Malaysia calls for Myanmar truce extension, pushes for peace deal
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia called on Sunday (May 25) for the extension and expansion of a post-earthquake ceasefire in Myanmar, as it ramped up calls for the long-awaited implementation of a five-point peace plan.
The ruling military junta initially declared a truce in the many-sided civil war after a huge quake in late March killed nearly 3,800 and left tens of thousands homeless.
That agreement, which has been extended before, is due to expire at the end of May – though conflict monitors say fighting and junta airstrikes have continued throughout.
At a meeting of regional foreign ministers on Sunday, Malaysia's Mohamad Hasan "proposed the extension and expansion of ceasefires beyond the currently affected zones", a statement said.
"We call on the stakeholders in Myanmar to cease hostilities, and to extend and expand the ceasefire, to facilitate the long and difficult path towards recovery, and ease the suffering of the people of Myanmar," Mohamad said in his opening remarks.
The United Nations and independent conflict monitors say the junta has continued its campaign of aerial bombardment despite the ceasefire.
Numerous anti-coup and ethnic armed groups have made their own pledges to pause hostilities.
However some residents in eastern Myanmar said they have been displaced as anti-coup forces besieged junta-held towns.
More than 6,600 people have been killed since the coup, according to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, and millions displaced.
"MYANMAR MUST COMPLY"
Malaysia currently holds the rotating chairmanship of the 10-country Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), with leaders due to meet at a summit in Kuala Lumpur on Monday.
The bloc has led so far fruitless diplomatic efforts to end Myanmar's conflict since the junta staged a coup deposing civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi in February 2021.
ASEAN has struggled to implement the five-point peace plan agreed by all bloc leaders in April 2021.
As a result junta officials have been barred from ASEAN summits over lack of progress on the deal.
"One thing for sure that we agreed is that Myanmar's government ... must comply with the five points consensus which they themselves agreed on as one of the signatories," Mohamad said later on Sunday.
He stressed two of the most important points were an immediate halt to hostilities, and the appointment of a special envoy to visit Myanmar's capital Naypyidaw.
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim met Myanmar's junta leader Min Aung Hlaing in Bangkok in April and urged him to respect the truce.
That followed an earlier visit by Mohamad and Thai counterpart Maris Sangiampongsa to Naypyidaw as part of ASEAN's efforts to assess humanitarian needs and aid delivery to those affected by the earthquake.
Mohamad told reporters Sunday he would visit Naypyidaw in an ASEAN capacity in June.
"We have to explore (the issue) with patience because the warring sections have been against each other for decades," Mohamad said.
Myanmar's junta has announced plans to hold an election around the end of the year.
But the opposition has urged the public and political parties to boycott any poll organised by the military government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
4 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
‘No NS, no plans to settle but still gets BTO?' — Singaporean questions HDB rules for new citizens
SINGAPORE: After learning that a Malaysian couple — one of whom recently became a Singapore citizen — is applying for a Build-To-Order (BTO) flat despite having no plans to settle here long-term, a local took to social media to question whether public housing policies are really fair. Posting on the r/askSingapore subreddit on Tuesday (June 10), he explained that both individuals were born in Malaysia. The male partner recently became a Singaporean citizen prior to the recent election, while the female partner remains a permanent resident. According to the post, the couple had openly shared with others that they are not planning to live in Singapore permanently. Instead, they see the BTO flat primarily as an investment opportunity or a contingency plan. This prompted the man to question whether the current public housing system adequately serves citizens who have long-standing ties to the country and who plan to build their future here. What particularly concerned him was the fact that the male partner did not serve National Service (NS), as he became a citizen in adulthood. 'The man didn't serve national service because he became a citizen as an adult. Yet, by simply converting, he now has access to heavily subsidised public housing — and the PR partner gets to ride on that privilege too,' he wrote. The local argued that cases like this highlight several policy gaps. Currently, there is no minimum citizenship duration required before a new Singaporean can apply for a BTO flat with a PR spouse. There is also no requirement for adult male new citizens to contribute in lieu of NS, and no checks on whether applicants intend to stay in Singapore for the long term. He admitted that this felt unfair for many Singaporeans, saying, 'Those who've served NS, paid taxes all their lives, and genuinely plan to raise families here—are still waiting years for a BTO or are priced out of the resale market.' 'I'm not against immigration or new citizens — but access to subsidised public housing should reflect commitment, sacrifice, and intent to settle, not just a passport conversion. There's a growing sense that some are exploiting the system while true-blue citizens are left behind.' Looking for perspective, he asked others in the online community, 'What are your thoughts on new citizens purchasing HDBs?' 'It's not just new citizens…' In the comments, one Singaporean Redditor responded, 'LOL What to do? Despite the disadvantage and odds stacked against true-blue Sinkies, 65% preferred and continued with the status quo.' Another commented, 'You are new? This has been happening for 10 to 20 years.' A third remarked, 'If the screening to allow someone to be a new citizen was done correctly, then none of these problems would happen. The main issue is that citizenship anyhow given out for mainly economic and demographic reasons.' Some Redditors, however, did not take issue with the couple's strategy. One user even commended it, saying, 'This is a good strategy. He can rent out the HDB, and she can buy a landed property in JB. The rental money allows them to retire earlier in JB.' Another pointed out that it's not just Malaysians who do this, but locals as well: 'Honestly, it's not just new citizens. I have neighbours who are Singaporeans but rented out their units to non-Singaporeans while they lived with their parents. I have colleagues who do this even before the 5-year MOP is up, too. Somehow, it's easier to pick on others than to realise and accept that there are a lot of Singaporeans who do things like that too. We just choose to turn a blind eye to it.' In other news, a young Singaporean who only recently started working took to Reddit to ask if it was unreasonable for him to refuse to contribute to his retired parents' car expenses. Posting anonymously on the r/SingaporeRaw forum, the user shared his confusion and frustration after his parents asked him and his sister to evenly split the cost of the Certificate of Entitlement (COE) for the family car. 'The thing is, both my sis and I don't have driving licenses yet, plus I believe that a car is a luxury item in Singapore,' he said. Read more: 'Why should I pay for a car I won't use?' — Singaporean upset after parents ask him to pay for family car's COE Featured image by freepik (for illustration purposes only)
CNA
8 hours ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - Is it time to rethink lowering Singapore's voting age to 18?
CNA938 Rewind Over the past few years, there have been calls from some quarters to lower Singapore's voting age to 18. What are the factors to consider in deciding to lower the voting age, and the pros and cons of doing so? Andrea Heng and Hairianto Diman speak with Dr Elvin Ong, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, NUS, to find out more.
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
‘Big game-changer': Can ASEAN's next-gen trade pact with China deliver on its promise?
The recently concluded negotiations for the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA) 3.0 upgrade - slated for signing in October 2025 - could be a game changer for businesses like his, said observers, citing how the updated agreement will focus on the digital and green economies, as well as supply chain cooperation. 'ACFTA 3.0 will modernise the agreement and open new doors in the digital economy, green economy and supply chain connectivity. It will redefine ASEAN-China economic relations through innovation and competitiveness,' said ASEAN Secretary-General Kao Kim Hourn, speaking at a conference held in Huangshan, China earlier in June. Analysts also said the agreement lands at a timely but delicate moment - as Southeast Asia grapples with both a retreat by the US from global trade and the ripple effects of China's export glut. Who stands to gain most from the upgraded deal? Much will depend on the fine print - and businesses across the region are watching closely to see whether it can live up to expectations after two years and nine rounds of negotiations. ACFTA 3.0: WHAT'S NEW - AND WHY NOW? First signed in 2002, ACFTA was China's first free trade agreement and ASEAN's first with a major external partner. For Singapore alone, the deal eliminated tariffs on nearly 95 per cent of exports to China, while expanding market access. The latest provisions under ACFTA 3.0 will cover new and enhanced regulations in areas like supply chain connectivity, competition and consumer protection. 'This is a much needed upgrade,' said Priyanka Kishore, founder and principal economist at Asia Decoded, a macro-consultancy providing advisory services to policymakers. '(Policymakers) have taken into account pandemic disruptions, which I think is very important and there's a focus on strengthening supply chain resilience in critical and essential goods,' Kishore added. 'These agreements are not just about lowering tariffs - they are about building long-term resilience, enhancing economic integration and enabling our businesses to thrive in a rapidly evolving global environment,' Kao said. Analysts also pointed to stronger commitments in emerging areas like the digital and green economies as ASEAN nations work towards sustainability goals. 'Areas like solar panels and batteries,' said senior analyst Lee Chi Him from the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 'Indonesia's solar projects tend to have (a lot of) local requirements so for Chinese exporters, there will be limits in terms of what they can do in that market,' he said, adding that it will be interesting to see whether such non-tariff barriers are addressed. Lucas Myers, a research affiliate at George Washington University's Sigur Center for Asian Studies, noted that the new ACFTA provisions will carry both economic and geopolitical implications for China and its trade partners across Southeast Asia, especially as the US distances itself from regional trade frameworks. 'With an absent US uninterested in free trade, China believes it can position itself as the defender of regional multilateralism and the existing trading system,' Myers told CNA, adding that ACFTA 3.0 will deepen China-ASEAN relations, 'handing Beijing more leverage'. 'In doing so, China can weaken US' influence (in Southeast Asia) and ensure that it usurps the role traditionally played by Washington.' Others agreed that the pact sends a strong geopolitical message - but have also urged caution. 'It's coming at a tricky but opportune time (for overseas markets) looking to de-risk slowly from the US,' said Kishore. She noted that the upgraded pact 'comes at the right time' to strengthen the region's integrated push - but added that Southeast Asia will also need to tread carefully in managing concerns over Chinese industrial overcapacity spilling into the region. '(ASEAN member states) are aware that there is a challenge to the local industries from Chinese goods that are coming in,' said Kishore. UNEVEN GAINS: WHO BENEFITS MORE? If ACFTA 3.0 is a bridge to the 'economy of the future', as several analysts described it, then not all ASEAN countries are starting from the same bank. Some, like Vietnam and Thailand, are poised to gain early. 'Vietnam and Thailand are increasingly destinations for Chinese companies to invest in manufacturing, and this deal's supply chain provisions will only boost their attractiveness for Chinese investors looking to offshore,' said Myers. There will be 'a real opportunity for Singapore and Malaysia' to deepen their roles as hubs in the regional digital economy, Myers added. Singapore, Kishore noted, has been 'one of the fastest growing areas (in the region) in terms of its digital economy'. 'It has one of the fastest growing exports of digitally deliverable services in the world and China is one of its key partners, a lot of FinTech exports happen between Singapore and China so it's definitely an important area.' EIU's Lee said Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand have 'been benefiting a lot from trade with China already'. 'In this context, they will benefit from the economic integration in terms of ease, trade, as well as better protection for investments and investors'. Kishore also warned of a long-term risk for Thailand. The kingdom's manufacturing prowess - spanning steel mills, cable factories and EV component plants, has made it a focal point for Chinese green-economy investments, even as the nation imposes anti-dumping duties on steel to protect local producers. 'The risk, which is actually playing out in Thailand (now), is Chinese investments come in … help develop the green economy, but knowledge transfers do not happen,' she said. 'So it ends up being dominated by Chinese manufacturers in these New Age industries but you don't build domestic capabilities.' Myers signalled the risks to ASEAN's companies and industries 'if Chinese firms come to dominate and crowd out smaller Southeast Asian businesses'. 'There are also worrying signs that the deal's primary beneficiaries will be large Chinese firms that are already dominant in 3.0's target sectors, like electric vehicles (BYD) and digital infrastructure (Huawei),' said Myers. Smaller and less-developed economies like Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar, would not stand to gain as much, Lee, the senior analyst from EIU said. 'They are at very early stages in terms of development and do not necessarily have very sophisticated exports that can go to China.' But on the other hand, technology transfer, technical cooperation and assistance could prove very beneficial for those countries, Lee added. 'We also know that the Philippines does not have the best relations with China, and in terms of the economy, (its goods and products) do not necessarily gravitate towards areas Chinese consumers are particularly interested in.' 'As it currently stands, the Philippines may not benefit a lot from ACFTA 3.0.' Since the ACFTA's implementation in 2010, data shows that trade between China and ASEAN has more than tripled, to US$696.7 billion in 2023 from US$235.5 billion. In the first four months of 2025, bilateral trade totalled 2.38 trillion yuan (approximately US$330.86 billion), reflecting a 9.2 per cent increase compared to the same period last year, according to data from China's General Administration of Customs. However, while China's share of ASEAN trade jumped from 12 per cent in 2010 to around 20 per cent by 2023, ASEAN's imports from China have surged far faster than its exports there, widening the bloc's trade deficit to over US$190 billion. 'China's market and capital are so disproportionately powerful that individual countries and their firms find it difficult to compete in a bilateral setting,' Myers said. 'And there are concerns that ACFTA 3.0 will enable China to deepen this imbalance in its favor over time.' ON THE GROUND: HOW SMES STAND TO GAIN Micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) make up the backbone of ASEAN's economy, but challenges on the ground still remain, especially for smaller firms and start-ups struggling to navigate complex regulatory environments. 'Simplified streamlined processes and stronger grassroots implementation' will be critical going forward, ASEAN Secretary-General Kao said. 'Breaking that initial barrier of awareness and simplifying the process is really key,' said Lee, the Singaporean entrepreneur who also serves on an official MSME committee at the Singapore Business Federation. 'Practical, industry-specific support from government or trade bodies is something that is very crucial,' Lee added. 'And if paperwork seems too daunting, you wouldn't want to incur any associated costs (and) you'll just miss out on the advantages.' Yang Juejun knows the challenges of navigating complex regulations all too well. The company she works at, Suzhou Mega Plastics - which exports specialised medical and industrial cable polymers to countries like Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia - has had to deal with regulatory hurdles across the region. Southeast Asia is one of the company's largest overseas markets by export volume, accounting for 40 to 50 per cent of its total export trade. 'One of the primary difficulties we face is product certification,' Yang, the company's board secretary, told CNA. 'Markets like Thailand and Vietnam enforce their own certification systems and we must undergo a separate domestic certification process, which adds both cost and time,' she said. Logistics and warehousing pose additional challenges. 'Establishing local warehousing facilities would involve substantial investment and operational complexity on our part,' Yang said. 'For these reasons, we are hopeful that the ACFTA 3.0 provisions will include policy support for companies with growing trade volumes in Southeast Asia.' 'We are expecting major green-energy investment projects in Southeast Asia to help sustain our downstream volumes and drive greater demand across the region,' she said. If ACFTA 3.0 aims to redefine the region's trade future, analysts believe what counts as success will vary - and so will the time needed to see it. Kishore of Asia Decoded emphasised that integration in new sectors must be matched by real outcomes. 'I would definitely look at how the digital economy integration has progressed between the two regions,' she said. Services trade offers one of the clearest benchmarks. 'We (ASEAN) do run a surplus with China on services,' she said, noting that opportunities may grow as ACFTA 3.0 streamlines digital rules. 'That's where the advantages could emerge - that we get more digital access to Chinese markets, but it's tricky for sure.' 'ACFTA 3.0 feels quite different,' said Lee, who feels that change could be 'truly transformative, really empowering businesses on the ground'. The real test of ACFTA 3.0 will be whether it enables more small businesses to act regionally from day one. 'Success would be measured by the number of MSMEs actively trading regionally, not just the total trade value dominated by large corporations,' he said. 'It's really seeing young entrepreneurs confidently looking at the entire region as the whole market from day one - because (they know) the systems truly support them.'
