
EXCLUSIVE The migrant tent cities springing up in the suburb where one in every 112 residents is an asylum seeker
Mini 'tent cities' have sprung up in a West London borough where councillors say they are struggling to cope with housing thousands of asylum seekers.
Hillingdon had supported 89 asylum seekers out of every 10,000 residents at the end of last year – or one in every 112 – and residents told MailOnline the taxpayers' money which the council is having to pay to house them was 'disgraceful'.
Councillors say they are £5million short of the funds they would need to support everyone asking for help - putting a 'huge burden' on taxpayers and local services.
With some deemed ineligible for housing support after leaving hotels, there has been a 'significant increase' in rough sleeping - with 'tented communities' springing up in parks and under bridges.
Hillingdon accommodates a higher number of asylum seekers than average because of the large number of hotels it has near Heathrow Airport.
Some of these are used as taxpayer-funded asylum accommodation – and, once a migrant moves into a hotel, they become the local council's responsibility.
Residents said they think central government needs to fork out more money, but were equally sympathetic to the plight of the asylum seekers fleeing war and famine.
Lisa Stevens, who lives in Cowley, a village within the borough of Hillingdon, admitted she did not know how much the council was spending on asylum seekers.
'I see them all at the hotels [near Heathrow],' the 49-year-old told MailOnline. 'I didn't know it was that much we were spending on them.
'I just pay my bills. My daughter's in temporary accommodation and can't get a council house, and she's lived in the borough for 18 years.'
Margaret, another Hillingdon resident, said she was 'fed-up' with the current migrant situation, and couldn't understand how authorities were unable to stop small boats crossing the Channel in the first place.
The 76-year-old fumed: 'I find it absolutely appalling. My husband's in a nursing home and has been for three years. All I get to help is the attendance allowance of £435 a month. The rest comes out of our savings and my husband's state pension.
'I find it incredible that they can't stop the boats coming over. I can't understand why they can't and what the French are doing. I worked all my life, sent my kids to university and now I am paying for my husband's care. It's absolutely disgraceful.'
Meanwhile Gina Forse sympathised with migrants making the perilous journey across the Channel to Britain, but believes central government should be footing the lion's share of the bill for migrants, not individual local councils.
'I work for the mental health trust,' the 66-year-old said. 'We have a lot of asylum seekers in hotels who come across with a lot of mental health problems to do with their homes and their traumatic journeys across.
'[The money to house them] should come from central government. Asylum seekers should also have a separate mental health service for them as well, because it's draining on our already-drained mental health services.
'Some people obviously need help more urgently than others, so we should triage them.'
Sharon Harries, who works at Hillingdon Hospital, said asylum seekers often shoulder the blame for wider failures in services in Britain.
'It's nothing to do with asylum seekers,' the 68-year-old, who lives in Uxbridge, said. 'The National Health Service is not what it used to be. Waiting lists are getting longer and longer. People wait so long for one appointment that they don't even turn up.'
Councillor Steve Tuckwell, cabinet member for planning, housing and growth at Hillingdon Council, said the strain on local services could soon increase due to the large number of asylum seekers currently staying in local hotels.
He told MailOnline: 'We estimate there's around 3,500 asylum seekers in hotels in Hillingdon at the moment, which is the largest concentration in the country.'
'These asylum seekers will eventually become the responsibility of the London Borough of Hillingdon.
'And that doesn't include the additional asylum seekers that the Home Office is processing and will put in hotels.'
The Conservative councillor said Government funding was not enough to cover the costs lumbered on the council, resulting in it having to stump up £5million a year from its own funds.
'Five million pounds would cover the entire library and heritage service for the year,' he said.
'The government provide some funding, but we are way, way, way beyond that. We estimate the funding [for this year] will run out by November.
'After that, the entire burden of asylum seekers will be with the Hillingdon taxpayer. That's unacceptable, particularly because some companies are making record profits from processing asylum claims.'
Mr Tuckwell added that their asylum seeker burden was also being added to by British Nationals Overseas (BNOs) arriving from the Chagos Islands, which is expected to be handed over to Mauritius under a controversial new deal agreed by Labour.
'This week alone, we had 129 individuals arrived from the Chagos Islands,' he continued.
