Meghan Markle Accused Of Overestimating Prince Harry's Wealth
Many questions have been asked about 's life, but thinking she was marrying up into billions is a new one.
The Duchess of Sussex's expectations reportedly fell short when she married into the royal family and discovered her husband, , is a humble millionaire.
Meghan Markle's life has been under intense scrutiny since she left the United States to marry the future king's younger sibling in the United Kingdom.
Tom Quinn, in his book "Yes, Ma'am: The Secret Life of Royal Servants," notes that Meghan was allegedly taken aback when she learned that Prince Harry, despite being the brother of a future king, was not as wealthy as she had anticipated.
Despite leaving her flourishing acting career behind to move to the UK, the mother-of-two reportedly faced an unexpected reality.
Quinn shared that Meghan had expected Prince Harry to be a billionaire but found out he was worth around £20 million. This revelation prompted her to reassess her assumptions about her new royal family.
Furthermore, it was shocking for Meghan to discover that, unlike her ex-husband, Trevor Engelson, who married a multi-millionaire heiress, she would not be residing in grand royal locations like Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle.
Instead, the couple lived in the modest Nottingham Cottage at Kensington Palace, with no live-in staff to cater to their needs. According to the Daily Mail, Quinn shared that Meghan's net worth was about $5 million when she married the prince.
Quinn commented on Meghan's dissatisfaction when she and Harry were expected to live in the modest Nottingham Cottage, which she perceived as a slight against her husband, especially when compared to the accommodations of and .
A member of Palace staff suggested that Meghan's troubles began with this small living situation, as she felt it signified how the Royal Family viewed Harry. Meghan's perspective also illuminated Harry's position as the "spare" to William, a realization that seemed to deepen after their marriage.
According to an insider, she quickly recognized that Harry was not as central to royal matters as his brother, which sparked a sense of grievance. While Harry had not considered his role as a spare before, Meghan's sensitivity on his behalf led her to believe he was being treated as less important.
Prince Harry's 40th birthday last year made him richer by millions when he received an $8.5 million inheritance, a gift arranged by his late great-grandmother, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother.
As noted by the New York Post, this inheritance comes from a $90 million trust fund established for the family, which stipulated that Harry could access his share upon turning 40.
Initially, there were concerns that he might need to pay taxes on this inheritance. However, investment experts from Stocklytics have clarified that this inheritance will not be subject to tax due to how the Queen Mother's estate was managed.
The firm noted that inheritance tax applied only to trusts established within seven years of an individual's death. Since the Queen Mother's passing in 2002, the trust has remained exempt from inheritance tax.
Had the trust been created within that seven-year window, it could have incurred a tax liability of up to $9.7 million for HM Revenue & Customs. As it stands, Harry's inheritance is not expected to be taxed, allowing him to receive the full amount.
Following Harry's deafening loss at the court, the couple's finances became public knowledge, which included the debt left behind by the legal proceedings. According to The Mirror, Harry will now have to settle $2 million in legal expenses despite losing the case to reinstate his United Kingdom security detail.
After moving to the United States with Meghan, they secured several lucrative contracts, including a $100 million deal with Netflix, which they signed as soon as they stepped back from their royal duties in 2020.
Meghan and Harry also acquired a $20 million advance from Penguin Random House for a four-book deal, with one of the books being 'Spare.' The couple expanded their earnings with another $25 million deal with Spotify, which led to the creation of Meghan's Archetypes podcast.
Despite their transition away from royal life and the financial obligations associated with their former residence, their net worth has impressively reached around $60 million, alongside their Montecito home, valued at $14 million.
In May 2020, Harry and Meghan showed commitment to repaying the taxpayer money spent on refurbishing Frogmore Cottage. They planned to reimburse $3 million over the next decade, remitting approximately $24,000 per month.
Harry losing his case came with personal consequences. As noted by The Blast, the younger royal mourned the possibility of his kids never setting foot in the U.K. since their security cannot be guaranteed by the Royal Family.
