logo
What are sleeper cells and why is the US on high alert after Iran nuclear sites bombing?

What are sleeper cells and why is the US on high alert after Iran nuclear sites bombing?

Indian Express4 hours ago

The United States is on high alert after Iran threatened to activate sleeper cells inside the country in response to President Donald Trump's strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites, which drew the US directly into Israel's war with Iran. The airstrikes, carried out on Saturday night, hit key facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites central to Iran's uranium enrichment operations. The strikes came as part of a joint effort with Israel, whose offensive against Iran began earlier this month.
Iran had earlier warned that if attacked, it could activate sleeper cells inside the US. The warning was reportedly delivered to Trump through an intermediary at the G7 summit in Canada last week, according to The Telegraph.
Now, security agencies including the FBI and Department of Homeland Security have increased surveillance to counter potential threats linked to Iran or its allies, including Hezbollah.
Sleeper cells are operatives who live quietly in a country, blending into society until they are told to act. These individuals may work normal jobs and avoid drawing attention. When activated, they could carry out attacks, sabotage or espionage.
Former Homeland Security adviser Michael Balboni told Fox News, 'The Iranians have shown a good capability in terms of their intelligence apparatus and operatives being able to work clandestinely. They are determined. The question is how many are in the country and the answer is we don't know.'
According to Fox News, White House border czar Tom Homan revealed that over 1,200 Iranian nationals reportedly entered the US during former President Joe Biden's time in office, sparking concerns about potential domestic sleeper cells driven by foreign terrorist organisations.
Homan shared this information on 'Sunday Morning Futures' with Maria Bartiromo, highlighting the risks associated with foreign nationals flowing into the country. National security experts are worried that these individuals could pose a threat to US security, especially in light of recent tensions with Iran .
However, US officials are especially concerned about cells linked to Hezbollah, a group supported by Iran. The FBI began stepping up monitoring of suspected Hezbollah-linked agents well before the latest strikes.
The National Terrorism Advisory System issued a bulletin warning of a 'heightened threat environment' after the strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. While no specific plot has been identified, the advisory said the risk of violence could rise if Iran calls for retaliation inside the US.
Former FBI assistant director Chris Swecker told Fox News that the situation is made more difficult because of gaps in border controls in recent years. 'We don't know where those thousand Iranians are and who knows how many others got across the border,' he said.
He believes that authorities missed an opportunity to gather intelligence by not thoroughly vetting these individuals, saying 'we missed the opportunity to gather intel by interviewing them and thoroughly vetting them. We just simply let them go.' Swecker attributes this to 'gross negligence on the part of the Biden administration.'
According to CBS News, potential targets of Iranian-backed plots include high-profile critics of the Iranian government, such as John Bolton, former national security adviser, and Masih Alinejad, an Iranian American journalist. Both individuals have been subject to alleged plots to be harmed, with prosecutors charging people with plotting to kill them in recent years.
The increased surveillance started earlier this month, after Israel's Operation Rising Lion offensive began, according to the report.
This heightened vigilance stems from longstanding concerns about Iranian operatives, particularly after the 2020 assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, which prompted the FBI and Department of Homeland Security to bolster counter-threat resources.
Since then, several US-based individuals have been charged with plotting to kill Trump and his former national security adviser John Bolton.
The airstrikes ordered by Trump targeted the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites, which are central to Iran's ability to produce enriched uranium. Israel's campaign against Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure began on 13 June. Trump's decision to join the offensive marks a major escalation in US involvement.
Iran has described the US strikes as 'unforgivable' and vowed to respond. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned Iran that any attack on the US would be 'the worst mistake they've ever made,' speaking on Fox Business.
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that Israel was 'close' to destroying Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities.
Sleeper cells have long been a concern for US security services. After the 9/11 attacks, agencies increased efforts to detect covert groups that could plan violence while appearing to live normal lives. While the 9/11 hijackers were not sleeper agents living in the US long-term, the attack highlighted the dangers of operatives planning in secret.
Iran has previously been linked to attempts to use such cells for attacks or assassinations abroad. Balboni told Fox News that sleeper cells could target individuals or infrastructure and are difficult to track because they 'look just like everyone else.'
Mashkoora Khan is a sub-editor on the global desk. With a background as a multimedia journalist, her work has been featured in publications such as Al Jazeera, Down to Earth, and The Wire among other national and International outlets. ... Read More

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

By bombing Iran, Trump made a mockery of his own call for talks: Congress
By bombing Iran, Trump made a mockery of his own call for talks: Congress

Time of India

time21 minutes ago

  • Time of India

By bombing Iran, Trump made a mockery of his own call for talks: Congress

Congress on Monday said the US bombing of Iran's nuclear sites made a mockery of President Trump's calls for continuation of talks with the Islamic republic, speaking on the issue after maintaining silence on it on the previous day. "President Trump's decision to unleash US airpower on Iran makes a mockery of his own calls for the continuation of talks with Iran. The Indian National Congress reiterates the absolute essentiality of immediate diplomacy and dialogue with Iran," said party spokesman Jairam Ramesh. Speaking to media persons in Karnataka, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said, "We want peace in the world. Iran is our neighbour and always stands with us in tough times. We have trade relations with Iran, and we import crude oil from them. When the question of J&K was raised in the UN, Iran took our side. We want Iran not to suffer. He further said, "We don't want any country to attack any sovereign, democratic country... Be it Israel, Iran, or the US, they shouldn't attack any sovereign, independent country... India has always been with those who want to be at peace." Economic Times WhatsApp channel )

The sorry state of South Asian economic integration
The sorry state of South Asian economic integration