'They arrive at Heathrow Airport and, if they have dependants, we are obliged to house them. The Government have said they will only cover the costs for the first ten days.
'We are putting as much pressure on the Government as we can to provide adequate funding for processing asylum claims. It's a huge burden and it also diverts our attention from the services we provide our residents.
'Hillingdon is a welcoming borough, but the volume of asylum seekers being given permanent settlement means we need the funding from government to carry out their policy.
'It's not right that the Hillingdon taxpayer is to fund all of that. It's not acceptable.'
Mr Tuckwell added that the council were housing some asylum seekers in newly refurbished temporary accommodation blocks in the borough, but admitted that rough sleeping had risen among asylum seekers deemed ineligible for housing.
Outside the Holiday Inn near the airport, Afghani asylum seeker Tory Alai said he had been living in Hillingdon for over a year, after spending his first year in Colchester, Essex.
The 23-year-old said he took a small boat across the English Channel from France along with 18 other people, and insisted that he would not go back to Afghanistan, where the 'dangerous' Taliban now rule.
'I am not worried about being thrown out of the hotel,' he told MailOnline. 'I am going to a friend's home. I am not going back to Afghanistan.'
Another man named Carlos, from Cali in Colombia, said he had been paying to stay in the same Holiday Inn hotel since arriving in the UK last August.
London Councils, which represents the capital's boroughs, told the BBC that asylum accommodation pressures 'are felt by boroughs across the capital and are especially acute in port authorities like Hillingdon'.
The group said it estimated a funding shortfall 'of at least £500million this year across all services.
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'This government inherited a broken asylum system, with tens of thousands stuck in a backlog and claims not being processed, wasting millions in taxpayer money.
'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so we can end the use of hotels, and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Anti-Brexit newspaper changes name to reflect ‘reality' of global politics
The New European, a 'Remainer' magazine launched in response to the Brexit referendum, is being renamed to reflect the changing picture of global politics. The rebrand to The New World is a nod to the 'the global unravelling' which started with Britain leaving the EU but is now being seen worldwide in countries such as the US, according to founder and editor in chief Matt Kelly. 'The New European was conceived as a pop-up provocation; a defiant middle finger to the rising tide of right wing populism that brought us Brexit,' said Mr Kelly. 'Nine years later, the world and The New European has changed dramatically. This is a reflection of that new reality. 'We know there is enormous appetite for our style of journalism - vibrant, constructive, witty and full of ideas and great reads that make sense of this extraordinary moment in world politics and culture.' The New European, which has published more than 400 editions, had 35,000 paying subscribers and claim revenues have trebled since the business moved independent three years ago. Tony Blair's former spin doctor Alastair Campbell, who is editor-at-large of The New European newspaper, said themes that underpinned Brexit are playing out around the world, including a political shift to the right in many nations. 'We're always going to be very passionately anti-Brexit, very pro internationalism, liberal democracy,' said Mr Campbell. 'When we started the paper, you could never have predicted [where we are]. Just to look at United States alone. You wouldn't have predicted that Ukraine and Russia were going to be fighting a war on the edge of Europe. Lots has happened - it's a reflection of that.' Mr Campbell said he will 'never resile from the view that Brexit is the biggest act of self harm that we've inflicted upon ourselves', but added: 'I'm hoping this will be the next chapter of a story that we're going to keep telling, which is that liberal democracy is the way forward, that nationalism is not the answer to the challenges that we face, that populism is doomed to fail, and there's a better way that involves people with an optimistic, internationalist outlook.' New contributing editors slated to join The New World include Sonia Sodha, formerly of The Observer, The Revenge of Power author Moises Naim and Tom Baldwin, Keir Starmer's biographer and former senior advisor to Labour.


