logo
Romania could be next to elect a right-wing populist: What to know

Romania could be next to elect a right-wing populist: What to know

Washington Post18-05-2025

BUCHAREST, Romania — It might be Romania's most consequential election since the fall of communism, when the dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu and his wife were shot by a firing squad. Romania today is a volatile, highly polarized country; its social media wild, its online political space riddled with antisemitism, gay-baiting and conspiracy theories.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Claims Ukraine Gave Putin A Reason To 'Bomb The Hell Out Of Them' – Forgetting 1 Obvious Detail
Trump Claims Ukraine Gave Putin A Reason To 'Bomb The Hell Out Of Them' – Forgetting 1 Obvious Detail

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Claims Ukraine Gave Putin A Reason To 'Bomb The Hell Out Of Them' – Forgetting 1 Obvious Detail

Donald Trump has claimed Ukraine gave Vladimir Putin 'a reason to go in and bomb the hell' out of the beleaguered country this week. After enduring more than three years of Russian bombings, an invasion and the occupation of 18% of its territory, Ukraine managed to strike deep within its opponents' land last weekend. Known as Operation Spiderweb, Kyiv used drones to target Russian air bases in a game-changing moment for the war, damaging 41 planes in total. Putin then retaliated by launching a mass missile and drone attack against Ukraine overnight on June 6. According to Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, 80 people were injured and four killed, including first responders. The US president appeared to justify that deadly Russian strike when speaking to reporters on Air Force One on Friday, clearly overlooking that Putin starting the war in February 2022 by invading the country. He said: 'They [Ukraine] gave Putin a reason to go in and bomb the hell out of them last night. 'That's the thing I don't like about it. When I saw it I said, 'here we go, now it's going to be a strike'.' Putin had confirmed that Russia intended to enact revenge on Ukraine during a phone call with Trump earlier this week. The US president also said on June 5 that he knew Russia's response was 'not going to be pretty', adding: 'I don't like it, I said, don't do it, you shouldn't do it, you should stop it.' Since being re-elected and returning to office in January, Trump has repeatedly tried to broker a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia – even if it means resolving the war on Putin's terms, and forcing Ukraine to cede its occupied land. But, despite the president's repeated attempts to push the two sides into a truce, he is yet to impose any further sanctions on Moscow. Trump said on Friday that there was a deadline whereby he expected Russia to have agreed to a ceasefire or face sanctions from the US – but noted that it was 'in my brain' and offered no further specifics. He has previously said that he thinks a peace deal could be in reach and he does not want to 'screw it up' by putting sanctions on Russia. Trump also suggested he had shielded Putin from the worst consequences of his invasion last month. He wrote on Truth Social: 'What Vladimir Putin doesn't realise is that if it weren't for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean really bad. He's playing with fire.' According to Reuters news agency, the US also believes that Putin has not completed his retaliatory strikes yet – but the next phase could come within days. Trump: Musk Faces 'Serious Consequences' If He Backs Dems Over Budget Bill JD Vance Tells Theo Von That Musk Made A 'Huge Mistake' Going After Trump Zelenskyy Rejects Trump's 'Children Fighting' Analogy And Says Putin Is A 'Murderer'

Russians can't accept that people continue to live and work in Kharkiv
Russians can't accept that people continue to live and work in Kharkiv

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Russians can't accept that people continue to live and work in Kharkiv

Oleh Syniehubov, Head of Kharkiv Oblast Military Administration, offered his thoughts on the reason behind the large-scale Russian attacks on Kharkiv on 7 June. Source: Syniehubov in a comment to Suspilne Quote: "Russian forces cannot accept defeats on the battlefield and increasingly commit acts of terror against our local population. They also target businesses, unable to accept that people continue to live and work in Kharkiv. The energy sector is the primary target, but our Armed Forces are actively countering these efforts." Background: On the night of 6-7 June 2025, Russian forces launched a large-scale attack on Kharkiv using kamikaze drones, guided bombs and missiles, killing three people and injuring 22, including a one-and-a-half-month-old baby. At around 17:35, Russia attacked the Shevchenkivskyi and Kyivskyi districts of Kharkiv with four guided aerial bombs, killing a 30-year-old Ukrzaliznytsia (Ukrainian Railways) employee. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reported that over 40 people were wounded in the attacks. One of the wounded from the 7 June guided aerial bomb strike later died in hospital, bringing the death toll to four, with two others in critical condition. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

Trump rewarding loyalists with pardon spree
Trump rewarding loyalists with pardon spree

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump rewarding loyalists with pardon spree

Reality TV stars. Former lawmakers. A sheriff. A nursing home executive. A drug kingpin. What do they have in common? They are among the Americans convicted of crimes who have received pardons from President Donald Trump since he took office in January. And while US presidents have doled out questionable pardons in the past, Trump is doing so "in a bigger, more aggressive way with sort of no sense of shame," said Kermit Roosevelt, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania. "The pardon power has always been a little bit problematic because it's this completely unconstrained power that the president has," Roosevelt told AFP. "Most presidents have issued at least some pardons where people look at them and they say: 'This seems to be self-serving' or 'This seems to be corrupt in some way.'" But Trump is doling out pardons "that look like they're almost quid pro quo for financial donations," Roosevelt said. Among those receiving a pardon was Paul Walczak, a nursing home executive convicted of tax crimes and whose mother attended a $1-million-per-plate fund-raising dinner at Trump's Mar-a-Lago home in April. Other beneficiaries of Trump pardons include reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley, who were serving lengthy prison sentences for bank fraud and tax evasion. Their daughter, Savannah, is a prominent Trump supporter and gave a speech at last year's Republican National Convention. More than half a dozen former Republican lawmakers convicted of various crimes have also received pardons along with a Virginia sheriff sentenced to 10 years in prison for taking $75,000 in bribes. On his first day in office, Trump pardoned more than 1,500 supporters who stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 as they sought to prevent congressional certification of Democrat Joe Biden's 2020 election victory. The next day, Trump pardoned Ross Ulbricht, who had been serving a life sentence for running the "Silk Road" online marketplace that facilitated millions of dollars of drug sales. - 'Just another deal' - Barbara McQuade, a former prosecutor who now teaches law at the University of Michigan, said Trump is not the first president to be accused of "allowing improper factors to influence their pardon decisions." Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton's pardon of a commodities trader whose wife was a major Democratic donor and Biden's pardon of his son, Hunter, and other family members all drew some criticism. "(But) Trump is in a class by himself in both scope and shamelessness," McQuade said in a Bloomberg opinion column. "To him, pardons are just another deal. "As long as a defendant can provide something of value in return, no crime seems too serious," she said. Democratic lawmaker Jamie Raskin, in a letter to Ed Martin, Trump's pardon attorney at the Justice Department, asked what criteria are being used to recommend pardons. "It at least appears that you are using the Office of the Pardon Attorney to dole out pardons as favors to the President's loyal political followers and most generous donors," Raskin wrote. Martin for his part has made no secret of the partisan nature of the pardons recommended by his office. "No MAGA left behind," Martin said on X after the pardon of the bribe-taking Virginia sheriff, a reference to Trump's "Make America Great Again" slogan. Lee Kovarsky, a University of Texas law professor, said Trump's "pardon spree" opens up a "menacing new frontier of presidential power" that he calls "patronage pardoning." By reducing the penalty for misconduct, Trump is making a "public commitment to protect and reward loyalism, however criminal," Kovarsky said in a New York Times opinion piece. sst/cl/nl/tc

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store