The Hindu

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

The sorry state of South Asian economic integration

In the year so far there were two major incidents that shook India's economic and national security landscape: the reciprocal tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and the terror attack in Pahalgam. While these events may seem unrelated, their underlying causes and consequences are deeply interlinked, highlighting the urgent need for a comprehensive regional approach to security and economic stability. Economic and national security are often discussed separately, but they are deeply intertwined. Border disputes among South Asian nations significantly hamper trade and economic cooperation, preventing the region from achieving its full potential. Economic instability fuels unrest, while security threats disrupt trade and investment. No country can achieve lasting security without economic prosperity, and vice versa. One of the least integrated The South Asian region is one of the least economically integrated regions in the world. Intraregional trade of South Asia (South Asian Free Trade Area or SAFTA) accounts for barely 5% to 7% of its total international trade, which is the lowest when compared to other trading blocs. In contrast, intraregional trade accounts for approximately 45% of total international trade within the European Union (EU), 22% within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and around 25% within the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Current trade among South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries is just around $23 billion, far below the estimated $67 billion. According to a United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) study, South Asia's potential trade could have reached $172 billion by 2020, which means over 86% of its capacity remains unexploited. Even if we consider this assessment to be optimistic, the immense potential for significantly increasing intra-SAARC trade can never be denied. South Asia, the most populous region of the world (25% of the world's population), represents a combined market of only $5 trillion in GDP. On the other side, the EU, with 5.8% of the world's population, accounts for $18 trillion in GDP, and NAFTA has a GDP of $24.8 trillion. This clearly shows the underexploited capacity of the South Asian region. There is much potential As estimated by the UNESCAP South Asia Gravity Model of intraregional trade, in spite of trade liberalisation under SAFTA, intraregional trade in South Asia is less than a third of its potential. Bangladesh has the highest unexploited proportion, at 93%, followed by the Maldives (88%), Pakistan (86%), Afghanistan (83%), and Nepal (76%). Because of terror insurgencies and border disputes, trade between India and Pakistan has seen a significant decline over the years. Bilateral trade between India and Pakistan fell from $2.41 billion in 2018 to $1.2 billion in 2024. Further, Pakistani exports to India fell from $547.5 million in 2019 to just $480,000 in 2024. South Asia's trade-to-GDP ratio decreased from 47.30% in 2022 to 42.94% in 2024. Additionally, the World Bank reported a softened growth forecast of 5.8% for 2025, down from 6% in 2024. As imports have grown faster than exports for all South Asian countries, the trade deficit of the subregion has widened from $204.1 billion in 2015 to $339 billion in 2022. However, the value of overall trade, covering both exports and imports, increased significantly between 2015-22 to approximately $1,335 billion. Despite SAFTA, trading with neighbours is not 'free'. The inefficient trade governing mechanism and an unpromising political environment increase the cost of intraregional trade, which is one of the major reasons for significantly smaller intra-regional trade. Costs of trading within South Asia remain high at 114% of the value of the goods being exported, making trading with neighbouring nations more expensive or less competitive, compared to trading with distant partners. For instance, South Asia's bilateral trade cost with the U.S. is only 109% despite the vastly greater distance. It is about 20% more costly for a company in India to trade with Pakistan than with Brazil, which is 22 times farther away. This discourages the formation of regional value chains despite the geographic contiguity. In contrast, intraregional trade costs for ASEAN are some 40% lower than intra-SAARC trade costs, at 76%, creating high incentives for interdependence in that bloc. The main hurdles The low level of intraregional trade in South Asia demonstrates the absence of strategic policies. SAFTA and other regional agreements have the potential to create greater economic linkages. Besides, over two-thirds of the potential of intraregional trade in goods, the potential of trade in services, and investments in South Asia remain untapped. To this end, greater regional cooperation could facilitate the development of complementary and mutually beneficial export sectors by focusing on lowering trade barriers. SAARC had the aim of ending distrust and tension, but trust deficits and regional conflicts hinder the full implementation of agreements such as SAFTA. Political diversity, regional disputes, minority issues and terrorism are major obstacles to regional cooperation. Most SAARC countries are in conflict with each other, preventing effective regional integration. Lesser trade opportunity means lesser capacity for innovation, production and investment in the people of the country. Therefore, to exploit the full potential of the South Asian region, members must work actively to enhance intra-regional trade, keeping aside their bilateral conflicts. Shashank Patel is a scholar of international trade law at the South Asian University (SAU), New Delhi

'Remain Calm': Centre To 7.45 Lakh Indians As Iran Missiles Hit Qatar
'Remain Calm': Centre To 7.45 Lakh Indians As Iran Missiles Hit Qatar

NDTV

time23 minutes ago

  • NDTV

'Remain Calm': Centre To 7.45 Lakh Indians As Iran Missiles Hit Qatar

New Delhi: Nearly eight lakh Indians live in Qatar, sources in the External Affairs Ministry told NDTV late Monday, shortly after Iran fired ballistic missiles at a US Air Force base in that country. The Indian community in Qatar has been advised to "remain calm and indoors". "In view of the ongoing situation, the Indian community is urged to be cautious... remain calm, stay indoors, and follow instructions and guidance provides by Qatari authorities." Indian officials in Doha said updates will be posted on official social media channels. Minutes earlier Iran's Supreme National Security Council confirmed it had fired ballistic missiles at the Al-Udeid air base in Qatar. Tehran stressed the attack had been targeted at the American military facility only, and that urban centres were not damaged. The strike, the Council said, it was retaliation for the US bombing three Iranian nuclear facilities Sunday. The Council's message has been seen as a message to Washington - that Iran is satisfied with these retaliatory strikes and is willing to stand down, i.e., not escalate this conflict further. According to the New York Times, US President Donald Trump, rushed to a secure Situation Room to monitor developments in West Asia, does not intend counter-strikes at this time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store