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Conspiracy theorists share bizarre claims over Meghan Markle's twerking video saying baby bump is FAKE and it wasn't filmed inside hospital
Social media conspiracy theorists have weaponised Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's twerking hospital video to spread wild and groundless speculation that she wasn't pregnant at all and was wearing a 'moonbump '. A group of Twitter critics of the Sussexes have even made the extraordinary claim that the dancing video was faked and made on a film set - or could be AI-generated. Meghan Markle yesterday posted a video of her and Prince Harry twerking in a hospital room in an attempt to induce Lilibet's birth. The Duchess of Sussex shared the throwback clip on her Instagram to mark her daughter's fourth birthday saying 'there was only one thing left to do' when the princess was overdue and spicy food, walking and acupuncture failed to kickstart labour. But conspiracy theorists have pored over the film in order to make wild and even unhinged claims about her including that her pregnancy was faked and she wore a prosthetic fake pregnant belly known as a 'moonbump'. Several claimed, without credible evidence, that her bump was too high or the wrong shape to be real. Others said her ability to dance that way at nine months meant she was either 'superhuman' or not pregnant at all. Others have sought to back the incredible and baseless claim that the Sussexes used a surrogate by claiming the equipment in the background suggested it was not on a labour ward. Trolls have also claimed that Meghan would have been wearing a gown and would have had her jewellery removed. Others have questioned why she wasn't hooked up to an IV drip containing induction medication. One person claiming to be a nurse said that she should have had a canula in her hand. Another alleged that she would not have one fitted while in her own clothes. Some Twitter users crudely marked the pictures with what they considered inaccuracies, using child-like scribbles. MailOnline has asked a spokesman for the Sussexes to comment. The video has sparked baseless claims on social media that it was faked The video has sparked a social media frenzy. In it, Harry is seen coming into view of the camera as Starrkeisha's viral Baby Mama song begins to play. A heavily pregnant Meghan then starts twerking in front of a hospital bed before she gyrates around the room. 'Four years ago today, this also happened. Both of our children were a week past their due dates… so when spicy food, all that walking, and acupuncture didn't work - there was only one thing left to do!,' Meghan wrote on her Instagram. The Baby Mama dance was a social media craze in 2018 with celebs Shay Mitchell, and Chloe and Lauryn Goodman all previously posting videos of themselves taking part in the trend. Meghan had earlier shared two previously unseen photos of Lilibet with Harry. One of the pictures showed the Duke of Sussex holding his daughter's hand as they walked along a sandy road barefoot in the sunshine, while he held his shoes and a cap. The other image was of Harry holding Lilibet as a baby while they looked at each other. Meghan wrote in a post accompanying the pictures: 'The sweetest bond to watch unfold. Daddy's little girl and favorite adventurer. Happy birthday Lili!' The post was made at 7.40am California time (3.40pm UK), just under eight hours after Meghan earlier posted two other intimate family photos of her with Lilibet. In that post, the Duchess shared a black-and-white snap of herself cuddling Lili, who was sat on her lap, with the pair both sporting windswept hair, seemingly on a boat. The second image in the first post showed Meghan tenderly cradling newborn Lilibet as she enjoyed skin-to-skin time with the new addition to her family in 2021. Meghan wrote in the first post: 'Happy birthday to our beautiful girl! Four years ago today she came into our lives - and each day is brighter and better because of it. 'Thanks to all of those sending love and celebrating her special day!' The duchess usually only shares photos of her daughter pictured from behind to protect her privacy. But in the more recent photo, Lili's eyes and the top half of her face could be seen, with her nose and mouth and the rest of her face covered by Meghan's arms as she hugged the princess. Lili - the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's youngest child - was born on June 4 2021 and was named Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. She only became entitled to be a princess when her grandfather the King acceded to the throne, because of rules set out by King George V in 1917. Harry and Meghan started using prince and princess for Archie and Lili after the princess's christening in 2023, following correspondence with Charles about the matter. Yesterday, Meghan expressed her dream of launching a future business with Lili as she chatted to Beyonce's mother Tina Knowles on her podcast. 'I wonder if one day I'll be in business with Lili and we'll be building something,' the duchess said, with Knowles adding: 'That's the best.' Last week, the Duchess shared a clip of her and her daughter beekeeping in matching protective suits, writing: 'Harvesting honey with my little honey. (Like mother, like daughter; she's even wearing my gloves).' Lilibet is named after her great-grandmother Queen Elizabeth II. Princess Elizabeth had difficultly pronouncing her own name as a toddler and her grandfather George V would affectionately call her Lilibet, imitating her own attempts to say Elizabeth. The sweet nickname stuck and she became known as Lilibet to her family from then on. But the late Queen was reportedly 'as angry as I'd ever seen her ' after Harry and Meghan claimed they had her blessing to use the name for their daughter Lilibet, a royal aide said. Royal author Robert Hardman, in his biography of the King, told how a member of staff recounted Elizabeth II's fury following Harry and Meghan's announcement in 2021 over the use of her childhood family nickname. The BBC later reported a Palace source said the Queen was not asked by the Sussexes whether they could use Lilibet. But the Sussexes' lawyers fired off legal letters to the broadcaster and other publishers, saying the claim was false and defamatory. A spokesperson for Harry and Meghan insisted at the time that the duke spoke to his grandmother in advance and would not have used the name had the monarch not been supportive. Hardman wrote however: 'One privately recalled that Elizabeth II had been 'as angry as I'd ever seen her' in 2021 after the Sussexes announced that she had given them her blessing to call their baby daughter 'Lilibet', the Queen's childhood nickname.'


