For Senegal women's basketball team, show goes on without US visas
Originally slated to train in the United States, Les Lionnes are instead practising in their home country of Senegal (PATRICK MEINHARDT)
Members of the Senegal women's national basketball team hustled across the court in central Dakar, dribbling and pivoting as the scuffing noise of their trainers echoed across the empty arena.
Originally slated to train in the United States this week, Les Lionnes are instead practising in their home country, an abrupt change of plans highlighting the heightened frustrations for many attempting to enter America under tightened border controls.
Advertisement
Last week it emerged that the United States had rejected visas for 12 of Senegal's players and staff, raising eyebrows just days after the West African nation appeared on a list of countries for which America might extend its travel ban.
"I don't think it's a good look for the US right now", team captain Yacine Diop told reporters at the Dakar practice, conceding that the matter was ultimately out of Les Lionnes' control.
The basketball team's moment in the diplomatic spotlight comes as President Donald Trump's administration cracks down on immigration and US entry, with deportations and visa bans making frequent headlines.
Wearing the team's trademark green, the women spent their first morning of practice drilling and honing technique on Wednesday in Marius Ndiaye arena in central Dakar.
Advertisement
Trundling horse carts plied the street outside alongside taxis and other vehicles on the warm June morning.
"It didn't work out. We're here today, and we have to deal with it", assistant coach Madiene Fall told reporters.
The women were supposed to practise for 10 days in the United States with their American head coach Otis Hughley Jr ahead of the women's AfroBasket 2025 tournament in Ivory Coast next month.
Fall shrugged off the change of plans, telling reporters that the players' success was not contingent on practice location, and pointed to the team's silver medal in the 2023 tournament in Kigali after training in Senegal.
Advertisement
The highly successful Lionnes have finished first or second in eight of the last 10 AfroBaskets, which are held every two years.
Ultimately, team captain Diop added, the 10-day timeframe was short enough that "it doesn't matter if we go to the US or we stay here".
- 'Dunks' Washington -
Senegal Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko was less measured when he defiantly announced last week that he was cancelling the team's participation in the US training in light of the visa ordeal.
Baiting the United States with high praise for its archrival China, he thanked Beijing for its continued support of Senegalese athletes.
Advertisement
"Sonko 'dunks' Washington and lauds Beijing", the top headline in local newspaper Sud Quotidien read the next day.
Sitting outside the stadium, real estate agent Diene Bacar Diouf said "everyone is talking about it".
"The United States of America is a partner for Senegal, so I don't see the reason why they are refusing visas", the 45-year-old said, adding that the matter had "disgusted" him.
The US Embassy did not respond when asked by AFP why the visas were rejected, while the State Department said it was unable to comment on individual cases due to confidentiality.
Advertisement
Senegal is among 36 nations that the United States is considering adding to a 12-country travel ban barring entry to its territory, according to an internal administration memo.
For assistant coach Fall, the visa constraint simply calls for a pivot.
"There is no reason to worry", he told the reporters gathered at the arena, "we will prepare here in Senegal and try to win the holy grail in Ivory Coast."
bfm/cw
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dash Daniels gunning to match Bogut-inspired 2003 gold
Emerging star Dash Daniels has declared Australia are primed to end a decades-long medal drought as they seek to write their own history at the FIBA Under-19 World Cup. The Emus have not been on the podium since an Andrew Bogut-led line-up broke new ground in 2003 as the only Australian men's team to win gold at a global FIBA tournament. The current crop are eyeing their own glory but will have to overcome some significant early hurdles in Switzerland, starting with an opening match against eight-time champions USA early on Sunday morning (1.15am AEST). European heavyweights France and African wildcards Cameroon also feature in Group D - dubbed the 'Group of Death' on FIBA's website. While the tournament format dictates all 16 teams advance to the knockout rounds, the group stage can make or break a campaign. But Emus guard and NBA prospect Daniels - the younger brother of Atlanta Hawks star Dyson Daniels - holds no fears. "A medal is the least you can expect," 17-year-old Daniels told AAP. "Gold would be fantastic and we've got the team to do it. "We've just got to get out there and show the world." Daniels, who will feature as an NBL Next Star with Melbourne United next season, will line up alongside star forward Jacob Furphy for the Emus under head coach Robbie McKinlay. McKinlay's group are aiming to emulate Rob Beveridge's 2003 Emus outfit, which remains the only team from outside North America and Europe to win the FIBA Under-19 World Cup since its inception in 1979. Future NBA No.1 draft pick and champion Bogut was the MVP of that 2003 tournament, alongside fellow stars-in-the-making Damian Martin, Brad Newley, Matt Knight, Rhys Carter and Brad Robbins. The Emus have not reached the quarter-finals at the FIBA Under-19 World Cup since 2015.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Nuggets couldn't help craving Taco Bell in NBA Draft second round