The philanthropist noted that the Royal and VIP Executive Committee, before the judgment that nailed the coffin, made the hasty decision of demoting him from a high-risk to a low-risk entity.
The Prince's interpretation is that the committee downplayed his safety concerns, thereby making him and his family vulnerable to potential attacks.
"I can't see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children back to the U.K. at this point," Prince Harry explained, adding that his family would miss everything about the country.
Did Meghan Markle marry up, or did she give up a possible high Hollywood lifestyle?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
36 minutes ago
- New York Post
Oregon track star wages legal battle against trans athlete policy after medal ceremony protest
An Oregon high school track star is speaking out after refusing to stand on the podium with a transgender athlete, saying her protest was about fairness – not hate. 'I just didn't think that it's fair to biological females to allow and encourage biological males to compete among us, not only for myself and the other girl that stepped down, but the girl who should have been on the podium and the girl who didn't even get to go to state because she was beaten by a biological male at districts,' athlete Alexa Anderson said on 'Fox & Friends.' Advertisement 'It is not about hate or transphobia at all. It's about protecting women's rights and their right to fair and equal competition within sports.' Anderson and another athlete named Reese Eckard, who finished in third and fourth place in the Oregon State Athletic Association's Girls High Jump finale, respectively, stood behind the podium during the ceremony because they refused to stand next to the transgender student, Liaa Rose, who placed fifth, according to the New York Post. An official behind the event allegedly told those protesting to 'step aside' and 'get out' of the photos. 3 Reese Eckard and Alexa Anderson protest the girls' high jump medal ceremony at the Oregon State high school championships at Hayward Field on May 31, 2025. America First Policy Institute Advertisement 3 Alexa Anderson speaks out on her legal battle during a recent interview with 'Fox and Friends.' 'I was very shocked and kind of stressed with all the eyes and attention on us, so I complied with what he said, but I am a little bit frustrated that people were angry with us rather than supportive of our movement,' Anderson continued. During the 'Fox & Friends' appearance, Anderson's attorney Jessica Steinmann spelled out the legal action currently in motion, sharing that America First Policy Institute filed a complaint with the US Department of Education to request that they investigate the Oregon Department of Education. 'The law that was meant to protect our girls, Title IX, is now being weaponized against them. On top of that, they are now being sidelined and there's clear First Amendment issues as well,' she shared. Advertisement 3 Eckard and Anderson refused to share the podium with transgender athlete Liaa Rose who tied for fifth in the event. @LaLONeill/X Steinmann said female athletes today are losing medal access, scholarships and economic opportunities to biological males allegedly stealing their thunder. The incident came on the heels of a controversy in neighboring California, where trans athlete AB Hernandez won two state titles against female competitors.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Romeo Beckham splits from girlfriend Kim Turnbull after 7 months amid family feud
Romeo Beckham and Kim Turnbull have gone their separate ways, as family tensions within the Beckham clan continue to simmer. The 22-year-old son of David and Victoria Beckham had dated Turnbull, 26, for seven months before their romance turned sour. The couple ultimately parted ways in May, just three weeks after a lavish 50th birthday celebration for Romeo's father, David Beckham — an event that seemed to underscore lingering tensions within the family. 5 Romeo Beckham and Kim Turnbull have called it quits as tensions continue to rumble within the Beckham family. GC Images 'Romeo and Kim are both young and they had a lovely time together, but at that age, things don't always last forever, and they decided to split up,' a source told the Daily Mail. 'They have been friendly since and have even been at the same venues. It's a huge shame, particularly as David and Victoria really adored her and thought she made Romeo happy, but it wasn't to be.' Insiders claim that the split had nothing to do with Romeo's rumored feud with brother Brooklyn. 