logo
Tariff threats, wars will slow but not collapse global luxury sales in 2025, new study shows

Tariff threats, wars will slow but not collapse global luxury sales in 2025, new study shows

Independent6 hours ago

Global sales of personal luxury goods are 'slowing down but not collapsing,' according to a Bain & Co. consultancy study released Thursday.
Personal luxury goods sales that eroded to 364 billion euros ($419 billion) in 2024 are projected to slide by another 2% to 5% this year, the study said, citing threats of U.S. tariffs and geopolitical tensions triggering economic slowdowns.
'Still, to be positive in a difficult moment — with three wars, economies slowing down, inequality at a maximum ever — it's not a market in collapse,'' said Bain partner and co-author of the study Claudia D'Arpizio. 'It is slowing down but not collapsing.'
Alongside external headwinds, luxury brands have alienated consumers with an ongoing creativity crisis and sharp price increases, Bain said. Buyers have also been turned off by recent investigations in Italy that revealed that sweatshop conditions in subcontractors making luxury handbags.
Sales are slipping sharply in powerhouse markets the United States and China, the study showed. In the U.S., market volatility due to tariffs has discouraged consumer confidence. China has recorded six quarters of contraction on low consumer confidence.
The Middle East, Latin America and Southeast Asia are recording growth. Europe is mostly flat, the study showed.
This has created a sharp divergence between brands that continue with strong creative and earnings growth, such as the Prada Group, which posted a 13% first-quarter jump in revenue to 1.34 billion euros, and brands like Gucci, where revenue was down 24% to 1.6 billion euros in the same period.
Gucci owner Kering last week hired Italian automotive executive Luca De Meo, the former CEO of Renault, to mount a turnaround. The decision comes as three of its brands — Gucci, Balenciaga and Bottega Veneta — are launching new creative directors.
Kering's stock surged 12% on news of the appointment. D'Arpizio underlined his track record, returning French carmaker Renault to profitability and previous roles as marketing director at Volkswagen and Fiat.
'All of these factors resonate well together in a market like luxury when you are in a phase where growth is still the name of the game, but you also need to make the company more nimble in terms of costs, and turn around some of the brands,'' she said.
Brands are also making changes to minimize the impact of possible U.S. tariffs. These include shipping directly from production sites and not warehouses and reducing stock in stores.
With aesthetic changes afoot 'stuffing the channels doesn't make a lot of sense,'' D'Arpizio said.
Still, many of the headwinds buffering the sector are out of companies' control.
'Many of these (negative) aspects are not going to change soon. What can change is more clarity on the tariffs, but I don't think we will stop the wars or the political instability in a few months,'' she said, adding that luxury consumer confidence is tied more closely to stock market trends than geopolitics.
President of Italian luxury brand association Altagamma Matteo Lunelli underlined hat the sector recorded overall growth of 28% from 2019-2024, 'placing us well above pre-pandemic levels.'
While luxury spending is sensitive to global turmoil, it is historically quick to rebound, powered by new markets and pent-up demand.
The 2008-2009 financial crisis plummeted sales of luxury apparel, handbags and footwear from 161 billion euros to 147 billion euros over two years. The market more than recovered the losses in 2010 as it rebounded by 14%, with an acceleration in the Chinese market. Similarly, after sales plunged by 21% during the pandemic, pent-up spending powered sales to new records.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer's artificial intelligence adviser steps down
Starmer's artificial intelligence adviser steps down

Sky News

time36 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Starmer's artificial intelligence adviser steps down

Sir Keir Starmer's artificial intelligence adviser is standing aside after six months for family reasons. Matt Clifford continues to have a good relationship with Downing Street, and Sky News understands he would potentially be open to a return to help the government in the future. A government spokesperson told Sky News: "Matt Clifford is stepping down from his role as the prime minister's AI opportunities advisor for personal reasons. "The prime minister has thanked him for his dedicated work to deliver and implement the AI opportunities action plan. We will be building on this work to bolster AI expertise across government and cement the UK's position as a world leader in AI." Mr Clifford told Sky News: "It's been a privilege to spend the last year first writing and then implementing the AI opportunities action plan. "I'm grateful to the prime minister and the government for this opportunity to serve and am hugely optimistic about the UK's potential to be an AI superpower. "For family reasons, I will step back from my role as the prime minister's adviser on AI opportunities at the end of July, but I'm delighted that this important work will continue across government." Mr Clifford was the lead reviewer of the AI opportunities action plan, as well as being a member of the AI Safety Institute advisory board. As part of his backing of AI, Sir Keir accepted all 50 recommendations made by Mr Clifford in the action plan. 8:55 Mr Clifford has worked across Number 10 and the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. He was appointed as Sir Keir's AI opportunities adviser in January 2025. His remit included advising on policy to grow the UK AI sector, including supporting uptake. Mr Clifford was also working to help on strategies to attract AI talent and entrepreneurs to the UK. He worked with the previous Conservative government on setting up the AI Safety Institute and setting up the 2023 AI Safety Summit.