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
UK city reveals plans for new trams as part of £800million transport upgrade – after they were scrapped 84 years ago
A TRAM line could be on the cards after planned changes to key roads in the city centre are set to create an 'unbroken' corridor — a crucial step towards building a future mass transit network. In Bristol, the proposed route would run from the Long Ashton park and ride in the south-west, through the city centre, and along the M32 to the north-east, largely separated from other traffic. 4 4 Transport leaders say it's a strong contender for the first phase of a tram or rapid bus line. Over the next two years, significant roadworks will take place at several central hotspots including Bedminster Bridges roundabout, Redcliffe roundabout, Union Street, the Haymarket, and Bond Street. These upgrades will benefit the existing Metrobus M2 and set the groundwork for a future tram or rapid bus route. Transport officials at Bristol City Council say this new 'red route' could form the spine of a tram network. Speaking to councillors on the transport policy committee, Green Cllr Emma Edwards said: 'This route in future could potentially turn into a mass rapid transit route, whatever that might mean: more buses or maybe other modes as well. "We're trying to solve a problem for the future by creating an unbroken route that could turn into mass transit. "We're trying to think about the long term.' While the exact form of the network is still under discussion, trams and bus rapid transit are the main options being explored. The idea of a mass transit system for Bristol has been debated for decades. Former mayor Marvin Rees had proposed a partially underground system, but the spiralling cost halted progress. In 2023, former West of England Mayor Dan Norris vetoed the underground element entirely, calling it 'unrealistic'. Since then, the West of England Combined Authority (WECA) has continued to explore alternative solutions — without agreeing on whether a tram or bus system is best. Labour's Helen Godwin, the newly elected metro mayor, has yet to commit to a specific plan. Meanwhile, Bristol City Council is pushing forward with the groundwork. Adam Crowther, head of city transport, said: 'Whether mass transit there ends up as a bus or a tram, either way it needs to be fully segregated from traffic, otherwise you get stuck and that's when they become unreliable and therefore people don't want to use them. "So it's about providing that full segregation.' He acknowledged that new bus lanes on Bond Street will worsen car traffic in the short term. 4 But councillors hope the changes will encourage more people to leave their cars at home in favour of public transport or cycling, reducing congestion in the long run. Labour Cllr Tim Rippington added: 'One bus carrying 50 passengers really should be given priority, in my opinion, over 25 cars queuing up. "I don't see a problem with stopping the traffic in order to allow a bus to pass by. It's all designed to deliver this red route. "The worst thing that could happen is that we deliver all the infrastructure and then the lanes stay empty and we don't deliver the mass transit route until 10 years later. "I'm not even sure that the new metro mayor is aware that this route is our plan.' Redcliffe roundabout changes will also enable a potential orbital bus loop around the city centre, initially running anti-clockwise. Left turns are easier to implement than right turns, but funding remains uncertain. Franchising may be required if commercial bus companies are unwilling to take it on. The full red route begins at Long Ashton park and ride, travels along a bus-only road to Cumberland Road, and then through the newly controlled Bedminster Bridges junction. Redcliff Street will become bus-only, and a bus gate at Bristol Bridge already blocks general traffic. From there, it heads through Union Street and past Primark at the Haymarket. Further bus lanes are proposed along the M32, with a new park and ride to be built, though the location is still being debated. In the long term, the motorway could be downgraded to an A-road to accommodate tram or bus stops. WECA is currently developing an outline business case to assess the best way forward. Construction, however, is unlikely to begin before the 2030s. 4