'David and Victoria would hate for the view to be that they split because of Nicola (Peltz) and Brooklyn because that simply isn't the case,' they said. 5 The 22-year-old son of David and Victoria Beckham had dated Turnbull, 26, for seven months before their romance turned 180 Studios 5 Insiders claim that the split had nothing to do with Romeo's rumored feud with brother Brooklyn, 26. Instagram/victoriabeckham 'The fact is that Kim has got a really busy career as a DJ and Romeo has a busy work life too, there is lots of traveling for both of them at having a relationship at this time isn't all that conducive to their lives.' The duo were first linked in November 2024 when Romeo featured Turnbull in an Instagram post following a trip to the Big Apple. It was soon reported that Romeo's older brother, Brooklyn, took issue with Turnbull after the relationship was confirmed, driving a wedge between the two brothers. 5 Brooklyn and his wife, Nicola Peltz, have noticeably kept their distance from family events in recent weeks. Instagram/@nicolaannepeltzbeckham However, sources had immediately debunked that theory to Page Six at the time. Additionally, a source close to Brooklyn, 26, and his wife Nicola Peltz told Page Six that the couple 'didn't know Romeo and Kim split' because none of them has spoken 'in months.' Brooklyn and Peltz have noticeably kept their distance from family events in recent weeks. The aspiring chef and his wife, 30, failed to show up for David's 50th birthday bash in London in May — fueling rumors of an ongoing family rift. 5 Rumors suggest that Peltz and Brooklyn's mother, Victoria, are embroiled in a feud of their own. nicolaannepeltzbeckham/Instagram Victoria, sons Romeo, Cruz, 20, and daughter Harper, 13, were all present at David's star-studded bash at a London restaurant. Brooklyn was also notably absent from Victoria's fashion show in Paris in March, which had Romeo, Cruz and Harper all in attendance.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert
As King Charles prepares to put on a united front with his family at this year's Trooping the Colour, the monarch and estranged son Prince Harry are nowhere near ending their rift. "There is no turning back," British royals expert Hilary Fordwich claimed to Fox News Digital. "King Charles remains tender towards his son but can't risk communication," she shared. "Prince William now has absolutely no interest in mending fences. Those close to the king say he [shouldn't] make peace with Harry in a way that would burden Prince William's future reign. The animosity is so deep that William has shut the door on Harry. Charles is not willing to go against his heir's wishes." "Everything comes down to trust and the lack of it," Fordwich added. Fordwich's comments came shortly after insiders told People magazine that the monarch, who is battling an undisclosed form of cancer, is hesitant to reconnect with his son. Many royal observers believe it's the monarch who should take the first step in igniting a royal reconciliation. "The underlying issue is trust," royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith told the outlet. "The king and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Insiders told the outlet that the king, 76, isn't surrounded by palace aides urging him to reconcile with his son. Meanwhile, William is said to have "no interest" in extending an olive branch. "There is not a good angel in [the king's] ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move,'" royal author Valentine Low told the outlet. Fox News Digital reached out to Buckingham Palace for comment. WATCH: PRINCE HARRY LOOKING TO RECONCILE WITH KING CHARLES, ROYAL FAMILY Fordwich claimed that Harry has crossed such a deep line in Charles's eyes that it's been difficult for the king to forgive his son. Sources close to Harry previously claimed to People magazine that Charles won't respond to his letters or phone calls. "It's Harry's criticisms of Queen Camilla [in his memoir, 'Spare'], as well as his broader attacks on the family and institution, which have seriously crossed a line for the king and those closest to him," Fordwich claimed. "The king is now so puzzled by Harry's constant revelations. It's now beyond sensitive to discuss, so he avoids all interaction regarding the subject. He is so kind but overwhelmed and has quite enough on his plate to deal with, without all this from his son." Harry's troubled relationship with his family and the U.K. establishment has played out in public for years – in books, interviews, TV programs and the courts. Harry and his wife, Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, stepped back as senior royals in 2020, citing the unbearable intrusions of the British press and a lack of support from the palace. That same year, they moved to California. Since the couple's royal exit, they have aired their grievances and made blistering allegations against the royal family. Harry's explosive 2023 memoir, "Spare," was stuffed with private details and embarrassing revelations. Harry's rift with