logo
In Montana, a rare sight: Republicans and Democrats voting together

In Montana, a rare sight: Republicans and Democrats voting together

Boston Globe03-05-2025

That has made it all the more aggravating for conservative lawmakers to find themselves effectively in the minority this year.
Advertisement
After an intraparty dispute in January, nine Republican state senators began breaking with their caucus on key votes, siding with the 18 Democrats in the 50-person chamber. The result: a 27-person majority that has all but locked Republican leaders out of power.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Some or all of the Nine, as the Republican defectors are known, have voted with Democrats to reauthorize a Medicaid expansion, establish a child tax credit, increase access to maternal health care, and pass the state budget. They have helped block bills that would have weakened labor unions, made state judicial elections more partisan, and established an unlimited hunting season on wolves.
On Wednesday, the session's final day, they again broke with their party, pushing through a property tax cut to assist residents struggling with soaring home values.
Advertisement
The unusual alliance shows that for all the seeming unanimity in the MAGA movement, Republicans can still clash over policy objectives and the wielding of power. And in an era when advancing legislation often loses out to mocking the opposing party, it shows that some on the right remain more interested in getting things done.
It could prove to be something of a blip: a reversion to bygone reflexes toward compromise belying Montana's steady drift to the right.
Yet, former governor Brian Schweitzer, a Democrat, said politicians elsewhere could learn from the Nine.
'What they've done is said, 'I'm going to vote with the people I represent back home -- and that's not what the party leadership is telling us,'' Schweitzer said.
'We'll haul Congress out here to see how it's done in Montana,' he joked, adding that he would 'put in the first $50' for bus fare.
The Nine argued that they were simply prioritizing smart policy over ideological conformity -- reauthorizing the Medicaid expansion would keep open rural hospitals in their districts, for instance -- and supporting the agenda pushed by Governor Greg Gianforte, also a Republican.
But as President Trump exerts almost total control over the Republican Party, and the country seems bitterly divided along partisan lines more than ever, the GOP schism in Montana has attracted outsized attention.
As the session progressed, other Montana Republicans ramped up a pressure campaign against the defectors, posting their photos on social media, demanding that they quit bucking party leadership and giving them nicknames like the 'Nasty Nine.' In March, Republicans tried to expel one of the senators, Jason Ellsworth, from the Legislature over alleged ethical violations; a majority of Democrats helped block the attempt.
Advertisement
The Montana Republican Party even censured the Nine, saying they would no longer be considered Republicans or receive funding from the state party because of 'the damage they have exacted on the Montana Senate.'
The Nine remained upbeat. Days before the legislative session ended, seven of them sat for an interview in the state Capitol, describing praise from voters, swapping stories of admonishment by local Republican groups, and declaring that such criticism had only strengthened their resolve.
'I always looked at politics when I was younger and you see people work across the aisle,' said Gayle Lammers, a first-term senator. 'I know we're in this new age where division is so hardcore, but why can't we get back to where any reasonable legislation is reasonable legislation? If it's good for Montana, if it's good for your district, why not consider it?'
Even though they have voted with Democrats, the senators say they remain conservative Republicans and strong supporters of Trump. All of them voted for a bill restricting transgender people's use of public bathrooms, and most of them sided with their Republican colleagues on several anti-abortion bills. Josh Kassmier, who emerged as a leader of the Nine, noted that he had sponsored a bill cutting the income tax.
