
‘America's gulag': Trump's Guantánamo ploy tars migrants as terrorists
It has been denounced as 'America's gulag': a secretive, abuse-ridden Caribbean prison camp for terror suspects that Donald Rumsfeld once said contained 'the worst of the worst'.
'All of us have scars in our souls, deformities, from living at Guantánamo,' a former Yemeni inmate recalled of his time at the notorious military detention facility in south-east Cuba.
Even Donald Trump once balked at the 'crazy' amount of money being spent confining prisoners in orange jumpsuits to Guantánamo's concertina-wired cages.
This week the US president changed his tune, announcing plans to send tens of thousands of 'criminal illegal aliens' to the US naval base that houses the Guantánamo Bay jail as part of his 'mass deportation' campaign.
'It's a tough place to get out of,' Trump noted sarcastically after revealing that he had instructed the heads of the defense and homeland security departments to prepare a '30,000-person migrant facility' on the island.
'We have 30,000 beds in Guantánamo to detain the worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people,' said Trump, who claimed the move would help eradicate 'the scourge of migrant crime in our communities, once and for all'.
The announcement delighted Trumpists. 'The president is 100% correct to use Guantánamo,' the Texas Republican Chip Roy told Fox News, with the channel's reporter celebrating Trump's 'creative' and 'innovative' idea.
But it also sparked anger and revulsion, in the US and around the world. Many interpreted Trump's move as an attempt to further demonize undocumented migrants by conflating them with the terror suspects who were imprisoned at Guantánamo's detention centre after the then secretary of defense Rumsfeld opened it for 'enemy combatants' three months after the 11 September 2001 attacks.
'This is political theater and part of the Trump administration's broader effort to paint immigrants as threats in the United States … and fan anti-immigrant sentiment,' said Eleanor Acer, the senior director for refugee protection at the advocacy group Human Rights First.
Vincent Warren, head of the Center for Constitutional Rights legal advocacy group, said: 'Trump's order [sends] a clear message … Migrants and asylum seekers are being cast as the new terrorist threat, deserving to be discarded in an island prison, removed from legal and social services and supporters'.
There was even stronger condemnation in Latin America, from where many of the migrants expected to end up in Trump's camp hail. An editorial in Mexico's leftwing newspaper La Jornada called the move 'institutionalized sadism' and a Trumpian 'spectacle of violence' designed to excite hardcore supporters. 'The reopening of an international symbol of human rights abuses is a signal to Trumpists who believe the workers of the global south deserve the same punishment as supposed members of al-Qaida and the Islamic State,' it said.
'What Trump is doing in sending migrants to Guantánamo – a place of torture and death – makes me think that the author of the book about Trump being the antichrist is on to something,' tweeted the Brazilian theologian Leonardo Boff.
Adam Isacson, a migration expert from the Washington Office on Latin America thinktank, said Trump's headline-grabbing initiative was 'absolutely part of the narrative' that a military response was needed to tackle the supposed threat from migrants, whom the recently installed US president has repeatedly cast as dangerous 'animals' and 'trash'.
'And the idea is to just scare the hell out of immigrant communities all around the United States too,' Isacson added. 'They're just trying to scare people and maybe scare people into just making their own arrangements and leaving the country on their own. This is all shock and awe.'
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Trump's decision to create a massive migrant facility at Guantánamo would not be the first time it has been used to house those seeking a new life in the US.
In the 1990s, during the presidencies of both George HW Bush and Bill Clinton, tens of thousands of Haitians and Cubans were held there in open-air camps after being picked up while making the perilous sea journey to Florida.
More recently, a far smaller number of migrants have reportedly been held there after being intercepted by the US Coast Guard. Those migrants have been held in a separate part of the base to alleged terrorists, 15 of whom are now imprisoned there, compared to hundreds after al-Qaida's 9/11 attacks. The most notorious is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged Pakistani mastermind of that plot.
It remains uncertain precisely whom Trump might send to his expanded Guantánamo camp and whether it will be used to hold migrants accused or convicted of crimes or simply anyone lacking documents.
