DOT's deregulation barrage raises compliance concerns for trucking
WASHINGTON — The axing of dozens of regulations this week by the U.S. Department of Transportation has raised concerns from trucking industry experts concerned about compliance and safety.
While the majority of the 52 deregulatory actions affecting the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Federal Highway Administration provide 60-day comment periods to allow for public protest, most if not all will likely be taken off the books.
'Big government has been a big failure,' said Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, commenting on the changes in a press statement on Thursday.
'Under President Trump's leadership, my department is slashing duplicative and outdated regulations that are unnecessarily burdensome, waste taxpayer dollars, and fail to ensure safety. These are common sense changes that will help us build a more efficient government that better reflects the needs of the American people.'
Of the 20 actions taken at FMCSA, two are final rules and 18 are proposed rules that would either amend or rescind current regulations.
P. Sean Garney, a trucking regulatory expert and co-director at Scopelitis Transportation Consulting, singled out several of FMCSA's deregulatory actions for potential compliance issues.
For example, while Garney considers reasonable a proposal to eliminate a requirement that truck drivers keep a hard copy of the truck's electronic logging device user manual on board, 'what's a little tricky and what carriers will need to take note of if these are finalized as written is that it only applies to the user manual,' he told FreightWaves in an email.
'Drivers are still required to carry (or store electronically) the instructions for how to transfer data at roadside and the instruction sheet for how to deal with a malfunction, not to mention blank logs. It'll be important for motor carriers to make sure drivers have access to it either way. It's like your car user manual, you don't need it until you need it.'
FMCSA also proposes revising a requirement that motor carriers and intermodal equipment providers sign and return a completed roadside inspection form to their issuing state agency. Because not all states require that they be returned, FMCSA wants the form-return requirement to apply only to carriers obligated to do so by their state – and that could be a problem, Garney cautioned.
'While many states do not require these inspection reports to be signed and returned … others still require them,' he said. 'If removing the requirement is the best course of action, I wish FMCSA would have pulled the trigger for all states, rather than leave us guessing on who requires it be returned and who doesn't. Figuring this out and adhering to it is a burden.'
FMCSA's proposal to rescind a manufacture certification label requirement for rear impact guards on truck trailers has a potential enforcement issue lurking, according to Garney.
Motor carriers have balked at the requirement because the labels can become worn and illegible.
'What's interesting about this one is that this notice is just half the story,' he said. 'Removing this from [FMCSA's regulations] will help out carriers at roadside as inspectors won't be able to write the violation … but the requirement still lives in the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, which are controlled by NHTSA.'
In the event of a failure of a rear guard that has a worn label, 'who will be left holding the bag? Who's in charge here?'
The list of deregulatory actions at FMCSA has raised red flags at the Truck Safety Coalition, which advocates for truck crash victims and their families.
'Certainly time has rendered some regulations obsolete,' acknowledged TSC Executive Director Zach Cahalan in an email to FreightWaves.
However, 'TSC remains concerned FMCSA is rushing to fulfill campaign pledges and failing to uphold its historically high burden to prove any deregulatory changes will not adversely impact safety.'
As an example, Cahalan pointed to FMCSA's proposal to rescind a regulation requiring retroreflective sheeting on semitrailers and trailers (which improves their visibility at night) manufactured before 1993.
'FMCSA declares 'it believes' trailers manufactured prior to 1993 are not in use, but fails to quantify this assertion in any way, shape, or form,' he said.
Regarding eliminating the ELD manual requirement, 'it's probably a good idea to keep ELD manuals in rigs as there is no reason to believe all drivers receive sufficient training in their use and operation, something our victims can tragically attest to.'
He emphasized that driver fatigue – which the ELD mandate is supposed to help address – 'remains a chronic problem in the industry and is frequently cited by the NTSB as a contributor in most truck crashes.'
DOT takes heat for drug testing certification delays
Lawmakers look at expanding FMCSA's power to rein in cargo theft
Trump's NHTSA nominee raises concerns among truck safety advocates
Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.
The post DOT's deregulation barrage raises compliance concerns for trucking appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Declining Stock and Solid Fundamentals: Is The Market Wrong About Ringmetall SE (ETR:HP3A)?
