sense as anti–automobile repair or anti–computer debugging agendas. The agendas we want are pro–making cars run, pro–computers correctly ciphering, and pro–vaccines that protect against diseases. However, in looking over the backgrounds of the new ACIP members, several of them can be fairly characterized as being at least anti-vaxxer-adjacent. First, there is physician researcher Robert Malone, who has made exaggerated claims about being the inventor of the mRNA technologies that led to the development of the successful mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Eventually, Malone became a COVID-19 vaccine skeptic, asserting that "they are not working." In 2023, he credulously cited a bogus analysis that claimed COVID-19 vaccines were responsible for 17 million excess deaths worldwide. Later epidemiological research suggests that the vaccines averted around 4 million deaths globally. A 2024 Brookings Institution report suggests "the delivery of vaccines to a substantial majority of the American population by mid-2021 saved close to 800,000 American lives relative to what would have occurred had vaccines not been developed." Then there is public health nurse Vicky Pebsworth. She is a board member of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC). NVIC continues to peddle the debunked claim that vaccines cause autism, as does our HHS secretary. Next up is Massachusetts Institute of Technology management professor Retsef Levi. In 2023, Levi called for the immediate suspension of all COVID-19 vaccination programs. His chief concern was the reported detection of heart inflammation (myocarditis) cases in young males who had been vaccinated. Subsequent research has shown that post-vaccination myocarditis is considerably less harmful than post–COVID infection myocarditis and conventional myocarditis. In his announcement of the new ACIP members, Kennedy declared, "All of these individuals are committed to evidence-based medicine, gold-standard science, and common sense." Maybe so, but the backgrounds of several of these appointees provide good reasons for skepticism. The post Under RFK Jr., Vaccine Approval Is Getting More Politicized, Not Less appeared first on
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr's shakeup of vaccine advisory committee raises worries about scientific integrity of health recommendations
On June 11, 2025, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced a slate of eight new members to serve on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on national vaccine policy. The announcement, made on the social media platform X, comes two days after Kennedy removed all 17 of the serving committee members. Kennedy called their replacements 'a bold step in restoring public trust' rooted in 'radical transparency and gold standard science.' However, public health experts decried the removals, pointing to Kennedy's promise not to change the committee and warning that the move politicizes its work and undermines its scientific integrity. Health experts have also noted that multiple new committee members appointed on June 11 have voiced anti-vaccine views that are not evidence-based. The Conversation U.S. asked Santosh Kumar Gautam, an expert in global health policy at the University of Notre Dame, to explain how the vaccine committee's guidance has shaped vaccine recommendations for the public, and what the changes might mean for peoples' ability to access vaccines in the future. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, is a panel of experts appointed to advise the CDC on how to use vaccines to protect the health of people in the U.S. The committee's job is to review multiple strands of scientific evidence to recommend which vaccines should be used, who should get them and when they should be given. Its guidance affects vaccine schedules for both children and adults, insurance coverage and public health policy across the country. The committee was formed in 1964 to establish national vaccine policy as federal immunization programs began to expand. It can have up to 19 voting members, who are appointed by the secretary of Health and Human Services. Members are experts in areas such as medicine, public health and immunology. Member usually serve overlapping four-year terms to ensure continuity. All 17 previous members were appointed at different times during the Biden administration. Removing all members of the committee at once is unprecedented. The group also includes nonvoting members from government health agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health. There are also representatives from more than 30 medical and public health organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Physicians. These nonvoting members share useful information and real-world experience such as practical issues in administering vaccines in hospitals, management of vaccine side effects and insights into adverse events. Their input helps the committee make recommendations that reflect both science and practical needs. The committee meets three times a year to review new data on vaccine safety and effectiveness. Its next meeting is scheduled for June 25-27 and is expected to include discussions on COVID-19 and HPV vaccines, with recommendation votes planned for COVID-19 boosters, human papilloma virus and influenza vaccines. The meeting is open to the public and will be telecast live online. The committee makes its recommendations to the CDC by reviewing scientific evidence about a vaccine's safety and efficacy, as well as practical issues, such as how easy a vaccine is to use, how it affects different groups, its side-effects and how it fits into the health system. The recommendations don't just consider whether a vaccine works, but how it can be most effectively deployed to protect the American public from disease outbreaks. The committee looks at data from clinical trials and other research to examine the most recent data on a vaccine's safety, efficacy and use in everyday settings. When new vaccines come out or a change occurs in the way a disease spreads or behaves, the committee often revises its advice. It also responds to public health emergencies such as recent measles outbreaks in the U.S. The committee has made many updates over time. It changed flu shot guidance when new strains appeared. It lowered the recommended age for the HPV vaccine based on new research. And it adjusted vaccine plans for meningitis to better protect people at higher risk. The committee played a vital role in evaluating vaccine safety and effectiveness and authorizing the use of vaccines for different age groups by reviewing clinical trial data, from Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and other vaccine manufacturers. The committee also developed step-by-step guidelines for who should get vaccinated first, based on how likely people were to catch the virus, their risk of serious disease, the type of work they did and whether they came from a population that was historically underserved or at higher risk. It also issued tailored guidance for pregnant and breastfeeding women, immunocompromised people and children and adolescents as more trial data became available. These recommendations shaped vaccine rollout strategies at both national and state levels, guided insurance coverage and influenced COVID-19 vaccination policies in other countries around the world. Although Kennedy promised more transparency, he handpicked the advisory committee's new members without revealing how they were selected. Historically, the body's members are selected after an