Rough ride: how Uber quietly took more of your fare with its algorithm change
Rough ride: how Uber quietly took more of your fare with its algorithm change

The Guardian

time36 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Rough ride: how Uber quietly took more of your fare with its algorithm change

More than a decade after being one of 19 Uber drivers who took the company to court in 2015, Abdurzak Hadi continues to drive for – and fight with – the ride hailing app. The group won their claim confirming their entitlement to the legal minimum wage – but the Silicon Valley company's insistence that its drivers were self-employed contractors meant the case went all the way to the supreme court. In 2021, Hadi and friends won there too. If that sounds as if the British legal system left the former Somalian refugee in the driving seat, he argues that life for Uber workers is now as precarious as ever. On Thursday, academics at the University of Oxford – in conjunction with the non-profit gig worker organisation Worker Info Exchange (WIE) – launched a report analysing a mass of data relating to 1.5m trips provided by 258 UK Uber drivers, who had used privacy legislation to extract their personal data from the ride hailing app. The study gave a rare opportunity to study the workings of Uber's technology and produced some eye-catching findings. It found that many Uber drivers have earned 'substantially less' an hour since the ride hailing app introduced a 'dynamic pricing' algorithm in 2023, which is said to adjust trip prices in real time based on a number of factors. These include time, distance, the number of available drivers in the area, the passenger demand, traffic and the weather. The paper found that these earnings drops coincided with the company taking a significantly higher share of fares. The study unearthed further data suggesting that drivers such as Hadi are experiencing less and less control over their working lives. They described their days as being controlled by increasingly sophisticated pieces of computer code, which left them unclear how much Uber would take in fees on discrete jobs. '[The old system] was clear, transparent,' Hadi told the Guardian and ITV News. 'You can calculate, you can see. Say, for example here it says about eight miles, so I know eight miles plus how long it took me, plus the starting fare, minus Uber's fee, which is 20%. Even when they increased it to 25%, I would exactly know how much. Exactly.' The new system has resulted in Uber taking a variable cut, or 'take rate', of 29% of a fare on average, rising to more than 50% in some cases, the University of Oxford researchers found. The paper also found that Uber's take rate increased on higher value rides – something the company has denied. The 29% figure appears to chime with disclosures within Uber's latest quarterly results figures, which show that the company made $1.2bn of income from its operations (about £887m) in the first three months of this year. Meanwhile, the WIE estimates that UK Uber drivers lost out on $1.6bn in pay as a result of Uber increasing its share of the fare, during the 12 months to March 2025. Uber said the UK take rate and lost earnings figures are inaccurate, and that its take rate had remained 'steady' at 25%. The company added: 'The Uber app reviews real-time information to provide the best price to appeal to the drivers in the area, helping to minimise waiting times for customers and maximise earnings. Drivers are shown their earnings for the trip before they decide whether to accept.' But as Uber grows more confident in its calculations, those transporting passengers say they are becoming less so. A driver's livelihood depends on their ability to guess what kinds of trips they will get at particular times and places, and how much those trips will pay. However, the University of Oxford study stated that 'drivers frequently complained about the unpredictability of pay post-dynamic pricing'. The paper continued: 'Any tacit knowledge drivers have built up over years about how much pay a given trip is likely to yield may no longer help them … the predictability of pay drastically changed after dynamic pricing was introduced.' An company spokesperson said: 'Uber drivers in the UK took home over £1bn in earnings between January and March of this year, which is up on the year before. Drivers choose to drive with Uber because we offer total flexibility on when they work and provide full transparency over the trips they accept. 'All drivers receive a weekly summary of their earnings, which includes a clear breakdown of what Uber and the driver received from trips. We are proud that thousands of drivers continue to make the positive choice to work on Uber as passenger demand and trips continue to grow.'

New York City could soon get Waymo self-driving cars
New York City could soon get Waymo self-driving cars

The Independent

time36 minutes ago

  • The Independent

New York City could soon get Waymo self-driving cars

Waymo, an Alphabet subsidiary, is seeking a permit to operate self-driving cars in Manhattan with a trained specialist behind the wheel. The current operation in New York City is a test phase, not yet serving customers, as fully autonomous operation without a driver is currently illegal in the state. Waymo aims to eventually bring its fully autonomous ride-hailing service to New York, while the city's transportation office reviews the permit with public safety as a priority. Waymo's self-driving cars are already active in several cities including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Phoenix, and Austin, with plans for further expansion. Separately, Elon Musk's Tesla is preparing to launch its own robotaxi service in Austin, starting with a limited number of vehicles and emphasizing safety.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store