By now, everyone knows Nikola Jokić's incredible story. These days, the Serbian center is a three-time regular-season MVP, the 2023 NBA Finals MVP, and a 2023 NBA champion. Jokić is one of the biggest faces of one of the most competitive eras in NBA history. The guy nicknamed "Joker" is not only the best basketball player in the world, but he's also one of the best ever. It's fitting, then, that he plays an unconventional point center/three-level scorer style that has transformed him into one of the most unique talents ever to palm an orange ball. That style of play is specifically what makes it seem like he has the easiest time dominating whenever he's on the court. Advertisement But before Jokić became the king of the hill and a remarkable all-timer, he was an overlooked second-round NBA Draft pick. Jokić was so overlooked initially, in fact, that the Denver Nuggets' selection of him during the 2014 NBA Draft famously came across the ESPN ticker during a Taco Bell commercial. It's one of those fun, quirky NBA facts that is definitely a staple at many trivia nights across the country. As the No. 41 overall pick clock ticked on Thursday night, the Nuggets decided to make light of their selection of the greatest second-round pick in NBA history. They made a string of Taco Bell jokes, first qualifying their desires for a cheesy quesarito, then following that up with a picture of the item while standing in front of a view of the Denver skyline. When you get this lucky with a prospect who turns into a generational-defining player AND his story so happens to have a funny Taco Bell segue involved, you should feel free to get away with this kind of humor: Call it a hunch, but I'm willing to bet some diehard Nuggets fans celebrate the No. 41 overall pick every year by getting some Taco Bell. When that selection turns into someone unforgettable like Nikola Jokić, it's only fair. That's the type of niche tradition worth celebrating. This article originally appeared on For The Win: Nuggets make perfect Nikola Jokic Taco Bell joke during NBA Draft second round
42 minutes ago
Family files for release in lawsuit considered first involving children challenging arrests at court
A mother and her two young kids are fighting for their release from a Texas immigration detention center in what is believed to be the first lawsuit involving children challenging the Trump administration's policy on immigrant arrests at courthouses. The lawsuit filed Tuesday argues that the family's arrests after fleeing Honduras and entering the U.S. legally using a Biden-era appointment app violate the family's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizure and their Fifth Amendment right to due process. 'The big picture is that the executive branch cannot seize people, arrest people, detain people indefinitely when they are complying with exactly what our government has required of them,' said Columbia Law School professor Elora Mukherjee, one of the lawyers representing the family. The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment. Starting in May, the country has seen large-scale arrests in which asylum-seekers appearing at routine court hearings have been arrested outside courtrooms as part of the White House's mass deportation effort. In many cases, a judge will grant a government lawyer's request to dismiss deportation proceedings and then U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers will arrest the person and place them on 'expedited removal," a fast track to deportation. Mukherjee said this is the first lawsuit filed on behalf of children to challenge the ICE courthouse arrest policy. There have been other similar lawsuits, such as in New York, where a federal judge ruled earlier this month that federal immigration authorities can't make civil arrests at the state's courthouses or arrest anyone going there for a proceeding. The Texas lawsuit was filed using initials for the children and 'Ms. Z' for the mother. Their identities have not been released because of concerns for the family's safety. As the family has been held for a month in the Dilley Immigration Processing Center, the mother has watched her 6-year-old son's health decline, Mukherjee said. He recently underwent chemotherapy treatment for leukemia and because of his arrest missed his check-in doctor's appointment, Mukherjee said. In the weeks since, he has lost his appetite. 'He's easily bruising. He has bone pain. He looks pale," Mukherjee said. "His mom is terrified that these are symptoms that his leukemia situation might be deteriorating.' The mother, son and 9-year-old daughter fled Honduras in October 2024 due to death threats, according to the lawsuit. They entered the U.S. using the CBP One app and were paroled into the country by the Department of Homeland Security, which determined they didn't pose a danger to the community, Mukherjee said. They were told to appear at a Los Angeles immigration court May 29. President Donald Trump ended CBP One for new entrants on his first day in office after more than 900,000 people had been allowed in the country using the app since it was expanded to include migrants in January 2023. During the family's hearing, the mother tried to explain to the judge that they wished to continue their cases for asylum, Mukherjee said. Homeland Security moved to dismiss their cases, and the judge immediately granted that motion. When they stepped out of the courtroom, they found men in civilian clothing believed to be ICE agents who arrested the family, Mukherjee said. They were transported to an immigrant processing center in Los Angeles, where they spent about 11 hours and were each only given an apple, a small packet of cookies, a juice box and water. At one point, an officer near the boy lifted his shirt, revealing his gun. The boy urinated on himself and was left in wet clothing until the next morning, Mukherjee said. They were later taken to the processing center, where they have been held ever since. 'The family is suffering in this immigration detention center,' she said. 'The kids are crying every night. They're praying to God for their release from this detention center." Their lawyers have filed an appeal of the immigration judge's May decision, but they're at risk of being deported within days because the government says they are subjected to expedited removal, Mukherjee said. The arrests of the family were illegal and unjustified, said Kate Gibson Kumar, an attorney for the Texas Civil Rights project who is also representing the family. She said the government had already decided when they first entered the country that the family didn't need to be detained. 'The essential question in our case is, when you have these families who are doing everything right, especially with young children, should there be some protection there?" Gibson Kumar said. "We say 'yes.''