Ringmetall (ETR:HP3A) has had a rough three months with its share price down 8.2%. But if you pay close attention, you might gather that its strong financials could mean that the stock could potentially see an increase in value in the long-term, given how markets usually reward companies with good financial health. Particularly, we will be paying attention to Ringmetall's ROE today. ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Ringmetall is: 13% = €11m ÷ €89m (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2024). The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. Another way to think of that is that for every €1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn €0.13 in profit. See our latest analysis for Ringmetall We have already established that ROE serves as an efficient profit-generating gauge for a company's future earnings. Depending on how much of these profits the company reinvests or "retains", and how effectively it does so, we are then able to assess a company's earnings growth potential. Generally speaking, other things being equal, firms with a high return on equity and profit retention, have a higher growth rate than firms that don't share these attributes. At first glance, Ringmetall seems to have a decent ROE. Even when compared to the industry average of 11% the company's ROE looks quite decent. This probably goes some way in explaining Ringmetall's moderate 17% growth over the past five years amongst other factors. Next, on comparing Ringmetall's net income growth with the industry, we found that the company's reported growth is similar to the industry average growth rate of 18% over the last few years. The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. It's important for an investor to know whether the market has priced in the company's expected earnings growth (or decline). This then helps them determine if the stock is placed for a bright or bleak future. If you're wondering about Ringmetall's's valuation, check out this gauge of its price-to-earnings ratio, as compared to its industry. Ringmetall has a three-year median payout ratio of 27%, which implies that it retains the remaining 73% of its profits. This suggests that its dividend is well covered, and given the decent growth seen by the company, it looks like management is reinvesting its earnings efficiently. Besides, Ringmetall has been paying dividends over a period of nine years. This shows that the company is committed to sharing profits with its shareholders. On the whole, we feel that Ringmetall's performance has been quite good. In particular, it's great to see that the company is investing heavily into its business and along with a high rate of return, that has resulted in a sizeable growth in its earnings. With that said, the latest industry analyst forecasts reveal that the company's earnings growth is expected to slow down. To know more about the latest analysts predictions for the company, check out this visualization of analyst forecasts for the company. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
China accuses U.S. of violating trade truce, vows "forceful measures"
China has accused the U.S. violating the trade deal that the world's two largest economies signed last month and vowed to take "resolute and forceful measures," per a briefing on Monday morning local time. Why it matters: It's the latest sign of deteriorating relations between the two nations since their Switzerland meeting led to a May 12 deal to lower tariffs on each other fo 90 days while they negotiated on trade. President Trump accused Beijing on Friday of violating the agreement, one day after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described negotiations as " a bit stalled." Driving the news: A Chinese Commerce Ministry spokesperson said Beijing "firmly rejects these unjustified accusations," per translations of the comments that were carried by state media. The spokesperson alleged the U.S. had "seriously undermined" and "violated" the trade agreement by issuing "export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software (EDA) to China, and announcing the r evocation" of visas for Chinese students. "If the U.S. insists on its own way and continues to damage China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests," unnamed official added, without elaborating further. The other side: While Trump didn't go into details on his claims that Beijing had "totally violated" the trade deal, administration officials have pointed to delays in sending critical minerals to the U.S., which are needed for American auto, electronics and defense industries, that formed part of the agreement. "What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe, and that is not what a reliable partner does," Bessent said during a Sunday interview on CBS News ' "Face the Nation." What we're watching: U.S. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said Sunday he expects Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jingping will hold a phone call this week as part of negotiations. Bessent said on CBS he's "confident" that the two sides' issues "will be ironed out" once Trump and Xi have spoken. "But the fact that they are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement — maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional," he told CBS' Margaret Brennan. "We'll see after the president speaks with [Xi]." Beijing had not commented on any plans for a call between the two leaders as of late Sunday.
Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Americans Share Shocking Tariff Costs Hitting Wallets
On May 12, President Trump reached a deal with China that cut tariffs on imported goods from the country from 145% to 30% for 90 days. But for companies that had to restock while the higher tariffs were in effect, like the open-source hardware retailer Adafruit, the costs of the highest tariffs are still being felt. In a blog post about its tariff bill, Adafruit wrote, "We'll have to increase the prices on some of these products, but we're not sure if people will be willing to pay the higher cost, so we may well be 'stuck' with unsellable inventory that we have already paid a large fee on." The co-founder and president of Popsmith and Franklin's Popcorn also took to X to share how the tariffs are affecting his business: He went on to clarify that yes, the tariffs will cause higher prices. Some companies have announced layoffs related to the higher costs of doing business under Trump's tariffs. Higher prices are also beginning to show up on store shelves. It can be harder to tie these increases directly to the tariffs because big American companies are currently not being very transparent about how these new import taxes are affecting prices. For example, this Target employee captured the moment they changed an imported 6-foot USB cable's price from $9.99 to $17.99 in mid-May, before the highest tariffs were paused. The timing would seem to line up with the tariffs' first round of effects, but there's nothing on the price tag to indicate why the price went up by so much so quickly. BuzzFeed has reached out to Target for comment, but they did not immediately respond to our request. A Walmart employee also shared the price jump on an 8-ounce container of cocoa powder from $3.44 to $6.18. Walmart recently announced that it would be raising some prices due to the tariffs. If you work in retail, please pop into the comments and let us know what you're seeing in your store — and post pics if you've got 'em! Or, if you'd like to remain extra anonymous, email me. On the other hand, some smaller brands, like the inclusive underwear company tomboyx, have started showing a tariff charge on their products. The company explained on its website, "The tariff surcharge helps us stay sustainable while we move quickly behind the scenes—developing new styles and expanding production to other countries. We're adapting fast, but building responsible manufacturing relationships takes a bit of time — and we refuse to compromise on the quality you expect from us." And people genuinely appreciate the transparency: Meanwhile, at the "old-fashioned" grocery store, this Iowa shopper noticed a wild price tag on a container of pre-cut imported fruit: Restaurant prices are also creeping up. One restaurant owner told CBS News, "We're not importing fresh ingredients like vegetables, but everything else around it — spices, seasonings, even our beers. Now it's double. Who's going to pay $20 for a beer?" If you've got kids who maaaybe do a little online shopping, you should probably talk to them about the tariffs to avoid any nasty surprises like what this parent discovered: And if you're planning to buy any new shoes or clothing for the summer season, be warned: most of these products are manufactured in Asia. Scientists who are lucky enough to still have funding for their research are now facing higher prices on lab equipment: While all of this is going on, many everyday shoppers are still asking, "Are 'import charges' the same thing as tariffs?" The answer is yes, yes they are. Finally, before you say "just buy American," there are many things that people and businesses rely on to survive that we do not (or in some cases, can not) make here. It could take years for manufacturing to gear up, and paying high prices in the meantime is a financial pain that few Americans are equipped to meet. Now it's time for Comment Corner. A few weeks ago, I shared some of the first tariff receipts making the rounds online, and members of the BuzzFeed Community joined the conversation to share where they've noticed the tariffs going into effect. Here's what they had to say: "Jasmine rice is usually imported from Thailand. Costco is already showing how tariffs affect consumers and hardworking citizens like me. In March 2025, a bag of jasmine rice cost $15.99 (25 lbs). April 2025: $17.99 (25 lbs). In the month of May, it already jumped to $25.73 (25 lbs)." —Anonymous, 41, Florida "I'm an assistant store manager at Skechers, and maybe a week ago, we were given updated/higher prices for EVERYTHING in our store — shoes, socks, backpacks, apparel, and even the cleaning supplies we have for your shoes!! I wish I was kidding when I say our three pack of quarter crew socks went from prices between $14.00, $16.00, and $18.00 (which was already, in my opinion, kinda pricey) to $20.00." "The cost of my home repairs is three times the amount previously quoted due to an increase in materials costs. I canceled all repairs unless absolutely needed. I'll just sell my house 'as is' or not at all. Someone quoted me $18k to put up a fence. Not going to happen." —Anonymous, 66, Florida "I own a small wedding company in California. I have noticed that people are opting for the less expensive package we offer, which is just elopements. Flowers for weddings are going sky high. People are just cutting way back and not having the wedding they've always dreamed of." "My contact lenses went from $750 last year to $1,248 this year. They updated the prices the week before my appointment, saying it was due to the tariff charges." —Anonymous, 35, North Dakota "I work for a patio furniture company. Two weeks ago, they started raising all of our prices up 40-70%, which is an incredible amount. We had a chaise lounge chair go from an already high of $1,000 to $1,600 while others doubled. I don't believe all these increases are due to tariffs. A lot of companies see an opportunity to raise prices on a product that wasn't necessarily hit that high simply because they can. We have no way of actually knowing if that product was really part of it." "I was laid off from my job because of tariffs. When they called me in, they said that because they were an 80% import business, they were decreasing their staff by 25% because of the Trump tariffs. I was on track to be promoted next month." —Anonymous, 48, Los Angeles "I have a small business where all of my stock comes from overseas. There simply aren't any US-based producers. My suppliers started raising their prices in January due to 'expected tariffs,' and they're still rising. What cost me $3 a year ago now costs me $6.50. This is unsustainable for businesses and customers." And finally, "My partner and I were in the process of purchasing an apartment here in Spain (he is Spanish, I am American) when the bank rescinded our mortgage offer due to 'economic uncertainty in the global market caused by Trump's changing policies.' Even abroad, we can't escape the effects of all this." —Anonymous, 36, Spain Have you been charged a tariff fee or noticed prices going up on imported goods? Tell us all about it in the comments or via this anonymous form:
