
B.C. woman whose ‘earliest memories' are of sexual abuse wins civil suit against stepfather
A statue of Themis, Goddess of Justice, in the B.C. Supreme Court building in downtown Vancouver on June 26, 2024 (Zak Vescera / Investigative Journalism Foundation and CTV News)
Warning: This story contains disturbing details.
A B.C woman who sued her former stepfather over childhood sexual abuse has been awarded nearly $900,000 in damages, according to a recent court decision.
Last week, a B.C. Supreme Court judge found James Arthur Smith liable for sexual battery and assault of his stepdaughter, concluding it was more likely than not that he committed multiple and repeated acts of sexual violence against the plaintiff over a nearly 10-year period – starting when the girl was around three years old.
'The defendant's actions during the years of the plaintiff's childhood have caused serious harm to the plaintiff,' Justice Maegen Giltrow wrote in her decision.
'Despite her determination and resilience at times throughout her life, and despite her demonstrated capacity to form meaningful and loving relationships with friends and people she has trusted over the years, the plaintiff has suffered significant psychological injuries due to the defendant's actions.'
The identity of the plaintiff, now 34, is protected by a publication ban and she is referred to as 'MP' throughout the decision.
'The plaintiff attested that her earliest memories are of abuse by the defendant,' the judge wrote.
Smith, the decision noted, has denied all of the allegations and he has not been criminally charged or convicted.
The judge, however, was satisfied on the 'balance of probabilities' that Smith sexually abused MP.
'I have found that the defendant did commit the acts alleged by the plaintiff,' Giltrow wrote in a decision that spans roughly 90 pages and details numerous instances of abuse.
Those include Smith touching his stepdaughter sexually while toilet training and bathing her, touching MP sexually in her bed at night, 'compelling' MP to watch pornography, kissing her on the mouth, making MP suck his toes and looking into the girl's room through a peephole. Smith was also found to have masturbated in front of MP on at least one occasion and to have put her on his lap to 'stimulate his own erection' while touching MP's genitals, according to the decision.
MP's testimony was credible and reliable, despite the passage of time and her young age when the abuse began, the judge found.
'MP described specific events with details – such as the smell of the defendant's foot, the scrape of his toenail on her mouth, the snap of her pyjama pants, the specific locations within the family's various homes of where events occurred, the time of day of the masturbation event, and things the defendant said to her during, or just after, alleged events,' Giltrow wrote.
Smith, on the other hand, was found to lack credibility.
'Overall, the tendency of the defendant's evidence was toward dismissiveness of MP, as though she were an outsider to the family or he did not feel serious concern or responsibility for her,' the judge wrote.
'Devastating' impact
In assessing damages to compensate MP for her pain, suffering and 'loss of enjoyment of life' the judge considered the profound and lasting impact of the abuse on MP's mental health.
'MP began to suffer the tortious acts of the defendant when she was very young,' the decision said. 'She began to suffer the resulting mental health injuries also when she was young.'
'She described by the age of eight seeing suicide as a way out – a 'safety plan' as she put it. This was a devastating result of the defendant's victimization of MP. The injuries to MP's mental health became woven into her life and her identity.'
The court heard expert evidence that MP suffers from PTSD, major depression and anxiety disorders and tends toward agoraphobia. However, the judge also noted repeatedly that MP has shown remarkable resilience.
'The active and positive things MP has been able to accomplish do not refute the severity of the mental health symptoms she suffers. Rather, their import is that she did these things despite her mental health symptoms,' Giltrow wrote.
'MP does not want to be debilitated, she wants to live a full and happy life.'
Despite her best efforts, the judge said, MP was on leave from her job and on long-term disability at the time of the trial and continued to struggle with the effects of trauma in a way that impacted her day-to-day life and all her relationships.
'The consequences on MP have been devastating, despite her efforts to forget and live a life unmarred by this history,' the judge wrote.
