Bitcoin ATM scams on the rise: Pennsylvania Attorney General
(WHTM) — Pennsylvania Attorney General Dave Sunday is warning the public of the recent rise in scams involving Bitcoin ATMS.
According to Sunday, scammers use Bitcoin ATMs, or 'BTMS,' to gain access to victim's money by coercing victims into depositing money into BTMs. Sunday said scammers will target victims with messaging like 'protect your money' and 'take care of any criminal charges.'
According to Sunday, scammers will convince victims to make large cash withdrawals, deposit the funds into a Bitcoin ATM, and then scan and send a QR code. Sunday says this will give criminals access to the funds, making it impossible to get the money back.
RELATED: Scammers steal over $2,000 after posing as Food Plus, FedEx employers in Dauphin Co.
Similar scams tend to start with a telephone call, text, social media message, or email per Sunday.
'Scammers will try to alarm, scare, and persuade you to take sudden action before you are able to stop and realize you are being scammed,' Attorney General Sunday said. 'My office is offering advice on how to protect yourself from these elaborate deceptions.'
To avoid being scammed, potential victims should never click links or respond to unexpected calls or messages.
Sunday said victims should ask their banks to put more protections in place to prevent scams.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Wrench Attacks' Are Shocking and Violent. It's Only Going to Get Worse.
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Late last month, a shoeless and injured cryptocurrency investor fled from a posh Manhattan townhouse and approached the NYPD with a mortifying story: He'd just escaped 17 straight days of torture, having been held in SoHo and peed upon, forced to smoke crack, pistol-whipped, shocked with a Taser, cut with a saw, and dangled over a ledge. All because two fellow crypto enthusiasts, whom he personally knew, desired access to his multimillion-dollar Bitcoin fortune—and were willing to do anything to make him give up the password to his virtual wallet. With the information provided by this battered trader—a 28-year-old Italian named Michael Valentino Teofrasto Carturan—the authorities quickly took the accused culprits, John Woeltz and William Duplessie, into custody. Per police reports, Carturan and Woeltz had ties to an unnamed New York crypto hedge fund; the latter had often 'picked on' the former and, eventually, a disagreement over money led Carturan to fly back to Italy. Woeltz, who'd been spending time with Duplessie partying hard and splurging generously—including on that 17-floor, $30,000-a-month SoHo townhouse—persuaded Carturan to return to NYC early last month and allegedly hired an off-duty NYPD officer to pick him up from the airport on May 6.(It's unknown whether the cop knew what was about to happen.) According to Carturan's account, he only escaped after agreeing to give up the passkey to his Bitcoin wallet, claiming it was stored on his laptop; when his tormenters left him behind to fetch the computer, Carturan bolted from the premises. The NYC torture scheme was just the latest example of a 'wrench attack,' where a thief employs brutal physical violence in order to gain access to a target's virtual cryptocurrency stashes. The phrase hails from a 2009 strip from the popular webcomic xkcd, making the point that any common thief could break into a user's encrypted software simply by battering the owner with a $5 wrench 'until he tells us the password.' It's not a new phenomenon—but these days, it's a troublingly common one. On the same day Carturan left his captives, the crypto-crime watchdog group TRM Labs put out a report on the recent uptick in wrench attacks, noting that such acts 'have escalated in both frequency and severity,' typically involving 'high levels of violence that are extremely traumatic for the victims to endure.' Ari Redbord, a former federal prosecutor who now heads global policy for TRM Labs, gave me a blunt explanation for this surge: 'We've seen the price of Bitcoin double in the last year or so. Criminals tend to go where the money is. These aren't cybercriminals. These aren't hackers. They don't need sophisticated tools.' A few days later, longtime software engineer and Bitcoin maximalist Jameson Lopp gave a detailed presentation on the escalation in wrench attacks at the Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas. After kicking off with a reference to that xkcd comic, Lopp deployed various graphs of reported wrench attacks over the years, noting that such assaults are still relatively rare compared with other crypto-related crimes (such as hacking or phishing), but that they do tend to spike whenever Bitcoin's value balloons rapidly, like during the crypto craze of 2021. This year, Bitcoin's value has reached all-time highs—and 2025 is on pace to see a record amount of wrench attacks worldwide. Lopp emphasized that the total number will still be 'relatively small'—the previous record-breaking year, 2021, only recorded about 35 attacks, most of them in the U.S. But the details common to these crimes are terrifying enough to warrant extra caution for crypto holders: home invasions, kidnapping, drugging. And, Lopp warned, 'a decent number of these also involve torture.' Bitcoin Conference attendees likely found Lopp's presentation valuable, not least because many crypto investors are reportedly growing more fearful. The Wall Street Journal recently spoke with anonymous 'members of the crypto community' who 'say they are turning their Instagram profiles private and are trying to remove their physical addresses, and those of their families, from public records.' Other crypto enthusiasts are also