Acer said the 'outrageously vague and incredibly sweeping language' in Trump's memorandum ordering Guantánamo's expansion meant it was unclear who would be targeted. The three-paragraph directive calls for 'all appropriate actions' to be taken to expand the facility in order to 'address attendant immigration enforcement needs'.
However, the activist called the president's comment that the base was 'tough' to escape 'a disturbing signal that the Trump administration may be planning to hold people there indefinitely'.
During George W Bush's 'war on terror', 'the US chose to hold people on the Guantánamo base because they believed that it would be removed from legal scrutiny,' Acer recalled.
Now she suspected Trump also planned to treat it 'as a sort of rights-free zone'. 'The whole thing is just absurd … Guantánamo is essentially designed to prevent outside scrutiny. Human rights abuses will be hidden,' Acer warned, adding: 'The Trump administration is thumbing its nose at the law and the rule of law.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
3 minutes ago
- BBC News
Lee Jae-myung: South Korea's new president has a Trump-shaped crisis to avert
South Korea's new president, Lee Jae-myung, has secured a storming victory, but his honeymoon will barely last the former opposition leader is not getting to enjoy the two-month transition period usually afforded to new leaders, so they can build their team and nail down their vision for the country. Instead he is entering office immediately, to fill the hole left by the impeachment of the former president, Yoon Suk Yeol, who last December tried and failed to bring the country under martial electing Lee, with almost 50% of the vote , South Koreans have vehemently rejected the military dictatorship that was almost forced upon them. Lee campaigned on the promise that he would strengthen South Korea's democracy and unite the country, after a divisive and tumultuous six that will have to wait. First, he has a Donald Trump shaped crisis to avert. In the coming months, Trump has the power to destabilise South Korea's economy, its security, and its volatile relationship with North Koreans were dismayed when Trump slapped 25% tariffs on all Korean imports in April, after already hitting the country with aggressive tariffs on its core industries – steel and cars. They had assumed that being longstanding military allies from the days of the Korean War, and having a free-trade agreement with the US, would spare these tariffs take effect "they could trigger an economic crisis", a seasoned advisor to Lee's Democratic Party, Moon Chung-in, said. Before Trump's announcements, South Korea's economy was already slowing down. The martial law chaos constricted it further. Then, in the first quarter of this year, it contracted. Fixing this has been voters' number one demand, even above fixing their beleaguered democracy. But without a president, talks with Trump have been on hold. They cannot be put off any there is much more than South Korea's economy at stake in these US currently guarantees South Korea's security, by promising to come to its defence with both conventional and nuclear weapons, were it to be attacked by its nuclear-armed neighbour, North Korea. As part of this deal there are 28,500 US troops stationed in the Trump has made clear he does not plan to differentiate between trade and security when negotiating with South Korea, signalling that Seoul is not pulling its weight in either a post on his Truth Social platform in April, Trump said that during initial tariff talks with South Korea he had "discussed payment for the big time military protection we provide", calling it "beautiful and efficient one-stop shopping".This approach makes Seoul uniquely vulnerable. Evans Revere, a former senior US diplomat based in Seoul, fears a crisis is coming. "For the first time in our lifetime we have a US president who does not feel a moral and strategic obligation towards Korea".In his first term as president, Trump questioned the value of having US forces stationed in Korea and threatened to withdraw them unless Seoul paid more to have them. It seems likely he will demand more money this time may not want to pay more, but it can afford to. A bigger problem is that Trump's calculations, and that of his defence department, seem to have changed. This is no longer just about the money. Washington's top priority now in Asia is not just stopping North Korea attacking the South, it is also to contain China's military ambitions in the region and against Taiwan. Last year, a now senior US defence official, Elbridge Colby, said that South Korea was going to have to take "overwhelming responsibility for its own self-defence against North Korea", so the US could be ready to fight option is that the troops stationed here would switch their focus to constraining China. Another, touted