logo
Shiny façade with little substance: Reflections from the Fullerton Rally

Shiny façade with little substance: Reflections from the Fullerton Rally

by Kairen
Having missed out on the pomp and circumstances normally associated with elections in GE2020, I decided to go attend the PAP's signature Fullerton Rally even as it broke through my lunch break. Luckily for me, my workplace was not 20 minutes away by bus to UOB Plaza.
As speeches came and gone, I went closer and ever closer to the podium for increasingly better pictures. But in those moments where I had to bide my time within the hot sun and listen to them speak, it confused me slightly.
On the one hand, they played to their strengths. Their past legacy of building Singapore. Assurances to the future that they'll build with Singaporeans still in mind. Nothing out of the usual. In fact, it would be more shocking if they didn't play to their technocratic strengths. Those segments I could immediately grasp, I agreed with them.
The other half, however… Confused me greatly. They essentially said that they would be welcome to alternative voices within Parliament… So long as it wasn't the Opposition vying for their seats. Does that mean that they'll get rid of the Party Whip system and allow for internal ideological division? Or are they just throwing insults until something sticks?
At some point, though, I had to leave halfway. After all, it WAS during my lunch break. But it was somehow harder to get out than in. So many people poured in that I had to move snake-like. Eventually, through these monumental crowds and slight peer pressure, I found myself in the Szechuan restaurant on UOB Plaza's 60th floor.
I could've easily gathered my thoughts to go somewhere else, but I rationalised to stay and order as time was scarce. 15 minutes of half-masked anxiety later… I got myself a bowl of Dandan noodles that was less wide than the palm of my hand. It only had one piece of green mustard and a spoonful of minced meat. And the gravy didn't even numb my tongue once.
I had zero illusions that it would be cheap, given the ambience surrounding my paltry meal… But the bill gave me a small aneurysm. $19 ! AND THEY CHARGED ME FOR THE PEANUTS AND PICKLES THAT YOU'D ASSUME WOULD BE FREE IN A PLACE LIKE THAT. One wonders if the restaurant would've also charged me for the tea as well.
As I slowly found my way back to the office and recollected my thoughts, I realized that my lunch itself could be an apt summary of the PAP in 2025.
An organisation with a shiny, grandiose facade. One that is apparently highly rated by other customers. Even goes the extra mile for a good presentation. But ultimately under-delivers even as you pay more for what you normally would get for something considerably basic.
Not unlike that restaurant perched so high up in the clouds, I hope one day it gets changed or replaced with something for the better. They both kept me fed… But just about barely. Unless you consider what you've received to be 'well nourishing'.
So when you go to that ballot box on the 3rd, please choose carefully to make your vote truly money worth. Or else we might have to endure more expensive 'lessons' in the future.
I hope one day we get changes or replacements with something better.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts
Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts

Straits Times

time13 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts

This is the second time that The Online Citizen has been slapped with the declaration, with its first due to expire in July 2025. PHOTO: THE ONLINE CITIZEN/FACEBOOK Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts SINGAPORE – The people running The Online Citizen's (TOC) website, Facebook, Instagram, and X pages will continue to be barred from deriving any financial benefits from the running of its platforms till 2027. In a statement on June 11 , the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) said TOC's website and social media pages – which were labelled as Declared Online Locations (DOLs) – had first been declared as such in July 2023, and were due to expire on July 21, 2025. DOLs have to comply with actions under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma) that would prevent their operator from financially benefiting during the period they are listed as one. However, said MDDI, TOC 'continued to communicate falsehoods through its online platforms over the past two years'. Between July 2023 and June 2025 , it received eigh t correction directions under the fake news law . These included one in Feb 25, after TOC published an article about modification works at the Ridout Road colonial bungalow leased by Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam's wife. In its article, it said the Singapore Land Authorit y had given Mr Shanmugam assurances of a lease extension beyond its 2027 expiry, and that public funds were used to pay for the earthworks carried out at the bungalow since 2024, among other claims. These are falsehoods, said MDDI. As a result, TOC's website and social media pages have again been labelled DOLs, a move necessary 'to ensure Singaporeans continue to be alerted to TOC's record of communicating falsehoods', said the ministry. The new declaration comes into effect immediately after the current direction expires and will remain till July 21, 2027 at 12p m. TOC will be able to continue its operations, but will have to carry a notice on its online platforms to notify its audience that it has been declared a DOL. The notice will also have to state that it had 'communicated multiple falsehoods' and that its viewers should exercise caution when accessing it for information. MDDI added that service providers, including digital advertising agencies, will have to take steps to ensure that their paid content on TOC's platforms are not made available in Singapore. 'Individuals and companies must also not provide financial support to TOC's DOLs to avoid promoting the communication of falsehoods in Singapore on these platforms,' it added. At present, there are three other outlets currently listed as DOLs. They are Transformative Justice Collective's website and social media pages, Gutzy Asia's website and social media pages, as well as opposition politician Kenneth Jeyaretnam's website and social media pages. A provision under Pofma allows the Government to order an internet intermediary to disable access to a DOL if the owner of the DOL does not comply with the declaration and paid content on the site continues to be displayed to users here. If an internet intermediary fails to comply and is convicted, it can be fined up to $20,000 for each day that the government order is not fully complied with, up to a total o f $500,000 . The owner or operator of a DOL can however apply to the Minister for Digital Development and Information to suspend, vary, or cancel the declaration. If the minister refuses the application, an appeal can be made to the High Court. Aqil Hamzah is a journalist covering breaking news at The Straits Times, with interests in crime and technology. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?
Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?

Straits Times

time2 days ago

  • Straits Times

Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?

I was heartened to learn that our Government is extending support to the 151 Singaporean students at Harvard (S'porean undergrads at Harvard can continue studies in universities here, June 6). I am sure the Government will similarly extend support to Singaporean students at other elite US universities if the situation deteriorates there. I sympathise with the Singaporeans studying at Harvard, but I wonder if the message is that our local universities do in fact have the capacity to take in more local students. Or is it that our local universities will reduce the number of places available to local students, to accommodate the returning US students? Many local students do not have the financial resources to seek an overseas education, and universities at home are their only option. But due to limited capacity, not every eligible applicant is accepted. So, I was surprised to learn that local universities are able to accommodate the affected Singapore students at Harvard. Wouldn't this be at the expense of eligible local applicants? Finally, these Ivy League students no doubt have the ability and resources to study in the US. They took the decision to study abroad willingly. In the face of adversity, is our Government expected to offer a safety net back home? What about a safety net for local students? Roy Tan Choon Kang More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store