The court awarded MP $330,000 in non-pecuniary and aggravated damages as compensation for the impact of the abuse. Smith's 'avoidance and denial of MP's accusations' was also factored into that calculation.
Punitive damages – meant to 'punish' the defendant – are not generally awarded in abuse cases where someone has been convicted and sentenced, the decision said. Given that Smith has never been charged, Giltrow found punitive damages were on the table and ordered Smith to pay $250,000.
'The defendant's conduct was deliberate and concealed, and continued for many years. The defendant prioritized his own sexual desires over the well being of MP, his young stepdaughter. He took advantage of her natural dependence and vulnerability as a child, and violated her personal integrity in a deeply personal way,' the judge wrote.
'Her childhood was scarred by the defendant's actions, and she faces a lifetime of grappling with the consequences. The defendant avoided police investigation when the plaintiff was young. He has never faced criminal charges or conviction.'
The court also awarded MP $100,583 for loss of future earning capacity and $130,000 for the cost of future care – specifically, life-long counselling. Smith was also ordered to pay $71,281 for past wage loss and $12,260 for counselling expenses MP has already incurred – bringing the total to $894,124.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
40 minutes ago
- CBC
Sisters angry at their mother attacked her as she slept, murder trial hears
Two sisters accused of first-degree murder in the 2022 killing of their 88-year-old mother were angry at how they said she treated them, struck and strangled her as she slept, then called 911 and told the dispatcher and police that they had killed her, their trial heard Tuesday. Chau Lam, now 59, and Hue Lam, now 62, have both pleaded not guilty in Superior Court in Ottawa to murdering their mother Kieu Lam. The salt-and-pepper-haired sisters sat in the courtroom Tuesday directly behind defence counsel as the judge gave her opening instructions to the jury and the Crown opened its case. Jury selection was completed Monday. Assistant Crown prosecutor Tasha Bobrovitz told the 13 jurors — seven men and six women — that in the days leading up to the killing on Oct. 31, 2022, the sisters discussed a plan to kill their mother. "They entered her bedroom as she slept in the comfort of her bed, used a hammer to strike her head, and throttled her with a string cinched across her neck," Bobrovitz said. "You will hear each of them in their confessions to police describe how they did it, why they did it and when they did it, in detail. "They were mad — angry at their mother for how they say she treated them." Co-operated with police The sisters were waiting at the front door when police arrived and pointed them up to the second floor of their townhouse where Kieu Lam was lying unresponsive in her bed. Lifesaving efforts had no effect and she was pronounced dead. A forensic pathologist is expected to testify that the cause of death was compression to the neck with a component of ligature strangulation, Bobrovitz said. One officer spoke to the sisters, who speak Vietnamese and participating in the trial with the help of live translation, in the kitchen, using broken English and Cantonese. Bobrovitz told the jury that when the officer asked them what happened, Hue Lam pointed at herself and her sister, clasped both of her hands together in a fist, raised it above her head, then made a downward striking motion. Witnesses for the Crown include police and paramedics who responded to the scene, a forensic pathologist who visited the scene and performed the autopsy on Kieu Lam, and the homicide detectives who interviewed each sister separately and heard "exacting details about the murder of their mother," Bobrovitz said. 'Me and my sister kill my mom' The dispatcher who took Chau Lam's 911 call was the first witness to testify. Marlo Villalobos said it was his birthday the day of the call, and colleagues had just finished singing him happy birthday when he offered to pick up an incoming call. That call was played in court. In the recording, Lam says she needs police and that "Me and my sister kill my mom." "Sorry, I'm having a really hard time understanding," Villalobos replies. "Kill my mom," Lam says before spelling out the word kill. The dispatcher puts Lam on hold to get a translator. When he and the translator hop back onto the line, the translator confirms that Lam is saying she and her sister killed their mother. "Yeah, too angry, so they took a hammer and hit her and strangle her. I don't know if she's dead or not," the translator says. The dispatcher asks if their mother is breathing and if they can go check, and Chau Lam replies through the translator that she doesn't know and will let police check. Moments later police are heard arriving, and the call ends a short while later. Friend of the court appointed for Hue Lam Justice Narissa Somji is presiding the approximately five-week trial. Chau Lam is being represented by defence lawyers Ewan Lyttle and Brett McGarry. Hue Lam is representing herself. To ensure her right to a fair trial, Paolo Giancaterino was appointed by the court to act as an amicus curiae, or friend of the court, to raise any important issues, ask questions and make submissions and objections during the trial. That may sound a lot like a defence lawyer's role, but amicus curiae don't act quite the same. The bar for raising issues is typically higher for an amicus curiae than for defence counsel, and is limited to interventions aimed at preventing a miscarriage of justice. Bobrovitz is prosecuting the case alongside assistant Crown attorney Julian Whitten.