his family burst into the open once more with a raw interview he gave to the BBC in May after losing a court case over his security. In a long and at times emotional conversation, Harry said he wanted reconciliation. He admitted that his father, who is battling an undisclosed form of cancer, won't speak to him. "Harry's ill-timed recent interview on the BBC highlighted the lack of trust between them publicly," royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital. "He seemed to believe his father could and should solve the issue of security, which he insists he and his family should have." "The rift, sadly, seems likely to remain toxic as there is no mutual trust between them," said Fitzwilliams. "Hopefully, it will not worsen as the Sussexes could give further interviews or possibly write more about the feud, something that is invariably remunerative for them." Low told People magazine that despite Harry's call for peace on the BBC, his comments were seen as another blow to the royals. During the interview, Harry, who has met his father only once, briefly, since his diagnosis early last year, said, "I don't know how much longer my father has." "It wasn't meant to be an attack, but it would be seen as one," said Low. "It makes Charles reaching out even harder." Royal expert Ian Pelham Turner told Fox News Digital that the royals take great pride in protecting their public image. They've maintained the late Queen Elizabeth II's motto of keep calm and carry on. "The royals play a positive role to the cameras," he explained. "[But] behind the scenes, they allegedly are constantly bickering with each other… King Charles has a past reputation for not making advances on difficult decisions." A source recently claimed to Us Weekly that William was "absolutely appalled" by Harry's comments to the BBC about their father's health. The insider claimed that the 42-year-old feels like Harry stooped "so low." Royal experts previously told Fox News Digital that William is fiercely protective of Charles. The source also told the outlet that it's unlikely that the feuding brothers will reunite while their father is still alive. "The funeral of Charles would be the first time that courtiers would imagine [them reuniting]," said the insider. "I can't imagine William would invite Harry to his coronation." Despite infrequent updates from the palace about his health, Charles has returned to a full slate of public duties. During his sit-down with the BBC, Harry held out little hope of another meeting with his father. "The only time I come back to the U.K. is, sadly, for funerals or court cases," he said. Fitzwilliams said that Charles must address his ongoing rift with Harry, 40, as it remains a dark cloud over his reign. "We are now less than a fortnight away from Trooping the Colour, which celebrates the monarch's birthday," he said. "King Charles can surely congratulate himself on negotiating a year where he has worked so hard and achieved a great deal despite battling cancer." "The one area that remains problematic is the rift with the Sussexes. He has only seen Prince Harry once after his diagnosis and then fleetingly." Back in 2024, Christopher Andersen, author of "The King," claimed to Fox News Digital that the king is still unable to forgive his son for casting Camilla as the villain in "Spare." "I think people have to realize that the one thing that Charles finds unforgivable is criticism of Camilla," said Andersen at the time. "There's no criticism of Camilla," Andersen claimed. "And unfortunately for Harry… Harry said some pretty devastating things about her. He made it clear that he felt she was… the villain in the piece. I think that still bothers the king, and I don't know that it will be easy for him to [forgive]. I don't think they'll ever forgive Harry for that." WATCH: PRINCE HARRY'S JABS AT QUEEN CAMILLA UNFORGIVABLE FOR KING CHARLES: EXPERT "[He's] on his own," Andersen added, referring to the Duke of Sussex. In televised interviews to promote the book, Harry accused his stepmother, 77, of leaking private conversations to the media to burnish her own reputation. He accused members of the royal family of getting "into bed with the devil" to gain favorable tabloid coverage, singling out Camilla's efforts to rehabilitate her image with the public after her longtime affair with his father. "That made her dangerous because of the connections that she was forging within the British press," Harry told CBS ahead of his book launch. "There was open willingness on both sides to trade information. And with a family built on hierarchy, and with her on the way to being queen consort, there was going to be people or bodies left in the street." The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reside in the wealthy coastal city of Montecito with their two young children.