training in hand-to-hand combat—perhaps not incidental to the fact that, as Lopp stated, many wrench-attack survivors lacked adequate home-security or self-defense tools. Again, such events are rare. But for those who go through them, they're scarring. Just last week, two Russian crypto executives were kidnapped by Chechens in Buenos Aires and forced to pay $43,000 in ransom before the perpetrators fled. A few weeks before that, a 30-year-old American tourist in London was drugged by a man who claimed to be his Uber driver; the kidnapper only let him out once the American gave up his crypto-wallet passkey. In late November, a Las Vegas–based investor left a local crypto conference and was kidnapped by three armed and masked robbers right as he reached home; they extorted him for $4.8 million worth of tokens, then abandoned him in a desert area 26 miles from the Nevada border. That same month, WonderFI CEO Dean Skurka was kidnapped in Toronto, held for a $1 million ransom, then freed when the sum was paid. There are still more recent incidents that I have not rounded up—or that, more chillingly, have not been made public. But a series of repeated kidnappings in France alone (which, in at least two cases, ended with the captive's finger getting cut off) were enough to spur the country's interior minister to convene a group of local crypto entrepreneurs and promise extra protection. (Redbord suspects that the revitalized presence of organized-crime syndicates in France has contributed to the increase of wrench attacks there, as he told me.) Bennett Tomlin and Cas Piancey, reporters for the crypto news site Protos and co-hosts of the Crypto Critics' Corner podcast, told me that the targeted wrench attacks may come down to the fact that fewer and fewer people hoard more and more digital currencies, juicing the value of their stashes. 'There's a pretty significant portion of high-net-worth individuals who have some portion of their money in crypto,' Piancey said, 'and that becomes a much easier target for a robber than demanding all the cash in their house, because there probably isn't any.' The often-public nature of crypto ownership—social media boasting, digital-influencer status, conference attendance, inconsistent cybersecurity measures—also makes it easier to target the most outspoken enthusiasts. That's especially the case at large in-person conferences with rich and powerful registrants like Bitcoin 2025. Unlike traditional means of protecting and storing wealth, like physical banks whose accounts are protected with sophisticated security measures, crypto holders carry immense, untraceable wealth by way of the passkeys to their crypto wallets, whether those are hosted online or stored within a flash drive. When you are your own bank, you risk being broken into like one. It becomes even riskier when any high-profile crypto holders gather together. Tomlin mentioned the fallout from last summer's Brussels Ethereum conference, where multiple attendees were robbed. 'You don't hear about this stuff happening at big conferences that involve bankers,' Piancey explained. 'Someone who has $100 million in crypto is a more appealing target for that kind of attack than someone who has $100 million in the banking system, because one of those is going to be a lot easier to quickly take and hold on to.' In other words: A heavily deregulated and public-facing sector that boasts relatively few buyers—who are even richer as a result—can become a sensible target for an otherwise technologically unsophisticated criminal who knows how to browse social media. At Bitcoin 2025, Jameson Lopp also noted this tendency and gave some advice to his audience: 'Shut up and stop flaunting your wealth.'
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Department of Justice just seized crypto and 145 web domains from what they allege was an online marketplace for stolen credit cards
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has seized 145 internet domains and an undisclosed amount of cryptocurrency from an internet marketplace they allege facilitated the exchange of stolen credit cards, the agency announced on Wednesday. Known as BidenCash, the marketplace began in 2022, and attracted more than 117,000 customers, according to the DOJ. The platform's administrators allegedly charged a fee on each transaction that took place on the website, generating over $17 million in its three years of operating, according to the agency. It remains unclear what role cryptocurrency played in the operation's payment infrastructure. It is also unknown how much and what kind of cryptocurrency was seized from the operation. The DOJ did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fortune. The U.S. government has been seizing cryptocurrency associated with alleged criminal activity since as far back as 2013, but the sums collected have become larger over the years. One of the largest seizures to date was in 2022, when the U.S. government confiscated approximately 120,000 Bitcoins—now worth more than $12 billion—that they say was stolen during a hack of crypto exchange Bitfinex. Prior to this year, it was customary for the U.S. Marshals Service to auction off seized Bitcoin, like it does with other assets like real estate and cars. However, that changed in March when President Donald Trump signed an executive order to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve, and separate digital asset stockpile which will include other cryptocurrencies like Ethereum and Solana. The executive order stated that the government would create the stockpile with crypto seized from criminal activity. While it is unclear exactly how much crypto the government owns, the White House's AI and crypto czar David Sacks said at the time that it held around 200,000 Bitcoins, worth over $20 billion at the currency's current price. This story was originally featured on