Since Gianforte took office in 2021, Kassmier said, 'we've cut the budget, we've made government more efficient -- that's all Trump politics, right?' He added, 'We're voting on the policy. It's not a deal we've made with the Dems.'
One of the Nine, Wendy McKamey, keeps at her desk a stack of notes from Montanans thanking the group for its courage. 'Give 'Em Hell,' the front of one card reads, above an image of a cowgirl astride a galloping horse.
Advertisement
'They help me own my vote,' McKamey said. 'I will not offend my conscience.'
Although the Legislature's political lines seemed blurred, some lawmakers and analysts suggested the real rift was between those who wanted to make policy and those who sought to obstruct it.
'It's about who is more interested in governing, really,' said Jessi Bennion, a political science professor at Montana State University. Montana's right wing, she said, seemed less interested in conservative fiscal policy than in introducing controversial bills on social issues that jammed up the legislative process.
That put hard-liners on a collision course with Gianforte, who did not endorse Matt Regier, the right-wing Senate president, last year but did endorse a group of relative moderates. The Freedom Caucus issued a rebuttal to Gianforte's State of the State address in January, suggesting that Montana should spend less money than the governor desired and opposing some of his priorities, including Medicaid expansion.
Gianforte has avoided speaking directly about the Nine, and a spokesperson for the governor declined to comment. But he has seemed pleased to have achieved many of his goals.
Despite the recent rightward drift, Big Sky Country has long been proud of its independent streak and small-town values. Montana has voted for a Democratic presidential candidate only once since 1964 -- Bill Clinton in 1992 -- but it had Democratic governors and senators for decades.
In previous legislative sessions, which occur every two years, a loose coalition of Republicans called the Solutions Caucus worked with Democrats to pass bills. But that was easier for Republicans to swallow when a Democratic governor made it necessary to compromise.
Advertisement
What stood out about this year's bipartisanship was the animosity it produced.
The conflict started the first week of the legislative session, when the Nine were assigned to what they say was a sham committee that would have sidelined them from the legislative process -- part of an effort, they argued, to make it easier for Regier and his allies to consolidate power.
The senators pushed back, agreeing with Democrats on alternate committee assignments. From there, they said, the Democrats were only too happy to work with the Nine on some bills.
In an interview, Regier called the bipartisan alliance a 'gut punch.' He said none of the Nine had raised concerns about committee assignments when Republicans met before the session, and suggested the unhappiness was a 'talking point' that provided 'cover for them to side with Democrats.' Efforts to win them back, he said, had been rebuffed.
'We tried and tried,' Regier said. 'It was obvious to see there was some sort of handshake, friendship, collaboration with the Democrats.'
Regier denied that right-wing Republicans were obstructionist and sounded dumbfounded by the Nine's role in locking them out of the legislative process. 'You're scratching your head being like, 'Are you even on our team anymore?'' he said.
Democrats also felt heat for their role in the coalition -- from the left. Bill Lombardi, a former top aide to Tester, faulted the Democratic senators for voting with Republicans on issues such as maintaining a tax on Social Security.
'While working together is good, you can't give away Democratic principles,' Lombardi said. 'Republicans have cemented their position in Montana, and some legislative Democrats think they must hew to the moderate Republican line to get anything.'
Advertisement
But the frustration appears more strongly felt on the right.
Theresa Manzella, a founder of the Freedom Caucus, said right-wing state senators had tried hard to get the Nine to back down but eventually tired of the fight.
'We've resigned ourselves to life in the circus,' she said. 'And, unfortunately, it is our circus, and these are our clowns.'
This article originally appeared in