by a couple of US defence officials last month, is that thousands of soldiers would be removed from the peninsula altogether and redeployed, and that Seoul's military would also have to play a role in deterring only could this put South Korea in a dangerous military predicament, but it would also create a diplomatically difficult Lee, who historically has been sceptical of Korea's alliance with the US, wants to use his presidency to improve relations with China, South Korea's powerful neighbour and trading partner. He has stated several times that South Korea should stay out of a conflict between China and Taiwan."We must keep our distance from a China-Taiwan contingency. We can get along with both", he said during a televised debate last month. The political advisor Mr Moon, who once served as national security advisor, reiterated Lee's concerns. "We are worried about America abandoning us, but at the same time we are worried about being entrapped in American strategy to contain and encircle China", he said. "If the US threatens us, we can let [the forces] go", he Mr Revere, the former US diplomat, this combination of Lee, Trump and China threatens to create "the perfect storm". "The two leaders may find themselves on very different pages and that could be a recipe for a problematic relationship. If this plays out, it would undermine peace and stability in North East Asia".In Pyongyang, Kim Jong Un will no doubt be watching closely, keen to exploit the shifting ground. His nuclear weapons programme is more dangerous than ever, and nothing or no-one has been able to convince him to wind it down - including Donald Trump who, during his first term, was the first US president to ever meet a North Korean returning to office Trump has indicated he would like to resume talks with Kim, which ended without agreement in 2019. In Seoul, there is real concern that this time the pair could strike a deal that is very bad for South fear is that Trump would take an "America first" approach, and ask Kim to stop producing his intercontinental ballistic missiles that threaten the US mainland, without addressing the multiple short-range nuclear weapons pointed at Seoul. And in return, Kim could demand a high price. Kim has far more leverage than he did in 2019. He has more nuclear warheads, his weapons are more advanced, and the sanctions that were supposed to put pressure on his regime have all but collapsed, thanks largely to Vladimir Putin. The Russian leader is providing Kim with economic and military support in return for North Korea's help fighting the war in therefore gives Kim the cover to make more audacious requests of the US. He could ask Trump to accept North Korea as a nuclear weapons state, and agree to a deal that would reduce Pyongyang's weapons count rather than get rid of them altogether. Another of his requests could likely be for the US to remove some the security it provides South Korea, including the troops."North Korea is in the driver's seat now. The only curveball is how much risk President Trump will take", said Sydney Seiler, who was involved in the 2019 negotiations on the US side. "The idea there might be some sort of troop withdrawal [included in a deal] is really not that far-fetched".Mr Seiler stressed that the US would "not leave South Korea in the dust," but advised South Korea's new president to "establish a relationship with Trump early on", and be clear they expect to be part of any process, if talks new president must move quickly on all fronts, added Mr Revere, arguing that Lee's first homework assignment should be to come up with a list of 10 reasons why South Korea is an indispensable partner and why American dollars are being well spent; reasons that can convince a sceptical and transactional Trump. One Ace card South Korea is hoping to play is its shipbuilding prowess. It builds more vessels than any other country bar China, which is now the world's dominant ship builder and home to the largest naval fleet. This is a frightening prospect for the US whose own industry and navy are in month I visited South Korea's flagship shipyard in Ulsan on the south coast - the largest in the world – where Hyundai Heavy Industries builds 40-50 new ships a year, including naval destroyers. Sturdy cranes slotted together sheets of metal, creating vessels the size of small is hoping it can use this expertise to build, repair and maintain warships for the US, and in the process convince Washington it is a valuable partner."US shipbuilding difficulties are affecting their national security", said Jeong Woo Maan, head of strategy for Hyundai's naval and ship unit. "This is one of the strongest cards we have to negotiate with".In his campaign for president, Lee Jae-myung declared he did not want to rush into any agreements with Trump. Now in office, he could quickly find himself without this luxury.