WIRED
21 hours ago
- WIRED
Ross Ulbricht Got a $31 Million Donation From a Dark Web Dealer, Crypto Tracers Suspect
Jun 5, 2025 2:50 PM Crypto-tracing firm Chainalysis says the mysterious 300-bitcoin donation to the pardoned Silk Road creator appears to have come from someone associated with a different defunct black market: AlphaBay. Online marketplace Silk Road creator Ross Ulbricht speaks at The Bitcoin Conference at The Venetian Convention & Expo Center on May 29, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Photograph:When Ross Ulbricht received a $31 million bitcoin donation last weekend from an unknown source, many observers saw it as more than a very nice welcome-home gift. Rumors swirled that the creator of the Silk Road, less than five months after receiving a pardon from Donald Trump that saved him from a lifetime in prison, was sending himself a trove of his stashed criminal proceeds from his days running the dark web's first black market more than a decade prior. Now cryptocurrency tracing investigators say they've arrived at a stranger explanation: The money wasn't originally Ulbricht's, and didn't come from the Silk Road. Instead, they suspect it came from a different long-defunct dark web black market: AlphaBay. The crypto tracing firm Chainalysis tells WIRED that, based on blockchain analysis, it has tied the origin of the 300 bitcoins sent to Ulbricht on Sunday to someone involved in AlphaBay, a dark web market that sold a wide variety of drugs and cybercriminal contraband from 2014 to 2017 and eventually grew to be 10 times the size of the Silk Road, according to the FBI. Chainalysis says the funds appear to have emerged from AlphaBay around 2016 and 2017. Given the amount of the donation, Chainalysis suggests it might have come from someone who acted as a large-scale seller on the market. 'We have reasonable grounds to suspect that these funds originated in AlphaBay,' says Phil Larratt, Chainalysis's director of investigations and a former official at the UK's National Crime Agency. 'Looking at the amount, that would suggest they came from someone who was possibly a vendor on AlphaBay back in the early days.' WIRED reached out to Ulbricht for comment about the donation's origin via contacts at the Free Ross campaign that lobbied for his pardon, but didn't immediately receive a response. Prior to Chainalysis's finding that the $31 million donation appears to have originated at AlphaBay, the independent crypto tracing investigator known as ZachXBT had already posted to his account on X his own findings that the money didn't appear to have come from the Silk Road. ZachXBT found that, despite the donor's use of multiple Bitcoin 'mixers' that take in users' coins and return others to obfuscate their trail on the blockchain, he was able to trace the funds to an address that had been flagged in Chainalysis's software tool Reactor as tied to illicit activity. That analysis suggested that the money was a 'legitimate donation but not legitimate funds,' ZachXBT wrote in a text message to WIRED. ZachXBT also found that the same individual who controlled the funds had cashed out other cryptocurrency at an exchange in small, distributed quantities rather than in a single sum, suggesting he or she may have been trying to prevent them being seized or flagged—another sign that the money may have come from criminal origins. 'Usage of multiple mixers, spreading out CEX deposits, etc,' ZachXBT writes to WIRED, using the term CEX to mean a centralized exchange, 'that is done typically if you are trying to avoid getting illicit funds frozen.' Chainalysis declined to offer more information on how exactly it identified the funds as originating at AlphaBay. But the company has built a business around identifying illicit services like digital black markets out of the morass of billions of cryptocurrency addresses. Chainalysis' identification of the AlphaBay cluster of bitcoin addresses, in fact, played a key role in the takedown of the market in a law enforcement investigation known as Operation Bayonet that spanned 2016 and 2017. AlphaBay certainly produced plenty of crypto kingpins who would have the kind of eight-figure sum donated to Ulbricht. Before it was torn offline in an elaborate sting operation in July of 2017, the site was facilitating $2 million a day in sales, largely of illegal drugs although it also offered malware, stolen data, and other cybercriminal wares. AlphaBay's creator and administrator, Alexandre Cazes, died in a Bangkok jail cell under mysterious circumstances following his arrest, but the site's second-in-command, who went by the handle Desnake, appears to have remained at large. Any bitcoins an AlphaBay seller or administrator managed to hold onto since the site's closure would have since appreciated more than 40-fold. Exactly why one of AlphaBay's crypto moguls would donate $31 million to Ulbricht, however, remains a mystery. Speculation on social media has ranged from a fellow black marketeer repaying a favor to a more principled gift intended to thank Ulbricht for blazing a trail with his invention of the Silk Road's crypto-enabled anonymous transactions. That gratitude may also take into account that, while many got rich on the dark web markets that Ulbricht pioneered, he instead spent over a decade in prison, speculates Taylor Monahan, a crypto tracer and security researcher at crypto firm MetaMask. 'People donate when they're deeply inspired by someone and/or grateful and/or have some sort of remorse for the situation,' says Monahan. 'Survivor's guilt is wild.'