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

People Truly Can't Believe The Location This Republican Senator Chose To Film Her "Apology"
People Truly Can't Believe The Location This Republican Senator Chose To Film Her "Apology"

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

People Truly Can't Believe The Location This Republican Senator Chose To Film Her "Apology"

I'm sure you've heard of Iowa Senator Joni Ernst's "we all are going to die" thing. She held a townhall on Thursday, and a clip of her comments about SNAP and Medicaid cuts went viral: At her town hall, when the crowd says people will die due to Medicaid and SNAP cuts, Joni Ernst responds "well we all are going to die." #iasen — danny (@dabbs346) May 30, 2025 ABC/dabbs346/Twitter: @dabbs346 Someone from the crowd shouted, "People are going to die," and Joni responded, "Well, we all are going to die." FWIW, The Hill reported she went on to say that Republicans would protect Medicaid for "the most vulnerable." She also said, "SNAP overpayments that the states have been making will need to stop," and "When you are arguing about illegals that are receiving Medicaid benefits, 1.4 million, they're not eligible, so they will be coming off." ANYWAY, this whole thing kind of blew up. People are calling this "one of the worst politician quotes" they've ever heard. And people are joking: "New GOP slogan: 'We're all gonna die!'" Related: 18 Major Global Events That American Media Is Ignoring Right Now, And Why They Actually Matter To Us Sooo, we're on round two from that. Senator Ernst decided to issue an "apology" that isn't really an apology at all. Against all odds, Joni Ernst has made it worse — Keith Edwards (@keithedwards) May 31, 2025 joniernst/Twitter: @keithedwards "Hello everyone, I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall," she said. "See, I was in the process of answering a question that was asked by an audience member when a woman who was extremely distraught screamed out from the back of the auditorium, 'People are going to die.' And I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that, yes, we are all going to perish from this earth." "So, I apologize, and I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well. But for those that would like to see eternal and everlasting life, I encourage you to embrace my Lord and savior Jesus Christ." Related: "I Am So Torn With What You Are Doing" — 11 Posts From MAGA Business Owners Who Are So Close To Getting It Yeaaah, people are unpacking this one. "I'm at a loss for words..." one person said. Another person encouraged her to keep digging in, "Keep posting through it Joni you're almost there." And this person joked, "Leave the tooth fairy out of this, you monster." But the #1 thing people can't believe is the location where she recorded it. It appears that she's walking through a cemetery. "I'm sorry... is she walking through a cemetery as she makes this?" one person asked. Another person said, "No way that Joni Ernst apology video can be real is she in a cemetery." And this person gave her a new nickname: "Senator Grim Reaper." Thoughts? Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: Miss USA's 2024 "National Costume" Has Been Revealed, And It's Obviously An Interesting Choice Also in In the News: One Body Language Expert Spotted Something Very Telling When Donald Trump "Held His Own Hand" At His Recent Press Conference

Walz to South Carolina Democrats: ‘We Lost Our Way' as a Party
Walz to South Carolina Democrats: ‘We Lost Our Way' as a Party

Epoch Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

Walz to South Carolina Democrats: ‘We Lost Our Way' as a Party

Former vice presidential candidate and Minnesota governor Tim Walz told Democratic Party voters in South Carolina on May 31 that their party had lost its way and needed to revive its identity as Democrats prepare to challenge for control of Congress and governorships in 2026. Walz, who was former Vice President Kamala Harris's running mate in 2024, gave the keynote address at the South Carolina Democratic Party Convention and opened with a general critique of President Donald Trump's second administration, mentioning topics including the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Department of Government Efficiency, tax policies, and the president's decision to accept Qatar's gift of a Boeing 747.

Johnson says 4.8 million Americans won't lose Medicaid access ‘unless they choose to do so'
Johnson says 4.8 million Americans won't lose Medicaid access ‘unless they choose to do so'

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Johnson says 4.8 million Americans won't lose Medicaid access ‘unless they choose to do so'

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) doubled down on his claim that there won't be Medicaid cuts in President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' despite projections that millions of low-income individuals would lose health insurance as a result of the bill. Johnson, during an appearance on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' pushed back on independent projections that the bill would lead to 4.8 million who would lose coverage because of work requirements, saying they won't lose it 'unless they choose to do so.' 'Those 4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so,' he told host Kristen Welker. 'You're telling me that you're going to require the able-bodied — these young men, for example, okay — to only work or volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week, and that's too cumbersome for them? I'm not buying it. The American people are not buying it.' He added that the people who are complaining about losing their coverage are doing so 'because they can't fulfill the paperwork,' noting that the policy follows 'common sense.' 'When people work, when able-bodied young men work, it's good for them, for their dignity, their purpose, and it's good for the community,' he said. 'If you can't find a job, then volunteer in your community for 20 hours, and you will meet the requirement.' The proposed Medicaid and health care reforms would require states to impose work requirements on childless adults aged 19-64 to be eligible for Medicaid. It also aims to shorten the open enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act, among other changes. The reforms are key components of the bill, which the House Energy and Commerce Committee crafted after being tasked with finding more than $800 billion in savings over a decade. Those portions of the GOP proposal would save $625 billion over 10 years, according to the CBO. Johnson said that the bill 'strengthens' Medicaid and said what they are doing is 'an important and frankly heroic thing.' 'It's intended for young, you know, single, pregnant women and the disabled and the elderly,' he said. 'But what's happening right now is you have a lot of people, for example, young men, able bodied workers, who are on Medicaid. They're not working when they can.' His comments are just the latest assertion from Johnson that the bill won't threaten Medicaid coverage for people who need it. However, the bill is hitting some roadblocks for Republican lawmakers, who are finding themselves enveloped in criticism at their town halls.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store