
When is a person considered missing? And time it takes to be presumed dead
It can be hard to know what to do when someone goes missing but here's a simple guide to understanding the different types of missing people and what happens when someone is never found
Every year, around 17,000 people go missing in the UK. But what is a missing person? Who counts as a voluntary missing person, and what does it mean to be an endangered missing person? Knowing when a missing person is considered missing to police and when a missing person can be declared dead can help families understand the process better.
In March, The Mirror teamed up with the charity Missing People to launch the Missed campaign, raising awareness of every publicly-listed missing person in the UK, no matter their story.
Understanding the police search process and the meaning behind the jargon can improve the chances of finding someone. Here are some answers to these important and difficult questions about missing people.
What is a missing person?
The police's exact definition of a missing person is as follows: "Anyone whose whereabouts cannot be established will be considered as missing until located and their wellbeing or otherwise confirmed. This means that if you are expected to be at home and aren't there, or haven't arrived at somewhere you're supposed to be, you may be reported missing."
If a missing person has been reported to the police, an appeal to the public to help find them may go out in the form of social media posts and other means of publicity. When Missing People charity - the only UK charity dedicated to supporting missing children, adults and their loved ones - is informed, they will also put out their own appeal which may include posters.
What is a voluntary missing person?
Anyone over the age of 18 who chooses to leave home without telling anyone and is safe and well, is called a voluntary missing person. If they're not in danger, not a victim of crime, and not a risk to themselves or others, the police will leave them alone according to Missing People charity. But if they're covered by a law such as the Mental Health Act, or are at serious risk of harm, the police must step in and take them somewhere safe.
DEMAND ACTION FOR MISSING PEOPLE
Too many missing people are falling through the cracks - harmed while away, and ignored when they return.
We need a proper government strategy led by the Home Office, Education, and Health departments to stop this crisis.
Right now, there's no real support. People go missing again and again - yet no one's asking why.
We're calling for:
A new national strategy for missing children and adults
Proper support for missing people when they return
Investment to stop people going missing in the first place
At 10,000 signatures, the government has to respond. At 100,000, it will be debated in Parliament. That's our goal - real action.
What does "endangered missing person" mean?
When police assess a missing person, they decide if the person is in danger. A missing person might be at risk of harm because they are vulnerable - for example, they can't cope with the weather, may have been abducted by someone, or could face other serious risks over time.
Police may also concentrate efforts on people who are considered to be at risk due to diminished mental capacity, physical disability or illness, or when circumstances are suspicious.
When is a person considered missing?
A person is considered missing as soon as no one knows where they are and no one can confirm they're safe. They stay classed as missing until they're found or it's confirmed they're okay.
When is a missing person presumed dead?
If someone has been missing for seven years and there's no sign they're alive, the law allows the court to presume they are dead. This is called the "seven year rule." However, in some cases, things can be dealt with before or after seven years. The seven year mark is important in marriage and civil partnerships - after this time, the court can legally end the partnership and declare the person dead, as long as there's no evidence they're still alive.
Even with this declaration, it doesn't give others the right to manage the missing person's money or property. Seven years also matters when applying to deal with their estate (called a grant of probate). Until seven years have passed, the law usually assumes the person is still alive.
After seven years, a court might allow a missing person's affairs to be handled if people who would know about them haven't heard from them and if plenty of efforts have been made to find them. But if there's proof the person was alive during those seven years, the court won't say they're dead just because of the time.
There are also important exceptions. Families of people who went missing in dangerous situations such as at sea, in a disaster, or a terrorist attack, can ask the court to deal with their affairs much sooner than seven years.
When can a missing person be declared dead?
The family or anyone else concerned with the missing person, must ask the court to officially declare a missing person is dead. This is usually needed to start handling the missing person's money and belongings. The court will only agree if it is satisfied that enough has been done to try to find the missing person, including checking with the police.
But getting permission to handle the estate (called a grant of probate) is not the same as the court officially saying the person is dead, and it doesn't automatically affect other legal matters such as ending a marriage.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Migrant machete attacker allowed to stay in Britain
A machete attacker jailed for four years has avoided deportation because of European Union rules. Daniel Koopmann, 24, a German citizen, claimed to have arrived in the UK in 2014 and was granted indefinite leave to remain in 2020 before Brexit. However, in July 2020 he slashed his victim across the forearms in a machete attack. Then, after his arrest, he intimidated his victim over Snapchat and Facebook in an attempt to get the case dropped. The Home Office sought to deport him once he was jailed but he successfully appealed to an upper tribunal which ruled his case should be re-heard because a lower court had failed to take sufficient account of immigration rules for EU citizens. Another, lower court will now have to reconsider his case. The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph in which illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have been able to remain in the UK or halt their deportations. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has announced plans to curb judges' powers to block deportations with new legally-enforced 'common sense' rules to clarify how judges interpret human rights laws and strengthen the public interest test. Koopmann was 19 at the time of the attack when he and another unidentified attacker ambushed their victim as he walked outside a primary school in Northampton at night. While the other attacker held the victim from behind, Koopman swung a machete at him once and cut him across both forearms. In the days that followed, Koopman began a campaign of threatening social media posts in a bid to scare his victim into keeping quiet. They included videos of driving past his address with the caption 'talk get stitches'. Another read: 'Cool your snitching I'm back out now – you better drop the case you silly boy.' In sentencing, His Honour Judge Rupert Mayo told Koopman: 'These threats posted on social media get around instantly. These threats are even more sinister when they are shared and seen by hundreds of your contacts. A custodial sentence is inevitable.' 'Genuine, present' threat Koopmann initially appealed his deportation to a lower immigration tribunal which rejected his claim, saying his conduct represented 'a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society.' The judge had stated: 'He has shown a disregard for the law and he still fails to acknowledge his own criminality.' However, an upper tribunal has found the judge erred in law and ordered a fresh hearing. It was claimed the previous judge had failed to conduct an assessment of the proportionality of his expulsion as required by European citizen immigration regulations. Gang member not deported over EU rules It follows a similar case where a migrant gang member convicted of manslaughter after the murder of an 18-year-old could not be deported because of EU rules. William George, 28, a semi-professional footballer, was a member of a gang of 10 men convicted of killing Abdul Hafidah, 18, in front of rush hour commuters in Manchester in May 2016. George, a Belgian who moved to Britain with his parents at the age of eight, was jailed for 12 years for manslaughter for his part in the assault. In 2018 he was served with deportation papers, which said he had a 'real risk' of reoffending. Home Office officials lost a six-year legal battle to remove George from the UK, despite him being associated with Manchester's notorious AO gang. Under Brussels directives, which applied until Brexit, EU nationals who lived in Britain for an extended time could only be deported 'on imperative grounds of public security'.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Musk bombshell fears grow for Prince Andrew after Trump feud Epstein 'bomb'
Fears are growing over Elon Musk's next possible move after he claimed Trump was named in the Epstein files - There is no suggestion Trump knew of any crimes or participated in any criminal behaviour Donald Trump declared open war on Elon Musk, branding the billionaire "a man who's lost his mind". The outburst came less than 24 hours after the world's richest man claimed the US leader's name appears in the FBI's Jeffrey Epstein files, adding it was the reason they had not been made public. Any hopes of reconciliation between the two former allies were obliterated today after Musk hinted at a truce, only for Trump to respond with full-scale personal attacks. "I'm not even thinking about Elon," the president said. "He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem. I won't be speaking to him for a while, I guess, but I wish him well." When asked if he would accept Musk's call, Trump shot back, "You mean the man who has lost his mind?" The explosion follows Musk's nuclear accusation he posted directly to his own platform, X, on Thursday, that the US leader is named in the secret Epstein files. "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files," Musk wrote. "That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" The claim sent shockwaves through Washington and plunged the White House into emergency crisis mode. There is no suggestion Donald Trump knew of any crimes or participated in any criminal behaviour. Today, fears emerged that Musk could publicly name Prince Andrew, who has vehemently and repeatedly denied any wrongdoing during his friendship with Epstein, as one of the powerful men identified in the files, dragging him once more into the spotlight regarding his friendship with the disgraced financier. The Mirror has learnt Musk has been privately telling associates he has "direct knowledge" of the classified Epstein evidence from his four months working in the White House. He claims that "dozens of powerful men" are named, including the Duke of York, who was pictured with his late pal on numerous occasions. There is no suggestion Prince Andrew knew of any crimes or participated in any criminal behaviour. During their friendship, Andrew was a guest of Epstein at his home throughout the States, while the royal hosted Epstein at the royal palaces. The Duke also flew on the American's private jet, according to court-released flight logs. Insiders say Epstein's entire inner circle - from Mar-a-Lago to Manhattan - is now in full-blown panic. "If Elon's willing to drop Trump, no one is safe, not even royalty," said one senior Washington DC source. "While he had close ties to the Trump administration, Musk had eyes and ears everywhere. He knows exactly who was connected to Epstein and how deep it goes. No one could do more damage to Trump world than Elon right now, and the President's aides know it." Musk's erratic behaviour, amid reports of heavy ketamine and drug use, has made him a volatile and unpredictable threat. Another insider warned: "You've got the world's richest man with access to explosive material, a platform to drop it on 185 million people, and if the allegations are true, whose mind is not always thinking clearly. That's not just dangerous. It's a nightmare." The Trump administration is reportedly watching Musk "like a hawk," with some MAGA allies trying to broker a peace deal to stop Musk from making more incendiary claims about his former boss. "If that means Elon throws other people under the bus and not him, then Trump will be all for it," added the source. In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi released a heavily redacted tranche of Epstein files, including partial flight logs and blurred-out names. She has since released a small amount of papers that the FBI has handed over, though thousands more still remain unreleased. A former national security aide added: "If Musk dumps what he knows, it won't just shake politics. It'll shatter the global elite." Tensions between Trump and his former 'First Buddy' Musk, are so high that the president is now moving to sever every remaining tie with the man who bankrolled his return to the White House. He's ditching the Tesla he bought in a very public show of support. In March, Trump paid full price for a red Tesla, telling aides he wanted to "support Elon" amid a wave of anti-Tesla protests and attacks across America. The vehicle is currently parked at the White House and is intended for staff use. Now, a senior official confirmed to The Mirror that Trump plans to sell it or give it away. "He doesn't want anything to do with Musk," the official said. "Not even the car." The fallout is deeply personal. Last year, Musk pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into Trump's re-election. He restored his X account and helped engineer the property mogul's digital resurrection. Back then, Trump talked about transparency and pledged to reveal the names in the Epstein files if re-elected. During an appearance on the Lex Fridman Podcast last year, he said: "I never went to his island, fortunately. But a lot of people did." Asked why so many powerful figures were drawn to Epstein, Trump said: "He was a good salesman, a hailing, hardy guy, and he had some nice assets that he'd throw around like islands. But a lot of big people went to that island. But fortunately, I was not one of them." Fridman pressed further on why the client list hadn't been released. Trump replied: "Yeah, it's very interesting, isn't it? It probably will be, by the way. I'd certainly take a look at it. But yeah, I'd be inclined to do the Epstein." Musk was rewarded for his support of Trump. The president appointed him head of the newly created and powerful Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a role that saw him slash tens of thousands of federal jobs - a move hailed by MAGA loyalists but condemned across America. However, their alliance began to collapse after Trump's "Big, Beautiful" £980 billion spending bill gutted electric vehicle tax credits, wiping nearly £22 billion off Tesla's market value. Musk was livid. Tesla stock nosedived. He blamed Trump. Now, insiders say the president has a new strategy: cut Musk off completely and neutralise him before he can do more damage. The White House is watching the tech mogul "like a hawk," said one source, terrified of what he might reveal next. "You've got the world's richest man, reportedly using ketamine and other drugs, in possession of a platform that can broadcast to billions of people and allegedly sitting on a file that could blow up the global elite," they added. "That's not a red flag. That's a five-alarm fire." Trump's attorney general, Pam Bondi, has so far only released a partial dump of the Epstein materials - a limp, heavily redacted batch of flight logs and contact pages in February. She's demanded thousands more pages from the FBI's New York field office but has offered no timeline or reason for the delay. And with Musk now threatening to take matters into his own hands, the pressure is exploding inside the highest levels of government. "If he dumps what he knows," said a former national security advisor, "it won't just shake politics. It'll detonate the global elite." On Thursday, after Musk claimed Trump's name was contained in the Epstein files, he doubled down on his attack. Among a barrage of social media posts attacking the president, he threatened to decommission a spacecraft contracted to NASA and needed to return astronauts from the International Space Station. Although he later retracted the threat, the Tesla CEO agreed with another post, saying that Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him. He also followed up his original tweet by asking his followers to "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." He then posted: "The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year." Steve Bannon, one of Musk's most vocal critics for months, said he advised the president to cancel all of Musk's government contracts and launch several investigations into the world's richest man "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately," he said.


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
UK taxpayers face extra costs as France plans Channel small boat interceptions
British taxpayers will be expected to contribute more money to stop irregular migration as the French government prepares to halt small boats carrying asylum seekers even if they are already at sea. It is understood there will be extra costs associated with the scheme to tackle boats within 300 metres of the shore – including paying for police, boats and drones – which the UK will be asked to share with France. The development comes as a refugee charity that successfully intervened to stop the UK sending boats back to France said it would explore legal avenues to stop the latest tactic. It is understood the French government is braced for court challenges. Home Office officials confirmed on Wednesday that the French government hoped to launch interventions in the Channel and in nearby waterways in July. It follows increasing use by traffickers of 'taxi boats', which pick up asylum seekers a few hundred yards from the shore before taking them to the UK. The strategy aims to be ready in time for the Franco-British summit, which begins on 8 July. This coincides with the state visit to London of Emmanuel Macron, the French president. The scheme is intended to give the French authorities the power to halt dinghies that 'taxi' up to beaches from nearby waterways. Current guidelines prevent French police from intervening offshore unless it is to rescue passengers in distress. In practice, the policy means officers can stop boats leaving the beach by puncturing them, but are restricted once they are in the water. The French government has changed the framework so that its officers can now operate in shallow waters up to 300 metres from the coast, allowing them to intercept 'taxi boats'. The UK government will be expected by Paris to contribute further funds to help pay for more officers and equipment along the coast. The UK signed a £480m deal two years ago to pay for additional border patrols and surveillance equipment such as drones and night-vision binoculars. But government sources pointed out that Keir Starmer agreed a deal with Macron at the start of the year to increase measures to halt Channel crossings. This led to a formal agreement a month later under which the UK extended its deal to pay for policing French beaches in return for new measures to stem the flow of boats. France could seek extra funds from the UK for the Compagnie de Marche, a specialist unit of enforcement officers operating on beaches to tackle the people-smuggling trade. Announced in February this year and allocated £2.2m from existing funds, the unit's officers have public order powers to apprehend smugglers and intercept crossings. The unit could be expanded, it is understood. Violent confrontations on French beaches have increased. In a recent incident, French officers confronting a suspect were sprayed with petrol and told they would be set alight unless they backed off. France is expanding its naval forces with six new patrol boats that can rescue migrants and intercept 'taxi boats' before they leave for the UK, the Telegraph reported. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The French government is expecting legal challenges to come from charities and NGOs, either through the French or European courts. A British charity that operates in France has said it plans to explore possible legal challenges to stop the tactic. Steve Smith, the chief executive of Care4Calais, said: 'When the last Tory government tried to do pushbacks in the Channel, Care4Calais initiated a legal challenge and won. Any attempt to introduce interceptions in French waters must face the same level of resistance. Anything that puts human lives at risk must be opposed, including considering all legal avenues to defeat it.' The UK government has suggested that improved weather conditions may be a factor behind the sharp rise in small boat crossings so far this year. According to official figures, 11,074 people crossed the Channel on small boats before May – nearly 50% more than during the same period in 2024. A Home Office report links this increase to a greater number of 'red days' – when weather and sea conditions are more likely to allow for small boat journeys. Between January and April, there were 60 such days, compared with 27 last year. More than 1,100 migrants crossed the Channel on Saturday, official data shows, the highest number recorded in a single day so far in 2025. It brings the provisional total of people making the perilous journey so far this year to 14,811.