The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump news at a glance: Musk attacks president's tax bill; Colorado suspect's family detained by Ice
Days after officially exiting the White House, Elon Musk has grown increasingly critical of President Donald Trump's signature tax bill, describing it as a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk's online outburst may embolden fiscally conservative Republican senators to defy Trump as they continue crucial negotiations on Capitol Hill over the so-called 'one big, beautiful bill'. Musk departed the White House last week after steering its so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) with the stated mission of slashing fraud and abuse within federal departments. He has argued the bill will undermine Doge's work and drive the US further into debt. Here are the key stories at a glance: Elon Musk, the billionaire tech entrepreneur, has opened a new rift with Donald Trump by denouncing the US president's tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on his X social media platform on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Read the full story Republican firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has drawn widespread criticism from Democratic colleagues for admitting that not only did she not read Donald Trump's tax and spending bill before voting for it, but she would have voted against it had she read thoroughly. Read the full story US immigration authorities have taken into custody the family of Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the man who allegedly used a flamethrower to attack a Colorado rally for Israeli hostages, the Department of Homeland Security said. Read the full story Millions of legal immigrants may be left unable to work after the US Social Security Administration quietly instituted a rule change to stop automatically issuing them social security numbers. Read the full story Johnnie Moore, an evangelical leader and adviser to Donald Trump on interfaith issues, has been appointed the new head of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation as the controversial US and Israeli-backed initiative attempts to recover from top-level resignations during its deadly rollout last week. Read the full story The Trump administration rescinded Biden-era guidance clarifying that hospitals in states with abortion bans cannot turn away pregnant patients who are in the midst of medical emergencies – a move that comes amid multiple red-state court battles over the guidance. Read the full story A US judge on Tuesday ruled the US Bureau of Prisons must keep providing transgender inmates gender-affirming care, despite an executive order Donald Trump signed on his first day back in office to halt funding for such care. Read the full story Newark's mayor sued New Jersey's top federal prosecutor over his arrest on a trespassing charge – which was later dropped – at a federal immigration detention facility. Defense secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the US navy to remove Harvey Milk's name from a ship during Pride month, according to multiple reports. The Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts has reportedly seen subscription sales fall by about $1.6m – or roughly 36% – after Trump appointed himself to lead it. The Trump administration reversed its decision to revoke the legal status of a four-year-old girl, receiving ongoing life-saving treatment in the US, and her family after a national outcry. Catching up? Here's what happened on 2 June 2025.


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Dollar edges down as trade tensions simmer ahead of jobs data
TOKYO, June 4 (Reuters) - The dollar drifted lower on Wednesday as the market looked ahead to U.S. employment data for immediate trading cues, while waiting on developments in President Donald Trump's tariff negotiations with key trading partners including China. The Trump administration has given a Wednesday deadline for countries to submit their best offers on trade, the same day a doubling of duties to 50% on imported steel and aluminium comes into effect. Trump is also tipped by the White House to have a call this week with Chinese President Xi Jinping after the two sides accused each other of violating the terms of an agreement last month to roll back some tariffs. In the meantime, macroeconomic indicators have returned as a driver of the U.S. currency this week, even if trade frictions remain centre stage. The dollar slumped 0.8% against major peers on Monday following a contraction in manufacturing, only to rebound by almost the same amount overnight after a surprise increase in U.S. job openings. Early on Wednesday, the dollar was down 0.09% at 143.82 yen and the euro was up 0.13% at $1.1385. The dollar index , which measures the currency against those two peers and four other counterparts, was flat at 99.159. Traders will have an eye on the ADP employment report later in the day, in the run-up to crucial U.S. monthly payrolls figures on Friday. "Job openings were much stronger than expected," Commonwealth Bank of Australia analyst Joseph Capurso said of the overnight JOLTS data, which is closely watched by the Federal Reserve. "The low estimate for ADP means the USD and U.S. bond yields have a small hurdle to climb for a positive surprise tonight." Elsewhere, the Australian dollar was little changed at $0.6460 ahead of the release of GDP figures. South Korea's won strengthened about 0.2% to 1,375.25 per dollar after the victory of liberal candidate Lee Jae-myung in the country's presidential election.