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
P.E.I. judge to decide this fall on legality of DNA taken from Byron Carr murder suspect
Dates have been set for court proceedings that will determine whether the DNA collected from Todd Joseph Gallant as part of the investigation used to charge him with the murder of Byron Carr violated his rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Gallant has been charged with one count of first-degree murder and one count of interfering with human remains connected to the 1988 killing of the 36-year-old Montague Regional High School teacher. Charlottetown Police had long said they believed Carr had consensual sex with a young man he brought to his Charlottetown home, and presumed that person was his killer. Advances in technology prompted the force to reopen the Carr cold case in 2007. Last year, Charlottetown Police announced it had used genetic genealogy to match a DNA sample taken from underwear at the Carr crime scene to Gallant, who lived on P.E.I. at the time of the murder but left the province shortly afterward. He returned to the Island in 2022. Gallant's lawyer, Chris Montigny, told CBC News on Tuesday that the defence is taking issue specifically with one step in the process that investigators said they used to match the crime scene DNA to Gallant. "We're alleging that the seizure of some of the evidence was contrary to the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure," Montigny said. "An accused person is allowed to ask a court to consider whether or not that evidence was collected in violation of their Charter rights — and if so, what is the appropriate remedy? "In this case, we're asking that that evidence that we say was gathered improperly be excluded from the trial." Sample gathered in 2023 Montigny said this comes down to "an opportunity to get DNA" from Gallant in 2023 when had returned to P.E.I. and was living in Souris. No details have emerged in court about how this DNA was gathered. Gallant has already pleaded not guilty and elected for his case to be heard before a judge and jury in the Supreme Court of P.E.I. But the arguments on whether the DNA evidence can be produced will be made before a judge alone, starting Oct. 8. In the meantime, both Montigny and the Crown prosecutor handling the case will be preparing for that hearing. They have to file documents with the court on dates that were fixed during a court appearance on Tuesday. The hearing in October will involve calling witnesses, which Montigny said will likely include police officers who took part in the investigation. Gallant has been in jail for a year and a half so far and will stay there until his next scheduled appearance, at the October hearing.


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Edmonton police say shootings are down from last month
Edmonton police say that shootings have been on the decline. There were eight recorded shootings last month, a decrease from 11 shootings recorded in April and the 10 shootings recorded in May 2024. 'The drop in shootings last month is certainly a positive and hopefully is a trend,' says Staff Sgt. David Graham of the Edmonton Police Service (EPS) Firearms Investigation Section. 'The EPS has built a strategy to not only fully investigate every shooting and the individuals and groups involved but also trace the origins of the firearms in an effort to work towards prevention.' EPS Edmonton police say shootings have gone down from last month. (Supplied) Of the eight reported shootings in May, seven were believed to be targeted and five resulted in reported injuries. There was one death as a result of a shooting last month. Police also seized 56 firearms in May, contributing to a total of 312 seized so far this year. Last year at this time, Edmonton police had confiscated 332 firearms.