Woman pleads guilty to aggravated robbery at Urbana car dealership
Editor's Note: Video aired in 2023, after police arrested multiple people in connection to the armed robbery at Crispin Auto.
CHAMPAIGN, Ill. (WCIA) — Nearly two years after the crime occurred, a woman has pleaded guilty for her role in an armed robbery at an Urbana dealership in 2023.
On June 7, 2023, a Crispin Auto employee was robbed at gunpoint and a car was stolen. The next day multiple people were arrested in a McLean County town. Police officials said the car they were driving in was stolen from an Urbana dealership.
Michaella Campbell pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery on Monday. She was ordered to serve 48 months of probation, 180 days in the Champaign County Correctional Center (with credit for 145 days previously served) and 100 hours of public service work. If Cook County approves, the probation will be served in their jurisdiction.
WCIA previously reported that surveillance video obtained after the aggravated robbery shows the incident started with a test drive involving an employee and two White women.
When the three returned to Crispin Auto, two Black men were recorded on surveillance footage running up to the car as the employee was getting out. One pointed a gun to the back of the employee's head and shoved her out of the way. Seconds later, the same employee was pepper sprayed by one of the women before she got in the car with the other suspects and drove away.
Third defendant in U of I pro-Palestine protest pleads guilty to misdemeanor
Three other people were arrested alongside Campbell, according to the Urbana Police Department. This included Michael Roberts, Deandre Young and an unnamed female juvenile.
Roberts and Young previously pleaded guilty, in June and December of 2024 respectively, to aggravated robbery. They each received 48 months of probation, and a 180-day jail sentence. Roberts received 366 days credited for time served, while Young received 545 days credited for time served.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
He was 20 when he was sentenced to death. Now he hopes US Supreme Court will hear his case
A man on Mississippi's death row is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to take a look at his case while he continues seeking other federal relief. Terry Pitchford, 39, was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death in 2006 for the death of a man in a Grenada County grocery store during an armed robbery in 2004. In 2023, Terry Pitchford's conviction and death sentence were set aside and a new trial was ordered by a federal district court judge. The state appealed and the conviction and sentence were reinstated after a ruling in favor of the state by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Mississippi: Man whose death sentence was overturned in 2023 is now facing death again. Here's why Now Pitchford is hoping the nation's highest court will review his case while he also continues to work on other aspects of the case in the Mississippi Northern District of U.S. District Court. The state has until July 3 to file a brief opposing Pitchford's petition. The Supreme Court may consider Pitchford's petition at the opening conference of the October term. Pitchford is asking the Supreme Court to review his Batson claim, which refers to jury selection in which race, ethnicity or gender played a role in excluding potential jurors. During jury selection at Pitchford's trial, then-District Attorney Doug Evans "used four of his allotted 12 peremptory strikes to remove four of the five Black venirepersons provisionally seated in the jury's empaneling," court records show. Evans was accused of doing the same during the prosecution of Curtis Flowers, who stood trial six times for the murders of four people at a furniture store in Winona. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2019 overturned Flowers' conviction for the last time, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh "citing a 'relentless, determined effort to rid the jury of Black individuals,'" according to an earlier story. In Pitchford's case, during his appeal, the Mississippi Supreme Court said Pitchford should have raised objections at his initial trial if he wanted to contest the jury selection. The court's decision in favor of the state was not unanimous. Two justices disagreed with the ruling, saying "the record showed that D.A. Evans used peremptory strikes in an intentionally racially discriminatory manner," according to court documents. The federal court agreed with the dissenters and set aside Pitchford's conviction and ordered a new trial. The federal appellate court looked at the case and determined the Mississippi Supreme Court did not err when it considered the Batson claim and reinstated Pitchford's conviction and sentence. Now it will be up to the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in, if it decides to review the case. Lici Beveridge is a reporter for the Hattiesburg American and Clarion Ledger. Contact her at lbeveridge@ Follow her on X @licibev or Facebook at This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Mississippi death row inmate asks SCOTUS for help

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
The Daily Money: Is AI coming for your job?
The Daily Money: Is AI coming for your job? Good morning! It's Daniel de Visé with your Daily Money: Yes, this newsletter is still written by humans. If the job market is slowing, as many economists predict, don't blame the trend solely on uncertainty surrounding President Donald Trump's tariffs. You can also point the finger at AI. Here's how artificial intelligence is changing the hiring landscape. Can White workers claim discrimination? For decades, men, straight people and White people were often held to a higher legal standard when bringing workplace bias claims than groups that historically faced discrimination. No longer. The Supreme Court this week made it easier for members of so-called 'majority groups' to sue for discrimination by siding with an Ohio woman who claimed she twice lost jobs to lesser-qualified gay candidates because she is straight. Here's what that means for future discrimination complaints. Big Brother is watching you more than ever For decades, the government has been able to watch where you drive and where you walk. It can figure out where you shop, what you buy and with whom you spend time. It knows how much money you have, where you've worked and, in many cases, what medical procedures you've endured. But because all of those data points were scattered across dozens of federal, state and commercial databases, it wasn't easy for the government to build a comprehensive profile of your life. That's changing ‒ fast. 📰 More stories you shouldn't miss 📰 We haven't forgotten about Consumer Friday. Here are the week's top headlines. About The Daily Money Each weekday, The Daily Money delivers the best consumer and financial news from USA TODAY, breaking down complex events, providing the TLDR version and explaining how everything from Fed rate changes to bankruptcies impacts you. Daniel de Visé covers personal finance for USA Today.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Russia offers Elon Musk political asylum after billionaire's public feud with Donald Trump
Russia has said it would offer political asylum to billionaire Elon Musk following his high-profile feud with US President Donald Trump. Dmitry Novikov, first deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs, told the state news outlet TASS: 'I think that Musk has a completely different game, [so] he will not need any political asylum, although if he did, Russia, of course, could provide it.' The surprise offer comes after Musk and Trump clashed publicly earlier this week in a series of heated exchanges on social media and in comments to the press, rattling markets and plunging shares in Musk's Tesla company. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov refused to directly weigh in on the dispute when questioned by reporters on Friday, describing the row as a 'domestic issue of the United States'. 'We don't intend to interfere,' Peskov said. 'We're confident the US president will handle this situation on his own.' Russia previously made headlines for granting political asylum to US whistleblower Edward Snowden and pro-Kremlin British blogger Graham Phillips. The row erupted after Musk resigned last week as head of a controversial federal agency called DOGE, aimed at cutting US government spending. He described President Trump's spending bill, a key piece of domestic policy, as a 'disgusting abomination' that would irresponsibly add to the national debt. Trump publicly criticised Musk's stance, telling reporters during a news conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday: 'I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. All of a sudden he had a problem.' Trump implied Musk was primarily concerned about the removal of subsidies for electric vehicles, potentially hurting Tesla. Musk denied this, tweeting: 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' The relationship deteriorated further when Musk claimed Trump was 'ungrateful,' stating: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election.' Musk had previously donated $300 million to Trump's 2024 re-election campaign and had been considered a close ally on issues such as spending cuts. Despite the acrimonious exchanges, both parties appeared open to reconciliation by late Thursday. Trump told Politico the situation was 'going very well, never done better,' with aides scheduling a phone call between the pair. Musk also signalled a potential cooling of tensions, responding to prominent Trump supporter Bill Ackman's suggestion they should reconcile, by writing: 'You're not wrong.' However, Musk's vow to scrap a key US space programme in response to the feud has already sent shockwaves through the markets, deepening concern about the longer-term implications of the row.