extensive vetting process that can take two years. The newly appointed members have expertise in psychiatry, neuroscience, epidemiology, biostatistics and operations management. However, several have been linked to vaccine-related misinformation, particularly relating to COVID-19 vaccines, raising concerns about the scientific neutrality of the committee moving forward. For example, Retsef Levi, a professor of operations management at MIT Sloan School of Management, has publicly called for suspension of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, claiming they cause serious harm and death in young people – a statement not supported by evidence. Another member, physician and biochemist Robert Malone, made scientifically inaccurate statements about the dangers of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic. A third member, epidemiologist and biostatistician Martin Kulldorff helped write the Great Barrington Declaration, which opposed lockdowns and argued that people at low risk of severe illness or death should be allowed to contract COVID-19 to build natural immunity – a stance that was heavily debated among health experts. The committee's new makeup and Kennedy's decades-long anti-vaccine stance threaten to erode the integrity of scientific decision-making and commitment to ethical standards in vaccine recommendations. Kennedy's overhaul of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices will likely affect how insurers, doctors and the public make decisions about vaccines – and vaccine policy generally. For example, the advisory committee's decisions directly affect which vaccines are covered by health insurance. If a vaccine is not recommended by the committee, many insurance plans, including those under the Affordable Care Act, are not required to cover it. This means families could face out-of-pocket costs, making it harder for children to access routine immunizations. The advisory committee also plays a key role in shaping the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule. Given Kennedy's long-held skepticism about childhood vaccines — including those for measles and polio — some public health experts worry that the newly appointed members could push to revisit or revise vaccine recommendations, especially for newer and more debated vaccines like those for COVID-19 or HPV. States usually base their school entry vaccine requirements on the committee's guidelines, and insurers often use them to determine which vaccines are covered. As a result, shifts in policy to childhood vaccinations could influence both school vaccination mandates and access to vaccines for millions of children. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Santosh Kumar Gautam, University of Notre Dame Read more: RFK Jr. says annual COVID-19 shots no longer advised for healthy children and pregnant women – a public health expert explains the new guidance Unverified reports of vaccine side effects in VAERS aren't the smoking guns portrayed by right-wing media outlets – they can offer insight into vaccine hesitancy Vaccine misinformation distorts science – a biochemist explains how RFK Jr. and his lawyer's claims threaten public health Santosh Kumar Gautam does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WA doctor among those fired in RFK Jr.'s purge of vaccine panel
(Photo by) Dr. Helen Chu gained attention early in the COVID-19 pandemic as her repurposed flu research project identified the first case of coronavirus spreading person-to-person in the United States. She and her colleagues carried out this work in defiance of the federal government. And her efforts to accelerate the pandemic response later earned her a 'Washingtonian of the Year' award from a state leadership board. After a two-year vetting process, the University of Washington scientist landed a spot last year on the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's influential panel of vaccine experts. But on Monday, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired Chu and the 16 other members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. 'I really worry about the health and safety of people in our country and the future of our public health infrastructure,' Chu told reporters Thursday in a call with U.S. Sen. Patty Murray. Kennedy said he wanted to restore trust in a panel he believed was rife with conflicts of interest. And on Wednesday, he named eight replacement members, including several with track records criticizing vaccines. Kennedy himself has a history of promoting skepticism and unfounded theories about vaccines. He came to Olympia in 2019, for example, to advocate against legislation that would have made it harder for parents to opt their children out of the measles, mumps and rubella shot in the middle of a measles outbreak. The medical field largely condemned this week's firings. For over 60 years, the committee has reviewed vaccine efficacy and recommended who should receive which shots. The guidance goes to the CDC director, who usually follows the group's decisions. These recommendations impact what vaccines insurers will cover, as opposed to forcing patients to pay out of pocket. Members typically serve four-year terms. The purge comes on the heels of Kennedy announcing unilaterally that federal health officials would stop recommending COVID vaccines for healthy children and healthy pregnant women. The federal panel is set to meet later this month, with recommendation votes scheduled for several vaccines, including for coronavirus. 'RFK Jr is not just crossing a red line for public health,' said Murray, a Democrat from Washington. 'He is sprinting into dangerous, uncharted territory in support of totally deranged conspiracies, and he is dragging us all along with him.' Chu used the example of a vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, to show the importance of the committee's work, and that it's not just a rubber stamp for immunizations. When reviewing data on the proposed vaccine, the panel found a risk of the rare neurological disorder known as Guillain-Barré Syndrome. So Chu, an infectious diseases professor at the UW, and her fellow members decided to recommend the shot only for older adults at a higher risk of getting severe symptoms from RSV. 'I think this example really illustrates the approach that the ACIP takes, that what we do is rooted in science, and that the decisions we make do not necessarily benefit the companies that have invested heavily to develop these vaccines,' Chu said. 'As a result, ACIP is widely regarded as an international gold standard for vaccine decision making.' Lacking trust in the committee's potential recommendations, Chu advised doctors to turn to groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology for science-based vaccine guidance. She worries that turning the previously 'independent, unbiased' committee into something driven by 'one person's beliefs,' Americans will lose trust in national vaccine policy. This could lead to a patchwork of policies that differ state to state, Chu said. 'Washington state is a place where we have experts and scientists who work together,' she said. 'There are other states where this may not exist, or where they may not choose to recommend vaccines, so that is going to create a lot of chaos.' Murray pleaded with her Republican colleagues in the Senate to tell Kennedy his moves are unacceptable. To get confirmed, Kennedy made concessions to moderate Republicans, namely Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, over how much he would disrupt existing vaccine policy.
